Saturday, July 11, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Rapidgator Uses DMCA to Crack Down on Premium Link Generators
Ernesto Van der Sar, 11 Jul 10:32 PM

rapidgator logoFounded in 2010, Rapidgator has grown to become an established name in the file-hosting business over the past decade.

The site has millions of regular users but is not particularly well-liked by copyright holders. This resulted in a spot on both US and EU lists of notorious piracy markets.

Rapidgator dismisses these characterizations and bills itself as a content-neutral hosting platform. The company accepts and processes DMCA takedown notices but in addition, we recently discovered that it also sends takedown notices itself to deal with problematic sites.

The Premium Link Generator Problem

Similar to many other hosting sites, third-party services actively abuse Rapidgator's service. Specifically, some sites allow the public to generate 'premium links,' which effectively bypass the need to register for a paid account.

These 'link generators' use hacked or purchased premium accounts, which are then shared with the public at large. This is a relatively easy trick, but the affected sites see it as a threat to their business.

This is also the case for Rapidgator.net, which is incorporated as Northern Ireland company Y-Flex LLP. Over the past weeks, Rapidgator has started to use takedown notices to its advantage, asking Google to remove several problematic sites from its search results.

Rapidgator Starts Takedown Spree

The first notices we spotted were for 'traditional' copyright infringements. For example, Rapidgator.info was reported for using the official Rapidgator logo and misleading users. Another site that was flagged in a similar notice was Cloudzzer.

rapidgator takedown

These traditional takedown requests had mixed results. Google removed some URLs but left others online.

More recently. Rapidgator started using another takedown tool. Instead of standard DMCA takedown notices, it sent DMCA anti-circumvention complaints. These tend to be even more effective, as targeted sites can't submit standard counternotices.

Anti-Circumvention Notices

These 'anti-circumvention' requests still have to be reviewed by Google and are not blindly accepted. That said, Rapidgator managed to remove several sites from Google's search results, including a page on login site Bugmenot.

"Rapidgator.net premium account circumvention content: Webpage provide username and passwords of hacked accounts circumvention mechanism: passwords or access codes," Y-Flex writes in a recent request to Google.

rapidgator anti-circumvention

Rapidgator confirmed that these requests are indeed coming from its company. The site sees these premium link generators as a major problem and hopes to minimize the harm by making them harder to find.

"They use all illegal methods to get premium accounts, which includes hacking premium accounts and using stolen credit cards in order to buy premium access. Once they have access to a premium account, they share the bandwidth on their server which is against our terms of use," Rapidgator informs us.

"We try to delete such sites from Google search because their business model allows circumventing our website security," the company adds.

Rapidgator is a Target Too

With these efforts, Rapidgator is trying to get something positive out of Google's takedown policies. Previously it had mostly felt the negative consequences. The site's homepage, for example, was removed after an erroneous request.

Rapidgator as also had more than 36 million of its own pages removed from Google, following takedown requests from copyright holders. This earns the site a spot in the top three most-targeted domain names on Google search.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Amazon Piracy Lawsuit: Court Restrains Assets & Domains of Pirate Sites
Andy Maxwell, 11 Jul 11:59 AM

LawsuitEarlier this week, Amazon Content Services, publisher Penguin Random House and several authors including John Grisham and Lee Child, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against 'pirate' eBook sites operating under the Kiss Library brand.

Accusing the platforms of "rampant and willful infringement" due to their sales of pirated eBooks to the public, the plaintiffs alleged direct and secondary copyright infringement, while demanding the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 per infringed work. In addition, the architects of the lawsuit demanded urgent injunctive relief in an effort to bring the sites' infringing activities to a swift halt.

After being filed on Tuesday and with the ink barely dry on the complaint, United States Senior District Judge Marsha J. Pechman responded immediately by handing down a temporary restraining order.

Comprehensive Temporary Restraining Order

"Plaintiffs have demonstrated they are entitled to immediate injunctive relief by establishing they are likely to succeed on the merits of their copyright claims," the Judge wrote in her order.

"Defendants have gone to great lengths to conceal their identities, locations, and proceeds from Plaintiffs' and this Court's detection, including by using multiple false identities and addresses associated with their operations and purposely-deceptive contact information."

The Judge found that given the above elusive behavior, it is likely that if any notice was given of an impending order, the defendants would likely destroy or hide evidence of their infringement and proceeds from the same, thus frustrating the relief sought by the plaintiffs.

The temporary restraining order is valid for 48 days but if the defendants don't appear before August 25, 2020, to argue against it, a preliminary injunction will take its place. Whether the operators of Kiss Library will step forward remains a question but in the meantime, the Court has taken a pretty aggressive stance towards collapsing their business from every conceivable angle.

The list of targets is comprehensive, not only targeting the defendants themselves but also preventing anyone else from working or doing business with them, if that activity is connected to infringement of the plaintiffs' rights. The companies include, but are not limited to, payment processors, domain registrars or hosts, Internet service providers, back-end service providers, affiliate program providers, web designers, and search engines.

Ex Parte Asset Restraint

Citing 17 U.S.C. § 502(a), the Judge also authorized a comprehensive restraining order against the financial mechanisms supporting the Kiss Library operation, requiring that banks, payment processors, merchant account providers and credit card companies to "immediately locate all accounts connected to Defendants or the Websites" and prevent them from transferring or disposing of any money or assets.

Judge Pechman also ordered domain registries and registrars, including Tucows Domains Inc., Whois Privacy Corp., and NameCheap, Inc., to take action against all of the defendants' domains under their control, rendering them "inactive and non-transferable" pending further instruction from the Court.

Finally, a similar order was granted requiring email services, social media services, search engines and other online providers to disable service to all of the defendants' websites.

The temporary restraining order obtained by Amazon Publishing, Penguin Random House, Lee Child, Sylvia Day, John Grisham, C.J. Lyons, Doug Preston, Jim Rasenberger, T.J. Stiles, R.L Stine, Monique Troung, Scott Turow, Nicholas Weinstock and Stuart Woods, can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: