Thursday, December 31, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

christmascatvpn
 

Could Trump's Twitter Account Be 'DMCA-Banned'? Not Long To Find Out
Andy Maxwell, 31 Dec 06:16 PM

Donald TrumpEvery year billions of citizens help to develop the Internet by adding their own content, whether that's substantial works such as videos, music or articles, or smaller but nevertheless important comments or snippets of information.

Inevitably, however, some of these postings can infringe other people's copyrights, resulting in rightsholders and anti-piracy companies issuing DMCA takedown notices to have them removed. The sting in the tail for many users, however, is that if they continually receive DMCA notices against their accounts on sites like YouTube, Twitch or Twitter, their accounts can be put in peril.

Repeat Infringer Policies Can Be Selective

Indeed, large numbers of users of these platforms alone have been permanently banned under so-called repeat infringer policies, where they are essentially told they're no longer a responsible member of the community and must be banned. The reason, of course, is that the platforms themselves don't want to be held liable should rightsholders decide to file what could be a massive copyright lawsuit.

Interestingly, however, the old adage of "there's one rule for them and another for us" is alive and well, particularly on Twitter and especially in respect of President Trump, who – despite receiving a stream of copyright complaints against his account – has managed to avoid a ban from Twitter. But after receiving yet another DMCA complaint this week, an interesting question raises its head.

President Trump Receives Yet Another DMCA Complaint

It is not uncommon for Donald Trump's tweets to be either hidden by Twitter (when the platform believes the tweet carries an untruth, for example) or completely removed due to a copyright complaint. It has happened on many occasions in the past, largely due to allegations of him or his staff posting music in breach of copyright. And on December 28, it happened yet again.

Trump Tweet Delete

The content in question was a campaign-style video that celebrated the claimed accomplishments of the Trump administration. However, like many similar videos posted to Twitter in the past by Trump, it contained copyrighted music. In this case the track Hoedown by the late composer Aaron Copland.

A few hours ago the DMCA notice in question was submitted by Twitter to the Lumen Database, which published the details in its archives. Three separate notices were filed targeting the same content but the one shown below carries the most detail.

trump-dmca-hoe-down

President Trump Receives Twitter's 'World Leader' Treatment

Of course, had this been the umpteenth time that a regular user had received a DMCA complaint, their Twitter account would've been toast. Instead, however, it appears that Twitter has once again invoked its 'world leader policy' which allows people like Trump to do things that would end in mere mortals being banned from the platform.

There are limits to what even 'world leaders' can do to avoid getting nuked from Twitter but thus far, Trump has managed to avoid the banhammer. The big question now is for how long.

President Trump: Soon To Be Plain Old Donald

At noon on January 20, 2021, the presidency of Donald Trump will come to an end. No one will ever be able to remove his historic status as the 45th President of the United States but he will no longer be a world leader. As a result, on the same day (and as long as the company sticks to its own policies) Twitter will have to start treating the former president as plain old Donald Trump.

This raises many questions, some of them of great significance.

Strictly in terms of DMCA notices, President Trump already has way more than it would take for an ordinary citizen to get themselves banned from Twitter. On January 20, when he becomes 'ordinary' again, will those 'strikes' be consigned to the history books with no further action? That not only seems the most likely outcome but perhaps the most sensible too.

Whatever one thinks of Trump's presidency, records of his actions while in power are significant moments in time that simply do not warrant being erased from history. However, there are complications here too.

Personal and Presidential Account Combined

When Trump became president, he refused to give up his personal account, so @realdonaldtrump effectively became the presidential account. On January 20, however, that account will no longer be in the hands of a world leader, meaning that no more free passes should be available from Twitter.

This means that starting then, if Twitter levels the playing field as it should, three more strikes and Donald Trump's account should be done, just like anyone else's would be.

So Twitter is going to be left with a dilemma, should Donald Trump decide to continue posting stuff that results in DMCA notices. If the company keeps giving Trump the ability to sidestep copyright law, it could be held responsible for not terminating the account of a known repeat infringer. However, if it bans his account, all of the tweets from his presidency will disappear with it.

Clearly and for the sake of history, that can't happen. However, the law is the law so if any copyright holders decide to get fired up, Twitter could find potentially itself in an interesting legal position. Of course, there's always the chance that no more infringements or alleged infringements will occur, effectively solving the problem for them.

Only time will tell which way things go but at the very least, popcorn should be kept on standby in the new year. If only to see how many more notices will come in before the protective shield is taken away.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more. We have some good VPN deals here for the holidays.

TorrentFreak's 20 Most Read Articles of 2020
Ernesto Van der Sar, 31 Dec 11:00 AM

best visited top 10 torrent sites 2020Every year we write hundreds of articles here at TorrentFreak. While they're all worth reading, some get more exposure than others.

On the brink of the new year, we look back at 2020 by going over the 20 most-read news items of the year.

There are a few major themes in this overview. The biggest story of the year was perhaps the SPARKS raid and indictments, which makes an appearance with two separate entries.

As always, downtime and troubles at various pirate sites generate a lot of interest too. The weeks of downtime at The Pirate Bay earlier this year for example, and the trouble at Mangadex.

Needless to say, 2020 was a controversial year, dominated by COVID. The good news is, however, that our rundown of the most read articles is COVID-free, and we'd like to keep it that way in 2021.

Best wishes to all!

1. Court Suspends 'Copyright Troll' Lawyer From Practicing Law

Copyright lawyer Richard Liebowitz has been repeatedly sanctioned by federal courts. The controversial attorney has a long track record of disregarding court orders. In December, the grievance committee of the Southern District of New York decided to suspend Liebowitz to protect the public from future missteps.

2. YesPornPlease and VShare.io Go Offline Following Massive Copyright Lawsuit

YesPornPlease, an adult-focused video site that serviced more than 100 million visitors per month, disappeared in March following the filing of a lawsuit in the United States. The complaint, filed by Mindgeek-owned MG Premium, also targeted hosting site VShare.io, demanding a broad injunction and potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.

3. Vicious Headbutt Video Meets Bogus DMCA Notices and the Streisand Effect

A man from the US became a hero last year when a video of him subduing a man who had headbutted someone in the face went viral. The video was reposted numerous times but is regularly taken down following bogus copyright complaints. However, the censorship efforts massively backfired in April when someone tried to delete a Reddit thread using a DMCA anti-circumvention notice. Duh…

4. The Pirate Bay Uses Downtime to 'Rewrite Some Code'

In March, The Pirate Bay's regular domain became unreachable for weeks. Initially, it was unclear what had caused the trouble, but TorrentFreak was informed that the downtime was caused by a technical problem and that the tech admin was taking the opportunity to rewrite some code.

5. The Pirate Bay's Main Domain 'Returns' After a Month of Downtime

After a month, The Pirate Bay was accessible once again through its main domain name. The unannounced comeback came after the domain sent traffic to a black hole for nearly a day. Initially, Cloudflare's nameservers were removed from Whois records but the site soon was reachable again through a new set of Cloudflare nameservers.

6. US Indictments and Raids of Piracy Group Members in 'The Scene' Throw Top-Tier Piracy World Into Chaos

The top-tier piracy world, known as The Scene, was plunged into turmoil in August. US law enforcement targeted key members of release group SPARKS and several linked and affiliated groups including GECKOS, DRONES, ROVERS and SPRINTER. Sources informed TF that there were several raids across Europe, mainly focused on Norway and Sweden.

7. Meet FitGirl, The Repack 'Queen' Of Pirated Games

Repacked games are in high demand on pirate sites as they save considerable bandwidth. One of the leading names in this niche is FitGirl. In recent years, the Russian-born repacker transformed from a home archivist into the best-known releaser on the Internet. In June, we unpacked part of this fascinating story.

8. MangaDex Returns Under a New Domain, Confirms Legal Issues

After several days of downtime, manga scanlation giant MangaDex reappeared online in January. In addition to confirming the existence of a DMCA subpoena, MangaDex said it had legal issues that had resulted in the temporary loss of its .org domain and removal from Cloudflare.

9. MangaDex Targeted by DMCA Subpoena, Now Migrating Servers

Before the comeback mentioned above, MangaDex suffered extended downtime, with a host migration and maintenance cited as the official reasons. However, TorrentFreak also learned that a DMCA subpoena was granted to copyright holder Viz Media in December 2019, one that ordered Cloudflare to give up the identity of MangaDex's operator.

10. GitHub Reinstates Popcorn Time Code Despite MPA 'Threat'

In May, an MPA takedown notice pulled Popcorn Time's GitHub repository offline. The Hollywood group, which also represents Netflix, argued that the code facilitates mass copyright infringement. While that may be the case, Popcorn Time filed a counternotice arguing that they own the code. Faced with contradicting requests, Github reinstated the repository.

11. The Pirate Bay Suffers Extended Downtime

As mentioned earlier, The Pirate Bay's main domain became inaccessible in March. There was no communication from the operators initially, but the site's many proxies and its official Tor domain were still working fine.

12. Torrentz2.eu Domain Suspended by Registry on Public Prosecutor's Order

In June, popular torrent meta-search engine Torrentz2 stopped working through its main .eu domain name. The domain was suspended by the EURid registry pending an investigation, triggered by a Public Prosecutor's order. Torrentz2 was still accessible through its alternative .is domain but eventually disappeared.

13. Nintendo Lawyers File Copyright Complaints Against Super Mario 64 PC Port

Early May, a fan-made PC port of Nintendo 64 classic Super Mario 64 appeared online, wowing fans with its 4K resolution and ultra widescreen support. Somewhat inevitably, however, Nintendo's lawyers and representatives began to take action, filing copyright complaints with Google and YouTube to make the recreation disappear.

14. SPARKS Piracy Busts: Facts, Rumors & Fear Point to Something Huge

The raids and arrests in August targeting piracy release group SPARKS caused chaos in The Scene, with members and groups going into hiding and new releases dropping like a stone.

15. Don't Use the Word 'Did' or a Dumb Anti-Piracy Company Will Delete You From Google

In 2018, the owner of Two-Bit History, a site dedicated to computer history, wrote a successful article about mathematician Ada Lovelace, who some credit as being the first computer programmer. Sadly, some idiotic anti-piracy company had it deleted because it dared to use the word 'did'.

16. RIAA's YouTube-DL Takedown Ticks Off Developers and GitHub's CEO

An RIAA takedown request, which removed the YouTube-DL repository from GitHub in October, was met with outrage. Numerous people responded by copying and republishing the contested code, including in some quite clever ways. Meanwhile, GitHub's CEO expressed annoyance as well, offering his help to get the repo reinstated.

17. Activision Subpoenas Reddit to Identify Call of Duty Warzone 'Leaker'

In response to the many Call of Duty Warzone leaks appearing online in February, Activision filed aggressive takedowns on copyright grounds. According to documents obtained by TorrentFreak, the gaming giant was served with a DMCA subpoena from a US court, compelling Reddit to hand over the personal details of a user who allegedly posted a leaked image to the site.

18. Model Sues Cloudflare and Thothub in Mass Piracy Lawsuit

Texas-based model Deniece Waidhofer, known for selling access to sexy photos of herself online, took action against Thothub, a site that published leaked copies of her work. The site, its members, and services it worked with, including Cloudflare, were accused of copyright infringement. Thothub shut down soon after.

19. Massive Pirate Anime Site Uses Visitors' Connections to DDoS Competitor

With around 40 million visitors per month, 9anime.to is a formidable force in anime piracy. In October, however, a dispute with competitor Animixplay.to spiraled out of control when 9anime added code to its own site that made every visitor an unwitting participant in a DDoS attack on its rival.

20. Mystery as PortalRoms Disappears Leaving 4 Million Gaming Visitors in the Dark

PortalRoms, a popular index for ROM and emulators for a wide range of gaming systems, disappeared without a trace in January. The site previously serviced more than four million visitors per month with links to download content via torrents.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more. We have some good VPN deals here for the holidays.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Edit your subscription to TorrentFreak

Hi there,

To continue editing your subscription to TorrentFreak click here. You can also click here to unsubscribe.

If you're not trying to edit your subscription, no action is needed and you can safely ignore this email.

Thank you!

Edit your subscription to TorrentFreak

Hi there,

To continue editing your subscription to TorrentFreak click here. You can also click here to unsubscribe.

If you're not trying to edit your subscription, no action is needed and you can safely ignore this email.

Thank you!

Edit your subscription to TorrentFreak

Hi there,

To continue editing your subscription to TorrentFreak click here. You can also click here to unsubscribe.

If you're not trying to edit your subscription, no action is needed and you can safely ignore this email.

Thank you!

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

christmascatvpn
 

BREIN's Upcoming Anti-Piracy Campaign Is Unusually Honest and Focused
Andy Maxwell, 30 Dec 07:41 PM

BREIN logoWhile plenty of people monitor the world of online copyright infringement, here at TorrentFreak we've continuously dived deeper than most into almost every anti-piracy campaign proposed or launched in the last 15 years.

It's safe to say that pirates generally hate all attempts to deny them access to free content but whether people like it or not, rightsholders will always seek to protect their content. The big question is how and one doesn't have to be a proponent or opponent of piracy to recognize that there are levels to anti-piracy campaigns that can make some immediately repugnant.

Anti-Piracy Campaigns Come in Different Flavors

For example, organized copyright-trolling campaigns, ones that cynically attempt to exert maximum financial pressure on ordinary families with zero compassion, represent the worst examples. Equally, if we acknowledge the rights of artists of all kinds to limit the illegal spread of their work, there are campaigns that attempt to do so more intelligently, which renders them worthy of pragmatic analysis.

One such initiative is being undertaken by Dutch anti-piracy outfit BREIN. We reported the full details earlier this month and at first view, one could be forgiven for thinking this is simply another project to send notices to BitTorrent users in the hope they stop sharing content. But it's sharper and more targeted than that and as a result, could achieve its aims without resorting to the bottom-feeding tactics of its trolling counterparts.

'Openness' is Rarely a Word Associated With Anti-Piracy

Firstly, BREIN is being completely open about what it intends to do, even setting out the "rules of the game" in advance. That is a rarity in today's environment, if not unique.

For example, BREIN says it isn't interested in so-called "hit and run" downloaders, i.e BitTorrent users who download a movie and don't sit around seeding for hours. This means that the vast majority of pirates will be of no interest to BREIN. Instead, the anti-piracy group will focus on those who seed content for long or frequent periods.

It's important to recognize, of course, that these prolific seeders are important to the ecosystem because, without them, torrent swarms will be much less healthy. However, what BREIN appears to be doing here is drawing a line in the sand. To make a speeding analogy, those who break the limits by a few miles per hour every now and again will fly under the radar but persistent, heavy speeders who keep getting noticed could become targets because they pose the most risk.

Legal Action But Not Copyright-Trolling

Even then, those who become of interest won't find lawyers at their door. Providing ISPs cooperate, they'll receive a notice asking them to stop and it won't demand any form of payment either. Compare this to the copyright trolls who spot an IP address in a swarm for a few seconds and then file a lawsuit demanding thousands in compensation. There's a huge difference.

Of course, BREIN's plan does have a potential sting in the tail. For persistent, longer-term seeders it could mean an approach for a cash settlement or at the least a formal agreement to cease-and-desist. But BREIN could do this anyway under current law, immediately and without any notice.

Instead, it is choosing not to do so within a framework that appears to acknowledge that targeting petty sharers (the majority) won't be as effective in preventing sharing as targeting their sources will.

Leaving Casual Pirates Alone

Again, there will be people out there who feel any type of enforcement is unacceptable and should be rejected. However, that's not the way things work and BREIN has a job to do, whether people like it or not. Instead, the anti-piracy group is effectively laying down its own weaker 'legislation' on top of existing laws and being completely transparent about who it is interested in and why they need to exercise caution.

If the scheme works (and that's still a big if, even if it does get off the ground), BREIN won't need to bother the little guy at all so whichever way you cut it, that is rarely considered a bad thing. And even when more significant sharers are caught, they will have plenty of opportunities to walk away without getting 'fined' or dragged through court.

So, as anti-piracy enforcement goes, this is quite a targeted and resource-friendly scheme. Not only is it focused, but the rules are also there for all to see, upfront with plenty of notice. People may not like them but when viewed through the prism of some of the other projects around today, it's much more considered, limited (1,000 IP addresses targeted per month), and might even achieve some of its goals, without alienating the public.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more. We have some good VPN deals here for the holidays.

'Wonder Woman 1984' is a Massive Hit on Pirate Sites After Early HBO Premiere
Ernesto Van der Sar, 30 Dec 10:57 AM

wonder woman 1984The news that Warner Bros. has decided to premiere all upcoming movie titles both on HBO Max and in cinema, was a shock to many movie insiders.

Some star actors feared a loss in revenue and filmmakers, including Christopher Nolan, argued that their work should be seen on the big screen first.

Strong Opening Weekend

The critique didn't change Warner Bros. plans and a few days ago "Wonder Woman 1984" was the first film to premiere on HBO Max and in cinemas simultaneously. Thus far the results don't disappoint – the film set a 'pandemic record' of $16.7 million in box office revenue in North America.

The film "broke records" on HBO Max as well, according to the streaming company, which said that half of all subscribers viewed it on the first day. This means that more people saw the Wonder Woman sequel during the first weekend than the original.

The Warner Bros. streaming experiment is clearly shaking up the movie industry where cinema premieres were the norm for decades. It's a landmark decision that is also having a major impact on piracy consumption.

Piracy Premiere

Typically, when a movie debuts in theaters there aren't any good pirated copies available online. A low-quality camcorded version may eventually appear, but most pirates ignore these, preferring to wait for higher quality copies that follow a few weeks or months later.

The streaming premiere of "Wonder Woman 1984" is a game-changer in that regard. A few minutes after the film was made available on HBO Max, dozens of high-quality piracy copies appeared on torrent, streaming, and pirate download sites, where they were eagerly consumed.

To see just how well the film did on pirate sites and services we've collected various samples of download figures from public torrent trackers. With help from I Know, it soon became clear that "Wonder Woman 1984" was massively popular.

Millions of Pirate Viewers

We don't like to publish hard numbers, as it's impossible to capture all downloads perfectly, but it's safe to say that millions of people downloaded a pirated copy of the film via torrent sites. And since torrent sites are only a small fraction of the pirate ecosystem, including streaming and download sites would add millions more 'viewers'.

This means that the pirate audience could very well rival the number of people who watched the film legally.

Nearly 10% of All Downloads

Just how unique this release was is best illustrated by comparing the relative interest to some competing titles. On the first full day, nearly 10% of all movie and TV downloads (9.18%) in our sample were for "Wonder Woman 1984". A day later the film still dominated, with 6.26% of all downloads. This translates to millions of downloads on the first two days.

For comparison, the second most popular film of the weekend, "Soul", only managed to secure 2.37% on the first day and 1.98% a day later. Similarly, Avengers: Endgame, the top-grossing film of last year, took 5.63% of all downloads on the first day a high-quality pirate copy was out, and 4.38% a day later.

Looking at the download locations, we see India in the lead with 17% of all "Wonder Woman 1984" downloads on the first full day. The film reportedly premiered a day early to prevent piracy and was not available for streaming there.

With roughly 10% of all Wonder Woman downloads, the United States is in second place, followed by the Philippines (7%) and Great Britain (5%).

It is safe to say that the numbers we see for "Wonder Woman 1984" are massive and the HBO Max premiere has certainly boosted the piracy figures. But does that also mean that Warner Bros. made the wrong decision?

Unchartered Territory

Streaming premieres are unchartered territory, also for pirates. With a lot of press and PR attention for the film, pirates knew that the release was coming and jumped on it right away. This may explain part of the massive interest.

The question is whether this initial boost will result in more piracy in the long run, or if it's simply more concentrated in the first days. We can't answer this yet.

The availability of high-quality pirate copies will undoubtedly deter some people from going to the movie theater or streaming the movie legally. But will there be substantially more pirates than before? And how does that affect the streaming and box-office revenues?

Warner Bros. will likely use the coming months to answer these and various related questions.

Piracy Remains Relevant

The company should be applauded for having the guts to experiment. The audience is definitely the winner here, as they have more choice. And while it's too early to draw conclusions, it's probably safe to say that piracy remains very relevant.

Every year we see more and more exclusive movie releases on different subscription services. And since many people can't afford to access all these services legally, pirate sites and services are seen as an attractive alternative.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more. We have some good VPN deals here for the holidays.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company