Monday, March 29, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

TuneIn Infringed Labels' Copyrights, Court of Appeal Rules
Andy Maxwell, 29 Mar 06:10 PM

TuneInIn 2017, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group sued US-based radio aggregator TuneIn for infringing their copyrights in the UK.

TuneIn offers some premium streams to customers but describes itself as an "audio guide", primarily acting as an index of streams offered by third-parties. However, when TuneIn offered links to radio stations unlicensed for transmission in the UK, Warner and Sony believed that amounted to a breach of their rights, when those channels carried their copyrighted content.

High Court Finds TuneIn Liable for Copyright Infringement

In a 2019 judgment, Judge Birss highlighted the opposing positions of the parties, noting that the plaintiffs believed that ruling in favor of the defendants would "fatally undermine copyright" and TuneIn believing that if the Court ruled in favor of the labels, that would "break the Internet".

The case itself was extremely complex but could be broken down into a handful of basic arguments. The labels argued that in order to facilitate access to channels carrying their copyright works, TuneIn needed a license. TuneIn argued that since it did not store any music and merely provided hyperlinks to content made freely available on the Internet, it did not.

Judge Birss found TuneIn's argument unpersuasive, ruling that TuneIn's 'making available' amounted to a communication to the public. When that communication involved radio stations that are already licensed for use in the UK, TuneIn did not infringe the labels' rights. However, when TuneIn provided links to unlicensed stations containing the plaintiffs' works, that amounted to a breach of copyright.

Judge Birss ultimately declared TuneIn "liable for infringement by authorization and as a joint tortfeasor."

TuneIn Blocks Non-UK Stations, Files Appeal

In December 2019, the High Court allowed both parties to appeal the decision but pending the outcome, TuneIn took action which caused widespread disruption for its UK users.

Around September last year, TuneIn began geo-blocking thousands of stations broadcast from outside the UK, whether they infringed the labels' copyrights or not. Listeners found that using a VPN could restore service but for the majority who chose not to deploy this workaround, access to stations was severely limited.

"Due to a court ruling in the United Kingdom, we will be restricting international stations to prohibit their availability in the UK, with limited exceptions. We apologize for the inconvenience," the company wrote time and again on Twitter in response to complaints.

Court of Appeal Upholds High Court Ruling

In a judgment handed down Friday, Sir Geoffrey Vos (the second most senior judge in England and Wales), Lady Justice Rose, and Lord Justice Arnold found in favor of the labels by upholding the decision of the High Court. Given the depth and detail of the ruling, the judges could not be accused of being anything less than extremely thorough.

For example, the concept of "communication to the public" was examined in the light of 25 previous judgments handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Union over the past 14 years, including the GS Media, Filmspeler, Pirate Bay, and Tom Kabinet cases.

While the UK left the EU on January 31, 2020, and the transition period ended on December 31, 2020, the Court of Appeal noted that this does not affect "EU-derived domestic legislation" and that remains in effect until it is repealed or amended. The Court also highlighted that 24 of the 25 judgments involve "retained EU case law", meaning that they continue to form part of domestic law post-Brexit.

According to the judgment, TuneIn asked the Court to depart from the decisions of the CJEU on hyperlinking (in respect of an injunction valid from January 1, 2021) but that was rejected. Indeed, the numerous cases revisited, including those listed above, appear to have left TuneIn with little room to counter the judgment of the High Court, with the Court of Appeal rejecting the radio aggregator's criticism of the judge's findings.

Music Industry Welcomes The Decision

"Today's decision by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirms that TuneIn can only operate with appropriate licenses from right holders and therefore cannot continue to blatantly disregard its obligation to ensure that its service is lawful," a statement from IFPI reads.

"This is a big win for those investing in and creating music, reaffirming that services, like TuneIn, which generate revenues by providing online access to recorded music must be licensed to do so. Operating lawfully with an appropriate license is essential if music creators are to be fairly compensated."

The judgment can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

British MP's Old Domain Name Targeted in Million Dollar Piracy Lawsuit
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 Mar 12:20 PM

abs-cbn whittakerIn recent years, ABS-CBN, the largest media and entertainment company in the Philippines, has filed a series of lawsuits against pirate sites in the US.

These complaints typically list domain names as defendants, accusing their anonymous operators of copyright and trademark infringement, among other things.

ABS-CBN's Million Dollar Piracy Lawsuits

This legal campaign has been relatively successful to date. ABS-CBN has won millions of dollars in damages through default judgments and settlements. At the same time, domain name registrars and registries have been ordered by courts to take domains offline.

A few days ago, ABS-CBN filed a new lawsuit at a federal court in Florida, listing the operators of 21 allegedly infringing domain names as defendants.

"Defendants' entire Internet-based website businesses amount to nothing more than illegal operations established and operated in order to infringe the intellectual property rights of ABS-CBN and others," the complaint reads, stressing the importance of the domain names.

"The Subject Domain Names themselves are a significant part of the means by which Defendants further their infringing scheme and cause harm to ABS-CBN in that they cause and effect the infringement as described herein."

These allegations are in line with the other lawsuits ABS-CBN has filed in the past. Most of the domain names clearly give away the intention of the sites, such as hdfullmovies.net and fullpinoymovieshub.com. However, there is one that sticks out like a sore thumb.

Lawsuit Against British MP's Old Domain

Amidst the 'pirate' domain names, ABS-CBN also lists craigwhittakermp.co.uk. As the name suggests, this domain was previously used by British Member of Parliament (MP) Craig Whittaker.

In fact, the domain name was linked to the MPs official website up until 2017, which is still promoted in old tweets.

Whittaker tweet

Today, Whittaker has a new website and, as far as we know, the old domain name is no longer registered to or controlled by the MP. Instead, the craigwhittakermp.co.uk domain name now promotes Pinoy TV-shows and movies, which offends ABS-CBN.

whittaker new site

According to the media giant, craigwhittakermp.co.uk and the other domains are classic examples of pirate operations that willfully infringe ABS-CBN's copyrights and trademarks. Through the lawsuit, the company requests the court's help to stop this allegedly illegal activity.

'Craigwhittakermp.co.uk is a Classic Pirate Operation'

"Defendants' websites operating under the Subject Domain Names are classic examples of pirate operations, having no regard whatsoever for the rights of ABS-CBN and willfully infringing ABS-CBN's intellectual property," the company writes.

The complaint accuses the defendants of trademark and copyright infringement, among other things, requesting an injunction to halt this activity. Because defendants may not respond, ABS-CBN also requests an injunction ordering domain registries to take the domains offline.

Millions in Damages

In addition, the media giant asks the court to order all defendants to pay statutory damages. These can reach $2 million for each trademark infringement and an additional $150,000 for every copyrighted work shared without permission.

TorrentFreak reached out to Craig Whittaker for a comment but he didn't immediately respond.

There are no signs that Whittaker is in any way involved with his old domain name at the moment. The most likely scenario is that it expired at some point and that a third-party registered it afterward.

A copy of the complaint filed by ABS-CBN at the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Torrented Movies of The Week – 03/29/2021
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 Mar 12:30 AM

justice leagueThe data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have two new entries in the list. "Zack Snyder's Justice League" is the most downloaded title. The film can be watched online legally on HBO Max, but that's not available everywhere.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on March 29 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (1) Zack Snyder's Justice League 8.4 / trailer
2 (2) Raya and the Last Dragon 7.7 / trailer
3 (…) The Father 8.3 / trailer
4 (3) Coming 2 America 5.5 / trailer
5 (7) Tom and Jerry 5.4 / trailer
6 (6) Wonder Woman 1984 5.8 / trailer
7 (4) Cherry 6.5 / trailer
8 (5) Monster Hunter 5.3 / trailer
9 (8) Tenet 7.5 / trailer
10 (…) Doors trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: