Thursday, September 3, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Cloudflare Shared Personal Details of Hundreds of Customers in Response to DMCA Subpoenas
Ernesto Van der Sar, 03 Sep 09:47 PM

cloudflarePopular CDN and DDoS protection service Cloudflare has come under a lot of pressure from copyright holders in recent years.

The company offers its services to millions of sites. This includes multinationals, governments, but also some of the world's leading pirate sites.

Many rightsholders are not happy with the latter. They repeatedly accuse Cloudflare of facilitating copyright infringement by continuing to provide access to these platforms. At the same time, they call out the CDN service for masking the true hosting locations of these 'bad actors'.

Cloudflare sees things differently. The company positions itself as a neutral service provider that doesn't 'host' any infringing content. They just pass on information that is cached on its services temporarily.

This means that if copyright holders report Pirate Bay URLs to Cloudflare, the company takes no action other than forwarding the DMCA takedown notices to its customer. By doing so, Cloudflare is convinced that it operates in accordance with the law.

Identifying 'Infringing' Customers

Not all rightsholders agree with this approach and some have filed lawsuits to hold Cloudflare liable. Others have gone to court to obtain DMCA subpoenas, which require the CDN provider to hand over all personal details it has on allegedly infringing customers.

We regularly report on these requests, which target torrent sites, streaming sites, and many other pirate portals. In its latest transparency report, Cloudflare reveals how many times it was asked to comply and what information was shared in response.

Over the past 12 months, Cloudflare received 58 DMCA subpoenas and the company answered all but one. Together, these affected more than 1,000 domains and close to 500 Cloudflare customers.

cloudflare transparency subpoenas

Previously it wasn't clear what type of records the company could hand over, but the transparency report provides more information on that as well.

What Information is Shared?

To comply with the subpoenas, Cloudflare can share the IP-addresses that were used to login to the site as well as the login times. In addition, it can hand over so-called 'basic subscriber info.'

"This basic subscriber data would include the information our customers provide at the time they sign up for our service, like name; email address; physical address; phone number; the means or source of payment of service," Cloudflare writes.

Whether copyright holders can do anything with this information remains a question. Many larger pirate sites are quite skilled at hiding the tracks that lead to their true operators. For smaller sites that may be different.

Website Blocking

The transparency report also touches on website blocking, which is another high-profile topic. While Cloudflare is very cautious with blocking, it may in some cases comply with law enforcement requests and foreign court orders.

"If we determine that the order is valid and requires Cloudflare action, we may limit blocking of access to the content to those areas where it violates local law, a practice known as 'geo-blocking'. We will attempt to clarify and narrow overbroad requests when possible," Cloudflare writes.

Cloudflare says it's cautious because of "the significant potential impact on freedom of expression." How many domains are blocked is not mentioned, but it does occasionally take action.

For example, earlier this year the pirate site DDL-Music.to was blocked in Germany following a court order.

Finally, we have to note that Cloudflare also offers hosting services to some clients. If that's the case, it will remove content when appropriate. That happened three times over the past year, affecting one or two domain names.

Cloudflare's latest transparency report is available here.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

High Court Grants Premier League IPTV Blocking Order, Fans Beg For More Legal Options
Andy Maxwell, 03 Sep 11:33 AM

footballWhile there's no doubt that humans have been kicking objects around for fun for thousands of years, organized football as we know it today has existed in the UK since the 19th century.

Today, however, football faces a threat like never before. The coronavirus pandemic has thrown the sport into chaos, with schedules massively disrupted and leagues thrown into turmoil.

In an effort to return to some kind of normality the new Premier League season is set to start on September 12. However, with social-distancing restrictions still in place, fans will be banned from stadiums for the foreseeable future.

In the 21st century, the logical solution would be to air all Premier League matches on TV or via the Internet for UK fans to enjoy. At it stands, however, 160 of the planned 380 top-tier games will not be shown in the UK, leaving fans frustrated that they're being left behind. And there are good reasons for that upset.

If fans want to watch the limited matches that are available, they'll have to subscribe to several services – Sky Sports, BT Sport and Amazon Prime – at a cost of around £100 per month. If they want the rest, there's no legal option so combined with the price and lack of choice, some fans turn to pirate IPTV providers instead. That's something the Premier League is working to prevent.

Premier League Obtains a New Blocking Order

Over the past several years, the Premier League has obtained blocking orders from the High Court, which give it permission to compel ISPs to block pirate streaming services. The last order, which aimed to cover the 2019/2020 season, ran out on July 27, 2020.

However, ISP Virgin Media's portal now reports that new permission has been granted by the High Court via a "sealed order", which will cover the 2020/2021 season.

Virgin will be required to block "Various Target Servers notified to Virgin Media by FAPL or its appointed agent for the duration of the FAPL 2020/2021 competition season." While yet to publicly report the new order, all other major ISPs will be required to follow suit.

We've previously covered how these blocking orders work from a technical perspective. Their sole aim is to prevent people from watching matches via illegal providers but the plans for limited legal airings in the UK under pandemic conditions places these efforts into a whole new light.

UK Fans Are Being Backed Into a Corner

With significantly higher prices, a limited legal offering, and a stadium ban in full effect, UK fans are not only being backed into a corner, on the world stage they're being treated as second-class supporters of their own sport.

All Premier League matches are available to watch live in other countries and at vastly cheaper prices. Citizens of the US, for example, will be able to use NBC channels and streaming services to watch all 380 matches at a vastly reduced price.

Other international services showing matches unavailable in the UK include DAZN, Optus Sport, QQ Sports, Sport TV1, and fuboTV, but it is impractical and/or impossible for UK fans to access them all. Legally that is.

Pirate IPTV Providers Are The Ultimate One-Stop-Shop

By their very description, it's clear that pirate IPTV providers are illegal. That aside, what they do very effectively is cut through all the red tape. Football fans are not only greeted with the live matches offered by Sky and BT Sport, but also all of the matches offered by NBC and, where necessary, any and/or all of those shown by the other legal providers mentioned above.

While price is clearly a huge factor for UK fans, freedom to choose which matches to watch live is a massive draw too. The Premier League knows this, the government knows this, as does the Football Supporters' Association, which is campaigning for all games to be shown live in the UK.

"We all want to get back to games when it's safe to do so," said FSA Chief executive Kevin Miles in comments to the BBC this week.

"But it's not in anyone's interests to have a situation where fans excluded from grounds for reasons of health or Covid-related capacity reductions feel they have no option but to resort to illegal pirate broadcast schemes."

Comments from an IPTV Insider

Last evening TorrentFreak spoke with someone with inside knowledge of IPTV providers and he agreed that the new season will be covered in depth by pirate suppliers.

"All the games will be available through different providers like the ones you mentioned and many more, and will almost definitely increase the amount of people using illicit options. It's almost like [the Premier League] are trying to make more people use illicit options," he said, demanding anonymity.

"Illegal IPTV providers will use the legitimate sites to take the streams and redistribute them either via the original source URL or they will simply use HDMI encoders to do so. This is nothing new and in effect the illegitimate providers will continue most likely un-affected in obtaining the content.

"We cannot forget however that many people who watch the Premier League illicitly actually have a legit subscription and only use these services to watch the content that they are not able to watch legitimately," he added.

What Next and Will the Premier League Change Its Position?

At the moment, the Premier League has declined to comment but it does have a shareholders' meeting today so it's at least possible that something positive may come from that. Our IPTV insider is less optimistic, since he believes that any decisions made will be in the interests of the Premier League, not in the interests of fans. A glaring and persistent error, he says.

Whatever the outcome, at some point in the future the Premier League and indeed all providers of live sporting content will have to realize that if they are underserving supporters, someone else will come along and exploit that service gap. Blocking and pirate supplier crackdowns have a limited effect so it seems logical that in order to defeat them holistically, the consumer has to be played onside.

And that, as always, means putting all content into a convenient package and making that available to fans at a reasonable price. Until then, pirate suppliers have all the oxygen they need to keep taking a piece of the pie, not to mention a not insignificant slice of the revenue.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: