Sunday, August 30, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Anti-Piracy Groups Keep Sending Takedown Notices for Dead Sites After Many Years
Ernesto Van der Sar, 30 Aug 10:40 PM

Many 'pirate' sites – we use that term very loosely here – have come and gone over the years.

Older readers may recall that Suprnova was once the leading torrent site, a brief reign that came to an end in 2004. The same can be said for other torrent juggernauts, such as Mininova, isoHunt and KickassTorrents.

In the file-hosting arena, the same process unfolded. Rapidshare was once the site to beat, a spot that was later taken over by Megaupload. Today, both sites and many others no longer exist.

While these names may occasionally cross the minds of melancholic file-sharers, the masses have moved on. However, when we browsed through Lumen's database of Google takedown notices this week, some old giants were brought back to life.

Apparently, several anti-piracy organizations still believe the dead sites to be a threat. Below is an overview of some random findings. We will start with Openload, which disappeared just a few months ago, and work our way back from there.

Openload

Openload should still be a familiar name to most. The file-hosting service was shut down by the anti-piracy group ACE last October. The site handed over its domain names to the group and reportedly paid "significant damages".

Today, all former Openload URLs point to a page on the ACE website where people can find out how to watch content legally. However, that doesn't stop the DMCA notices from coming in.

In recent months, tens of thousands of Openload.co URLs were reported to Google by reporting companies. These are sent on behalf of a variety of copyright holders, including ACE members Amazon and Disney.

We totally understand that it may take reporting companies some time to adapt to the new reality, but you'd expect that it would have sunk in by now. However, things can get worse, much worse.

KickassTorrents

Let's take a leap back to 2016 when KickassTorrents was shut down by the US Government. This came as a surprise to millions of users. However, it appears that some anti-piracy groups still can't believe that it's gone.

Today, more than four years later, several reporters continue to flag KAT.ph links. The majority of the recent notices are sent by MUSO, who have flagged hundreds of KAT.ph links this year alone.

kat late takedown

When we checked the Kat.ph domain it was throwing up all sorts of security warnings, but there were no torrents in sight.

Rapidshare

We can go even further back though. Half a decade ago, Rapidshare closed its doors. At that time the site's traffic had already plunged as the result of various voluntary anti-piracy measures.

After five years one would think that anti-piracy outfits have all moved on, but that's certainly not the case. Reporting companies including Marketly, Digimarc, Link-Busters, and WebSheriff, continue to report Rapidshare links.

isoHunt and Hotfile

2013 was a big year for the Motion Picture Association (MPA) as it booked legal victories against torrent site isoHunt and the filehoster Hotfile. In the years that followed both domains remained online, linking to the MPA website.

We are pretty sure that the MPA wouldn't host any infringing content. However, the takedown notices for both domains continue to trickle in 2020. Some are even sent on behalf of MPA member Disney.

disney hotfile

Megaupload

The further we go back in time, the number of takedown notices is generally lower. But Megaupload.com was still being flagged last December, after nearly eight years of downtime. This suggests that some reporting organizations may want to dust off their databases.

2012 is also where our quest stops, but not without leaving you with a head-scratcher. If we look at Megaupload, we see that Google received requests to take down 14,505 URLs.

That number is not very impressive, but the fact that more than half of these URLs were reported AFTER the site was taken down certainly is.

All in all, it's safe to say that reporting agencies are sending tens of thousands of pointless notices, if not more. We don't know if they all charge based on volume, but regardless, it's a waste of resources.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

DISH Network Sues Universe IPTV For Mass Copyright Infringement
Andy Maxwell, 30 Aug 12:41 PM

DISH logoUS broadcaster DISH Networks is well known for its seemingly relentless pursuit of groups and individuals who access and rebroadcast the company's content without permission.

In recent years, DISH has targeted a number of 'pirate' IPTV providers, sometimes under the Federal Communications Act and in other instances under copyright law. A new lawsuit filed in the United States falls into the latter category and claims that unlicensed IPTV service Universe IPTV infringes its exclusive rights.

Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Targets Universal IPTV

The suit targets five 'doe' defendants, together doing business as Universe IPTV and Universe TV. The complaint alleges that the service's business was carried out via several domains, including but not limited to World-Universeiptv.com, Uni-Update.com, and UniWeb.online.

DISH explains that it has contracts and licensing deals to transmit more than 400 channels in the United States and also acquires copyrights for shows that air on various channels, whether transmitted via satellite or the Internet. Some of these works are registered with the Copyright Office in the US while DISH holds the exclusive distribution and public performance rights for others that are unregistered.

Universal IPTV has not been authorized by DISH to distribute these protected works and channels, the suit claims, so has therefore breached the company's exclusive rights.

"Defendants distribute, sell, and promote Universe Subscriptions to consumers, including Service Users, and to resellers, including Universeonlinetv.co; Universeiptv.stream; Universeiptvs.com; Iptvuniverse.net; and Universe2iptv.com, with knowledge that these and other resellers distribute, sell, and promote Universe Subscriptions to Service Users," the complaint reads.

"Defendants promoted the Universe Service on their World-Universeiptv.com website, instructing consumers that '[t]here are more than 40,000 channels, films and series in every country in the world,' 'we are constantly expanding the number of channels,' they have '[a]ll channels,' and 'we continuously update our service'," DISH adds.

Universe Advertised on Facebook and Instagram

The complaint alleges that Universe advertised to consumers and potential resellers of its service on social media, including Instagram and two Facebook accounts, where it promoted the availability of channels including CBC and CBC Drama, among others.

DISH says that the social media platforms removed these pages for violations of Facebook's policy on copyright infringement. A Twitter account was also deleted but a Telegram page offering the service remains online.

DISH Asked About Becoming a Reseller Via WhatsApp

Via its websites and social media, subscriptions were offered at the rate of $70 for 12 months, $40 for six months and $22 for three months worth of access. The IPTV supplier also invited people to get in touch via WhatsApp to become a reseller, so that's exactly what DISH did as part of its investigation.

"In July 2020, DISH's investigator contacted Defendants through WhatsApp at +43 [redacted] to inquire about becoming a reseller of Universe Subscriptions.

"Defendants responded that the price for one three month Universe Subscription was 20 Euro (approximately $22) and the price for ten three month Universe Subscriptions was 200 Euro (approximately $220) with payments to be made to their PayPal account [redacted]@gmail.com," the complaint reveals.

Attempts to Take Down Universal IPTV Failed

Universe IPTV reportedly told DISH investigators that they live in Austria but it appears that the broadcaster's attempts to take their service down weren't successful.

Between August 27, 2019 and the filing of its lawsuit, DISH sent at least 10 cease-and-desist notices to the IPTV outfit, none of which received a response. During roughly the same timeframe, DISH also filed at least 14 complaints with CDN networks associated with the Universe service, some of which were forwarded to the defendants. However, DISH claims that even CDNs took action to remove content, Universe simply shifted to other CDNs or locations.

Copyright Infringement Claims Running to At Least $5 Million

In addition to demanding a permanent injunction against the defendants under 17 U.S.C. § 502 of the Copyright Act, preventing Universe IPTV from streaming, distributing, publicly performing, and selling or providing its content in the United States, DISH also demands substantial damages.

"For 37 or more registered works, statutory damages as awarded by the Court up to $150,000 per registered work infringed under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), or the Defendants' profits attributable to the infringement of those registered works under 17 U.S.C. § 504(b)," the complaint requests.

For any and all unregistered works (DISH lists more than 200), the company demands defendants' profits attributable to the infringement of those works. When all is considered, the broadcaster is requesting well in excess of $5 million in damages and potentially, depending on the discretion of the court, substantially more.

In common with other pending lawsuits of its type, DISH also seeks to take control of Universe IPTV's domains.

A copy of the complaint can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: