Monday, December 13, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Sites With >100 Links to Pirated Content Will Be Banned From Search Engines
Andy Maxwell, 13 Dec 12:28 PM

deleteDespite receving criticism from international rightsholders, Russia's efforts to prevent pirated content being accessed locally match and at times even exceed standards applied elsewhere.

The country blocks pirate sites, sometimes permanently, and has a rightsholder-driven mechanism to automatically remove links to allegedly-infringing content from search engines. The latter is part of a voluntary anti-piracy memorandum signed by some of the country's largest content and tech companies back in 2018.

The scheme has undergone adjustments and several extensions over the past three years and is now set for yet another revamp, one that is set to introduce even more measures aimed at reducing access to infringing content online.

New Agreement, Even Tougher Measures

On December 7, 2021, the signatories to the current memorandum attended a meeting with telecoms regulator Roscomnadzor. The parties agreed that by the end of this year, a new version of the memorandum will be signed, one that will seek to clamp down further still on the availability of pirated movies and TV shows in particular.

Mikhail Demin, President of the Media Communication Union (MKS), provided Vedomosti with details of what is perhaps the most aggressive measure thus far. Rather than rely on proactive actions to remove allegedly-infringing links from search results, domains that carry more than 100 links to pirated content will be removed from search results altogether.

For context, over the three years that the memorandum has been in action, more than 31 million links to pirated content have been carried out using the automated takedown system. Of the total domains affected by the deletions, around 20% of the domains were found to carry more than 100 links to unlicensed copies of movies and TV shows.

By removing these domains entirely, proactive measures against them will not be needed, at least as far as search is concerned.

"This indicates the systemic nature of violations. The removal of such sites entirely from search results, as stipulated by the agreed amendments to Memorandum 2.0, will definitely increase the effectiveness of the fight against pirates, reduce the availability of illegal content and contribute to the growth of legal video consumption," Demin told the publication.

'Legitimate' Sites and Domains Excluded

The threshold of 100 links to infringing content is particularly low when given the nature of user-generated content sites anywhere in the world. Platforms such as Facebook and local competitor VKontakte/VK, YouTube and any similar service would immediately find themselves in huge trouble. However, this has already been considered as part of negotiations.

According to information from the working group, various categories of sites are excluded from the measure. Examples include government sites, online media sources, social networks and legitimate video platforms.

"It is understood that these resources are public and controlled by legal entities, which in case of violation of copyright or related rights may act as defendants in court," the proposals read.

Expansion of Memorandum 2.0

While all signatories to the current memorandum support the proposals of the working group, there is also a desire to have the voluntary agreement written into law. That is taking longer than many people hoped, as is the inclusion of other rightsholders in the memorandum that were previously excluded.

However, Maxim Ryabyko of anti-piracy group AZAPI (which represents major publishers) and Nikita Danilov of NMFI (which represents recording labels such as Universal, Warner and Sony) inform Vedomosti that they have been taking part in the discussions to formulate the new agreement. Whether they will be fully embraced at this stage remains unclear.

The new memorandum is planned to be adopted by the end of 2021 with a validity period of three years.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 12/13/2021
Ernesto Van der Sar, 12 Dec 11:30 PM

venomThe data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are only meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have two new entries in the list. "Venom: Let There Be Carnage" is the most downloaded title.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on December 13 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (1) Venom: Let There Be Carnage 6.1 / trailer
2 (2) The Last Duel 7.5 / trailer
3 (4) No Time to Die 7.5 / trailer
4 (6) Dune 8.3 / trailer
5 (5) Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings 7.7 / trailer
6 (3) Ron's Gone Wrong 7.1 / trailer
7 (7) Free Guy 7.4 / trailer
8 (…) The Unforgivable 7.2 / trailer
9 (…) Encounter 5.8 / trailer
10 (9) Finch 7.0 / trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

'Copyright Troll' Must Pay $60k Extra to Compensate Wrongfully Accused 'Pirate'
Ernesto Van der Sar, 12 Dec 03:23 PM

x-artIn recent years, adult entertainment outfit Malibu Media has often been described as a copyright-trolling operation.

The company, known for its popular "X-Art" brand, has gone after thousands of alleged file-sharers in U.S. courts, collecting millions of dollars in settlements.

Accused Pirate Fight Back

Most accused pirates don't put up a fight, but occasionally one does. They include Mr. W.M. who filed a counterclaim and demanded that Malibu should back up its claim with the digital evidence that led to their piracy accusation.

Despite a court order, this evidence never came in. This frustrated the court, the accused subscriber, and even Malibu's own attorney, who withdrew from the case last year because her client failed to comply.

In the months that followed little progress was made and, earlier this year, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas M. Durkin handed a win to Mr. W.M. The court ordered Malibu to pay $48,656.73 in costs and attorneys' fees.

Malibu Failed to Pay

In most cases an order like this would end things but, in this instance, things went from bad to worse. Malibu Media failed to pay up and on top of that, the company actively diverted funds that should have been used to pay these fees.

To recoup the money, Mr. W.M. hired Joseph Stewart, an experienced collection attorney. They went as far as obtaining a order that required Malibu Media and its payment processor Epoch.com to restrain the subscription revenue from "X-Art.com" members.

That order also applied to ZO Digital, a company operated by the husband of Malibu's boss, Colette Pelissier, which collected well over $100,000 in proceeds during the first half of the year.

Things Escalate

A few weeks ago the matter started to escalate further. The court ordered Epoch to make sure that all Malibu's proceeds are frozen and then sent to Mr. W.M.'s legal team, until the fees are paid off.

The Judge concluded that Malibu obstructed the legal process on several occasions, despite having sufficient financial means to pay. Harsh comments were also directed at Malibu's designated representative Colette Pelissier, who failed to appear before a court without a proper reason.

To make sure that Pelissier attended an upcoming meeting Judge Durkin signed a conditional body attachment order. This effectively meant that she would be arrested if she failed to obey.

Court Drama

The threat of prison worked but things didn't improve for Malibu and its CEO. During a digital court hearing last week, Mr. W.M.'s legal team requested that Malibu should pay additional legal fees, to cover the expenses that were incurred while trying to collect the previously awarded money.

We haven't witnessed the hearing ourselves but copyright attorney and YouTuber Leonard J. French, who is not involved in this case, told us that the proceeding was quite messy.

Pelissier reportedly had a complete breakdown. She spoke quickly and panicky, while repeatedly interrupting the Judge, referencing issues that appeared to bear no relation to the case at hand.

Malibu's boss also blamed lawyers for trying to profit from copyright lawsuits. She said the company has stopped filing new cases because she doesn't want to be hard on people during the COVID pandemic and added that this is the only remaining case.

Judge Durkin asked her to slow down but that didn't help much. Pelissier continued to interrupt which wasn't appreciated by the court, to put it mildly.

"I deal with prisoners who are more appropriate, I have people who are mentally ill who can conduct themselves with more decency," Judge Durkin said, before cutting off the call.

Fees Increase to $108,271

Shortly after the hearing, Judge Durkin issued an order partially granting the motion for extra fees. The post-judgment fees of $59,614 for the collection counsel and $764 in costs were awarded. However, the requested $23,775 for the prior counsel was denied.

granted

Malibu Media and its representative Collette Pelissier are jointly and severally liable for this amount and the same applies to ZO Digital.

Together with the pre-judgment fees that were granted earlier, Malibu Media must pay a total of $108,271 in fees and costs. This is one of the largest judgments we've seen in favor of a wrongfully accused file-sharer.

Collection Time

The next step is to actually collect the money and Mr. W.M.'s legal team continues to work on that. In a court filing submitted this week, they note that the payment provider Epoch has restrained $67,289 already.

Epoch is required to keep future Malibu Media (X-Art.com) fees restrained until the full amount is paid, which means that there's roughly $41,000 to go.

A copy of Judge Durkin's order granting the request to compensate the additional legal fees is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: