Tuesday, July 21, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

French Torrent Giant YggTorrent Changes Domain to Avoid ISP Blocking
Andy Maxwell, 21 Jul 07:56 PM

YggTorrentMost large torrent sites are published in the English language, with sites like The Pirate Bay and RARBG attracting massive international audiences. However, others can also build significant userbases by concentrating on local audiences.

Published entirely in French, YggTorrent provides a prime example of a site that has achieved remarkable success, despite not catering to the masses in the United States and Europe where English is broadly spoken. The site has in excess of 3.5 million registered members but that also ensures it's a target for copyright holders.

Domain-Hopping During 2020

Earlier this year the site's then-main domain, YggTorrent.ws, was suddenly disabled by its registrar Tucows without any advance warning, leaving the ominous 'serverHold' message behind. Given the levels of traffic to this domain, the suspension would've proven an irritant to the site, despite it having many other domains in backup to cater for this kind of action.

What followed was a switch to its Sweden-based YggTorrent.se domain, which was subsequently promoted as the main way to access the site. However, after just a few months since this change, that domain is also being targeted by copyright holder action.

Switch to a Brand New Slovenian Domain – YggTorrent.si

According to an announcement by Ygg, several ISPs in France recently began blocking the .se domain so rather than watch traffic levels fall, the site's operators decided to take evasive action. With a switch to yet another new domain – the Slovenia-based YggTorrent.si – the site hopes it can mitigate blocking attempts, at least for a while.

The full list of ISPs now blocking the .se domain (which remains in use and acts as a redirect) isn't clear but one of YggTorrent's other domains, the Iceland-based YggTorrent.is, is reportedly on the blacklists of several providers including Free, VOO, Telenet, Brutélé, and Proximus.

The site's Swiss-based domain is also affected by blocking. In 2019, following a complaint from local anti-piracy group SCPP, a Paris court ordered five French ISPs to block access to more than a dozen websites that link to pirated content. Included in that blocking order was YggTorrent.ch, a domain that is still being used by the site but only for redirection purposes.

Domain Whac-a-Mole

Overall it appears that YggTorrent is getting used to the domain name whac-a-mole game it's now engaged in. In addition to the .si domain now being touted as its primary access point, the site has many alternatives up its sleeve including the previously mentioned .se, .is and .ch domains, plus .gg and .to variants.

The site first experienced domain issues in 2018 when it was forced to abandon its .com domain following a complaint from French anti-piracy outfit SACEM. Considering what has happened since, it seems likely that the latest switch won't be the last.

Finally, another big player in the French-language piracy scene has also announced a domain change. Previously known simply as Zone-Telechargement and rebranded as Zone-Annuaire earlier this year, this month the file-sharing giant consolidated under the ZT-ZA banner.

"We are aware that the fact of changing domain name 'every four mornings' is starting to weigh heavily BUT Google and the [copyright holders] are not the only ones to put obstacles in our wheels and therefore for the survival of your / our site, it is again with a powerful aversion that we are going to have, once again, to change the domain name: ZT-ZA.COM," an announcement from the site reads.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Hosting Provider is Not Liable for 'Pirate' Site, US Appeals Court Rules
Ernesto Van der Sar, 21 Jul 11:33 AM

steadfast logoIn 2016, adult entertainment publisher ALS Scan dragged several third-party Internet services to court.

The company targeted companies including CDN provider CloudFlare and the Chicago-based hosting company Steadfast, accusing them of copyright infringement because they offered services to pirate sites.

ALS argued that Steadfast refused to shut down the servers of the image-sharing platform Imagebam.com, which was operated by its client Flixya. The hosting provider had been targeted with hundreds of DMCA notices, and ALS accused Steadfast of turning a blind eye to the situation.

In 2018, the hosting provider booked a significant victory. California District Court Judge George Wu dismissed all claims against Steadfast, including contributory copyright infringement and vicarious copyright infringement.

Steadfast wasn't completely satisfied, however, as their request for attorneys' fees was denied. The company filed an appeal on this ground. ALS, for its part, wanted Steadfast to be held liable for the infringements of its customer.

Steadfast Wins Appeal

Last Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided on the matter. In a 2-to-1 majority ruling, it awarded a clear win to the hosting company.

According to the appeals court, it is clear that Steadfast took the required "simple measures" by forwarding DMCA notices to Imagebam, who then removed the infringing content.

ALS had argued that simply forwarding the notices is not enough. According to the rightsholder, the hosting company should have done more as it was clearly aware of the numerous infringements. The Court disagrees.

"ALS complains that it is not enough to forward the infringement notices to Imagebam's owner in light of the number of infringement notices that Steadfast has received. But the number of notices is legally irrelevant," the decision reads.

The situation may be different if a hosting provider is aware of 'specific' infringements and doesn't take action. However, that is not the case here. The fact that pirated content continued to be uploaded doesn't change that.

Simple Measures Are Enough

"We are sympathetic to ALS's 'whack-a-mole problem,' but we are persuaded by the specific facts of this case that Steadfast's 'simple measures' are enough," the Court clarifies.

whack a mole steadfast ALS Scan

These "simple measures" are as far as Steadfast could go, according to the Court. There were no other 'simple' options available

"What measures were available to prevent further damage to ALS's copyrighted images, Steadfast took," the Court writes, noting that Steadfast didn't operate, control, or manage any functions of Imagebam.com.

On top of that, the Court mentions that ALS itself hasn't taken any other measures either. For example, the company didn't take legal action against Imagebam directly.

Based on these and other arguments the district court ruling is upheld. In addition, the appeals court believes that attorney's fees may be an option as well, and it sends that issue back to the district court for a do-over.

Circuit Court Judge Clifton Dissents

While the opinion is convincing, it's not undisputed, as AVN also highlights. Circuit Court Judge Richard Clifton disagreed with the majority and dissented.

According to Judge Clifton, the majority correctly notes that Steadfast has to take adequate "simple measures" to avoid being held liable, but he disagrees that the measures are adequate when infringements continue.

"The majority expresses sympathy for the 'whack-a-mole' problem faced by ALS Scan, Inc., but that sympathy does not solve the problem," Judge Clifton notes.

"Where, as here, there are allegations that the volume and magnitude of previous infringements caused a defendant to know that such infringements would continue tomorrow, and the next day, and the day after that, I would send this claim to the jury."

A copy of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals memorandum is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: