Friday, May 21, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Facebook and Instagram Reveal How Much 'Pirated' Content is Removed Proactively
Ernesto Van der Sar, 21 May 10:26 PM

instagram facebookSimilar to other social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram have to battle a constant stream of unauthorized copyright material.

To facilitate this process, parent company Facebook has rolled out several anti-piracy initiatives in recent years.

Automated Piracy Takedowns

Both Facebook and Instagram use a "Rights Manager" tool that automatically detects infringing material and allows owners to take down or monetize this content. In addition, Facebook also uses the third-party service Audible Magic to spot and remove pirated music tracks.

With these proactive tools, the social media giants hope to help copyright holders protect their rights. At the same time, it also keeps the takedown notice volume low, which saves resources.

Thus far not much information has been made available to show the scope of these proactive removal tools. This is also true for other platforms, including YouTube's Content-ID system, which we highlighted in an article last week.

In Facebook's latest transparency report this changes. For the first time, the company shares detailed data on its provocative takedown measures, that take place without intervention from copyright holders.

Facebook Reveals Proactive Takedown Stats

The reported data cover the second half of 2020 and Facebook writes that, in the period, "the vast majority" of potential copyright-infringing content was removed proactively. This amounts to millions of automated removals.

"On Facebook, 77.9% of all copyright-related removals were done proactively, accounting for 9,822,070 pieces of content. On Instagram, 59% of all copyright-related removals were done proactively, accounting for 2,170,529 pieces of content," the company writes.

These numbers include a variety of items, including posts, photos, videos, and advertisements. On Facebook, pages, groups, and events are counted as well.

Although there are currently more proactive takedowns on Facebook – a little over 1.5 million per month – Instagram is starting to catch up. In July 2020 there were 255,000 proactive removals, which had increased to 447,000 in December the same year.

insta

Although most pirated content is removed automatically by Facebook and Instagram, both companies still receive plenty of regular takedown requests from rightsholders.

Traditional Takedown Notices

During the second half of 2020, Facebook removed 2.8 million pieces of pirated content. Instagram, for its part, took down 1.5 million copyright infringing items. For both platforms, this is an increase compared to the first half of the year.

Facebook realizes that it plays an important role in combating piracy and that robust and proactive enforcement systems will help to guarantee the best results.

Improving Automated Systems

In recent years the company has made several improvements to its anti-piracy systems. These can detect copyrighted media but are also able to spot links to pirate sites and advertisements for pirate streaming devices.

"To better detect and remove potential counterfeiting and piracy, we use a combination of machine learning, suspicious signals such as prior IP violations and keywords commonly associated with infringement, as well as direct insights from rights holders, among other things," Facebook notes.

"Similarly, we've also taken steps to proactively stop the spread of links dedicated to copyright infringement and to remove content related to devices that facilitate illicit streaming of copyrighted material".

More information on Facebook's updated transparency report, which includes all the data referenced above, is available on the official website.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Njalla Takes 'Pirate' Site Domains Offline Following Legal Pressure
Ernesto Van der Sar, 21 May 09:46 AM

njallaFour years ago Pirate Bay founder Peter Sunde helped to launch Njalla, a privacy-oriented domain registration startup.

The company offers a proxy for domain name registrars who don't want their personal details listed in Whois records. As such, it's effectively operating as a privacy shield.

"Njalla is needed because we're going the wrong way in society regarding people's right to be anonymous. With social media pressuring us to be less anonymous and services being centralized, we need alternatives," Sunde told us at the time.

This approach has attracted thousands of customers who, for various reasons, choose to hide their identities. While these website operators are happy, copyright holders have criticized Njalla for protecting pirate sites.

Copyright Holders are Not Happy

Last fall the RIAA and MPAA reported the company to the US Trade Representative, characterizing it as a notorious market that aids pirate sites.

While Njalla disagrees with this characterization, the company is known for digging its heels in the sand when it comes to legal pressure. Njalla complies with 'appropriate' court orders but it has also brushed off several legal complaints and requests, even from the US Government. Recently, however, the pressure became too large for Njalla to ignore.

'Pirate' Domains Go Offline

Over the past week, TorrentFreak noticed that several domain names registered by Njalla had become unavailable. This includes 1337x.is, Flixtor.is, Getpopcorntime.is, and stream2watch.is. The domains were updated to Njalla-owned nameservers and simply stopped resolving.

Ceci n'est pas

njalla dns

As it turns out, Njalla took this action in response to legal pressure from Iceland. Local copyright holders went after the .is domain registry (ISNIC), which received several abuse complaints and legal threats over Njalla-registered domains.

Take Action Or Lose All .is Domains

ISNIC then referred the matter to Njalla, urging the company to take action. If not, Iceland's registry would have the right to suspend Njalla's NIC-handle, and all domains connected to it.

A Njalla spokesperson informs TorrentFreak the company's hand was forced, and it saw no other option than to take the domains 'offline'. If Njalla had decided to ignore the request, all other .is domains under their control would have been at risk. That includes the domains of many other customers.

In an ideal situation, Njalla would fight this type of pressure tooth and nail but in this case, it would've done more harm than good.

Flixtor Understands

At the time of writing, all of the affected sites using .is domains have continued doing business under new domains. The operator of Flixtor told us that he is happy with how Njalla handled the matter, as there was clearly no other option.

The only downside for Flixtor is a significant loss of Google traffic. As a result, many users now end up at fake sites, filled with malware and phishing scams.

ISNIC Takes Stand Against Abuse

When we asked ISNIC about the matter, the registry said that it has seen a rise in abuse complaints, which it has to address properly and swiftly.

"An increasing number of what is called 'abusive domain registrations' is a real problem/concern for all serious domain name Registries. For us at ISNIC, the integrity of the .is domain as such plays an important role in our day-to-day work," ISNIC CEO Jens Pétur Jensen says.

ISNIC confirmed that if Njalla had not have taken action, it would've suspended the company's NIC-handle based on Article 12 of the .is domain rules. As mentioned earlier, that would mean that all Njalla-registered .is domains would've gone offline.

Pressure

After talking to various parties it is clear that a lot of legal pressure is being applied in the background. Copyright holders are pressuring ISNIC which in turn has been pressuring Njalla.

Ultimately, copyright holders are trying to find out the identities of those who operate these alleged pirate domains. However, since Njalla is the official owner according to Whois data, ISNIC can't help with this. Unless they change the rules to prohibit proxy registrations, perhaps.

According to Njalla, there is also an ongoing court case in Iceland to find out who the end-users of these domains are, so it's likely that we haven't heard the last of this.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: