Monday, December 14, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Pirate IPTV: UK Police Prepare to Send Warnings to 7,000 Users
Andy Maxwell, 14 Dec 06:09 PM

Lancs PoliceAs pirate IPTV providers and resellers continue to provide access to low-cost premium TV services, law enforcement agencies around the world are stepping up efforts to disrupt their activities.

Pirate IPTV platforms remain popular in the UK, where they are the preferred choice to access matches from the Premier League and other mainstream content at affordable prices. As a result, many individuals are taking advantage of the market and attracting thousands of subscribers but action in the UK last summer shows that's not without risk.

Police Swoop On The Home Of Alleged Operator of IPTV Service

On Thursday, June 25, Lancashire Police executed a search warrant at a house on Buckley Grove in the seaside resort of Lytham St Annes. Carried out under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, a 28-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of being involved in the supply of pirate IPTV services and illegal TV streaming devices.

What was particularly notable about the case was the seizure of high-value assets, including a Range Rover Sport SVR V8 and an Audi A5 convertible. At the time, police confirmed they had also seized designer clothing, designer bags, and jewelry.

Cars Seized IPTV

TorrentFreak sources close to the investigation confirmed that a pair of Rolex watches, designer clothes, and exclusive trainers were among the items taken. We also understand that around £17,000 in bitcoin formed part of the seizure but none of these additional details have been officially reported or confirmed by the authorities.

Police Are Now Targeting Subscribers

In a new announcement this morning, police reference the arrest and seizures in the summer, noting that the man in question was released under investigation. Then, as now, police are still not naming the service in question but TorrentFreak can confirm it operated under the name North West IPTV.

At the time, reports in anti-piracy circles suggested that the service could have had as many as 32,000 subscribers but our information, supplied by a source familiar with the matter, previously downplayed that claim. Nevertheless, a substantial number of presumed customers of North West IPTV are now about to receive correspondence from the police.

7,000 Alleged Subscribers Will Receive Warnings

"More than 7000 residents, believed to have been using an illegal TV streaming service, are set to receive warning notices this week from Lancashire Police," police said in a statement this morning.

"Our cyber-crime unit is issuing the warnings to subscribers of a service called IPTV which allows users to illegally stream premium channels at a reduced rate. Subscribers will receive the Cease and Desist Notices this week, via email, asking them to stop using the service immediately."

The warnings, as yet unseen in public, will warn those who reportedly subscribed to the service that they are committing a crime that carries a maximum sentence of up to five years imprisonment and/or a fine.

Given the current sentencing standards in the UK it seems highly unlikely that a regular subscriber of such a service would receive a custodial sentence of any kind but given the involvement of the police, a criminal record is certainly possible. This, the police and copyright holders hope, will prove to be a sufficient deterrent for those considering a similar subscription in the future.

Evidence of Infringement

At the moment, Lancashire Police are not claiming to have any evidence of actual infringement or crimes carried out by any of those who allegedly purchased a subscription from North West IPTV or its resellers.

Instead, they appear to be relying upon contact information secured from the IPTV supplier's customer database seized during the raid in the summer, which necessarily holds email addresses for correspondence purposes. Indeed, police also acknowledge that some customers may not even be aware that their purchase was illegal.

"People who subscribe to these services might not realize that they are illegal, but the simple fact is that they are," says Olivia Dodding from Lancashire Police Cyber Crime Unit.

"What may cost you a relatively small fee, actually results in television producers and sports broadcasters losing millions of pounds which affects their ability to make and show sports events and entertainments series, which many of us enjoy watching.

"Anyone who subscribes to IPTV or any other steaming service [sic] should stop now to avoid facing prosecutions themselves."

Similarities With Action Against GE Hosting

In late June, subscribers to pirate IPTV service Global / Global Entertainment were given an unwelcome surprise. Rather than seeing the normal array of content on their screens, they were instead greeted by a notice from a police force in the UK.

"This illegal stream has been seized By Norfolk and Sussex Police," it began. "Watching illegal broadcasts is a crime. Your IP address has been recorded. You are instructed to cease and desist immediately from all illegal media streaming."

Police Seize IPTV

At the time a 24-year-old man was arrested under section 44 of the Serious Crime Act and Section 11 of the Fraud Act under suspicion of obtaining services dishonestly and concealing/converting criminal property, i.e money laundering.

Progress in that investigation is unknown but in September it became clear that police were also interested in the service's customers.

In emailed letters sent to alleged subscribers, police warned that viewers were committing an offense contrary to s.11 of the Fraud Act, which carries a maximum sentence of up to five years imprisonment, and/or a fine. This seems to be in line with the warning issued by Lancashire Police this morning.

Also, in common with the case handled by Norfolk and Sussex Police, Lancashire Police are warning that customers of North West (and potentially its resellers) will have their behaviors "monitored" by the authorities, to ensure they are complying with the emailed cease-and-desist.

Again, there is no indication of what that monitoring might entail but having the same email address or payment method turn up at another provider at some point in the future might be enough to trigger some kind of investigation.

Given the resources available to police in general it seems very unlikely that a wave of prosecutions will follow but given the aim is to disrupt and deter, it cannot be ruled out that a handful of individuals could face prosecution in the future, if they keep sticking their heads far enough above the parapet, in defiance of the warnings.

Finally, even in the face of a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to pursue a case against a small-time subscriber, the possibility that an entity such as the Premier League could pursue a private prosecution at their own cost is always real and a threat not to be discounted.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

German Court: YouTube Not Obliged to Reveal Movie Pirates' Email or IP Addresses
Andy Maxwell, 14 Dec 11:12 AM

YouTubeWith more than two billion logged-in users every month, YouTube is the world's most dominant video platform. Every day people watch over a billion hours of videos, together generating billions of views.

Over the past five years, YouTube has paid out over $2 billion to partners who utilize the company's Content ID system to utilize otherwise infringing uploads but some companies prefer to tackle alleged infringement through legal action and the courts instead.

Users Uploaded Pirated Movies to YouTube

In 2013 and 2014, three YouTube users uploaded the movies Scary Movie 5 and Parker to the platform breaching the rights of Constantin Film, the exclusive rights holder for the titles in Germany. Since the illegal uploads had been viewed thousands of times, the movie company sought to identify the individuals so that compensation could be obtained.

Constantin contacted YouTube and owner Google, demanding access to the personal details of the alleged infringers. The company sought the users' email addresses, IP-addresses, and phone numbers. These requests were denied and the matter went to court.

The case first went to the Frankfurt District Court, which rejected the demands of the movie company. Later, a higher court partly overruled the decision, ordering YouTube to reveal the email addresses of the users but not their IP addresses and phone numbers.

This decision was unacceptable to both parties and the case was sent to Germany's Federal Court of Justice (BGH). With the BGH uncertain of how the disclosure request should be handled under EU law, the Court referred questions to the EU Court of Justice, with clarification sought on the definition of the term "address" as referenced in Article 8 of the EU Copyright Directive.

EU Court of Justice Rules in YouTube's Favor

In a decision handed down in July 2020, Europe's highest court effectively found in favor of YouTube, Google, and the three users who uploaded the pirated movies several years ago.

The Court found that Directive 2004/481 does not oblige the authorities to compel a video platform operator to disclose email addresses, IP addresses or telephone numbers of users who uploaded pirated content.

In this case, and in line with an earlier opinion, the term "addresses" refers to a physical location, i.e a "permanent address or habitual residence", not email addresses, IP addresses or telephone numbers.

Case Returns to the Federal Court of Justice

With the benefit of the EU Court of Justice's ruling, the case headed back to the BGH. In a decision handed down late last week, the Court noted that the parties have been arguing about what information should be disclosed, with Constantin pushing for maximum disclosure and YouTube seeking to have the case dismissed altogether.

Supported by the EU Court's decision, Germany's top appeals court ruled that under EU law and Germany's corresponding copyright law, YouTube is not required to reveal all of the allegedly-infringing users' personal details to Constantin Film.

Any disclosure to the movie company can only consist of the users' names and postal addresses. This remains the case when the users only provided an assumed name or pseudonym when they signed up, as was the case when the users uploaded the movies in 2013 and 2014.

If YouTube has no physical address on file for the users (which is the case in respect of all three uploaders), the company does not have to hand over IP addresses, despite YouTube users' consenting to their storage when they sign up. YouTube does not have to hand over any telephone numbers or dates of birth it may have on file either.

The decision can be found here

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Torrented Movies of The Week – 12/14/20
Ernesto Van der Sar, 13 Dec 11:30 PM

tenetThe data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have four new entries in the list. Christopher Nolan's Sci-Fi movie "Tenet" is the most downloaded title this week.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on December 14 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (2) Tenet 7.7 / trailer
2 (3) Honest Thief 6.0 / trailer
3 (2) Freaky 6.5 / trailer
4 (…) Songbird 4.4 / trailer
5 (4) Greenland 6.4 / trailer
6 (…) Monsters of Man 5.1 / trailer
7 (6) Wander 5.1 / trailer
8 (7) Fatman 6.0 / trailer
9 (9) Borat Subsequent Moviefilm 7.0 / trailer
10 (back) Mulan 7.0 / trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: