Wednesday, September 22, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Movie Companies Demand Over $10m in Piracy Damages from LiquidVPN
Ernesto Van der Sar, 22 Sep 10:02 PM

liquidvpnA few years ago piracy-related lawsuits were pretty straightforward. Copyright holders would either sue alleged file-sharers or the operators of pirate sites.

In recent months, we have seen a new breed of lawsuits filed on behalf of the makers of movies such as "Hunter Killer," "Automata," "Survivor," and "I Feel Pretty."

These lawsuits target VPN providers, which are generally seen as third-party intermediaries. This includes LiquidVPN. The company was taken to court in March, shortly after the former owner was sued in a separate lawsuit.

The current owner, Puerto Rico company 1701 Management, is allegedly linked to U.S. resident Mr. Muszynski, who continued operating the service. While running a VPN is not copyright infringing, the movie companies accuse the service of encouraging and facilitating piracy.

VPN-related Copyright Infringement

The complaint mentions a variety of other examples where the defendants directly or indirectly referenced copyright infringing activity. This includes a screenshot of Popcorn Time which shows the Millennium film Survivor. The movie companies argue that, through various public statements, LiquidVPN 'encouraged' users to use its service to pirate movies.

"The LiquidVPN Defendants describe their VPN service as a tool to 'Watch Popcorn Time without being detected by your ISP and P2P tracking software' and promote it as a tool that can be used to pirate copyright protected content 'without the risk of getting caught by your ISP or anyone else'," they wrote.

Default Judgment

Despite the serious allegations, 1701 Management and its alleged owner failed to respond in court. As such, the film companies are now requesting a default judgment in their favor.

The movie companies claim that Mr. Muszynski, a Florida resident, is the driving force behind the shelf company 1701 Management, which bought LiquidVPN from its former operator two years ago. According to the legal paperwork, there are still claims on outstanding payments for this deal, which the movie companies have taken over from the former owner.

The main allegations relate to copyright infringement, however. According to the plaintiffs, it is clear that LiquidVPN crossed a line and should be held liable for direct and contributory copyright infringement, among other things.

No Safe Harbor

The motion for default judgment argues that LiquidVPN isn't entitled to a safe harbor defense because it failed to implement a repeat infringer policy. In addition, the company didn't have a registered DMCA agent.

"The LiquidVPN Defendants have no safe harbor from liability because they fail to implement a policy for terminating repeat infringers and have not even registered a DMCA agent with the Copyright Office," the movie companies write.

The repeat infringer angle is noteworthy because many other VPN services don't take action against repeat infringers either. VPNs generally don't log IP-address allocations, which makes it pretty much impossible to track repeat offenders.

No Logs, No Excuse

The movie companies argue that this isn't a valid excuse, as LiquidVPN willingly chose not to keep logs.

"[T]he LiquidVPN Defendants cannot use their policy of not logging their subscribers' access to provide anonymous IP addresses as an excuse for not terminating repeat infringers. A defendant who disables itself from doing anything to prevent infringement does not reasonably implement a repeat infringer policy."

These and other claims are novel issues and there is little VPN-related jurisprudence. However, without a defense in court from LiquidVPN, these arguments won't be actively contested in court.

Millions in Damages

All in all, the movie companies demand compensation on various grounds. This includes the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each of the 66 works included in the complaint. This amounts to $9,900,000. In addition, the movie companies request $1,650,000 for DMCA violations.

The case comes with a trademark twist as well. The Hawaiian company 42 Ventures, which is operated by anti-piracy lawyer Kerry Culpepper, owns the "Popcorn Time" trademark and requests $100,000 for unauthorized use by LiquidVPN.

In addition to the damages, the movie companies also request an injunction that requires LiquidVPN to terminate the accounts of repeat infringers. In addition, the service should block access to the pirate sites YTS.MX, Piratebay.org, rarbg.to, 1337x.tw, and popcorn-time.tw.

Interestingly, the mentioned Pirate Bay domain doesn't point to the official site, but a Pirate Bay proxy. That said, it's unsure whether any blocking action is actually needed at this point.

At the time of writing, the LiquidVPN website appears to have disappeared, as it's currently returning a Cloudflare connection error. The client area of the website is still online.

A copy of the motion for a default judgment, filed at the US District Court for the Southern District of California, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Grand Jury Charges 'Omi in a Hellcat' With Conspiracy to Pirate Xfinity & Spectrum TV Services
Andy Maxwell, 22 Sep 11:36 AM

OMI IN A HELLCATA little under two years ago, the federal government shut down Gears-branded IPTV services operated by Bill Omar Carrasquillo (aka Omi in a Hellcat).

IRS and FBI agents seized "at least" $5.2m from his bank accounts along with a laundry list of supercars and other vehicles, alleged to have been purchased with revenues from Carrasquillo's TV services.

As the government works to take possession of those assets in a civil process, the long-awaited criminal indictment has now landed. Unsealed last evening, it attempts to drive a coach and horses through Carrasquillo's claim that his services operated in a legal gray area.

Grand Jury Indictment – Copyright Infringement

The indictment begins by naming Carrasquillo ('Omar,' 'Omi,' 'Target,' and 'Target1080p') of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, Jesse Gonzales (aka 'Wulfy') of California, and Michael Barone of New York as defendants. It also references a currently anonymous 'Person 1' as a co-conspirator.

It's alleged that for more than three years, the named defendants and others ran a 'video content delivery service' variously branded as Reboot, Gears TV, Reloaded and Gears Reloaded. They also operated a content library called Streams R Us (SRU) containing movies and other content.

"The Infringing Service delivered Video Content, including television shows and movies, to subscribers to the Infringing Service, in exchange for payment," it reads.

It's claimed that the defendants conspired to fraudulently obtain content from major video content providers including Comcast's Xfinity, Verizon, Charter's Spectrum, DirecTV and Frontier Communications. This was achieved by subscribing to their residential cable television services in a variety of locations in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, California and New York.

Criminal Violations of the DMCA

In order to capture the providers' content, the defendants allegedly imported devices from China designed to strip High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) including at least seven 16-port encoders. The content was then transmitted over the Internet and copied to computer servers controlled by the defendants, some of it for subscribers' time-shifted consumption.

"[The defendants and Person 1] did willfully, and for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, circumvent and attempt to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to one or more works protected under Title 17 of the United States Code, namely, audiovisual television and movie programming offered by the Video Content Providers, and others," the indictment states, citing criminal violations of the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions.

"[The defendants] and other conspirators did not at any point seek or obtain authorization from the copyright holders or licensees to transmit, copy, or stream the Video Content [and at no point did they] disclose to the Video Content Providers that, in signing up for residential services at multiple locations' they intended to copy, transmit, and stream the Video Content to thousands of their own subscribers."

A sample of the works allegedly copied include Steve Jobs, Man of Steel, Game of Thrones, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, Shameless and The Walking Dead. The copying of these works and more constitute criminal violations of copyright law under 17 U.S. Code § 506 and 18 U.S. Code § 2319, which can carry a sentence of up to 10 years imprisonment.

Pirate Services Generated $30 Million in Subscriber Fees

In order to market the pirate services to the masses, it's alleged that the defendants utilized a YouTube channel called 'TARGETIN1080p' while administrative interactions between the defendants and their subscribers took place on social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Discord and Google Hangouts.

The indictment claims that in total, the defendants received more than $30m in subscriber fees through merchant processing accounts at Stripe, BOAMS, EMS, Nuvei and Worldpay, among others. These accounts were allegedly obtained by making false declarations to the processors and in some cases their banking partners in respect of the nature of the IPTV services and the identities of their owners.

Fraudulent Documents, Fraudulent Tax Returns

It has been known for some time that tax issues form a major part of the case against Carrasquillo and the indictment makes that clear with its claims against the YouTuber. It states that Carrasquillo, Gonzales and others submitted fraudulent documents, including false tax returns.

Gonzales also filed a fraudulent 'Business Portfolio Purchase Agreement' that claimed to show that he provided Carrasquillo with an "online customer base with web hosting capabilities" in exchange for $3 million and 24 monthly payments of $50,000.

According to the US government, the defendants "misrepresented, concealed, and hid, caused to be misrepresented' concealed and hidden' and attempted to misrepresent, conceal and hide the actions done in furtherance of the conspiracy."

Indictment Demands Asset Forfeiture

The charges against the defendants reads as follows:

Conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S. Code § 371), circumvention of copyright protection systems (17 U.S. Code § 1201), reproduction of a protected work (17 U.S. Code § 106 and 18 U.S. Code § 2319), public performance of a protected work (17 U.S. Code § 106 and 18 U.S. Code § 2319), access device fraud (18 U.S. Code § 1029), wire fraud, false statements to a bank, engaging in monetary transactions from unlawful activity, false statements, removal of property to prevent seizure and tax evasion.

The indictment asks the court to order forfeiture of any and all property resulting from the offenses listed above including (but not limited to) the sum of $34,826,402.00.

The amount includes items seized by the government thus far, including a fleet of luxury cars and various sums seized from banking and similar accounts. The indictment also demands forfeiture of 52 items of real estate in the Philadelphia area.

The grand jury indictment can be found here, Carrasquillo's conditions of release order here (pdf)

Update: A video of Carrasquillo being arrested by FBI agents a few hours ago has now appeared on YouTube.

Update2: The Department of Justice has just announced that if convicted, Carrasquillo faces a maximum possible sentence of 514 years in prison, Gonzales 244 years in prison, and Barone 130 years in prison.

"You can't just go and monetize someone else's copyrighted content with impunity," says Bradley S. Benavides, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. "That's the whole point of securing a copyright. Theft is theft, and if you're going to willfully steal another party's intellectual property, the FBI stands ready to step in and shut you down."

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: