Monday, January 31, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Major Manga Publishers Prepare to Sue Cloudflare Over Pirate Sites
Andy Maxwell, 31 Jan 10:48 AM

cloudflare logoCDN company Cloudflare provides its services to millions of websites all around the world, enabling them to stay online with enhanced performance and better protection from attacks.

In recent years pressure from copyright holders has seen Cloudflare labeled a piracy facilitator. The CDN company does cooperate with rightsholders and insists that its services and processes meet the criteria laid out in the DMCA. But for some companies, Cloudflare doesn't go far enough and according to a report coming out of Japan, will soon face a new lawsuit related to manga piracy.

Major Manga Publishers Prepare to Sue Cloudflare

Major manga publishers Shueisha, Kodansha, Shogakukan and Kadokawa are no strangers to legal action against pirate sites and their operators. They were famously linked to the dismantling of Mangamura, a now-defunct site blamed for causing billions of dollars in losses to the Japanese manga industry. In that case, the site's operator was jailed for three years but since then other pirates have moved in to fill the void.

In many cases, these pirate sites use the services of Cloudflare and over the past year we've reported on various DMCA subpoenas obtained by the publishers in the United States that require Cloudflare to reveal the identities of their customers. In the meantime, Cloudflare invariably continues to offer services to pirate sites, arguing that it's a neutral technology intermediary.

It now transpires that assertion will be tested – not in the United States but on Japanese soil.

According to Asahi sources, the publishers will team up to file a lawsuit against Cloudflare in the Tokyo District Court next month, demanding 400 million yen ($3.48 million) in damages and an end to the "delivery" of pirated content to internet users.

The publishers say that their works, including the massively popular "One Piece" and "Attack on Titan", are regularly offered on pirate sites via Cloudflare's services causing them billions of yen in losses. Having previously filed a similar lawsuit in the United States, the fight will now be brought home to Japan.

Pirate Sites Not Yet Formally Identified

Since the lawsuit is yet to be filed, it is currently unclear which pirate sites the publishers are complaining about. However, there are tentative signs that the action could be related to a DMCA subpoena applications filed by Shogakukan, Shueisha, Kadokawa and Kodansha in a California district court in late 2021.

As noted in our report, the publishers asked Cloudflare to hand over the personal details of the operators of manga1000.com and manga1001.com.

At the time, manga1000.com was pulling in around 110 million visits per month, making it the 160th most popular domain in the world and the 17th most popular in Japan. With 180 million visits per month, 92% of them from Japan, manga1001.com was even bigger. Also targeted were manga1002.com and other platforms operating in the same niche.

In early December 2021, we estimated that when combined manga1000 and manga1001 were good for at least 290 million visits per month. The news coming out of Japan indicates that the publishers are targeting a platform with 300 million monthly visits, suggesting perhaps that they consider these domains to be linked.

Will Targeting Cloudflare in Japan Bear Fruit?

According to Asahi, since 2020 the publishers have been asking Cloudflare to stop "delivering" pirated content from unlicensed sites but under US copyright law, that was unsuccessful. Moving the battle to Japan now seems to be the preference since according to the publishers, Cloudflare has servers in Japan to service local users. This angle isn't entirely unexplored, however.

In 2018, the publishers filed a motion at the Tokyo District Court demanding that Cloudflare stop providing services to several pirate sites. That matter was apparently concluded via a settlement, with Cloudflare agreeing to "stop the replication" of the sites on its Japan-based servers, if a court declares them illegal.

Another interesting angle is that Cloudflare traditionally defends itself under US copyright law, something it did successfully last year after being sued by wedding garment companies including Mon Cheri Bridals and Maggie Sottero Designs. In that matter, Cloudflare emerged victorious with the judge noting that a "reasonable jury" would not conclude that "Cloudflare materially contributes to the underlying copyright infringement" carried out by pirate sites.

In this matter, Cloudflare also feels confident in its position.

"Cloudflare's CDN and pass-through security services do not meaningfully contribute to infringement," a statement from the company reads.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Spanish ISPs Blocked 869 Domains & Subdomains in 2021 To Prevent Piracy
Andy Maxwell, 30 Jan 04:13 PM

blockedAfter well over a decade of rightsholders using the legal system to compel ISPs to block sites on copyright infringement grounds, thousands of domains are blocked by national service providers.

According to rightsholders, this type of action is necessary to prevent unauthorized access to pirated movies, TV shows and music, thus boosting legitimate consumption. The downside is that the associated court processes are complex, expensive, and not particularly timely.

The answer in some regions has been the introduction of voluntary agreements between rightsholders and ISPs to block allegedly infringing sites without the need for a court process.

Spanish Companies Sign Protocol in 2021

In April 2021, the Coalition of Content Creators and Industries, an association representing the local entertainment sector, plus partners including internet service providers (98% of ISPs in the country), signed a voluntary protocol designed to protect intellectual property rights.

The agreement, which was formulated with oversight from the government's General Directorate of Cultural Industries, Intellectual Property and Cooperation, was the product of meetings that began taking place in March 2020. The final text, reviewed and approved by the National Commission of Markets and Competition (CNMC), was aimed at websites declared to be involved in serious copyright infringements.

The agreement was to block these sites, to prevent internet users from gaining access to them, at least using ordinary means. After nine months of operations, Spain's Ministry of Culture and Sports says that hundreds of domains and subdomains have already been blocked under the protocol.

869 Domains and Subdomains Blocked

According to an earlier report published in September 2021 (pdf), in the first six months of the protocol 500 domains and subdomains, together making available hundreds of thousands of infringing files, were blocked by ISPs. That number has since expanded.

"A total of 172 Internet domains and 697 subdomains have been blocked in 2021 to prevent illegal access to millions of works (books, musical or audiovisual works, video games) protected by intellectual property rights," the Ministry reports.

"The blockades are the result of the work of the Ministry of Culture and Sports, through the General Directorate of Cultural Industries, Intellectual Property and Cooperation, the right holders and the internet service providers that have signed the Protocol for the reinforcement of the protection of intellectual property rights."

The government describes the protocol as operating well and working in favor of a digital ecosystem that respects content creators and telecoms companies, while also benefiting consumers, employment, the economy, plus "society as a whole".

Fast Responses to Complaints, Tackling Mirror Sites

In 2021, the 'Technical Committee' representing the parties to the protocol submitted 32 blocking consultations, almost on a weekly basis. Each time it accurately complied with the submission requirements which involve verification processes. The Ministry of Culture and Sport says that in all cases it responded within 72 hours and in many cases within 36.

In common with other countries implementing blocking, Spain also has a problem with blocked sites reappearing in new locations. According to the Ministry, this is being tackled under the agreement.

"Among other measures, it has been agreed to regulate a global response to judicial and administrative resolutions on offending pages to their 'mirror web' or replicas, created under other domains or subdomains to elude current legislation and judicial blocking orders," the government department adds.

Rightsholders and related groups participating in the agreement include AIE (Artists, Interpreters and Performers), AEVI (Spanish Association of Video Games), AGEDI-PROMUSICAE, SGAE (General Society of Authors and Publishers), CEDRO (Spanish Center for Reprographic Rights), EGEDA (Audiovisual Producers Rights Management Entity), FEDICINE (Federation of Film Distributors) and FGEE (Federation of Publishers Guilds of Spain).

Expanding the agreement to encompass other players in the content industries is also underway.

"At this time, the Ministry of Culture and Sports is promoting other agents in the digital ecosystem to join this Protocol, which makes it possible to realize a great agreement for the reinforcement of the protection of fundamental rights on the Internet that benefits the whole of society," the Ministry concludes.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Sunday, January 30, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Downloading a Skyrim Mod Pack Can Cost You Your Internet Connection?
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 Jan 04:25 PM

skyrimIn the United States, Internet providers are required to "adopt and reasonably implement" a repeat infringer policy.

Under this policy, ISPs have to terminate the accounts of repeat infringers "in appropriate circumstances".

This language has been part of the DMCA for over two decades. Up until a few years ago, it was rare for ISPs to take action but, after several multi-million dollar lawsuits, things have changed.

It makes sense to sanction someone whose connection is structurally flagged for piracy, despite repeated and acknowledged warnings. However, given the vital importance of Internet access in today's society, it's probably wise to consider the context.

No Internet…

A few days ago we heard from a Wide Open West (WOW!) subscriber who faces a potential disconnection. WOW is currently being sued for failing to terminate repeat infringers on its network, so it's no surprise that the company is taking piracy accusations seriously.

WOW's terms of service also make it quite clear that the company can take action if needed.

"After receiving Notifications regarding repeated infringement through unauthorized file sharing […] WOW! will take action to prevent repeated infringement. Such action may include temporary or permanent termination of the subscriber account," the company warns.

Most ISPs include this type of language in their terms. It's the law, after all. And this is not merely an idle threat.

Skyrim Pirate?

The subscriber in question, who we'll refer to as Mark, recently noticed that his Internet connection was offline. After reaching out to WOW! over the phone, the company said that this was triggered by a recent piracy notice.

irdeto notice

Mark shared this notice with us for further context. It was sent by Irdeto, on behalf of the game company Zenimax Media, and alleges that Mark's Internet connection was used to share "The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim" without permission.

These types of warnings are not new. However, in this case, Mark didn't download a pirated copy of Skyrim. On the contrary, he owns a perfectly legal copy of the game. So what happened here?

PredCaliber Mod Pack

As it turns out, the torrent hash that Irdeto tracked is not for a pirated copy of the game. Instead, it's a free Skyrim "mod pack" made by YouTuber PredCaliber, which was shared through a torrent file that is still linked in the video's description.

youtube skyrim

While mod packs are not without copyright issues, Zenimax is generally quite supportive of user-made enhancements. In fact, it offers a dedicated modding tool called the Creation Engine just for this purpose.

So, would Zenimax want one of its legitimate customers to be sanctioned for downloading a mod pack? We doubt it.

Mistake?

The most likely explanation is that Irdeto mistakenly identified the torrent as a full pirated copy of the game. This is an easy mistake to make when there's no manual verification, as the download is titled "Skyrim SE 2021.rar."

This mistake is not without consequence, however, as Mark risks being disconnected permanently. This is a problem, as WOW! is the only "wired" Internet service where he lives.

"We've been put on a very slow connection until next week, while we either try to get Irdeto to admit that their automated system made a mistake or transition away from WOW," Mark tells us, sharing a picture of his current connection speed.

That's terrible mark

This is a rigorous stance from the ISP. However, for a company that faces potential multi-million dollar claims, it's understandable in a way. Especially since Mark informed us that he has had other 'incidents' in the past.

Also, Irdeto's notice specifically mentions that the ISP could be liable if it doesn't take action against repeat infringers. This likely added to the pressure.

That said, it makes little sense to terminate accounts of subscribers when the notices are 'incorrect'. And in this case, we have a hunch that Zenimax doesn't really want to crack down on people who share mod packs. After all, it's Zenimax that offers the tools to create these mods.

What's Next?

In an attempt to clarify the situation, TorrentFreak reached out to both WOW! and Irdeto but neither responded to our request for comment. We also asked Zenimax to respond but at the time of publication we haven't heard back from them either.

For now, Mark is still connected to the Internet, albeit in the slow lane. He hopes that one of the parties involved will come forward and eventually step in.

Even without a response, Mark is not entirely without options. In theory, he can file a DMCA counter-notice to dispute Zenimax's claim. However, that opens the door to a lawsuit from Zenimax, if the company is indeed planning to crack down on mods, so that should only be used as a last resort.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Saturday, January 29, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Twitter Now 'Rejects' Most Copyright Takedown Requests
Ernesto Van der Sar, 28 Jan 10:17 PM

twitter withheldTakedown notices are a vital tool for copyright holders who want to make sure that infringing copies of their work are not widely distributed.

Every week, millions of these requests are sent to hosting platforms and third-party services, including social media networks.

Twitter is certainly no exception. In fact, quite a few high-profile DMCA takedown notices have been sent to the platform, including several that targeted tweets from former U.S. President Trump.

This week, Twitter published a new update to its transparency report, highlighting the latest takedown volumes and trends. It reveals that the number of copyright notices received during the first half of 2021 increased slightly compared to the six months before.

Takedown Notices Increase

When combining the numbers of Twitter and Periscope, there's a 6% increase in DMCA requests, from 169k to 179k. However, if we zoom in, it becomes apparent that notices sent to Periscope were down by roughly 80% while Twitter's numbers increased by more than a third.

twitter takedown

The number of processed requests only tells part of the story though. One notice can flag dozens of tweets and media files, or just one. Also, not all reported content is removed or withheld by Twitter. In fact, most takedown requests processed by Twitter now result in no action.

Most Notices Result in No Action

Twitter's transparency report shows that the compliance rate dropped to an all-time low in the latest reporting period. For Twitter, only 31% of all takedown requests resulted in 'removals,' which is down from 59% during the previous reporting period.

twitter compliance

It's unclear what caused this sudden drop in compliance. However, Twitter says that it carefully reviews each notice and that it won't take action if requests are incomplete or even fraudulent. The same is true for content that's clearly fair use.

These rejected notices come in all shapes and sizes. Twitter mentions a few examples, including a series of takedown requests from an unnamed 'influencer'.

"A notable influencer filed hundreds of takedown requests targeting accounts that used the influencer's images for criticism and commentary. We took no action on several of these notices as the content didn't violate our policies," Twitter writes.

433k Tweets and 1.1m media files 'removed'

In total, Twitter withheld 433k tweets and 1.1m media files in the first half of last year. This is a significant number but, since the compliance rate dropped, the total number of withheld items is lower than the six months before.

Again, we need to zoom in to see the full picture. The number of withheld media files actually increased by 18%, while the withheld tweets dropped by nearly 50%. Periscope 'removals' are part of the media items, but this only represents a very small fraction of the totals.

The takedown requests are sent by hundreds of organizations and individuals. As is often the case, the majority of all requests come from a relatively small group.

According to Twitter's data, Universal Music Group, OpSec Online LLC, Leak ID, La Liga, and IFPI are good for more than a third of all takedown notices received during the reporting period. Of these, the notices from music group IFPI resulted in the most withheld items, 439k, which is more than a quarter of all 'removals'.

It is no surprise that music organizations are among the top senders. According to EU research, Twitter is one of the preferred social media platforms among music pirates. And according to the RIAA, the service does little to stop the "industrial-scale" piracy on its network.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company