Friday, May 7, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Jetflicks & iStreamitAll: U.S. Seeks 57 Months Prison For Pirate Site Operator
Andy Maxwell, 07 May 10:02 PM

In August 2019, eight men were indicted by a grand jury for conspiring to violate criminal copyright law by running two of the largest pirate streaming services in the United States.

One of those men, Darryl Julius Polo (aka djppimp), pleaded guilty to charges of copyright infringement and money laundering back in December 2019. The big question that remains is how long the Las Vegas resident will spend behind bars.

Background – Involvement in Jetflicks and iStreamitAll

According to the US Government, Polo helped build and run Jetflicks and iStreamitAll, a pair of subscription-based pirate services headquartered in Las Vegas. Polo was the direct owner of iStreamitAll (ISIA), which reportedly made available more than 118,479 television works and 10,980 movies – at the time more content offered by Netflix, Hulu or Amazon Prime.

Before his time at ISIA, Polo worked as a programmer at Jetflicks, another Las Vegas-based subscription service that offered around 183,285 TV episodes to customers.

Using automated scripts that ran around the clock, Polo is said to have obtained content from other unlicensed platforms including The Pirate Bay, RARBG, TorrentDay, NZBplanet, NZBgeek, and NZB Finder. That content was then made available to subscribers for streaming and downloading and the Government claims that the damage caused was significant.

"[T]he government now believes that the total estimated infringement amount for ISIA is over $40 million and the infringement amount for the two periods that the defendant worked at Jetflicks is an estimated $8 million, for a total of $48 million," its sentencing recommendation reads.

In addition to ISIA, Polo is said to have operated several other piracy services including SmackDownOnYou, BoxBusters.TV, Jailbreakingtheipad, and MixtapeUG. Overall, this generated significant revenue, with Polo himself admitting that between December 2016 and August 2019, he processed more than $1.1m through just one of many payment processors, most of it in relation to ISIA.

US Government Calls For A Harsh Sentence

According to the US, Polo is an individual who is "deeply embedded" in the piracy scene having previously been sued by DISH Network, Echostar and Nagrastar for multiple violations of the DMCA and Communications Act. In that matter the court awarded the plaintiffs a $250,000 judgment but instead of stopping his offending, Polo moved onto other piracy endeavors.

Furthermore, the US notes that instead of immediately shutting ISIA down after the FBI raided him in November 2017, he continued operating the service. Indeed, Polo reportedly carried on even after being indicted in August 2019 and only stopped when two domains were seized in September that year.

Given this background, including that Polo engaged in money laundering in addition to copyright offenses, the US Government demands a particularly lengthy sentence of 57 months in prison to send a message to others who might consider Internet piracy an easy way to make money. Of course, Polo sees things differently.

Polo: Lessons Learned, No Intention To Reoffend

In calling for a lower sentence, Polo's counsel submits that his client is a "fundamentally good and generous character" while also highlighting a less than favorable upbringing coupled with financial instability within his early family. Counsel also draws attention to the fact that Polo has outstanding warrants stemming from an assault which he eventually intends to address.

Significant parts of Polo's sentencing recommendation are redacted but the programmer does concede that he knew that running a pirate streaming service is illegal. However, he counters that he rationalized that by telling himself he wasn't hurting anyone and has since changed his mind.

"I have learned about the impact my crime has on the whole industry and I understand why the prosecution takes it seriously. To say this has been a wake-up call is an understatement," he says.

Polo's call for a more lenient sentence is backed up by letters of support from family and friends, many of whom advise the court that Polo regrets his crimes and has no intention of repeating them. What weight the court will give these letters remains to be seen but as far as Polo is concerned he does deserve to be punished, just not at the scale the Government is proposing.

Sentencing Disparity Should Be Avoided

In addition to various points of law, Polo's counsel says that sentencing disparities should be avoided. Attention is drawn to two cases prosecuted in the same division involving NinjaVideo and Megaupload, noting that the main defendant in the former was sentenced to 22 months, well below the guideline range of 46 to 57 months.

In the Megaupload case, defendant Andrus Nomm was extradited from New Zealand and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit copyright infringement. Despite his involvement in Megaupload, which is said to have caused upwards of $500m in damages to copyright holders, Nomm was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison.

Polo isn't requesting a comparable sentence but submits that in both cases, judges have imposed below-guidelines sentences in similar copyright infringement cases.

Polo Submits That a 36-Month Sentence is Appropriate

"A sentence of 36 months would be the longest sentence Mr. Polo will have served," his counsel informs the court.

"This extended period of time away from his family, friends, and community would send a clear signal that copyright infringement and money laundering are serious offenses punishable with prison. A 36-month sentence would be a more than adequate deterrent; while Mr. Polo is committed to leading a lawful life after his release."

Polo has reportedly expressed an interest in using his skills to combat copyright infringement online and believes that a three-year sentence would serve as a warning to others who may not necessarily be aware that copyright infringement can carry significant prison sentences.

The sentencing letters of the US Government and Polo can be found here and here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Github Restores Reverse-Engineered GTA Code Following DMCA Counter Notice
Ernesto Van der Sar, 07 May 10:01 AM

gtaIn February, a group of developers released a project that had many passionate GTA fans excited.

After years of work, they published "Re3" and "reVC," two fully reverse-engineered releases of the GTA III and Vice City games, which were originally released two decades ago.

The reverse-engineered code opens the door to many tweaks and modifications that make the old games much more playable on modern computers. Importantly, however, an official copy of the games was still required for the code to work properly since game assets are not included.

Take-Two Takes Down Reverse-Engineered GTA Code

GTA fans welcomed the releases with open arms but the same can't be said for Take-Two Interactive. A few days after "Re3" and "reVC" were posted on GitHub, the game publisher took them offline, claiming copyright infringement.

"The content in the links below consists of copyrighted materials owned by Take-Two. The use of our copyrighted content in these links are unauthorized and it should be removed immediately," Take-Two Interactive wrote.

When the news first broke, project leader "aap" said that the team was considering possible options to restore the code. That is not without risk. Under US law, reverse-engineering can be seen as fair use, but this area is a bit of a minefield that could open the door to an expensive legal battle.

The DMCA takedown notice didn't just target the official GitHub repository. There were more than 200 forks that were pulled offline too. One of these forks was created by a New Zealand-based developer named Theo, who, unlike the main developers, decided to take a stand.

Fork Owner Sends Counter-Notice

Last month, Theo submitted a counter-notice, arguing that his fork was taken down without a proper reason. "This should not have happened," he informed GitHub.

re3 counter

Speaking with TorrentFreak, the developer says that the reverse-engineered code is not completely identical to Take-Two's original. Since it's not copied verbatim, he believes that the game publisher can't claim it as theirs.

"It would appear that the code in the re3 repo is reverse engineered, not a straight decompilation. I believe Take-Two's claim to be wholly incorrect if this is the case, since the code may be functionally identical, but not exactly identical, they hold no claim to the code.

"I do not agree with how Take-Two handles events like this," Theo adds, referencing an earlier debacle when Take-Two targeted the OpenIV modding tool. "Taking down code that does not belong to them is abhorrent."

Github Restores Forked Repository

While this may seem like a David vs. Goliath battle, the developer's counter-notice was successful. After two weeks, GitHub restored the fork, which is now accessible to the public again.

This doesn't mean that GitHub has taken sides. The DMCA rules simply dictate that disputed content has to be restored between 10 and 14 business days, unless the rightsholder takes legal action.

Theo tells us that he hasn't heard from Take-Two in response to his takedown notice. While he's aware of the legal risk that he faces, the developer doesn't expect the game publisher to pursue this any further. This would mean that the reverse-engineered code remains online.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: