Thursday, November 18, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

YouTubers Who Uploaded Movie Edits Receive Suspended Prison Sentences
Andy Maxwell, 18 Nov 09:35 AM

Sad YouTubeIn the summer we reported on an unusual situation in Japan where copyright holders felt that the rise of so-called 'fast movies' represented a threat to their business.

'Fast movies' are essentially heavily edited copies of feature-length films that tell the entire story in just a few minutes. However, unlike most official trailers they also tend to come with commentary, in addition to an abundance of spoilers. Available on dedicated YouTube channels they became a roaring success but in Japan, this is a risky business.

With no broad 'fair use' style exceptions to lean on in a crisis, channels generating millions of views were seen as a major threat to the movie business. In response, rights holders vowed to do something about them and soon after, three suspects were arrested under suspicion of uploading 'fast movies' to YouTube.

"Fast movies are clear copyright infringement and serious crime that goes beyond the scope of legally permitted citation, however minor each act may seem," anti-piracy group CODA told TorrentFreak at the time.

"Fast movies including spoilers would discourage viewers from watching the original films and thus have a serious adverse effect on the right holders."

First Hearing: Suspects Go On Trial

Early this month the suspects, who have yet to be named, went on trial in Japan. The investigation by the Police and the Prosecutors office found that the defendants had systematically uploaded local films in 'fast movie' format to YouTube for monetary gain.

"The three defendants had been accused of violating the Copyright Act by editing 'I Am a Hero' and two other works copyrighted by Toho Co., Ltd. as well as 'Cold Fish' and another work copyrighted by Nikkatsu Co., Ltd., cutting the films down to 10 minutes without permission, adding narration and then uploading to YouTube from June to July 2020," CODA informs TorrentFreak.

All three pleaded guilty to the charges in the indictment with potentially serious consequences, including immediate prison sentences and fines. The prosecution requested the following:

– Defendant A: 2 years in prison + fine of 2,000,000 yen (US$17,472)

– Defendant B: 18 months in prison + fine of 1,000,000 yen (US$8,736)

– Defendant C: 18 months in prison + fine of 500,000 yen (US$4,368)

Citing the "remorseful attitude" of their clients, the defendants' lawyers argued that suspended sentences would be appropriate in this case, not the immediate custodial sentences sought by the prosecution.

Second Hearing: Sentencing

During the second hearing which took place this week at the Sendai District Court in Miyagi Prefecture, the judgment against the defendants was handed down. CODA says that due to the earlier guilty pleas and the existence of "lots of hard evidence", the matter was relatively straightforward.

The lawyers' request for relative leniency was taken into consideration and the sentences were as follows:

– Defendant A: 2 years in prison (suspended for 4 years) + 2,000,000 yen fine

– Defendant B: 18 months in prison (suspended for 3 years) + 1,000,000 yen fine

– Defendant C: 18 months in prison (suspended for 3 years) + 500,000 yen fine

CODA Welcomes the Decision

In a statement, CODA says that it finds the judgment a fair one and trusts it will act as a deterrent message to others thinking of uploading 'fast movies' to platforms such as YouTube.

"It is never permissible to use works that were created by many creative talents who devoted their time, labor and resources into their works without permission and earn enormous amount of advertising revenues," the anti-piracy group says.

"CODA shall continue to eliminate illegal use of Japanese content, including but not limited to, 'fast movies' and to protect copyright."

The fines issued to the defendants are payable to the state so if the rightsholders wish to recover damages for themselves, a civil case will have to be filed.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Miramax Sues Tarantino for Copyright Infringement Over "Pulp Fiction" NFT Sale
Ernesto Van der Sar, 17 Nov 05:01 PM

tarantino nftWith the NFT craze reaching new heights, Quentin Tarantino finds himself at the receiving end of a copyright infringement battle.

The director of movie classics such as Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill plans to sell NFTs to the public. These NFTs will unlock handwritten scripts and exclusive custom commentary from Tarantino, which could be worth millions of dollars.

Tarantino is collaborating with the Secret Network, a.k.a. SCRT Labs. They officially announced the planned sale a few weeks ago and launched a dedicated website where interested parties can join a waiting list.

While there are undoubtedly some die-hard fans willing to pay big money for these exclusive blockchain records and their associated perks, not everyone is happy with the plan. Movie studio Miramax, which owns most of the rights to the film, sees it as a contract breach and copyright infringement.

'Eager to Cah In'

In a lawsuit filed at a federal court in California yesterday, the movie company accuses the director of wanting to cash in on something he doesn't own the full rights to.

"Eager to cash in on the non-fungible token ('NFT') boom, as widely reported in the media, Quentin Tarantino recently announced plans to auction off seven 'exclusive scenes' from the 1994 motion picture Pulp Fiction in the form of NFTs," the complaint reads.

Earlier this month Miramax sent a cease and desist notice to Tarantino urging him to halt the upcoming sale. However, the director's attorney replied that his client was acting within his "reserved rights." As such, the sale is still scheduled to go through next month.

Miramax Claims NFT Rights

Faced with this refusal, the movie company saw no other option than to take the matter to court. Not just to stop Tarantino but also as a warning to others and to affirm that they hold the rights to sell Pulp Fiction NFTs.

"Left unchecked, Tarantino's conduct could mislead others into believing Miramax is involved in his venture. And it could also mislead others into believing they have the rights to pursue similar deals or offerings, when in fact Miramax holds the rights needed to develop, market, and sell NFTs relating to its deep film library," Miramax writes.

The lawsuit will have to determine what Tarantino can and can't do under his reserved rights, which include the right to "screenplay publication." Miramax argues that selling NFT's doesn't fall under this heading as it is a one-time transaction.

'Copyright Infringing Marketing'

In addition to a contract breach, Tarantino is also accused of copyright and trademark infringement. Among other things, the TarantinoNFTs.com website and marketing campaign uses copyrighted footage and the Pulp Fiction trademark without permission, the complaint alleges.

pai mei

As an example, Miramax mentions several tweets with unauthorized content from Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill: Vol. 2, including a fake Pulp Fiction VHS tape with unauthorized imagery from the film.

"In short, Defendants seek to capitalize, unilaterally, on Miramax's rights to Pulp Fiction," Miramax writes.

Through the lawsuit, Miramax hopes to stop the NFT sales. In addition, the movie company demands damages for copyright and trademark infringements, to be determined at trial.

'Massive Step Back'

The Tarantino NFT Twitter handle responded to a Variety article on the lawsuit, characterizing it as a massive step back.

"NFTs are meant to empower creators, connecting them directly with their audiences and communities. Secret NFTs on @SecretNetwork take this potential a step further. Now some in the media world want to take a massive step back," the tweet reads.

Since NFT's are relatively new, the lawsuit could potentially set an important precedent. At the time of writing, there are no signs that Tarantino and his team will back off as the NFT website remains online.

A copy of the complaint Miramax filed against Quentin Tarantino at the US District Court for the Central District of California is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: