Wednesday, July 28, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Bungie & Ubisoft Sue Destiny 2 Cheatmakers Ring-1 For Copyright Infringement
Andy Maxwell, 28 Jul 10:20 AM

Destiny 2Rather than test their skills on a level playing field, some gamers prefer to deploy third-party cheating software to gain a competitive advantage.

This is particularly prevalent in multiplayer games where being able to shoot through walls, automatically aim, run at advantageous speeds and retain ammo supplies naturally provides a competitive advantage.

While this may be good fun for those who dislike rules and don't mind hollow victories, these hacks create frustration for other players which diminishes the gaming experience.

As a result, video game developers are taking action against cheat makers and those who distribute cheats, with the aim of restoring fair play and enjoyment for their customers. A new lawsuit filed by Ubisoft and Bungie continues this trend by targeting individuals believed to be involved in the development and distribution of cheats for Destiny 2 and Rainbow Six Seige.

Lawsuit Targets Individuals Allegedly Behind Ring-1

Filed in a California district court, the lawsuit targets Andrew Thorpe (aka 'Krypto'), Jonathan Aguedo (aka 'Overpowered'), Wesam Mohammed (aka 'Grizzly'), Ahmad Mohammed, plus John Does 1-50. According to the plaintiffs, these people operate, oversee or participate in Ring-1, an operation that develops, distributes and markets a range of cheats for Destiny 2 and Rainbow Six Seige, among others.

Ring-1 is said to largely operate from Ring-1.io but is also active on hundreds of forums, websites and social media accounts selling cheats that enable Ubisoft and Bungie customers to automatically aim their weapons, reveal the locations of opponents, and see information that would otherwise be obscured.

"Defendants' conduct has caused, and is continuing to cause, massive and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs and their business interests. The success of Plaintiffs' games depends on their being enjoyable and fair for all players," the lawsuit reads.

"Cheaters ruin the experience of playing the Games. Not only do cheaters impair the enjoyment of gameplay by non-cheaters with whom they interact in-game, but cheaters also illegitimately obtain and thereby devalue the in-game rewards that non-cheaters obtain legitimately."

Ubisoft and Bungie say that the defendants' conduct is both unlawful and malicious since they deliberately set out to do harm to the companies and player communities.

Who Are The Ring-1 Defendants?

The lawsuit alleges that Andrew Thorpe (aka 'Krypto') is a person residing in North Humberside in the UK. It's claimed he is a Ring-1 staff member and moderator who assists the plaintiffs' customers to use the cheat software, serves as a liaison to the cheat developers, and may also be a developer himself.

Jonathan Aguedo (aka 'Overpowered') is said to reside in Windermere, Florida. Alongside similar allegations to those leveled against Thorpe, it's alleged that Aguedo also acts as a reseller of Ring-1 cheats.

Wesam Mohammed (aka 'Grizzly') allegedly resides in Munster, Indiana. He stands accused of being a long-time member of Ring-1 and a "prolific" reseller of the cheating software, with some sales being conducted under the moniker "Gaming Mods." Ahmad Mohammed is also claimed to be a resident of Munster and a reseller of the Ring-1 cheats.

The complaint goes on to list a number of individuals only by their online handles. These include Berserker, Cypher, Admin, Cale, Overseer, Tralepo, Frost, Dove and Pingu, who are all accused of being involved in various aspects of the Ring-1 operation. At this stage their identities are unknown but Ubisoft and Bungie say they will seek to amend their complaint once this information is obtained.

Defendants' Business Model

According to the lawsuit, the cheats developed and distributed by Ring-1 are not cheap. Access to Destiny 2 cheats via the Ring-1 website costs 30 euros per week or 60 euros per month while those for Rainbox Six Seige cost 25 euros and 50 euros respectively, netting the defendants up to hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue.

The plaintiffs believe that Ring-1 or those acting in concert with them fraudulently obtained access to the games' software clients before disassembling, decompiling and/or creating derivative works from them. These tools were then tested on Destiny 2 and Rainbow Six Seige servers under false pretenses by using "throwaway accounts" and false identities.

Copyright Infringement Offenses

Since the cheating software developed and distributed by Ring-1 is primarily designed for the purpose of circumventing technological measures that control access to their games, the plaintiffs state that the defendants are trafficking in circumvention devices in violation of the DMCA (17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(2)).

In addition, it's alleged that the defendants unlawfully reproduced and displayed the plaintiffs' artwork on the Ring-1 website, adapted the performance of the games, and reproduced game client files without a license during reverse engineering and similar processes.

In the alternative, Ubisoft and Bungie suggest that the defendants can be held liable for inducing and contributing to the copyright-infringing acts of their customers when they deploy cheats that effectively create unauthorized derivative works.

"As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiffs are entitled to damages and to Defendants' profits in amounts to be proven at trial, which are not currently ascertainable. Alternatively, Plaintiffs are entitled to maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each copyrighted work infringed, or in such other amount as may be proper under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)," the complaint adds.

Other Claims Against The Ring-1 Defendants

In addition to the alleged copyright infringement offenses, Bungie and Ubisoft say the defendants are liable for trademark infringement due to the use of various marks on the Ring-1 website and elsewhere. They are also accused of 'false designation of origin' due to false or misleading descriptions that suggest a connection with the companies, and intentional interference with contractual relations by encouraging Destiny 2 and Rainbow Six Seige players to breach their licensing conditions.

The gaming companies conclude with claims that the Ring-1 defendants' business represents unfair competition that relies on violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act due to the accessing of official gaming servers without authorization.

As a result, Bungie and Ubisoft demand injunctions to restrain this behavior going forward. They want the Ring-1 website (and any copies) to be shut down, along with the cheating software itself.

They also demand actual or maximum statutory damages on the copyright counts, plus damages for trademark infringement and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. All proceeds obtained by the defendants through the sale of the cheating software should be placed in a trust, the companies say.

The Bungie and Ubisoft complaint can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Cox Settles Lawsuit Over 'Abusive' DMCA Notice Campaign
Ernesto Van der Sar, 28 Jul 08:13 AM

emailInternet provider Cox Communications has been on the sharp end of several piracy lawsuits in recent years.

In December 2015, a Virginia federal jury held Cox Communications responsible for pirating subscribers, ordering the company to pay music publisher BMG Rights Management $25 million in damages.

This damages figure was reduced in a settlement agreement but, soon after, the Internet provider was hit with a $1 billion jury verdict in a similar case, which is still under appeal.

Cox Updated Its DMCA Policy

These lawsuits were a wake-up call for Cox. To cope with the constant stream of DMCA notices, the company spent millions to improve its takedown systems and processes. In 2017, DMCA notices were separated from other abuse complaints. After that, rightsholders were directed to use a new email address which is also listed a registered agent at the Copyright Office.

Most copyright holders began sending their takedown notices to the new email address, but there was one outlier. Despite repeated alerts and warnings, BMG and its anti-piracy partner Rightscorp continued to use the old abuse@cox.net address.

This presented a problem for the ISP, which didn't want to risk ignoring these notices. That's understandable, as doing so could potentially open the door to millions of dollars in new damages claims. In fact, Cox suspected that this was BMG and Rightscorp's plan all along.

Cox Sues BMG and Rightscorp

In a lawsuit filed earlier this year, the Internet provider described Rightscorp's business plan as "corrupt" as it basically attempts to "extort" Internet subscribers into paying settlements. In a similar vein, the 'refusal' to use the new email address was seen as an attempt to get Cox in trouble again.

"It is obvious that Defendants' tactic is a thinly veiled attempt to exploit the procedures set forth by the [DMCA], with the goal of leveraging their improper notices to attempt to extract windfall judgments for BMG and Rightscorp's other prospective clients. Their approach is improper and unlawful, and should be stopped," Cox wrote.

A few months have passed without an official response in court from either BMG or Rightscorp. Behind the scenes, however, the legal teams of all parties were working hard to resolve the issue without much bloodshed.

Resolving Matters Out of Court

Two weeks ago, the three companies submitted a joint motion asking to extend the reply deadline. According to this filing, Cox, BMG, and Rightscorp were engaged in "active discussions" to resolve the matter outside court.

These discussions were fruitful as Cox decided to drop the lawsuit in its entirety this week.

cox dismiss

The motion to dismiss doesn't explain how the matter was resolved but we can assume that Rightscorp will use the correct email address going forward. Whether Cox was also compensated for the damages it claimed is not clear.

For Cox, it was probably most important to prevent any future copyright infringement claims from BMG. And with the appeal against the $1 billion verdict in another lawsuit still pending, the company has other priorities as well.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: