Wednesday, July 8, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

GitHub Removes 'Chimera13' iOS Jailbreak After DMCA Notice from 'Unc0ver'
Ernesto Van der Sar, 08 Jul 09:41 PM

unc0verApple's iOS devices are part of a closed ecosystem that doesn't allow much tinkering and keeps unvetted apps out.

This works well for the vast majority of people but for those who demand more, jailbreaking is always an option.

While Apple doesn't like the fact that outsiders are circumventing their restrictions to open up access, it generally turns a blind eye to jailbreaks. The company patches leaks but since the DMCA offers a jailbreak exemption, taking legal action is not the obvious response.

Unc0ver vs. Chimera13

In this light, it's interesting to see that several copies of the Chimera13 jailbreak were taken down by GitHub this week, through a DMCA notice. This request didn't come from Apple, however, but from the Unc0ver team, which is behind another iOS jailbreak.

The Unc0ver team accuses third-party developers of pirating their jailbreak code. The DMCA notice points a finger at a specific target, developer Coolstar, who allegedly "stole" Unc0ver's code to use it as part of the Swift-based Chimera13 jailbreak.

"He was able to obtain a leaked copy of our private unc0ver repository that was previously available at [private] for selected team members of the Unc0ver Team," the DMCA notice explains.

"We have investigated this user and found that their first appearance on the r/Jailbreak Discord Server, where they later announced that they had obtained the source code, was approximately a day after the infringer had publicly indicated that he was able to obtain information about our work on Twitter," the Unc0ver team adds.

GitHub Takes Down Chimera13 Repositories

The DMCA notice asks GitHub to remove the Chimera13 repository as well as dozens of forks. And indeed, the official repository and the forks are all unavailable now.

Chimera13 removed DMCA

The takedown request is interesting for several reasons. First of all, a team behind an application that is exempted from copyright infringement claims under the DMCA is using the same law to go after another jailbreak app. In addition, the claim itself isn't without controversy either.

Coolstar Sends a Counter-Notice

Chimera13 developer Coolstar, who's a former computer science student at UC Santa Barbara, argues that the takedown notice is unwarranted. He sent a counter-notice to GitHub, asking the company to reinstate his repository.

"The code for Chimera13 is original code that I have written in Swift that relies primarily on the public techniques," Coolstar writes, pointing out the various pieces of open source and publicly available code that's included.

"The only 3rd-party code in this repository is Jake James' time_waste exploit. However, this is under an open source license (GPL)," he adds, highlighting the license in question.

According to Coolstar, the original notice was sent in bad faith. He further accuses the sender of committing perjury and abusing the DMCA process, a claim he repeats on Twitter.

Without making any judgments on the claims from both sides, it is clear that this is more than just a regular DMCA request. It appears to be part of an ongoing feud between two camps, which both develop jailbreak solutions.

In any case, it will be interesting to see how GitHub responds to the counter-notice. According to the regular DMCA process, the Chimera13 repository will be reinstated within two weeks, unless the Unc0ver team takes the matter to court.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Amazon, Lee Child & John Grisham Sue 'Kiss Library' Pirate eBook Sites
Andy Maxwell, 08 Jul 11:30 AM

LawsuitWell over a decade ago, music platforms like AllofMP3 were a thorn in the side of record labels, selling tracks at cut-down prices without appropriate licensing in place.

Today, similar sites are available in many niches, eBooks included. It's a growing problem that authors, publishers and distributors would like to reduce, in part via a lawsuit filed in a Washington court this week.

US Lawsuit Targets 'Pirate' Sites Under the 'Kiss Library' Brand

The complaint sees Amazon Content Services, publisher Penguin Random House and several authors including John Grisham and Lee Child, target a range of 'pirate eBook sites operating under the Kiss Library brand.

The 19-page lawsuit lists several domains (Kissly.net, Wtffastspring.bid, Libly.net, Cheap-Library.com) that claim to offer a "premium selection" of books at "unbeatable prices". The reason for this, the plaintiffs claim, is that they are "replete" with pirated eBooks.

"Through Kiss Library, Defendants engage in rampant and willful infringement of Plaintiffs' intellectual property rights and divert potential customers to Defendants' sites — where the Plaintiff Authors and Publishers do not receive any royalties for the sales — to purchase and download the unauthorized works," the complaint reads.

The stated claim of the action is to "bring down" the sites and put them out of business. It names several individuals as defendants, including alleged Ukrainian nationals Rodion Vynnychenko and Artem Besshapochny, who are said to have created Kiss Library and actively participate in and profit from its activities.

Australian national Jack Brown is said to work as a software developer while also being listed as Kiss Library's customer service representative. Together with an additional 10 'Doe defendants', Brown is said to act in concert with Kiss Library's creators to distribute the plaintiffs' copyright works.

Background to Kiss Library's Activities

According to the complaint, Kiss Library first appeared at KissLibrary.com back in June 2017 after being registered by Vynnychenko in Ukraine. However, due to what the plaintiffs describe as "increased negative reviews and assertions of piracy", the defendants registered new 'mirror' sites including kisslibrary.net, kissly.net, wtffastspring.bid, libly.net, and cheaplibrary.com.

Libly.net, Kissly.net and Wtffastspring.bid purportedly operate out of Canada but the plaintiffs couldn't find any matching registrations in the country. Cheap-library.com is said to operate out of Bulgaria but again, no registrations could be found. Attempts by plaintiffs to make contact via the supplied telephone numbers failed.

Distribution of Pirated Content, Non-Compliance Under the DMCA

"Defendants, through these and other known and unknown Kiss Library websites, engage in the rampant, illegal copying, display, and distribution of copyright-protected ebooks for their direct financial benefit, including works written by the Authors and exclusively published or distributed by the Publishers," the complaint alleges.

All of the targeted domains claim to have official DMCA agents to handle takedown complaints but according to the plaintiffs, the Copyright Office has no record of any registrations. Furthermore, when the defendants processed copyright infringement claims and took down eBooks, they reappeared on the platforms shortly after.

"As a result of Defendants' wrongful conduct, Defendants also damage and harm the Publishers in the form of losses to sales, prospective customers, goodwill from authors who exclusively publish with them, goodwill from customers who receive Defendants' inferior ebook copies, and resources expended in discovering and combatting infringement, as well as disruption and harm to their distribution arrangements, brands, and prospective business relationships with authors and others," it continues.

Copyright Infringement Claims

Alleging willful direct copyright infringement, the plaintiffs demand actual damages and profits of the infringers or statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringed work. They further demand injunctive relief, including an order impounding all copies of the infringing materials.

Alleging vicarious and/or contributory copyright infringement in respect of offenses carried out by Kiss Library's users, the plaintiffs demand actual damages and defendants' profits attributable to the infringements, or statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringed work and a similar injunction.

In addition, the lawsuit demands an order requiring Kiss Library's domain names to be disabled or handed over to the plaintiffs and preventing any commercial entities doing business with the platform, including banks, credit card companies and payment providers, from doing so.

At the time of writing, all of the listed domains are either completely down or advising maintenance issues.

The complaint, filed by plaintiffs Amazon Publishing, Penguin Random House, Lee Child, Sylvia Day, John Grisham, C.J. Lyons, Doug Preston, Jim Rasenberger, T.J. Stiles, R.L Stine, Monique Troung, Scott Turow, Nicholas Weinstock and Stuart Woods, can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: