Tuesday, December 21, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Kim Dotcom Suffers Setback in His U.S. Extradition Battle
Ernesto Van der Sar, 21 Dec 11:12 AM

megauploadNext month, a full decade will have passed since the file-storage empire of Kim Dotcom collapsed after Megaupload became the prime target in a high profile law enforcement operation.

Despite all the time that since passed, the New Zealand-based entrepreneur and his former colleagues are still waiting to hear whether they will be extradited to the US where a criminal prosecution is pending.

With the stakes this high, no legal resources are being spared. Several millions of dollars have been poured into this legal battle since 2011 and the end is still not in sight.

Last year, the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that Kim Dotcom, Bram van der Kolk and Matthias Ortmann can indeed be extradited to the United States. However, this still wasn't set in stone, as judicial reviews and appeals were still pending.

Supreme Court Denies Leave to Appeal

One of the potential appeals was rejected today, which brings bad news for Dotcom and his former Megaupload colleagues. The defendants requested to challenge an earlier Court of Appeal decision, where a judicial review appeal was dismissed.

Dotcom and the other two defendants characterized that dismissal as a miscarriage of justice. It would be of public importance to challenge it further, they argued.

Among other things the Megaupload defendants believed that the Court of Appeal didn't properly assess whether the provided evidence was sufficient. In addition, Dotcom challenged the Court's refusal to enforce his Privacy Act requests.

No Miscarriage of Justice

After reviewing the arguments from both sides, Supreme Court Justices Winkelmann, O'Regan, and France denied the request for further appeal on these grounds. The Supreme Court concluded that no grave mistakes were made.

"We are satisfied that nothing raised by the applicants gives rise to the appearance of a miscarriage of justice in the Court of Appeal's factual assessment," the order reads.

"Nor do we see any error in the approach of the Court of Appeal to the question relating to the enforcement of Mr Dotcom's Privacy Act requests or Messrs Ortmann and van der Kolk's application to adduce further evidence on the remitted appeal."

The Supreme Court acknowledges that the three Megaupload defendants raised a variety of issues during the court hearings. Not all were disregarded but the Court doesn't believe that the arguments are sufficient to justify an appeal.

"We do not consider there is anything more that this Court needs to do in relation to the proposed appeals, given our conclusion that no miscarriage has arisen," the Justices write.

Megaupload's Legal Fights Are Not Over

While the Supreme Court's decision is a setback for the Megaupload trio, it is likely not the last legal battle they will fight in this case. Meanwhile, the criminal and civil cases against Megaupload remain on hold in the US.

TorrentFreak reached out to Kim Dotcom who didn't immediately reply. On Twitter, the entrepreneur mentions that he's "unfazed," inviting people to tune into his Twitch streams early next year.

"I'll start live streaming in January. Join me. 2022 will be fun," Dotcom says.

dotcom

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Judge Recommends $83 Million 'Piracy' Damages Award Against YouTube Rippers
Ernesto Van der Sar, 20 Dec 09:50 PM

2convThe major record labels believe that YouTube rippers are the most significant piracy threat on the Internet.

These sites, which can be used for a variety of purposes, are used by some to convert free YouTube videos into MP3s.

The RIAA and several of its members have taken legal action to curb this threat. They previously sued YouTube-MP3, the world's largest ripping site at the time, which resulted in the site shutting down in 2017.

FLVTO.biz and 2conv.com Lawsuit

A year later, the music industry hoped to achieve the same with FLVTO.biz and 2conv.com. The sites' Russian owner Tofig Kurbanov was taken to court in the United States in 2018, accused of facilitating mass copyright infringement.

Kurbanov was convinced that his sites operate legally and fought back in court. However, after several setbacks, including a discovery order that required the YouTube rippers to log user data, the Russian operator decided to back out of the US court process.

Default Judgment

Kurbanov's failure to comply with the discovery order and his decision to step away from the US lawsuit cleared the path for the RIAA. And indeed, the music group was quick to request a default judgment, which was granted earlier this year.

The RIAA was pleased with this win but the final payoff had yet to be determined. In a follow-up filing, the music companies demanded more than $82 million in damages for copyright infringement and DMCA violations.

Kurbanov's legal team opposed this massive damages request and argued that $200 damages per infringement would be sufficient if the court chose to award any. In addition, the defense argued to limit any blocking measures to the United States, instead of applying them worldwide.

$82 Million is Appropriate, Judge Recommends

Late last week Virginia Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan issued a report, recommending the court to grant RIAA's requested damages award. After reviewing the positions from both parties, she concludes that Kurbanov is liable for copyright infringement and violating the DMCA by circumventing YouTube's technical protection measures.

The RIAA listed 1,618 copyrights and argued that $50,000 per copyright infringement is appropriate. In addition, it asked for $1,250 per DMCA violation, bringing the total to $82,922,500.

Judge Buchanan concludes that these amounts are appropriate, given the music companies' lost profits and advertising revenue, as well as the finding that the YouTube rippers willfully and repeatedly facilitated copyright infringement.

"Defendant's Websites caused the Plaintiffs to lose profits and streaming revenue because of the enormous internet traffic to and use of the Websites' stream-ripping functions," Judge Buchanan writes, noting that FLVTO and 2Conv are two of the most popular stream-ripping platforms.

'Significant Profit'

Kurbanov previously refused to provide all the financial details of the sites during discovery, so it's impossible to precisely calculate how much revenue they generated. However, the Judge finds it reasonable to conclude that they generated significant profit.

The copyright infringement complaints were not new either. The sites in question have been blocked through court orders around the world and the RIAA sent several complaints prior to filing its lawsuit.

"Defendant has a storied history of infringement. Multiple courts have found that Defendant's Websites are illegal for their stream-ripping functionality. Plaintiffs also sent infringement notices and cease-and-desist letters to Defendant, yet he has continued to infringe their copyrights," Judge Buchanan writes.

Registered DMCA Agent

In his defense, Kurbanov argued that he doesn't have sufficient knowledge of US law, as he's a Russian citizen. However, Judge Buchanan doesn't agree. The RIAA made it clear on several occasions that the site was infringing under US law. The stream-rippers themselves also cited US law on their websites and had a registered DMCA agent.

Finally, the Judge concludes that Kurbanov had "actual and constructive knowledge" that his activities are not permitted under US law.

"Defendant's Websites explicitly encourage Users to download Plaintiffs' copyrighted audio recordings for free. And Defendant has received actual notices from the RIAA, instructing him to disable from the infringing functions of the Websites, yet he continued," Judge Buchanan writes.

In addition to the nearly $83 million in damages, the RIAA can also be compensated for attorneys' fees and costs. On top of that, an injunction to stop the infringing activity going forward is appropriate too.

These recommendations have yet to be adopted by the court, which is expected to issue a final ruling in the near future. Before that happens, Mr. Kurbanov and his legal team have two weeks to object to the findings, which they likely will.

A copy of Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan's Report and Recommendation regarding RIAA's request for damages and a permanent injunction is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: