Monday, September 20, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Virgin Media Subscribers Told to Pay "Thousands of Pounds" to Settle Piracy Lawsuits
Andy Maxwell, 20 Sep 05:27 PM

Pirate KeyLast week TorrentFreak broke the news that Voltage Holdings LLC, a company well known for tracking down pirates worldwide, has obtained a High Court order compelling Virgin Media to hand over subscriber data.

As a result, some of the ISP's subscribers have begun receiving letters accusing them of pirating the movie 'Ava' with the advice that if the matter goes to court, they could be found liable for copyright infringement. Of course, this is something Voltage and its partners would prefer to avoid and to that end, are offering recipients the option to admit liability and pay a settlement fee.

In line with earlier High Court guidance, initial letters to subscribers don't provide any idea of what that settlement amount might be. In the past the sums requested have tended to drift around the several hundred pounds mark but early indications suggest that Voltage and its partners are now aiming much, much higher.

Multiple Thousands of Pounds Requested

According to sources familiar with the matter who spoke with TorrentFreak on condition of anonymity, attempting to settle a case with Voltage's law firm Lewis Silkin LLP will not be cheap. Early indications suggest that the amounts requested run to several thousand pounds and are likely to vary in scale depending on the specific defendant.

At this stage it's too early to definitively say what factors are being considered when assessing the settlement amount. However, if earlier methodology is deployed it's possible that Voltage's anti-piracy monitoring company (believed to be MaverickEye) will take the BitTorrent swarm size (the number of people sharing the movie at the same time) and multiply that by the price of the Ava movie.

As previously reported, this system has serious flaws. However, for people who simply want to settle and move on, paying Voltage a few thousand pounds should make the whole thing go away – at least in respect of this particular accusation. But what about those who wish to contest the claims being made?

Options For Accused Subscribers

At the core of the letters is the assumption that the person who pays the Virgin Media bill is the person who downloaded and shared the movie 'Ava' without permission. 'Assumption' is key here since Voltage acknowledges that may not be the case and someone else in a household could be liable.

If the bill payer did not carry out the infringement and did not authorize/allow someone else to do so, under the Copyright Designs and Patent Act they are not liable. This means that they can issue a direct denial to Voltage but that would not prevent the company from filing a claim if it believes it has a case.

At this point it's important to note that any claim by Voltage would be actioned in a civil court where cases are decided on the balance of probabilities – 51% confidence of infringement could tip a case in the company's favor, resulting in a damages award. That's in addition to the associated legal costs of a failed defense.

Given that Voltage is setting the bar so high with demands for multi-thousand-pound settlements, it seems likely that defendants who can afford to mount a defense will do so. Michael Coyle of Lawdit Solicitors is currently taking on defendants' cases for £300 (plus VAT) but for those with fewer resources, it's difficult to know where they can turn other than Citizens Advice.

However, there are some other interesting facts buried in the High Court order that could render some cases dead in the water before they begin.

Safeguarding Measures Are Built Into the High Court Order

While the letter from Lewis Silkin LLP ticks all the boxes and conforms to the standards laid down by the High Court, there are some interesting details in the actual order that the law firm's letter does not directly address.

For example, the High Court states that Voltage may not initiate legal proceedings against a minor, which means anyone under the age of 18 in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. This means that if a parent pays the bill and a 17-year-old illegally downloaded and shared the movie, Voltage cannot bring a case against them.

Furthermore, the High Court says that Voltage cannot pursue cases against an infringer who is a pensioner. The retirement age in the UK is currently 66 and according to the High Court's instructions, "anyone over the age of 65" can not have proceedings brought against them. In addition, anyone who is considered 'vulnerable' will not have to face proceedings either.

General Observations and Opinion

In many respects, this new anti-piracy program is the same as those that have come and gone in the past. The allegations are the same and the aims are the same – to have people pay large sums of money to avoid having to fight a copyright infringement lawsuit in court. That being said, this campaign has clearly learned many of the lessons that have dogged similar efforts in the past and is therefore much less likely to run off the rails due to incompetence and inexperience.

While arguably still objectionable given the ratio between the cost of the movie and what appear to be extortionate settlement demands, the project appears to have been planned in fine detail and has some major players on board. Also, given the history of Voltage and its partners, the claimants may yet have some surprise sources of additional evidence up their collective sleeves, rather than just IP addresses alone.

Where possible, all letter recipients should proceed with caution, preferably backed up by a legal professional. Voltage can't sue everyone but it should be assumed that hand-picking one or two defendants to be made an example of is probably part of the plan.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

U.S. Copyright Holders Want Tougher Anti-Piracy Measures in China
Ernesto Van der Sar, 20 Sep 12:59 PM

china flagThe American copyright industry generates billions of dollars in annual revenue and is generally seen as one of the primary export products.

Whether it's movies, music, software or other goods, US companies are among the market leaders.

US companies also have a clear presence in China which, with more than a billion potential consumers, is a massive market. This offers enormous potential, but there are threats as well, including various forms of piracy.

A few days ago several of these threats were highlighted by the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), which counts copyright groups including the MPA, RIAA, and ESA among its members. The IIPA shared its concerns with the US Trade Representative as part of the annual review of China's World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations.

The IIPA notes that China has made some progress recently, such as copyright law amendments introducing broadcasting and public performance rights for producers of sound recordings. In addition, the maximum punitive damages for copyright infringers in China was increased ten-fold.

Criminal Action Against Pirate Sites

However, the US copyright groups see a lot more room for improvement. Online piracy, for example, remains a major concern. They hope that the Chinese government will step up its efforts on this front too.

"The Chinese government should be encouraged to expand enforcement resources and capability, commensurate with the scale of the evolving online piracy problem," IIPA writes.

The US copyright holders note that civil lawsuits are insufficient to address major piracy problems. Therefore, they call for enhanced and effective criminal enforcement actions against pirate sites and services.

The online piracy problems in China are broad according to IIPA. They range from traditional torrent and hosting services, through a hybrid of both, to more advanced streaming operations.

"Piracy websites remain a serious concern, including illegal download sites; P2P piracy sites; deep linking sites; 'hybrid' sites […] which offer both hosting and torrenting services; cyberlockers; BitTorrent indexes, trackers, or clients; forums; streaming sites; social media websites; and online marketplace/auction sites selling pirated goods."

Baidu

The piracy problem isn't just limited to dedicated pirate sites. Legitimate platforms present problems too. The IIPA specifically highlights Baidu, which is China's equivalent of Google, which offers a search engine but also various other services, including cloud hosting.

The rightsholders would like to cooperate with Baidu but, instead, they were forced to take legal action. Despite numerous complaints, the situation apparently hasn't improved much recently.

"Unfortunately, Baidu's services continue to be used for piracy, and their notice and takedown system has been ineffective," IIPA notes.

To spur Baidu into action, the IIPA would like the Chinese government to get involved. In addition to implementing rigorous filtering technology, the tech giant should also take action against repeat infringers.

"China's government should encourage Baidu to do more, including improving implementation of its takedown tools, applying rigorous filtering technology to identify infringing content, and taking more effective action to suspend or terminate repeat infringers to ensure infringing content and links are removed expeditiously."

Piracy Apps and Devices

Piracy apps are a growing concern as well. This includes tools that aggregate copyright-infringing content stored on third-party servers. Going after these apps can currently be quite complicated under Chinese law.

Rightsholders also see China as a major hub for the manufacturing and distribution of piracy-enabling devices. IIPA specifically mentions Ubox which offers access to pirated video-on-demand and has more than 500 agents and distributors worldwide.

"China is a leading manufacturer of media hardware and accessories that can be modified to support the installation of third-party infringing apps, often, pre-loaded onto the device, allowing users to access pirated content. A prominent example is the 'Ubox,' which is manufactured and distributed by Unblock Tech."

Gaming Piracy

The above is just a selection of the piracy landscape, which also covers other industries such as academic publishers and the gaming industry.

For example, game companies often have their work 'cloned' or 'plagiarized'. This is a rampant problem in China, IIPA warns, encouraging the country to use its enforcement framework to effectively address the issue.

The same applies to manufacturers and distributors of circumvention devices such as mod-chips. These allow pirates to play copies of games on their consoles. According to the IIPA, criminal action is needed on this front as well.

"More targeted and transparent enforcement actions, and deterrent-level criminal sanctions and penalties against the manufacturers, suppliers, and exporters of circumvention devices and software components are necessary to meaningfully stem the downloading of infringing video games," IIPA writes.

All in all the US copyright holders have quite a long list of wishes and demands. These are not sent to China directly, but IIPA hopes that, through the US Trade Representative, they will get a spot on the political agenda.

A copy of IIPA's submission to the US Trade Representative, which also covers a wide range of other IP-issues, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 09/20/2021
Ernesto Van der Sar, 20 Sep 12:30 AM

candymanThe data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are only meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have four new entries in the list. "Candyman" is the most downloaded title.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on September 20 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (…) Candyman 6.2 / trailer
2 (…) Old 5.9 / trailer
3 (3) Malignant 6.3 / trailer
4 (2) The Suicide Squad 7.6 / trailer
5 (…) Prisoners of The Ghostland 4.4 / trailer
6 (…) Nightbooks 5.8 / trailer
7 (1) Escape Room: Tournament of Champions 5.9 / trailer
8 (6) Black Widow 7.0 / trailer
9 (8) F9: The Fast Saga 5.3 / trailer
10 (3) Don't Breathe 2 6.2 / trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: