Sunday, June 7, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Manga, Scanlation, and The Curious Case of The 'Pirating' Anti-Piracy Advocate
Ernesto Van der Sar, 07 Jun 10:27 PM

Manga comics and magazines are extremely popular. Early on this was mostly limited to Japan but nowadays it's a global phenomenon.

In part, this worldwide success was facilitated by piracy. We use this loaded term lightly here, particularly when it refers to scanlation.

How Scanlation 'Piracy' Popularized Manga

When some of the early torrent sites appeared in the first half of the 2000s, many had anime or manga sections. At the time, this category was alien to the majority of western users but that changed over time.

This shift was in part the result of the efforts from manga fans who translated scans of manga magazines from Japanese to English, so-called 'scanlation'. In the early days, official publishers weren't bothered by this practice. Some even saw it as flattering.

As the years passed the foreign manga audience kept growing and growing, with dedicated 'scanlation' sites and groups showing up. What started as a small niche pastime became a massive community of new consumers. Consumers who could be monetized.

We're not exaggerating when we say that the scanlation community created an entirely new industry – English manga – which created opportunities, challenges, drama, and conflict.

The Anti-Pirate Hyporite?

Last weekend an example of this drama was brought to the forefront on 4Chan, Discord, Twitter, and Reddit. The key player is On Takahashi, the owner of Irodori Comics, a company that works with Japanese authors to publish 'Doujinshi' manga overseas.

Irodori Comics basically turned scanlation into a business. It's not alone in doing so, but On Takahashi did more than that. He also began to take a harsh stance against pirates and organized sites.

For example, he went after manga aggregators that posted scanlations without permission. This includes MangaRock, which turned 'legal' late last year after increased pressure from copyright holders.

Irodori Comics

This is quite an extreme stance for the owner of a company that built its business on what started as a pirate activity. These and other observations were shared in a Reddit post, which also revealed another intriguing detail.

Working With a Pirate Group

Apparently, Takahashi has close ties to the Shinmai Maou scanlation group, which posts translations without permission from rightsholders. Three years ago, Takahashi also helped the group by doing some translation work himself.

After this was brought to the forefront, his name was swiftly purged from the group's site. By then, however, copies were already made and the whole episode blew up on Reddit.

Shinmai Maou translations

Needless to say, this is not a good look. The post speaks for itself and raised some great points. It fits particularly well in today's fast-pace social media-fueled discourse where siloed groups unite in pointing fingers at those who do wrong.

However, what intrigued us the most is why Takahashi would do this? It's clear that he doesn't like pirates, so why work with a group that can be defined as a pirate outlet, one that's even charging people for access to full content?

Takahashi responds

When the news broke Takahashi remained quiet. However, the Irodori Comics owner was willing to talk to us to provide some background and context. This doesn't change any of the facts really, but it shows how 'complicated' the relationship between piracy and manga can get.

Takashi doesn't dispute large parts of the Reddit thread and he does believe that piracy hurts sales. That said, he starts out by pointing out that the tweet – where he supposedly condemned the use of VPNs and stated that an unauthorized download equals a lost sale – was faked.

Takahashi also admits that he wrote a translation for the 'Shinmai Maou translation' group. He is good friends with the organizer and helped out when he needed assistance a few years ago. In fact, he is still in good contact today and hangs out in the Discord channel.

Even though the group doesn't have permission to publish these translations, Takahashi doesn't see it as a pirate group because it focuses on older works that have no official English translation. These are "fair game," he told us. Also, the group supports authors by sending any excess donations to the original authors.

"I still have a relationship with the group, because they aren't a piracy group. It is a private group that only had the fantranslation between the people who funded it and the people who supported the official Japanese release and the artist. None of these guys are free-riders," Takahashi says.

This is all a matter of perspective of course. Technically the group is pirating, whatever the intentions or motivations are. However, Takahashi draws a clear line between fan translations of manga that doesn't have an official translation and those that have. The first is not piracy but the latter is, according to him.

Scanlation ≠ Piracy

The Reddit and 4Chan crowd see things differently. They don't draw the same lines as Takahashi does, branding him a hypocrite. They view him as a pirating anti-pirate, one who helped to bring down MangaRock, which was a massively popular scanlation aggregator.

It appears that there are two rights and two wrongs here, depending on which position you take. If you see all unauthorized translations as piracy, the hypocrite label makes total sense. Especially for someone who has been a very vocal anti-pirate.

Mangarock

Takahashi, however, is fine with scanlations that don't have an official version, but he does condemn groups and aggregators that publish scanlations that are also available legally. That includes MangaRock.

"Some might accuse me of being a hypocrite, but aggregator websites like MangaRock are completely different in nature to a scanlation group, and should not be lumped into the same category. That's insulting to scanlators. The English manga industry's foundation was built from scanlation after all," Takahashi says.

"That's why I took my stance against aggregator sites like MangaRock, that took from scanlation group's labor of love and put it in their subscription system. But I'm not against scanlations of works that don't have an official English version."

The ultimate conclusion is that both sides are right. And both sides are wrong.

Pirate Roots

The positive historical links between piracy and the popularity of manga are undeniable. However, in recent years things have become more complicated as publishers and other companies work hard to get their piece of the legal pie.

With a legal translation business, Takahashi got his piece but with his strong anti-piracy stance, he clearly offended others in the scanlation community. This is a sensitive issue as some of the same people he now condemns helped to build everything up.

Just how thin the lines are is exemplified by the fact that Takahashi now sells content through Fakku, a massive publishing imperium that started out by posting scanlations without permission.

Ultimately, this article isn't about who's right or wrong. We merely want to provide some more context. Perhaps the real lesson is that 'extremes rarely work' and that piracy often plays a role in creating new industries. And that's not limited to manga, of course.

Spotify also has pirate roots, and so has the largest online adult entertainment company. Pirate radio helped to create commercial radio, and even Hollywood started out with a pirate mentality.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top Mistakes Made By BitTorrent Users That Lead to Lawsuits & DMCA Notices
Andy Maxwell, 07 Jun 01:27 PM

Once upon a time, most BitTorrent users could download whatever they liked with relative impunity.

Movies, TV shows, music, games and software could mostly be obtained trouble-free but more than 15 years on, the game has changed significantly. Copyright holders and their anti-piracy partners are highly-organized and Internet service providers in some countries, notably the United States, are keener than ever to forward complaints to lessen their own liability.

Yet despite the thousands of articles that have been written on the topic of DMCA notices, ISP account suspensions, and even lawsuits, BitTorrent users still hit the web every week to complain that even in the face of all of their efforts, they are now facing varying degrees of legal trouble. Here are the top reasons, misconceptions, and urban myths that lead to people getting into a fix.

Download and Sharing Copyrighted Content

Sherlock Holmes shouldn't be needed to highlight why people who download and share pirated content can get themselves into legal hot water. In most countries that care to enforce copyright, the duplication and distribution of pirated content is illegal and punishable under law, whether in civil or in extreme cases, criminal procedures.

Sharing any kind of copyrighted content without the protection offered by a VPN or similar tool, for example, always carries an element of risk. For instance, people think that by downloading older content, such as decades-old films or less popular material, they can completely avoid being tracked by copyright holders. That is not the case.

In summary, the only cast-iron guaranteed way to avoid being sent an infringement notice or potentially being subjected to a lawsuit is not to share any copyrighted content at all. Some people may argue that their country doesn't care about such matters and to those there is a simple response: Maybe today they don't.

Can People Avoid Getting a Notice By Not Seeding or Not Uploading?

In a word – NO. Most copyright holders and anti-piracy companies couldn't care less whether BitTorrent users downloaded or uploaded part of a film or all of it. There might be implications in a copyright lawsuit if someone was observed seeding a torrent for a very long time but simply being part of a sharing swarm is enough for anyone to get a copyright infringement notice and/or a 'strike' from their ISP in the United States.

Equally, there is a persistent belief among some that people who set their upload speed to zero won't get a copyright notice or even find themselves on the end of a lawsuit. That is completely false. While some are more thorough, there are plenty of companies that will detect a BitTorrent user's IP address in a swarm (this information is public) and then accuse them of copyright infringement just for being there.

This also applies to people who may have gotten halfway through downloading a movie, for example, and then backed out. Many notice senders and copyright trolls do not care how much people downloaded or whether they backed out or not.

Some people also claim that since they didn't upload anything the copyright holder has a weaker case but these are not matters that the ISP notification system cares about. Those targeted may also believe that they could stand up in court and argue that they didn't distribute anything but, at this point, the defense process will have already cost plenty of time and money.

In short and broadly speaking, if a case ends up in court any ordinary Joe who values their time and money has already lost. People do win cases but instances are few and far between.

But I Subscribe to a VPN and Still Got a Notice. Why?

Using a VPN is all well and good when the user understands how they work, sets them up properly, and remains cautious about their limitations. However, in some cases all of these conditions are overlooked, which can again lead to ISP notifications and even lawsuits.

All good VPN providers will supply accurate instructions on how to get their tools up and running but one of the most common blunders is to misunderstand the capabilities of the main products they supply. While those who obtain and correctly set up a good whole-system VPN should have few problems, there are plenty of cases reported online where people wrongly believed that using a browser-based VPN would protect their BitTorrent transfers.

While it is common for some BitTorrent clients/systems to have web interfaces these days, the transfers themselves do not take place through a browser. They use an entirely different process that must be protected in its own right or globally on the host system. In short, no browser plug-in will anonymize downloading and/or uploading with BitTorrent.

I had my VPN Set Up Correctly System-Wide and Still Got a Notice. Why?

Like anything on a computer, VPNs aren't completely fool-proof unless additional precautions are taken. For any number of reasons a VPN connection can temporarily fail, including but not limited to the underlying Internet connection itself dropping and causing a reconnection.

For this reason, some VPN providers provide a 'kill switch' function, which prevents Internet connectivity when a problem occurs. If this is not enabled, users can find their real IP addresses exposed to a BitTorrent swarm and people trying to monitor them.

Another basic failure is more simply prevented. Some people configure their torrent client to start when their machine boots up. If for any reason their VPN is not activated before this happens, their IP addresses will be exposed in public. While there are a number of possible workarounds, a simple option is to disable the torrent client's autostart feature and only launch the software once a VPN connection is established.

Finally, not all VPN providers are no-log services so by choosing the wrong supplier, anonymity can be undermined.

I Enabled the Encryption Option in My Torrent Client and Still Got a Notice, Why?

Most major torrent clients do indeed have an encryption option hidden away in their settings and there's no shortage of reports online from people who have still received a notice after enabling this option.

The reason is that this encryption is only aimed at hindering ISPs from identifying BitTorrent traffic so they have more difficulty slowing it down. Client encryption offers no protection whatsoever on the anonymity front and those using it will still have their IP addresses exposed.

Conclusion

There are many people out there who claim to have used torrents for years, downloaded and shared terabytes of data, yet have never received a complaint or been on the sharp end of a lawsuit. Just as many people drive around above the speed limit most days of their lives without getting a ticket, that is entirely possible.

However, in common with speeding drivers, those who take extra risks or don't exercise caution are putting themselves in danger of falling foul of those who would like to punish them. As a result, always staying below the limit or never sharing any copyrighted material online are the only guaranteed solutions for not getting a fine or, if people are lucky, getting off with a warning.

Everything else requires work, additional tools, and/or the acceptance of risk and the attached consequences.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: