Tuesday, July 14, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Canadian Pirate Site Blockade No Longer Blocks Original Domains
Ernesto Van der Sar, 14 Jul 10:31 PM

canada flagLate last year, Canada's Federal Court approved the first piracy blockade in the country.

Following a complaint from three major media companies, Rogers, Bell and TVA, the Court ordered ISPs to block access to domains and IP-addresses of the pirate IPTV service GoldTV.

The blocking injunction sets a new precedent that could have far-reaching consequences. It effectively opens the door to similar blocking requests, which could ultimately target hundreds of sites, as we have seen in other countries around the world.

While most ISPs accepted the order without protest, TekSavvy appealed. This appeal is ongoing and in the meantime, the blockades stay in place. However, that doesn't mean these are static, as the copyright holders can update domains and IP-addresses when required.

These updates are needed as GoldTV's presence continues to change. Old domains have stopped working, for example, while new ones have appeared. When these events happen, rightsholders can submit a new request to the court, which has the final say.

Court Grants New Blocklist Update

The latest update we reported on was in January. In March, another request came in, but the Court didn't approve that due to the COVID-19 shutdown. This prompted Bell and Rogers to submit another proposed update, which was granted by the Federal Court last week.

The new blocklist update is backed up by a detailed affidavit from Yves Rémillard, who works as an investigator for BCE, which is owned by Bell Media. Rémillard is part of the in-house antipiracy team that keeps an eye on GoldTV's business, including its resellers.

Undercover Investigator

BCE is able to monitor changes because it purchased access to a GoldTV "reseller control panel." When one of the old domains stopped working, the undercover investigator reached out to a reseller, who shared the new alternative via Whatsapp.WhatsApp investigator goldtv reseller

"I sent a message to the reseller of the GoldTV.biz Service through the messaging application WhatsApp, mentioning that I could no longer access the GoldTV.biz Service," Rémillard's affidavit reads.

"Soon thereafter, the reseller mentioned that the portal for the GoldTV.biz Service was now located at the address fortio.club and that the reseller control panel was now located at the address bill.rahez.co."

The investigator then researched these and related domains to see if they could indeed be used to access GoldTV's services. When that is believed to be the case, they are added to the blocklist. Currently, that's true for destv.me, three rahez.co subdomains, and global.myiptvplanet.com.

targeted domains canada block update

These domains now make up the entire blocklist. All IP-addresses and domain names that were present in the original order have been removed, as is shown in the partial overview below. The same is true for IP-addresses and several domains that were in the March blocklist request (pdf).

removed domains canada block

Andy Kaplan-Myrth, TekSavvy's vice-president of regulatory affairs, confirms that the ISP has received the new blocking demands. He announced the new requirements on Twitter as well and stressed that the company will comply with the order.

"The media companies now regularly ask the court to change the list of blocked sites. Today, July 10, 2020, the Federal Court issued an updated order removing blocks on almost all of the domains and adding a short list of new ones. #ShipOfTheseus TekSavvy continues our appeal," Kaplan-Myrth noted.

As was the case previously, the copyright holders' law firm asked the ISPs not to publish the domains before the court order was granted.

"Ship Of Theseus"

Based on the affidavit, the blocklist expansion is well documented and researched. However, Kaplan-Myrth's reference to the "Ship Of Theseus" thought experiment is intriguing. Is this still the same blocking order now that all original domains and IP-addresses have been removed?

While that question can be debated, the goal still remains the same. That is, blocking access to the GoldTV service, which still is a moving target.

Another issue worth highlighting is that while rightsholders can add new domains and IP-addresses, they require explicit approval from the court. This is different from the process in several other countries where blocklists can be expanded without court oversight.

This extra layer of oversight makes the blocklist less error-prone. However, it also slows down the process. It can take weeks before the court approves a blocklist extension, and by then, GoldTV and its resellers may have already relocated again.

The affidavit from BCE's anti-piracy investigator Yves Rémillard is available here (pdf) and a copy of the latest blocking order can be found here (pdf).

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Stop Selling Pirate IPTV Packages or Pay €10,000 Per Day, Court Rules
Andy Maxwell, 14 Jul 11:36 AM

IPTVBREIN is the leading Dutch anti-piracy outfit, tackling piracy of movies, TV shows, and a range of other infringing content.

In recent years and in common with its overseas counterparts, BREIN has been working to slow down the spread of pirate IPTV. In 2019, it reportedly curtailed the activities of around two dozen sellers but even after intense legal pressure, which in some cases involved cash settlements, at least one decided to continue their work.

The individual targeted by BREIN initially sold piracy-configured set-top boxes but later moved on to selling pirate IPTV subscriptions offering access to live TV, movies and TV shows. Following legal action by BREIN in 2019, a court ordered the defendant to cease-and-desist. Among other things, he paid BREIN a 40,000 euro (US$45,346) settlement.

Allegations of Repeat Infringement Contrary to Settlement

Subsequent inquiries carried out by BREIN last year suggested that the individual was already circumventing the requirement not to sell IPTV, by offering packages through two websites in the name of a third-party. After the third-party's identity was discovered, the websites were taken down. However, two more websites appeared, this time in the name of an individual in Marbella, Spain. BREIN believed that the original defendant was behind the websites.

Returning to court, BREIN again demanded that the individual stop providing links or other means enabling people to access infringing content.

The individual fought back on a handful of points, including that BREIN had only presented a generic case of alleged offending, but none were entertained by the court in Utrecht. He also did not deny that the second pair of websites sold access to pirate IPTV packages. The big question, however, was whether he was the person operating them from behind the scenes.

Evidence Showing Continued Sale of IPTV Packages

BREIN provided evidence suggesting that he was, revealing that payments were carried out via a PayPal account using an email address admittedly registered by the defendant. Also, a YouTube account ostensibly operated by the defendant's girlfriend carried an identical video to one published on one of the IPTV sales websites. The videos both contained a reference to a ProtonMail email address used to sell packages.

BREIN was further able to cross-reference details on Facebook pages which linked the defendant to the websites and a domain pointing to the same IP address as one of the websites. Also, the mobile number allegedly in use by the 'person' in Spain had a Dutch country code, leading the court to conclude that this individual probably didn't exist.

The defendant denied owning the websites and denied being involved in the Facebook pages. That being said, he did admit to opening a PayPal account using his girlfriend's email address for use by the individual allegedly in Spain. He denied being involved in the payments to the account, however.

Defendant is Offending Again, Court Rules

Despite these claims, the court came to the conclusion that it was "sufficiently plausible" that the defendant was behind the two websites and had been directly involved in the sale of pirate IPTV subscriptions which breached the rights of companies represented by BREIN.

As a result, the court handed down a judgment requiring the defendant to immediately stop offering "hyperlinks providing access to the illegal offer of protected works" or face a penalty of 10,000 euros per day up to a maximum of 500,000 euros.

While BREIN's claims in respect of the initial two websites were rejected due to a lack of urgency (both had closed down a while back), those pertaining to the more recent pair were upheld by the court. The defendant must now hand over information detailing all parties involved in the supply of the IPTV packages plus their purchase price and generated profit.

Failure to provide the information within 14 days will incur penalties of 1,000 euros per day, to a maximum of 100,000 euros. The defendant must also pay BREIN's legal costs of just under 7,400 euros.

The court's decision can be downloaded here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: