Tuesday, July 12, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Pirate Site Blocking Expansion to Mobile Networks Raises New Questions
Andy Maxwell, 12 Jul 07:43 AM

stopPirate site blocking in the UK is now commonplace, with the movie, TV show, music, live sports and publishing industries all directly involved.

Recording industry group BPI and its member labels are among the most prolific blocking injunction applicants. To date more than 70 base pirate sites are listed in High Court injunctions but due to their 'dynamic' nature, those injunctions now cover thousands of related sites and domains, including proxy, mirror and clone sites.

These injunctions require the country's major fixed-line broadband ISPs (those in the BT group, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media) to block listed domains, rendering them inaccessible to subscribers. These blocks can be circumvented using VPNs and other tools but a much bigger access hole has existed for some time.

Mobile Networks Lead to The High Seas

While most torrent site users have historically preferred the convenience a PC, the explosive growth in smartphone ownership since blocking began has seen millions of users flood to illegal streaming platforms and MP3 download sites instead.

The reason that happened so easily in the UK is that the injunctions obtained by the BPI, Hollywood, publishers and sports companies only cover fixed-line broadband, not mobile networks. Ten years ago, expensive mobile packages with small data allowances didn't pose much of a threat but today that's clearly not the case so the BPI is taking action.

"The BPI, the representative voice for independent and major record labels, has today confirmed that High Court website blocking of pirate music sites and apps – which previously applied only to users of fixed line broadband networks – is being extended to users of mobile networks, starting with EE, part of the BT group," the BPI's announcement reads.

The UK recording industry group notes that previously-obtained injunctions led to BT group, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin Media ISPs blocking thousands of domains. Those ISPs include EE, a broadband provider that's also the operator of the UK's largest mobile network.

The BPI says this is the first time since website blocking began in 2011 that a mobile operator has begun blocking pirate sites. So, during the past few hours, we had some tests carried out on EE's network in the UK. The results are mixed.

Recent injunctions obtained by the BPI targeted several platforms including file-hosting site Nitroflare.com and YouTube-ripping site 2Conv.com. Using EE's 4G network the sites now refuse to load but on an iPhone with Apple's iCloud Relay activated, everything returns to normal. Testing another dozen or so blocked domains returns the same results.

This seems to suggest that blocking is taking place on EE but there are some outliers too. For example, another recent target – Mixdrop.co – loads with no issues and the same holds true for ThePirateBay.org, the BPI's first ever blocking target a decade ago in 2012.

BPI Welcomes EE Development

The BPI cites figures from telecoms regulator Ofcom showing that in the last quarter of 2021, there were 85 million mobile subscriptions in the UK, a figure that exceeds the UK's entire population. Quality of service is good too, not exactly an ideal scenario for suppressing piracy.

"Mobile data connections are faster and more reliable than ever," says BPI General Counsel Kiaron Whitehead. "A quarter of people now connect to the internet over 3G, 4G and 5G rather than broadband and wi-fi. That growth brings with it the risk of increased music piracy."

Whitehead notes that revenue generated by pirate sites goes into the operators' pockets while none goes back to artists. Enhanced blocking on mobile networks may go some way to improving that.

"We are therefore pleased that EE – which was the first mobile network to launch 5G to the UK population – has now become the first mobile network to block pirate sites which are subject to our High Court blocking Orders under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988," Whitehead adds.

Mobile Network Blocking Raises New Questions

Considering the millions the company spends on advertising and marketing each year, EE makes absolutely zero personal appearance in the BPI's announcement, not even a short comment from a spokesperson.

It's hard to draw firm conclusions but this tends to suggest that EE doesn't view site blocking as an exciting marketing opportunity. However, EE's lack of public support raises other questions too.

The terms of site-blocking injunctions are negotiated between rightsholders and the ISPs. The details are hammered out in private but we do know that blocking on mobile networks was previously ruled out and is therefore not included in the orders handed down by the High Court.

That raises the question of whether EE Limited has made an agreement with the BPI to block sites voluntarily or whether additional court processes will be needed to modify existing injunctions. That leads to even more questions.

If EE is covered by existing injunctions or intends to block voluntarily, why are other mobile providers (e.g Sky Mobile, owned by Sky UK Limited) not carrying out BPI blocking as well?

There's also the issue of 'BT group' companies being covered by existing injunctions. BT owns EE but BT Mobile customers also use the EE network. Does that mean users of BT Mobile will experience blocking on their connections too?

The same thing can be said about subscribers to other providers including Plusnet Mobile, Utility Warehouse, and other smaller companies such as 1pMobile, The Phone Co-op, Ecotalk, IQ Mobile, Zevvle, RWG Mobile, and To The Moon. These all use the EE network.

Also, today's announcement only mentions BPI blocking injunctions in respect of EE. Is that the limit of EE's blocking or does it intend to block the many, many thousands of sites listed in injunctions obtained by the MPA and Premier League, for example?

And then there is the matter of EE's main competitors – O2, Three, and Vodafone. As a company, O2 has been named previously in at least one BPI fixed-line broadband injunction but Three and Vodafone have not. There is no mention of those companies implementing blocking so at least at this stage, it seems likely they haven't agreed to it.

That leads us to all the injunctions handed down by the High Court in the past, which currently cover most of the big pirate sites. Will the BPI have to go back to court and have them all modified or perhaps the other providers will act voluntarily?

All of these questions were put to the BPI before the publication of this article. We'll provide an update when we hear back.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Iconic Demonii BitTorrent Tracker Makes Comeback With Millions of Users
Ernesto Van der Sar, 11 Jul 10:45 PM

demoniiTrackers are a crucial part of the BitTorrent infrastructure, making it easier for downloaders and uploaders to connect to each other.

Technically speaking trackers are similar to a DNS provider, they function as a 'phone book' pointing people to content without knowing what it is.

Demonii Tracker

In 2015, Demonii was the largest torrent tracker around. The Demonoid-inspired service handled requests from more than 50 million peers, resulting in more than two billion connections per day.

This reign ended abruptly at the end of that year. When the Motion Picture Association shut down the torrent icon YIFY, Demonii went down with it. As it turned out, YIFY was also the driving force behind the popular tracker; a fact that was relatively unknown.

With YIFY in the grasp of the MPA, some people feared that Demonii had been compromised as well. There was no evidence for this claim but that was irrelevant as Demonii soon went offline. It stayed offline too, until just a few days ago.

Surprise Comeback

Out of nowhere, Demonii suddenly became responsive again this month. The comeback went largely unnoticed by most torrent users but those that keep a close eye on tracker connections could have noticed. As it turns out, many active torrents still have Demonii in the tracker list.

Immediately after its resurrection, Demononii roughly started where it left off, coordinating transfers of over four million peers. These millions of torrent users connect to nearly two million older torrents that were also active before the tracker's shutdown.

demonii overview

The instant activity shows how many active torrents still have Demonii listed as a tracker. And since these torrents often have less than a handful of downloaders today, a central tracker will help to improve connectivity.

The big question is, of course, who resurrected Demonii and how did they get their hands on the domain?

Demonii Has a new Owner

After reaching out to several people, we found out that 'Suni', a veteran in the BitTorrent scene, is behind the comeback. Suni was once the operator of a smaller torrent site and was connected to a collective of torrent sites that was started back in 2005.

This collective, which included popular sites such as myBittorrent and Fenopy, pooled resources and knowledge to get things done. The group eventually fell apart after a few years, but many site operators remained connected.

Suni eventually shut down his site, which he prefers not to name in public, but kept a close eye on the torrent ecosystem. When YIFY was shut down in 2015, he noticed that the Demonii.com domain remained in the hands of the original owner.

Demonii was "an icon" according to Suni, who decided to reach out to YIFY in the hopes that they would agree to hand it over. After all, with more than 50 million people relying on it, the tracker served an important function.

"The tracker served a purpose. While many may argue that the loss of Demonii back in 2015 was no big deal for the ecosystem, realistically, it was; it was one of the most relied-on Torrent Trackers in the world," Suni tells us.

Indeed, while trackerless technology such as PEX and DHT were able to take over the functions of the defunct tracker in most cases, centralized trackers can be crucial for less popular torrents to survive.

7 Years Waiting…

Unfortunately for Suni, YIFY didn't want to hand over the domain; at least, not at the time. It would take almost seven years before that would happen.

After the early offers to take over Demonii were rejected, Suni and YIFY remained in touch. Over the years the Demonii topic was brought up on occasion, but usually without success.

"I would jokingly be like 'hey, you should give me Demonii.com,' and always was rejected; never told why and of course, I accepted it.

"It wasn't until we were chatting more recently about the cost of domain pricing for each of our online presences, that YIFY randomly sent back a random string of characters; and was like 'it's yours, let me know when it's transferred'," Suni says.

This version of what happened is corroborated by another source. We also spoke to a member of the original YIFY team, who preferred not to comment. However, the end result is that Demonii is operational again, with millions of people using it.

Demonii Downloaders and Seeders

demonii peers

Tech Specs

Demonii, like the original, runs on the OpenTracker software which is relatively lightweight. Suni informs us that the tracker is currently hosted on two virtual machines, running Debian 11 from docker containers.

The tracker supports both IPv4 and IPv6 connections. The former are still much more prevalent and the dual-stack server handles around 300,000 active requests per minute on a 1x 6 Core 16GB machine. However, it's only using a fraction of its total capacity.

"Everything is as optimized as possible; realistically anything and everything that can be stripped out is stripped. At time of writing; the v4 server is using 850mb ram. and about 11% of a CPU core," Suni says.

Demonii Requests

requests demonii

The above shows that Demonii is ready for more growth if needed. Suni also ordered new hardware to expand the operation even further. This is all coming out of his own pockets as the tracker itself doesn't generate any revenue.

Legal Issues?

It is important to stress that the tracker is content-neutral. It's simply a service that anyone can use to add to their torrent files. The tracker itself doesn't host any torrents, nor does it have any control over how people use the tracker.

Still, rightsholders may yet demand the blacklisting of certain torrents. Like others such as OpenTrackr.org, Demonii will consider accepting these requests, although it doesn't believe that it's doing anything illegal.

"I am of course, more than willing and able to implement blacklisting, it's a small price to pay really. But like others I would be putting up lists of hashed that have been blacklisted from the tracker," Suni says.

All in all, Suni believes that Demonii is just offering a neutral service, much like ISPs or even torrent clients. And judging from the more than 400 million requests per day, it's quite a popular service already.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: