Friday, August 12, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Microsoft Sues Activation Key & Token Sellers For Enabling Customers' Piracy
Andy Maxwell, 12 Aug 12:09 PM

Pirate WindowsHaving spent billions on development and marketing over decades, companies like Microsoft dominate important sections of the software market.

As a result, in some business and educational environments use of Microsoft software is effectively mandatory, leaving consumers with little room to consider alternatives or negotiate a discount.

Pirate sites are always an option but many consumers feel that a genuine product bought at a discounted price is a safer and more honest option. What some don't know is that through the actions of others, they may be paying to access unlicensed software that is no more legal than a download from The Pirate Bay.

Microsoft Files Copyright Lawsuit

In a complaint filed at a Washington court this week, Microsoft targets Canadian company The Search People Enterprises Ltd (TSPE), assumed director Mehtabjit Singh, and 'John Doe' defendants 1-10.

The defendants are described as prolific distributors of "black market access devices", aka activation keys and tokens for Microsoft software. Those who bought keys and tokens may have been under the impression that they were purchasing official software but as Microsoft explains, that is not only misleading but a mischaracterization of the things they were sold.

Background: Keys and Tokens Are Not Licenses

Microsoft says that it develops software and distributes digital downloads using its own site and those of other vendors. Importantly, Microsoft stresses that it does not sell software; it offers licenses that enable people to use its software, under a set of strict terms and conditions.

Products including Microsoft Office, Project, Visio, Windows 10, and Windows 11 are all subject to licensing terms that restrict how the products can be used. Microsoft can also provide a product activation key to be entered as part of the installation process, with data about the activation sent to the company's servers.

Like software tokens, which enable downloads and automatic software activation, activation keys are anti-piracy tools, and exchanging money for them is not the same as buying a license. Indeed, Microsoft makes itself very clear – the activation of a piece of software means nothing in the absence of a license.

Microsoft's problem is that product activation keys can be 'decoupled' from the software they were meant to authorize and then reused to activate more copies of the software, in some cases more copies than the attached Microsoft license permits. As a result, there is a global black market for activation keys which are sold to often unsuspecting consumers who then download official software from Microsoft, without buying a license.

Device Peddlers Enabled Piracy

According to Microsoft, the defendants engaged in "widespread marketing" that enabled the illegal sale of Microsoft's activation keys and tokens through the websites softwarekeep.com, softwarekeep.ca, saveonit.com and catsoft.co. Once the keys were purchased, customers were given links to download the software either directly from Microsoft or from sites hosting counterfeit copies.

Between September 2020 and January 2022, Microsoft made a number of test purchases including Office Professional Plus, Office Home & Student, and Windows 10 and 11 Professional. These confirmed the sale of activation keys, software tokens, and the supply of instructions to illegally download Microsoft software.

software-keep

"In either instance, copying software from these sites constitutes the infringement of Microsoft's copyright-protected software which Defendants induced, enabled, facilitated, and proximately caused," the complaint reads.

In other words, since people who bought keys did not buy a license, downloading the software from anywhere and making a local copy amounted to piracy. Microsoft doesn't appear interested in chasing consumers but the software giant wants to hold the defendants liable for their customers' unintentional piracy.

Contributory Copyright Infringement

"Defendants' customers unwittingly have infringed and continue to infringe Microsoft's copyright-protected software by using unauthorized access devices to download, copy, and activate Microsoft software," Microsoft continues.

"Defendants and the Doe Defendants materially contributed to their customers' infringement by knowingly and intentionally sourcing and reselling decoupled product keys to be used by their customers to facilitate the downloading, copying, and activation of Microsoft's copyright-protected software from unauthorized and counterfeit download sites."

Microsoft says it's entitled to recover its actual damages and profits attributable to the defendants' infringement. Alternatively, Microsoft is entitled to seek $150,000 in statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c) for each willful infringement.

Additional Causes of Action

Microsoft continues with a claim for trademark infringement due to the defendants using its product logos to advertise and sell keys to activate counterfeit and unlicensed software.

"Defendants' activities are likely to lead others to conclude, incorrectly, that the infringing materials that Defendants are advertising, marketing, installing, offering, and distributing originate with or are authorized by Microsoft, thereby harming Microsoft, its licensees, and the public," Microsoft adds.

The complaint concludes with additional causes of action including false designation of origin, false and misleading representations and descriptions of fact, trade dress infringement, and a request for an injunction.

Microsoft's complaint can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

House of the Dragon Leaks: HBO Wields DMCA in Hunt For Mystery Reddit User
Andy Maxwell, 11 Aug 10:25 PM

house of the dragonFew people need to be reminded of the massive success story attached to HBO's hit TV series, Game of Thrones.

Aside from massive viewing numbers, the fantasy drama generated headlines due to various piracy-related controversies, including leaked episodes and the setting of piracy records, with the latter responsible for a global surge in internet traffic.

HBO took all of this in its stride early on and at one point an executive even described massive piracy as a 'compliment'. Almost a decade later a new controversy has hit HBO's Game of Thrones prequel House of the Dragons, even before its official release.

This time around, HBO seems done with the flattery.

Reddit User Spills The Beans

Reddit's /r/freefolk subreddit describes itself as a "wide open and minimally moderated subreddit" where Game of Thrones and related leaks can be discussed. Minimal moderation may be the aim but there are limits on what people can post to Reddit and live to tell the tale.

Last week a user called 'HOTDleaks' kicked up a storm with a post titled: 'Leaked plot summary for every episode of House of the Dragon'. According to various comments, the post delivered on its promises but not everyone was convinced of its credibility.

Soon after, however, Reddit suspended the 'HOTDleaks' account.

hotdleaks

An account suspension can be a pretty good sign that a nerve has been touched somewhere. Brand new user 'HOTDleak2', who posted just after 'HOTDleaks' was suspended, seemed to agree. "HOTD LEAKS VERIFIED BY COPYRIGHT STRIKE" they declared, before continuing the suspended user's work.

Not long after 'HOTDleak2' was suspended too. "My original account just got removed by Reddit's legal team. How do you address this?" they wrote.

Perhaps the bigger question related to who ordered the account suspensions. After scouring court records in the US, we can now confirm that this time around, HBO isn't taking copyright infringment as a compliment.

HBO Sent Multiple DMCA notices to Reddit

Documents filed at a court in California by Home Box Office, Inc. feature a declaration by Patrick Perkins, Senior Vice President, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. Perkins reveals that one of his responsibilities is anti-piracy enforcement for HBO.

The filing includes 20 pages of communications with Reddit beginning August 4, 2022, and relate to several DMCA takedown notices sent by Warner. The initial notice targets the original post made by 'HOTDleaks' alongside a claim that it contained a "Leaked full summary of episode 1 of the upcoming HBO series HOUSE OF THE DRAGON"

"Please remove immediately," the notice added.

Subsequent DMCA notices targeting dozens of Reddit posts are less specific, citing "Leaked plot information for the upcoming HBO original series HOUSE OF THE DRAGON" as the reason for takedown. But in this context, that's not the most important thing about these notices.

By first sending notifications to Reddit and then presenting them to the court, HBO can request a DMCA subpoena that requires Reddit to hand over the details of alleged infringers. And that's exactly what the company is doing.

HBO Wants The Leaker's Personal Details

Technically speaking HBO could do a sweep of the many users responsible for posting or reposting House of the Dragon leaks on Reddit but instead it appears to have just two users in mind. The accounts probably relate to the same person but if the court grants the DMCA subpoena and Reddit doesn't fight it, HBO will be in a good position to find out for sure.

HBO-leak Reddit

Citing 17 U.S. Code § 512, HBO says the court must order Reddit to disclose identifying information on the operators of the above usernames, from "any and all sources." In any event the information should include names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, account numbers, IP addresses and all other contact information.

What HBO will do with the information is unknown, but it must only be used to protect its copyrights. For the Reddit user/s targeted, that probably won't be much of a comfort.

The application and proposed DMCA subpoena can be found here (1,2,3, pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: