Saturday, March 13, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

RIAA Takedown Notices Target Spotify, Deezer, and Apple Music
Ernesto Van der Sar, 13 Mar 10:06 PM

pirate bay crewDespite the increased availability of legal options, millions of people still stream, rip, or download MP3s from unofficial sources.

These sites are a thorn in the side of the RIAA, which combats this in part by sending DMCA notices.

Since some sites are not responsive to these takedown requests, the music industry group also involves third-party services such as Google. In recent years, the RIAA has reported nearly 100 million 'pirate' links to the popular search engine, with no end in sight.

RIAA Finds Infirnging Music on Legitimate Streaming Services

The majority of these reported URLs relate to torrent sites such as The Pirate Bay or file-hosting platforms like Dbree. However, this week we spotted a new trend. In addition to classic pirate sites, the RIAA is reporting links on legal streaming services as well.

This month alone, we have spotted multiple takedown notices on Lumen with URLs from Spotify, Deezer, Apple Music, Amazon and Tidal. According to the RIAA's notices, these services all host infringing content.

While we initially assumed that the RIAA's takedown filters were going haywire, there is more going on here.

For example, a few days ago the RIAA sent a takedown request to Google asking it to remove 50 Spotify URLs. According to the notice, these URLs infringe the copyright of Boza's track 'Hecha Pa' Mi.'

Remixes, Karaoke, and Copies?

When we look at the URLs, these indeed all link to 'Hecha Pa' Mi' tracks. Some are remixes or karaoke versions and others could have simply been copied. Interestingly, many of these are published by 'verified' artists, including some with more than a million monthly listeners.

hecha pa mi riaa takedown

We don't know whether these tracks are licensed, but the RIAA clearly doesn't think so. This is not the only problem as the RIAA has identified many other problematic Spotify links over the past month too.

Some of the links point to podcasts, which have since been removed. However, there are plenty of other 'infringing' tracks as well.

Deezer, Amazon, Tidal and Apple Music

This issue isn't limited to Spotify either. When we took a closer look at the RIAA's recent takedown notices sent to Google, hundreds of links to legitimate streaming services popped up.

There are notices linking to 'infringing' music on Deezer for example. And the same applies to Tidal, Apple Music, Amazon. The list goes on and on.

riaa notice streaming services

We asked the RIAA to explain what the precise problem is with these URLs, but the organization did not respond to our request for comment. That leaves us no other option than to speculate.

Since the reported links don't identify the official artists and tracks, we assume that there is indeed a copyright issue. Interestingly, however, Google has decided not to take any action, keeping these URLs in its search engine.

Why Ask Google to Take Action?

Google likely believes that these music streaming platforms are better equipped to determine whether the content is infringing. That would make sense indeed and it's strange that Google is being involved.

After all, the RIAA's members, which includes the major labels, should have pretty decent contacts at these streaming services. In fact, the labels are part owners of some of the streaming services. So why not reach out to these streaming platforms directly? Or perhaps the RIAA did both?

When we tried to load the "infringing" URLs on the streaming services, most now point to removed content. Others still show the problematic tracks but can no longer be played.

Whatever the RIAA's motivation, it's safe to say that copyright issues are not limited to pirate sites or platforms such as Google and Twitter. the RIAA is known to criticize the latter, but it looks like there are internal music industry challenges as well.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Men Ordered to Pay 7 MIllion Euros in Damages For Illegal Sports Streaming
Andy Maxwell, 13 Mar 11:59 AM

Streaming KeyThe Association Against Audiovisual Piracy (ALPA) has been active in France since 1985, targeting pirates of all kinds.

More recently, ALPA has worked with broadcasting companies, targeting people who run unlicensed apps and sites dedicated to live TV programming. That work included an investigation into the administrators of beinsport-streaming.com and up to 20 other related sites.

Complaint Filed By ALPA and Broadcasters

Together with rightsholders Canal+ Group, beIN Sports and RMC Sport, ALPA filed a joint complaint with the French authorities. An investigation was carried out by the Cybercrime Group of the Research Section of the National Gendarmerie of Rennes, and in June 2018, the alleged founders and administrators of the sites were arrested.

The rightsholders demanded severe punishment of up to 10 years in prison on a range of offenses including organized counterfeiting and aggravated money laundering.

Last year, the men found themselves at the Criminal Court of Renne, which found them guilty of reproducing, communicating and distributing copyrighted content via the 20-site 'beinsport-streaming' ring. The convicted men were sentenced to varying degrees, from a 5,000 euro suspended fine right up to a 12-month prison sentence (six months suspended) for the group's leader.

However, the thorny matter of damages remained.

Damages Hearing Held in January 2021

In common with similar trials in the past, the case against the beinsport-streaming defendants had a civil damages component. According to Canal+ Group, beIN Sports and RMC Sport, the financial and moral damage caused by the now-convicted men was massive – an estimated 91 million euros.

In the event, the Criminal Court of Renne stopped well short of this considerable sum but still found that the broadcasters were owed millions of euros. Canal+ Group's compensation was set at 2.75 million euros, beIN Sports' at 3.94 million, and RMC Sport's at more than 600,000.

All of the men are liable to pay towards the compensation but three of the defendants, aged between 43 and 57-years-old, were ordered to pay the lion's share – jointly and severally more than seven million euros. The two other men, aged 44 and 49, we ordered to contribute towards part of the sum.

The legal representative of one of the defendants, named in the media as Franck C, expressed satisfaction at the ruling, albeit in a limited way.

"It is a satisfactory decision in the sense that the damages are extremely reduced compared to the sums requested. However, we remain on extremely high sentences," Katell Plançon said, commenting on the decision.

According to French media, the men were a mixed bunch. At the earlier hearing, FrancK C. was said to have been "taken for a simpleton" by the rest of the group. One of the men, a computer scientist, said he had acted in the "spirit of Robin Hood", taking content from big companies and giving it to the poor. Group leader Olivier O., a family man with a passion for football, used to sell photocopying machines.

"Whether we are at one, two, three or four million euros, it does not change much because they are people who do not have the means to repay", noted lawyer Hélène Laudic-Baron, who added that it was not out of the question that an appeal may yet be filed.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: