Tuesday, July 20, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Google Delisted Hundreds of Thousands of URLs to Comply with Russian 'VPN Law'
Ernesto Van der Sar, 20 Jul 09:32 PM

google russiaOver the past several years, Russia has introduced various anti-piracy laws and regulations that focus on the role of online intermediaries.

App stores are required to take strict action against 'pirate' apps, search engines must swiftly block pirate sites, and even VPN services and proxies can be banned.

Russia started cracking down on VPNs and anonymizers in 2017, banning services that allow users to access pirate sites. A year later the legislation was updated by requiring search engines to block the URLs of services that don't comply.

In recent years there hasn't been much news on how often search engines are urged to take action under this "VPN law." However, searches of the Lumen Database show that – at Google alone – dozens of requests come in every month, with some targeting thousands of URLs.

Unfortunately, the transparency stops there. Russian law doesn't allow Google to share what URLs are blocked. Instead of sharing what is removed, Google simply reports the number of URLs that are targeted.

"Google received a request from the Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) to remove over 340 URLs from Web Search in Russia," one of the many recent requests reads.

"This request came under Russian federal law 276-FZ 'On Amendments to the Federal Law 'On Information, Information Technologies and Data Security', commonly referred to as the 'VPN law'. We are unable to publish the full list of URLs due to Russian law," Google adds.

russia takedown

While details are scarce, we can expect pirate sites and proxies to be on the list of banned sites, as well as VPNs and anonymizers that are not on Russia's whitelist.

Just recently, Roskomnadzor added Opera VPN and VyprVPN to the list of threats. That would make them likely candidates to be removed from search results, at least in Russia.

When it comes to the takedown volume, there's another data source we can look at. Google separately reports takedown requests made by Governments and it has a dedicated page for Russia.

Just a few years ago, Russia asked Google to remove 'only' a few dozen links per month. However, after the "VPN law" was adopted, this number skyrocketed to tens of thousands of removed links per month.

During the latest reporting period – the six months ending December last year – nearly 200,000 items were removed. The removal reasons include "national security" and "defamation," but the largest category by far (162,000) is "other."

russia takedown

Based on the volume these "other" requests are sent by Roskomnadzor, which also covers the 'VPN law' takedowns. In an average week, these target thousands of links, so that fits the picture as well.

The question remains what URLs are blocked under this VPN law. When we used the Russian version of Google from a Russian IP-address, we had no trouble finding Pirate Bay proxies. The recently banned Opera VPN and VyprVPN still showed up in search results as well.

So while we can conclude that Russia's law required Google to remove hundreds of thousands of URLs to protect copyright holders, we wonder how effective it really is.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

UEFA Wins Two-Year Extension to Streaming Piracy Blocking Order
Andy Maxwell, 20 Jul 09:17 AM

Red CardWhen football fans choose to watch matches via pirated streams, top-tier football gets nervous. As a result, entities such as the Premier League have expended considerable resources attempting to shut down or otherwise undermine pirate streaming operations.

The key weapon of choice is server and IP address blocking. This aims to sever the link between pirate infrastructure and consumers but for that, football entities require cooperation from ISPs. That cooperation is facilitated by High Court injunctions issued in both Great Britain and Ireland that require ISPs to block access to pirate resources.

UEFA Follows The Premier League Model

After successes in the UK, the Premier League took similar action in Ireland. In 2019, the Commerical Court gave the Premier League the green light to block pirate servers until June 30, 2020. Then last year, just before that permission ran out, the Premier League obtained an extension for the 2020/21 season. It recently obtained a further extension to cover the 2021/22 season.

Following the model of the Premier League, UEFA has also sought permission from the courts to implement a blocking program. In 2017, UEFA obtained its first injunction in the UK, and in 2020 achieved similar success in Ireland.

The injunction, which covered Eir (Eircom), Sky Ireland Ltd, Sky Subscribers Services Ltd, Virgin Media Ireland Ltd and Vodafone Ireland Ltd, required the ISPs to block subscriber access to various IP addresses identified as being part of pirate IPTV infrastructure. However, that injunction only covered the 2020-21 season, meaning that UEFA needed to return to court for an extension.

UEFA Obtains Extension to High Court Injunction

The documents supporting the latest injunction are yet to be made public but if previous injunctions are any indicator, the High Court will not publish anything that details how the scheme works in practice. There are some basic details being distributed, however.

According to the Irish Times, the extended injunction targets the same set of ISPs as those contained in the original order. None of the ISPs contested the order, with Eir, Virgin and Vodafone presenting a neutral stance and Sky coming out in support.

The plan itself remains unchanged, in that it plans to give those using computers and piracy-configured set-top boxes a harder time when it comes to receiving illegal streams, by blocking them before and during live matches. These measures can be easily circumvented with the use of a VPN but UEFA clearly believes that blocking is worth both the time and effort.

Terms of Previous Injunction Remain Largely Unchanged

When the Premier League obtained its most recent injunction in Ireland, it was reported that it had been given permission to use enhanced measures to disrupt pirated streams.

The nature of those measures is not for public consumption but it was expected that UEFA would seek to follow suit with improvements to its application. However, according to UEFA lawyer Jonathan Newman SC, there is no substantive difference between this order and the previous orders, other than the injunction being sought for two seasons rather than one.

Justice David Barniville, who has handled these types of injunctions in the past, was happy with the evidence presented to the court and agreed it would be appropriate to extend the orders until the end of the 2022/23 season.

When the injunction is published by the court it will appear here

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: