Friday, July 23, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Watch Tower Can't Identify Defendant in 'Dubtown' Copyright Suit, Court Declines to Help
Andy Maxwell, 23 Jul 09:41 PM

Dubtown LegoThe Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, the supervising body and publisher for the Jehovah's Witness religious group, wants to put an end to the activities of a defendant known only as 'Kevin McFree'.

'McFree' (which is presumably not his real name) is the creator of the 'Dubtown' series of stop-motion Lego animations that take place in a fictitious Jehovah's Witness town.

In the summer of 2018, Watch Tower filed an application for a DMCA subpoena at a New York court, demanding that YouTube/Google should hand over his personal details based on allegations of copyright infringement.

The video was removed by YouTube but McFree also mounted a defense, challenging the subpoena. Arguments centered around the fair use provisions of the DMCA but three years later the matter remains unsettled. As reported in May, Watch Tower followed up with a full-blown copyright infringement complaint but that too has run into difficulties.

Who is McFree? Watch Tower Has No Idea

In a request for conference filed with the Court, Watch Tower says McFree "obtained purloined copies" of then-published videos and placed clips of those works in his video posted to YouTube. This amounts to copyright infringement and warrants a permanent injunction, Watch Tower says, but the road to that currently remains uncertain.

According to Watch Tower, it cannot ascertain the real identity of McFree.

"The true identity and physical address of Defendant are not presently known to Plaintiff. The Infringing Video and YouTube account associated therewith identify Defendant only by the pseudonym 'Kevin McFree' and do not provide any physical address," Watch Tower writes.

According to the religious group, it has made numerous attempts to discover McFree's personal details. Referencing the 2018 DMCA subpoena application to YouTube/Google that requested access to McFree's real name, address, telephone number and other personal information, Watch Tower notes that the process didn't lead anywhere useful.

Via pro bono counsel and without identifying himself beyond being a "British citizen residing in the United Kingdom", McFree sought to quash the DMCA subpoena. Two years later, Judge Román issued an order allowing him that opportunity. Since the motion to quash is still pending, YouTube is refusing to hand over any information.

New Corresponence Proving Fruitless

After filing the copyright infringement lawsuit in May, Watch Tower said it contacted the pro bono counsel representing 'McFree' in the DMCA subpoena action to see if they are representing the YouTuber in this matter too. Watch Tower also asked whether McFree was prepared to waive service.

Counsel advised that they are not involved in this matter so aren't in a position to waive service. McFree, for his part, refuses to disclose his identity, counsel added. This presents a problem for Watch Tower.

Google has already refused to hand over any information in the DMCA subpoena matter pending the motion to quash, so the religious group believes it would be futile to make a similar request in this matter. Furthermore, it appears the Clerk of the Court will not issue a summons in the name of Kevin McFree (or John Doe) and will only issue one once the defendant's real name is known.

"Plaintiff believes it has strong grounds to request the Court allow service on Defendant via email and would like to file a motion therefor. However, even if the Court grants a motion to allow service via email, because the Clerk will not issue a summons in the name of John Doe or in the fictitious name 'Kevin McFree,' Plaintiff will have no summons to serve," Watch Tower informs the Court.

Watch Tower Seeks Advice on How to Proceed, Court Declines

In its request, Watch Tower seeks a conference to determine "the best way for the case to proceed". Unfortunately, Judge Cathy Seibel doesn't believe it's her place to issue advice and has denied the request.

"The Court is not clear on what good a conference would do. If Plaintiff has a proposal for moving the case forward, it can put it in writing," Judge Seibel writes.

"The Court is not inclined to give advice on that subject, nor does it have any particular ideas other than awaiting the decision from Judge Roman."

After more than three years, that decision is still pending. These matters usually take just a few days to conclude.

Watch Tower's (denied) request for conference can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

MPA Adds New Pirate Streaming Sites to UK Blocklist
Ernesto Van der Sar, 23 Jul 11:39 AM

ukThe list of websites that are blocked in the UK for facilitating copyright infringement is growing longer and longer.

In a new ruling issued this month, the High Court ordered the major ISPs, including Sky, BT, TalkTalk, and Virgin, to block access to over a dozen 'pirate' streaming sites.

UK Blocklist Expands

The new blocking request was issued following a complaint from the Motion Picture Association Europe (MPA), which acts on behalf of Netflix and several major Hollywood movie studios.

Among the new sites are the popular streaming portals Myflixer.to, Soap2day.to, Lookmovie.io and Moviesjoy.to.

With more than 60 million website visits per month, Soap2day.to is by far the largest target on the list. However, most of the site's visitors come from the United States, not the UK.

soap2day

A public copy of the injunction isn't available yet but an MPA Europe spokesperson confirmed that it's the requesting party. The High Court issued the injunction on July 1st and ISPs were required to block the sites two weeks later.

19 Streaming Sites

The full list of blocked sites includes 19 domain names, but since it's a dynamic blocking order, copies and proxies of these sites can also be blocked at the request of the MPA.

Commenting on the injunction, the MPA informs TorrentFreak that it continues to use "no-fault injunctive relief' to make it harder for the UK public to access pirate sites. Thus far, it's happy with the results.

"No-fault injunctive relief is an effective way of curbing the spread of online piracy and supporting jobs and growth in the audiovisual sector," an MPA spokesperson tells us.

Malware and other Threats

Netflix and the major Hollywood studios obviously have a financial interest. However, the MPA stresses that the blocking measures also help to keep the public safe, mentioning potential malware and identity theft threats.

"Piracy harms everyone involved in the creative process – from writers, directors, and producers to cast and crew. It also harms consumers by exposing families to malware, identity theft and fraud.

"We plan to continue working with authorities across the region to implement these and other appropriate legal remedies in support of a safer and healthier online environment," the MPA tells us.

Further Expansions?

The MPA is happy with the new blocking injunction and the organization hopes that a similar measure will be available in the US in the future. At the moment, US law already allows courts to issue blocking orders, but "no fault" injunctions, where ISPs are not held liable, are not available.

In the UK, obtaining new blocking orders appears to be little more than a formality at this point. Over the years, hundreds of sites have been blocked, and the number of blocked domains names, which also includes proxies, likely runs in the thousands.

The full list of domain names covered by the latest blocking order are as follows: 1movies.best, azm.to, bflix.to, couchtuners.co, couchtuner.fashion, couchtuner.guru, couchtuner.stream, fmovie.sc, lookmovie.io, moviesjoy.to, myflixer.to, series9.ac, soap2day.to, vidcloud9.com, vumoo.to, watchmovie.movie, watchsomuch.tv, yesmovies.net, and yify-movies.net.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: