Monday, January 10, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

PrimeWire: Hollywood & Netflix Win Court Injunction to Disable Site Domains
Andy Maxwell, 10 Jan 11:41 AM

mpaWhile there are a handful of other contenders, PrimeWire is one of the most enduring pirate streaming portals on the internet today. In various forms, including under the 1channel branding, the site has been in operation for perhaps eight years.

In common with many similar sites, PrimeWire has had its fair share of anti-piracy problems over the years. Its domains are blocked by court order in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Norway, Denmark and Portugal, and the site has been repeatedly branded a 'notorious market' by the MPA.

Lawsuit in the United States

Last November, the MPA and Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment obtained a DMCA subpoena from a US court that required Cloudflare to hand over whatever details it holds on the operator of PrimeWire.

Then, in early December, companies including Paramount, Universal, Warner, Columbia, Disney and Netflix filed a full-blown copyright infringement lawsuit against the alleged operators of the site including moderators Dev_Team, Silverrain, Fugitive, and drodman250.

In addition to demanding millions in damages, the studios requested a broad injunction to bring PrimeWire to its knees in advance of a full trial on the merits of the case.

Considerations for Preliminary Injunction

Following a hearing that took place January 3, 2022, last Friday Judge Mark C. Scarsi at the United States District Court for the Central District of California noted that while the defendants in the case have been served, none have made an appearance.

Summarizing the business models of the plaintiffs, the Judge acknowledged that the alleged behaviors of the defendants, which include the provision of links to infringing movies and TV shows hosted on third-party sites, do indeed infringe upon the rights of the studios.

"Plaintiffs did not authorize the digital reproduction and streaming of their copyrighted works. Thus, the streaming that occurs on PrimeWire or at websites to which PrimeWire links violates the Copyright Act," Judge Scarsi writes.

"These violations are attributable to Defendants because under the doctrine of contributory infringement, a party is liable for copyright infringement if it materially contributes to infringement it knows another commits."

The Judge further agreed that the PrimeWire defendants' actions are willful since the platform solicits infringing reproductions and performances (links to movies, TV shows) in its forum. As a result, there is a "significant likelihood" that the plaintiffs' lawsuit will succeed on the merits.

Weighing the Standards

With no one for PrimeWire participating in the action, the Judge weighed the request for an injunction against case law, agreeing that the plaintiffs had demonstrated to his satisfaction that they would suffer "irreparable harm" without an injunction.

The Judge also agreed that while an injunction could cause damage to PrimeWire, that should be weighed against the scale of the infringing behavior and the lack of appearance by the defendants. Also, since an injunction would help to prevent widespread copyright infringement, ordering one would be in the public interest.

Preliminary Injunction Granted

In line with the studios' request, Judge Scarsi granted a preliminary injunction designed to prevent PrimeWire from continuing to infringe the plaintiffs' rights.

It enjoins and restrains the PrimeWire defendants and anyone acting in concert with them from carrying out a number of actions, including linking to, distributing, reproducing, copying, hosting, uploading, and displaying the plaintiffs' copyrighted works.

The defendants are further ordered to refrain from any action that enables, facilitates, assists, encourages or induces any user or third party to carry out any of the above.

In what appears any effort to take PrimeWire offline, the Judge says that no action may be taken by the defendants or their agents to transfer the domains primewire.li, primewire.ag or primewire.vc to any other registrant or registrar. Meanwhile, domain name registrars and registries API Gmbh, Gandi SAS, Namecheap, Inc., Nic AG, SWITCH, and Afilias, Inc., must freeze and disable the three PrimeWire domains.

If the PrimeWire defendants choose to make an appearance in the case, the Judge says that the preliminary injunction can be challenged, modified, or even dissolved but that currently seems unlikely. At the time of writing, all three domains remain active but that is likely to change in the days to come. PrimeWire does have other domains at its disposal though, so it may choose to deploy those in due course.

In a statement, the MPA welcomes the injunction.

"The Motion Picture Association applauds the court's decision to enter a preliminary injunction against the operators of PrimeWire, a notorious foreign online piracy operation that operates anonymously with blatant and repeated disregard for the law. Filing civil actions against piracy operators is one of the many ways the MPA is actively engaged in protecting the legitimate market for creative content around the world," the group says.

A copy of the preliminary injunction can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Subpoenas Targeted Over 35,000 Cloudflare Customer Domain Names in Six Months
Ernesto Van der Sar, 09 Jan 04:55 PM

cloudflare logoPopular CDN and DDoS protection service Cloudflare has come under a lot of pressure from copyright holders in recent years.

The company offers its services to millions of sites. This includes multinationals, governments, but also some of the world's leading pirate sites.

Not all rightsholders are happy with the latter. Some have accused Cloudflare of facilitating copyright infringement by continuing to provide access to these platforms. At the same time, they call out the CDN service for masking the true hosting locations of these 'bad actors'.

Cloudflare sees things differently. The company positions itself as a neutral service provider that doesn't 'host' any infringing content. They just pass on information that is cached on its services temporarily.

Identifying 'Infringing' Customers

This means that if copyright holders send DMCA takedown requests to Cloudflare, the company takes no action other than forwarding the DMCA takedown notices to its customer. The customer can then take action, if appropriate.

Not all rightsholders agree with this approach and some have filed lawsuits to hold Cloudflare liable. Others have gone to court to obtain DMCA subpoenas, which require the CDN provider to hand over all personal details it has on allegedly infringing customers.

We regularly report on these DMCA subpoenas, which target torrent sites, streaming sites, and many other pirate portals. In its latest transparency report, Cloudflare reveals how many accounts and domain names were impacted.

Subpoenas Target 35,382 Domain Names

The report shows that during the first half of 2021 the number of targeted domains skyrocketed. The subpoenas, which include DMCA subpoenas, targeted 35,382 domain names. For comparison, 'only' 79 domains were targeted during the same period a year earlier.

Domains Targeted by Civil (DMCA) Suboenas

domain cloudflare

Based on these numbers it could be easy to conclude that copyright holders are ramping up their enforcement efforts, but that's not necessarily the case. In fact, the number of civil subpoenas Cloudflare received during the six-month period increased only slightly.

During the first half of 2021, Cloudflare received 45 subpoenas and the company answered them all. Together, these affected more than 325 Cloudflare customers. A year earlier the company received 31 subpoenas, which targeted 548 accounts.

To comply with the subpoenas, Cloudflare can share the IP-addresses that were used to access the site as well as the login times. In addition, it can hand over other 'basic subscriber info.'

"This basic subscriber data would include the information our customers provide at the time they sign up for our service, like name; email address; physical address; phone number; the means or source of payment of service," Cloudflare writes.

Removal and Blocking Requests

Previously, courts have ordered Cloudflare to block specific sites but no new orders came in during the first half of last year. The company did respond to several DMCA takedown requests. In these cases, the reported content is stored on Cloudflare's network.

These regular DMCA takedown requests targeted 32 accounts and 367 domain names during the reporting period. This is a significant increase compared to a year earlier when 4 accounts and 4 domain names were impacted.

Domains Targeted by Regular DMCA Notices

dmca

Aside from copyright issues, Cloudflare also responds to other enforcement requests, including trap and trade orders and search warrants. These have also gone up over the years.

These increases are not really unexpected as Cloudflare has grown its business significantly, the company explains.

"While there has been a steady increase in the number of law enforcement requests since our first transparency report in 2013, this is due in part to the exponential increase in the number of Cloudflare customer domains during that time period."

A copy of Cloudflare's full transparency report is available through the company's official website.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: