Monday, November 22, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

RIAA Takes Down Popular Music Piracy Discord Over Adele '30' Leak
Andy Maxwell, 22 Nov 12:41 PM

RIAAMost mainstream music is available on commercial services, for streaming or download, on the same date in dozens of countries around the world. Among other things, the coordinated Friday release scheme was designed to reduce piracy.

While for the vast majority of legitimate consumers this is sufficient to level the playing field, there is a smaller but significant subsection of music fans who not only prefer to have content more quickly, but also at zero cost.

This was one of the functions of the 'RipRequests' Discord server and corresponding community on Reddit. People keen to get the latest releases a few hours, days, or even weeks ahead of schedule were sometimes able to obtain them from dedicated bots. But while this has operated well for some time, the thirst for Adele's new album appears to have been a step too far for the record labels.

Adele's '30' Brings the Heat

'30' is the fourth studio album by English singer-songwriter Adele. In line with the current releasing schedule, it appeared on official sites on Friday 19 November 2021 courtesy of Melted Stone and Columbia Records. However, at least one day before (and most likely two) at least one copy was being shared within piracy communities.

One of those communities appears to have included RipRequests and while this type of activity is nothing new for these types of platforms, this time the RIAA (of which Columbia and also Adele are listed as members) quickly waded into the action.

RipRequests RIAA

As the image above shows, in an announcement posted to Reddit the team revealed that the RipRequests Discord server had been taken down by the RIAA. The post is now inaccessible since the team, apparently of its own free will, has temporarily locked the sub-Reddit.

Discord Server Was Removed "By Force"

In most cases, copyright complaints filed by the RIAA against online services such as Reddit and indeed Discord are actioned under the DMCA's notice and takedown provisions. A notice is sent and when received, such platforms have to remove the content to avoid liability.

When an account holder runs into trouble on Discord, the company's repeat infringer policy can come into play. No specific parameters are published by Discord (such as two or three 'strikes') and indeed, the company reserves the right to take action immediately, even if there is no repeat infringement. Whether that was part of the reason for Discord banning the channel is unclear but other things could be at play here.

A copy of a copyright complaint / cease-and-desist notice shared with TorrentFreak (as far as we know sent by the RIAA as early as November 17) warns that distributing copyrighted tracks in advance of their commercial release is illegal.

"We have learned that, without the authority of the relevant copyright owners, you have engaged in the unauthorized reproduction, distribution and/or streaming of sound recordings that have not yet been commercially released, the rights to which are owned by one of more of our members," it reads.

"More specifically, it has come to our attention that you are responsible for leaking sound recordings from the upcoming Adele album '30' set for commercial release on November 19, 2021. Such activity is illegal, and these actions must stop at once."

The Complaint Cites Criminal Law

The message is framed as a "cease-and-desist" but has an interesting element. Most types of copyright infringements have civil penalties attached but in this case, the RIAA also cites criminal law in its takedown notice.

"Such pre-release piracy is prohibited by law. In particular, the willful authorized distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, is prohibited by 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(C)," it reads.

The relevant section of law can be found here and is clear that if the infringer knew (or should have known) that the work was intended for commercial distribution, then liability follows. Depending on circumstances, punishments are increasingly severe, from a maximum of three years imprisonment up to an exceptional ten years.

The cease-and-desist notice also references 17 U.S.C. § 106, which entitles copyright owners to damages of up to $150,000 per work and attorneys' fees.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Piracy Reporter Retracts Takedown Notices After Misconfiguration Targets Legitimate Sites
Ernesto Van der Sar, 21 Nov 02:50 PM

red crossThe UK piracy tracking firm MUSO has quite a balanced view on the piracy problem, framing it as an opportunity rather than a threat.

MUSO believes that by understanding what motivates pirates, copyright holders can gain great insights that will ultimately help to generate new revenue streams.

At the same time, however, the company offers classic anti-piracy services. This includes sending DMCA notices to Google for potentially infringing links that appear in the popular search engine.

Working on behalf of prominent rightsholders, MUSO has reported more than 100 million infringing URLs to Google over the years. This usually goes quite smoothly but this week we were alerted to a concerning pattern.

Non-existing URLs

In a series of quite unusual DMCA notices the company reported more than 100,000 URLs that flagged non-existing links on pirate sites. These URLs pointed to hundreds of domains and often used repetitive keyword strings, such as the examples shown below.

When we attempted to load these pages they nearly all resulted in 404-type errors. In some cases that's not really a surprise, including the questionable example below.

questionable

These takedowns don't really harm the targeted sites since the content doesn't exist. However, more flagged links on a domain could be that these sites are further demoted in Google's search results. That's a serious concern.

Takedowns Target Legitimate sites

The issue is not limited to pirate sites either. Tucked away in the long lists of 'pirate' links we also find several legitimate websites. These include ABC News, Amazon, Billboard, Redfin, Variety, the Red Cross, and the UK National Archives.

Below are a few examples from a single notice, but there are many more.

http://amazon.co.uk/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://www.abcnews.go.com/search-movies/Heart%20of%20Champions%202021.html
http://billboard.com/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://huffingtonpost.com/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://globalnews.ca/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://redcrossblood.org/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://redfin.com/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/3253571-after-we-fell-2021-720p-webrip-x264-xbet.html

Misconfiguration

We reported our findings to MUSO earlier this week and the company informed us that these URLs should not have been targeted. Apparently, a batch of incorrect listings were sent out as the result of a misconfiguration

"These delistings are part of a batch of incorrect delistings sent out due to a misconfiguration within our service. We have identified the incorrect delistings and issued retractions with Google to have these incorrect delisting requests voided," a spokesperson said.

Following up on this answer we requested a full overview of the incorrect delistings. In addition, we asked whether MUSO checks whether a URL is responding properly before a notice is sent.

While we didn't get a direct answer to these questions, MUSO said that there are multiple processes and checks in place to identify mistakes. The company also reaffirmed that all mistakes will be retracted.

TorrentFreak spoke to the operator of one of the affected sites. He didn't immediately notice a negative effect from the takedown notices. However, he points out that Google's transparency report sometimes suggests that the URLs are indexed by the search engine, which isn't the case.

Prevous Issues

From what we can gather, the takedown system wrongfully matched keyword strings to the wrong base URLs. This can work for some proxy sites that use the same URL structure but, in this case, something clearly went wrong.

muso takedown

This reminds us of a similar issue that popped up a few years ago. At the time, keyword string takedowns targeted many non-existing URLs as well but legitimate sites were not hit at the time.

While these types of mistakes should be avoided, we have to applaud MUSO for being open and transparent about it. Mistakes can happen and it's always better to focus on a fix rather than a cover-up.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: