Friday, July 15, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Google Delists Hundreds of Pirate Bay Domains From UK Search Results
Ernesto Van der Sar, 15 Jul 12:08 PM

google pirate bayLast year, we noticed that Google had delisted several popular pirate sites from its search results in some countries.

In the Netherlands, for example, The Pirate Bay and many of its mirrors and proxies were delisted by Google in response to a notice sent by local anti-piracy group BREIN.

Later, we learned that similar requests were being sent to Google by movie company representatives in other countries. In response, Google removed thousands of URLs from its search engine in countries such as France, Norway, and the UK. In all cases, the domains were already blocked by ISPs following a court order.

Google's Blocking Reversal

Google's decision to voluntarily take action is noteworthy. The company apparently removed thousands of 'pirate site' domain names without being named in a lawsuit and despite earlier objections to this type of whole-site blocking, of which it doubted the efficacy.

The search engine has clearly changed its views, much to the delight of rightsholders. That said, Google still needs a nudge to spring into action. In the UK, for example, The Pirate Bay remained in Google's search engine while hundreds of smaller sites were delisted.

Initially, it wasn't clear why The Pirate Bay remained unblocked but, in hindsight, the explanation appears to be quite straightforward.

The blocking notices that were sent to Google came from the UK law firm Wiggins, which works for the movie industry. The Pirate Bay blocking order, however, was obtained by the music groups BPI and PPL. Apparently, these groups hadn't sprung into action yet.

BPI/PPL Ask Google to Delist Pirate Bay URLs

In recent weeks the UK music groups got on the bandwagon. The first request, sent by BPI and PPL, asked Google to delist the main Thepiratebay.org URL from its search results and the company swiftly complied.

Since then, several other requests have come in, targeting hundreds of Pirate Bay proxies. For example, earlier this month a BPI/PPL notice identified 486 additional blocking targets, although half of these appear to be duplicated. A week earlier, a similar notice targeted 73 'Pirate Bay' URLs.

As a result of these actions, it's now harder to find Pirate Bay proxies through Google. And indeed, a simple search for The Pirate Bay in the UK now comes with a notice at the bottom of the results, indicating that several URLs were removed in response to a legal request.

The BPI informs us that it already asked Google to delist The Pirate Bay when the first blocking order was obtained in 2012. At the time, Google declined to do so but the search engine eventually changed its tune.

"Things have moved on a bit since then and Google is now prepared to delist sites which are the subject of Court Orders," a BPI spokesperson informed us.

"It's been a long time coming, and clearly not everyone uses Google to find infringing sites, but we are pleased that the biggest search engine in the world is now taking these steps, because the less visibility an illegal site has, the less it will be accessed."

More Targets?

By now, it's clear that the music industry groups have discovered their new power. However, as far as we can see their actions have been limited to The Pirate Bay. That's noteworthy, as the music industry groups also obtained ISP blocking orders against many other sites.

The popular torrent sites 1337x, LimeTorrents and TorrentDownloads remain accessible through Google, despite a BPI blocking order. The same is true for the music download portal NewAlbumReleases and cyberlocker Nitroflare.

Even the blocking order for popular YouTube download tools such as Flvto.biz, 2Conv.com, 2Convert.net, and mp3.studio has yet to reach Google. This, despite the fact that these sites are seen as the largest piracy threat to the industry.

It's not clear why these other sites haven't been reported but perhaps they will be targeted at a later stage. TorrentFreak asked BPI if that's the case but, at the time of publication, we have yet to hear back.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Manga Piracy: Operator of MangaBank Sentenced By Chinese Authorities
Andy Maxwell, 14 Jul 08:00 PM

pirate cardJapanese manga publishing giants Shueisha, Kadowaka, Kodansha, and Shogakukan are on a mission to disrupt piracy in any way possible.

Late October 2021, a law firm acting for Shueisha filed an ex parte application at a California district court seeking discovery of information for use in a foreign proceeding.

In our initial report we listed several domains of interest to Shueisha, all with a common denominator – connections to huge manga piracy site MangaBank. At the time the site was enjoying an estimated 81 million visits per month, making it Japan's 44th most popular site overall.

Soon after the publishing of our report, MangaBank went offline. The site's operator informed TF that his platform had previously been subjected to a continuous ~50Gbps/s DDoS attack from an AS in Japan. MangaBank utilized Cloudflare at the time but the unknown attackers knew the IP address of the site's backend server. Mangabank never came back online.

After Months of Silence, News From China

As early as March 2021, there were signs that MangaBank's operator may have had connections to China. Under the country's e-commerce laws, telecommunication companies and access providers can't be compelled to disclose the identifying information of internet service users. That didn't prevent the publishers from finding their target in the end.

In November 2021, Shueisha, Kodansha, Shogakukan and Kadokawa said they were preparing to file a criminal complaint against MangaBank's operator. The publishers also received assistance from the Fukuoka Prefectural Police, who had previously worked on the infamous Mangamura case.

The investigation eventually led to MangaBank's operator in Chongqing, China, and a request to Japan-based anti-piracy group CODA to use its office in China to take action.

MangaBank's Configuration Ensured No Piracy in China

An interesting aspect of the case is that MangaBank reportedly utilized geo-blocking to ensure that the site could not be accessed in China. This meant that Chinese authorities could not confirm local copyright infringement, leading them to conclude that at least locally, "no actual infringement" took place. CODA didn't give up.

"[W]hen CODA filed a petition for administrative punishment with the Chinese authorities based on a petition summarizing the enormous damage situation in Japan, its punishment and the importance of detection, and various information, it was accepted. It was done," the anti-piracy group says.

MangaBank's Operator Sentenced

According to China's "Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Disseminate Information on the Information Network", any organization or individual that makes another person's work, performance, sound or video recording available to the public, must obtain permission from rightsholders first.

According to an announcement on the website of the People's Government of Wanzhou District, Chongqing, MangaBank's operator did not obtain the necessary permission so was found in breach of Article 2

"[His] behavior of providing the works of others to the public without authorization through the information network violates Article 2 of the Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Disseminate Information on the Information Network," the announcement reads.

mangabank-sentence

The administrative penalty handed down to MangaBank's operator has two components – confiscation of illegal gains (16,409 yuan / $2,427) and a fine for violating the right of communication (30,000 yuan, approx $4,437) – a total of $6,864.

When compared to penalties handed down in similar cases elsewhere in the world, especially in the United States, the penalty seems rather low. However, the average annual pay for employees in urban areas of China in 2021 was 62,884 yuan, around $9,300.

CODA believes that the site caused considerably more damage than this penalty suggests. It says more time will now be spent to clarify the scale of the infringement and any means of recovery available to the rightsholders.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: