Thursday, January 25, 2024

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

IPTV Blocking System Survives: "Crafty People Thwarted," Says Serie A CEO
Andy Maxwell, 25 Jan 09:22 AM

Piracyshield-logoTo a background of seemingly unstoppable corporate and political momentum, challenging the introduction of Italy's much-heralded pirate IPTV blocking system was always a long shot.

In April 2023, months before the legal foundations were finally set in stone, a trade group that represents the interests of small to medium-sized ISPs, sent a memorandum to the authorities detailing its concerns.

President of Assoprovider, Giovanni Zorzoni, said he feared the proposed blocking system would introduce a single susceptible 'point of failure' with the potential to undermine national infrastructure.

The 'Mega-Firewall' of Italy, as he described it, could also expose ISPs to liability and that would mean end users picking up the bill. When the proposals became law, Zorzoni raised the alarm once again on behalf of smaller ISPs, warning that 'Piracy Shield' implementation costs could reach 300,000 euros per year, per ISP.

Assoprovider's Legal Challenge

With Zorzoni's warnings of potential job losses in the sector falling on deaf ears, last October Assoprovider launched a legal challenge against the regulations underpinning the introduction of the Piracy Shield system and their implementation by telecoms regulator AGCOM.

The Regional Administrative Court for Lazio published its 47-page judgment this week. Assoprovider was always likely to face an uphill battle and those that came out in opposition ensured that was the case, and then some.

The ISP organization knew it had to take on AGCOM but then came the interventions; local anti-piracy group FAPAV backed by powerful international entertainment industries, top tier football league Serie A, and Serie B for good measure.

Court Rejects Challenge

In broad terms, the court found that the regulations were put in place for the protection of copyright and since that goal is in the public interest, the Piracy Shield system will indeed go ahead. Concerns that mistakes will inevitably get made as rightsholders scramble to block pirate platforms within 30 minutes, were dismissed.

The court said that the 30-minute deadline had been put in place for a reason; football matches and other sporting events are relatively short, so any violations of intellectual property rights must be tackled quickly to ensure the system is effective.

The fact that the Piracy Shield system was donated to AGCOM by Serie A, the football league likely to benefit most from the new anti-piracy regime, wasn't considered an issue either. Serie A's 'donation' of the platform will ultimately benefit everyone according to the league; the Court found no grounds to disagree on that matter or indeed any of the objections raised in Assoprovider's challenge.

Court "Demolished" The Appeal

Anti-piracy group FAPAV welcomed the Court's decision, describing it as "an important step for the protection of copyright and the fight against online piracy, especially for live content." FAPAV said the judgment reinforces the legitimacy of the anti-piracy system, which is "fully compatible" with the constitutional and European legislative frameworks.

"Assoprovider's appeal had no grounds as there are no real dangers for providers in carrying out the new procedure, furthermore the platform has been positively tested in the previous months," FAPAV added.

Luigi De Siervo, CEO of Serie A, said the judgment "demolishes Assoprovider's appeal" and shows that Serie A's donation of Piracy Shield was "perfectly legitimate and will act to the benefit of the entire system." Piracy Shield will block pirate streams within 30 minutes as planned, De Siervo said, despite this detour through the Court.

"We have also thwarted the latest attempt by the 'usual crafty people' to block the entry into action of the anti-piracy platform. We expect that, after months of waiting, the 'machine to machine' system will finally come into operation in February, which will allow pirate sites reported by rights holders to be quickly interrupted," the Serie A chief added.

The judgment of the Lazio court is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Reddit: IP Address Disclosure Puts User Anonymity At Risk
Ernesto Van der Sar, 24 Jan 09:57 PM

reddit logoEarly last year, a group of filmmakers obtained a subpoena, requesting Reddit to reveal the identities of users who commented on piracy-related topics.

The movie companies said they were not planning to go after these people in court but wanted to use their comments as evidence in an ongoing piracy lawsuit against Internet provider RCN.

Reddit wasn't willing to go along with the request. Instead, the company objected, arguing that handing over the requested information would violate their users' right to anonymous speech.

Reddit I, II and III

A California federal court eventually agreed with this defense, concluding that Redditors' First Amendment rights outweigh the interests of rightsholders. According to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, the filmmakers have other options to obtain this type of information, including through RCN itself.

A few weeks after this setback, the rightsholders filed another request, seeking similar information for use in their lawsuit against ISP Grande. This second attempt wasn't successful either, and Redditors' right to anonymous speech prevailed once again.

Attorney Kerry Culpepper, who represented different line-ups of filmmakers in these cases, wasn't prepared to give up on this route to evidence quite so easily. Earlier this month he was back in court with a similar, but tweaked, request. This time it relates to a lawsuit targeting Internet provider Frontier Communications.

IP addresses & Anonymity

In general terms, this case is comparable to the others. The film companies, Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures, want to use comments made by six Redditors to show that the ISP didn't take proper action against repeat infringers, or that 'lax' enforcement acted as a draw to potential pirates.

Reddit, again, refused to hand over information, arguing it would violate their users' right to anonymous speech. This prompted the filmmakers to return to court for a third time.

In their latest motion to compel, the rightsholders introduce a new angle. They are no longer looking for any names or email addresses, only the applicable IP address logs. This would allow the commenters to remain anonymous, they argue.

"Reddit asserts that the information Movants request is not permissible under the First Amendment. However, Movants' subpoena does not request anonymous users' identities. Rather, the subpoena is limited to requesting the Reddit users' IP address logs," they write.

Reddit Opposes in Court

In a response to the motion this week, Reddit counters that disclosing IP addresses would still violate users' rights to anonymous speech, adding that no court has ever ruled otherwise.

According to Reddit, users' IP addresses would be useless as evidence if they didn't identify the targets in any shape of form.

"First, and most obviously, Movants' subpoena exclusively seeks the IP addresses of the targeted Reddit users. Were IP addresses not identifying information, they would hold no evidentiary value to Movants whatsoever and the subpoena would be pointless."

reddit compel

Secondly, since Reddit doesn't require users to verify their identities, IP addresses are sensitive information. They can be used to obtain the targets' personal information, for example, by serving a subpoena on their Internet provider.

"Movants know, the process of unmasking a Reddit user turns on Reddit's disclosure of an IP address because Reddit does not require its users to provide their real names or addresses. For that reason, provision of an IP address is unmasking subject to First Amendment scrutiny.

"After learning an IP address, the Movants need only subpoena the ISP for the subscriber information associated with that IP address, and the ISP does not share Reddit's interest in protecting the anonymity of that user," Reddit adds.

Other Options Preferred

In their motion, the filmmakers haven't explained what value the IP addresses offer in addition to the anonymous comments that are already publicly available. According to Reddit, there are other and 'less invasive' options for the filmmakers to get what they want.

The film companies already have IP addresses of pirating Frontier subscribers, Reddit argues. These can be used to obtain the identities of account holders, so they can be questioned for evidence.

The rightsholders previously noted that Frontier is not willing to share the identities of users, but Reddit points out that this is an outdated stance from the ISP which has since changed.

"Here, Movants again admit that they already have 'pirating [IP] addresses'. And, as described above, Frontier has already indicated that it will provide Movants with identifying information for those IP addresses upon receipt of a subpoena," Reddit's opposition reads.

If allegedly pirating subscribers can be targeted directly, Reddit believes that putting the anonymity of its users at risk by exposing their IP addresses is unnecessary.

The filmmakers further argued that, unlike the ISPs' 'pirating IP addresses', the Reddit comments specifically serve as evidence that lack of enforcement against repeat infringers served as a draw to potential Frontier customers.

Once again, Reddit doesn't believe that disclosing the IP addresses of its users adds anything to the publicly available comments.

"[T]o the extent Movants are suggesting that the Reddit posts themselves are 'documented evidence,' Movants need not unmask the Reddit users to admit that documented evidence; Movants could lay the evidentiary foundation for, and authenticate, those posts themselves," Reddit writes.

The response from Reddit shows that once again, it will be for the court to decide whether the company has to hand over any information. That will happen after the matter is discussed at a hearing in a few weeks.

In addition to the main question, there's also a request pending from film companies Killing Link Distribution, Family of the Year Productions, and Laundry Films, who want to join the rightsholder's motion.

A copy of Reddit's opposition to the motion to compel, filed at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

beIN Sports' Football Piracy Blitz Adds Blocking to Domain Seizures
Andy Maxwell, 24 Jan 03:09 PM

beIN SportsPerhaps more than any other broadcaster, beIN Sports understands the potential for piracy to spin out of control.

When a diplomatic crisis between Qatar and other Arab countries led to Saudi Arabia blocking the beIN service in 2017, beoutQ – a full-blown piracy platform – stepped in as a comprehensive but illegal beIN replacement.

Over the next two years, the political fallout spread beyond the Middle East to the United States and European Union, leading to a World Trade Organization report and ultimately the closure of beoutQ's satellite service in August 2019.

Protecting the Africa Cup of Nations

Over four years later, beIN is still battling commercial-scale piracy. After obtaining exclusive broadcasting rights to Africa's most prestigious football tournament, the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), tackling piracy of the month-long event would necessarily become a key component of the company's overall strategy.

According to a report published by L'Informé this week (paywall), beIN's plan to curtail piracy of AFCON in France had been in the planning for some time.

Early 2022, the broadcaster became the first rightsholder to take action under Article L. 333-10 of the Sports Code, legislation introduced by the French government that provided accelerated access to anti-piracy measures such as site blocking.

According to L'Informé, on December 15 under the same system, beIN served a writ of summons on the main ISPs in France – Bouygues Télécom, Free, Orange, Outremer-Télécom, Société Réunionnaise du radiotéléphone (SFR), and SFR Fibre. On January 9, 2024, the Paris judicial court upheld beIN's application for blocking measures against 56 illegal streaming sites, to be implemented by the ISPs, to protect the AFCON tournament.

Pirate Sites Were Likely to Air AFCON Matches

To support the blocking application, beIN presented evidence showing that the pirate sites had systematically infringed its rights in the past.

Last November, one of the domains on the list – Ishunter.net – was illegally broadcasting matches from Germany's Bundesliga, Spain's La Liga, and Serie A matches from Italy to which beIN holds French broadcasting rights. At the time of writing, the domain returns a parking page rather than live football streams; as a result, takedown notices filed with Google are mostly attempting to take down content that doesn't exist, at least at the specific URLs listed.

Three other domains – ipcover.tv, maxsmart.pro and pythonlived.com – reportedly service pirate IPTV apps. Maxsmart.pro is the only domain obviously functional today, serving pearls of wisdom from the likes of Mahatma Gandhi rather than football matches, however.

Current Status of Domains

While ISP blocking measures can be evaded when injunctions are static (i.e. targets are fixed) the order obtained by beIN Sports is dynamic. This means that if the listed pirate sites use subdomains, entirely new ones, or any other measures, if beIN is confident the new locations relate to the old ones, blocking can go ahead.

Speaking with L'Informé, Caroline Guenneteau, Deputy General Secretary of beIN Media Group and Legal Director of beIN Sports France, said that 70 domains have already been blocked to protect this competition alone

"It's very important to be proactive at the start of the competition, when there are a maximum number of illicit streams," Guenneteau added.

Even though the blocking measures shouldn't affect those who visit the sites from outside France, tests carried out by TorrentFreak on the specific domains as they appear in the order (full list below) suggest some have made changes.

Around 25 are still operational from their previous locations while a small number redirect to their own subdomains or new/alternative domains. Others display 'domain parking' style pages while others prefer to offer up their own blend of humor instead.

pirate travel

One of the pirate domains currently suggests involvement with the insurance and travel business, another claims to be a fitness promotion platform. At least two redirect to new domains before asking for money to keep things going.

bein-money

A handful of others show Cloudflare error messages but as these above show, perhaps not all messages appearing on these domains are authentic.

In any event, finding alternatives through search engines may be more difficult than it was before. The order obtained by beIN allows it to serve court orders on companies such as Google, requiring the domains to be delisted from search results.

The domains listed in an order published on the Lumen Database are broadly similar to those present in the original order, but additional notices will likely be sent as new domains are reported.

The blocking action in France complements the action we reported here on Monday. Dozens of domains linked to sites previously showing live football matches, to which beIN owns the rights, began redirecting to the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment.

Among those domains were 7kora.mpokora-online.com and 7koora.mpokora-online.com, both of which currently show the ACE domain seizure banner.

Since they're also on beIN's ISP blocking list, visitors to those domains in France shouldn't be able to access the sites, so in theory will be spared the bad news.

The domains/URLs to be blocked by ISPs in France:

Kooora4lives.net
Ishunter.net
Sportp2P.com
Rojadirect1.pro
Aflam4you.org
Kora-star.online
Yallalive.id
360kora.net
Live-koora.live
Yalla-live-tv.io
Sporttv123.xyz
Wholewellnesswhirl.live
Sporttvls.com
Top.crackstreamfree.com
Top2.crackstreamfree.com
Top3.crackstreamfree.com
Top4.crackstreamfree.com
Top6.crackstreamfree.com
Stad.livehd7s.live
V3.sportonline.so
Shoot.yallashoote.com
W1.yalla-shoot-tv.io
Futbolandres.xyz
360kora.tvem.net
Aleexsportz.online
Yalla-live.org
Sa.yalla-live.com
Lkooora.live
Livehd72.com
Kora-yallashoot.com
Kora.live-kooora.io
Goalarab.org
Go.livehd72.livve
Ar.new-yallashoot.com
10koora.livekooora.online
Totalsportek.pro
Kooralivs.com
7kora.mpokora-online.com
7koora.mpokora-online.com
Tv.yalla-shoot2day.com
Tv.yacine-tv.app
Spie.livehd7.io
Dotsport1.com
Yala-shoot.live
Streams.lc
Beinmatch1.com
Beinmatch.motorcycles
365kora.com
Ma.360kora-live.com
Kora.live-koora.net
Gogolion.xyz
Ipcover.tv
Maxsmart.pro
Megahdtv.xyz
Pythonlived.com
Smart-prott.xyz

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

270x90-blue

Are you looking for a VPN service? TorrentFreak sponsor NordVPN has some excellent offers.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: