Tuesday, August 1, 2023

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Putin Outlaws Anonymity: Identity Verification For Online Services, VPN Bypass Advice a Crime
Andy Maxwell, 01 Aug 10:52 AM

SpySince its invasion of Ukraine in February, Russian Members of Parliament and lawmakers have taken turns to see who can come up with the most aggressive anti-Western legislative proposals.

Suitably dressed-up in anti-American, anti-European rhetoric, plans to let everyone in Russia pirate Western content came early. While obvious to everyone else right from the beginning, the proposals were fundamentally flawed.

If Russians were allowed to gorge on free, high-quality foreign content, incentives to pay for Russian content would find themselves all but eliminated. Not only do local creators rely on that revenue for food and clothing, it also helps to prevent the collapse of Russia's own entertainment sector.

Other plans, involving everything from state licensing of pirate platforms to the unblocking of previously blocked pirate sites, would've been comical had it not been for the death and destruction wreaked in Ukraine. And then there were those crazy stories about Russia's 'Sovereign RuNet' initiative, which would see Russia's corner of the internet placed behind a giant firewall, where it would thrive within the confines of a utopian closed ecosystem completely isolated from the rest of the world.

Draconian Plans Aren't Speculative – They're Becoming Law

While Russia hasn't been able to cut itself off from civilization just yet, it can make people, companies, and investors leave of their own free will. By rendering its corner of the internet a hostile environment where free speech is a thing of the past, it raises the prospect of internet entrepreneurs walking in lockstep with the government, choosing another line of business, or leaving Russia altogether.

Citizens, meanwhile, will need identification to enjoy whatever remains.

Dated July 31, 2023, and approved by President Putin himself, Federal Law No. 406-FZ (On Amendments to the Federal Law 'On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection' and the Federal Law "On Communications") reads like a dystopian nightmare laying the foundations for worse to come.

russia-law

Registering on Russian internet platforms using foreign email systems such as Gmail or Apple will soon be prohibited. That's just a prelude to further restrictions coming into force in the weeks before Christmas 2023.

No Anonymity, No Privacy

Starting December, Russian online platforms will be required by law to verify the identities of new users before providing access to services. That won't be a simple case of sending a confirmation link to a Russian-operated email account either.

Platforms will only be authorized to provide services to users who are able to prove exactly who they are through the use of government-approved verification mechanisms.

For instance, users who already have a mobile phone subscriber number, obtained through another official process established by the government, will be able to enter into an identification agreement with the operator of an online service/website. Once cleared, the user will be able to use the service, safe in the knowledge that whatever they say on the platform is traceable to their home address.

Another option for site owners is to verify users through a federal platform known as the Unified System of Identification and Authentication. A law passed in December 2022 relates to the use of the Unified System and the identification and authentication of citizens' identities using biometric data.

The final option is to use an authorization system operated by a third-party platform already in compliance with government rules and regulations. Those rules go beyond the technical capabilities of the service; the platform must be owned by a Russian citizen who does not have citizenship of any other country, and is not controlled by anyone who fails to meet the same standards.

VPNs Still Not Outlawed But Talk of Circumvention is a Crime

Despite the draconian nature of the above, Russia still isn't imposing an outright ban on VPN providers and similar services, but does appear to be using familiar tactics.

After imposing obligations most mainstream providers found intolerable, including registration with the state, only compliant VPN companies remain in Russia today. No evidence has been produced to show they have been compromised but at this point, believing otherwise could amount to playing Russian Roulette with the authorities.

Instead, posting information online that amounts to advice on how to use VPNs, Tor, and similar tools, for circumvention purposes, will be considered a crime. On top, regular hosting providers will be subjected to state registration and new obligations along similar lines to those imposed on VPN providers.

Hosting Companies Must Obtain State Approval

The new legal amendments effectively regulate the business of "providing computing power" for the purposes of the "placement of information" on a system "permanently connected to the internet."

The obligations placed upon operating companies by the state are numerous and the new amendments make no attempt to hide that compliance with the state on security matters is mandatory. Authorized 'state bodies' carrying out investigative activities or those related to the security of Russia may require use of "computing power" and hosting companies will be expected to prevent any disclosure of those activities.

As mentioned earlier, before hosting companies are permitted to provide services to users, they will be required to positively identify potential customers using government-approved mechanisms. However, that can only take place when hosting companies themselves receive government permission to conduct business. That appears to involve the shouldering of considerable liability for whatever appears on their platforms.

Registration and Compliance

It's envisioned that the government will appoint an entity to form and maintain a register of hosting companies. Once on the register and with permission to operate (deadline February 1, 2024), hosting companies and online services will be provided with a list of activities, content types, and certain behaviors prohibited by the state.

Platform operators will be required to implement measures to "eliminate the identified violations" and then report the outcome to the authorities. Failure to do so will mean exclusion from the register and with that, the ability to conduct business in Russia.

To even qualify for potential placement on the register, hosting companies must be Russian legal entities, under the control of a Russian citizen who doesn't have citizenship in another country. By September 2024, state entities may only use "computing power" available from companies with a listing on the register while the use of "information systems" and software owned by foreign legal entities or citizens, will be prohibited.

Similar Russian ownership rules will also apply to news aggregator platforms, which will operate under the ultimate control of the Russian government, with known implications for the freedom of the press.

Federal Law No. 406-FZ is available here (pdf)

rus-law2

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Reddit Defeats Filmmakers' Second Attempt at Unmasking Anonymous Users
Ernesto Van der Sar, 31 Jul 09:41 PM

redditMillions of people regularly pirate movies and music without getting into trouble. In fact, some pirates even discuss their habits openly on the Internet, on platforms such as Reddit, for example.

Admissions of anonymous Redditors typically go unnoticed by copyright holders but even when observed, it's rare for companies to take matters further or ask any questions. A group of independent filmmakers in the United States recently attempted to buck that trend.

The film companies and their attorney Kerry Culpepper are not planning to take any Reddit users to court. However, they do want to reach out to them to ask some questions about their Internet providers, which are being targeted in various lawsuits.

Filmmakers vs. Anonymous Redditors

Earlier this year, the filmmakers turned to Reddit after they found public comments that may help their case. As part of the RCN lawsuit, they identified several potentially relevant threads and requested a DMCA subpoena, hoping to compel Reddit to identify the anonymous users.

The Redditors in question discussed issues such as RCN's handling of copyright infringement emails. The filmmakers could use this information to their advantage, but only if they obtained the identities of the commenters first.

Reddit was unhappy with the subpoena and only handed over the details of one user whose comment mentioned RCN. Reddit refused to hand over the details of users who posted 'less relevant' comments, arguing that their First Amendment right to anonymous speech outweighs the interests of rightsholders.

The court eventually agreed with this defense, concluding that Redditors' First Amendment right to anonymous speech should be protected. According to U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, the filmmakers have other options to obtain this type of information, including through RCN itself.

Another ISP, Another Reddit Subpoena

Judge Beeler's ruling was a setback for the filmmakers but a few weeks ago they returned to court with a similar request. Targeting a new group of Redditors, this time the request was related to the filmmakers' piracy liability lawsuit against Internet provider Grande.

The Reddit users all commented in threads with information that could be relevant to the Grande lawsuit, with many directly referring to piracy activity.

robo

The filmmakers argue that the Redditors can be used as witnesses to show that Grande failed to properly implement a repeat infringer policy, with that failure acting as a draw to potential subscribers.

Reddit again refused to identify its users, arguing that the right to anonymous speech outweighs the interests of the film companies. Reddit does not deny that its users are relevant, but the company stresses that the information sought by the filmmakers can also be obtained from other sources.

Among other things, Reddit refers to the filmmakers' statement that they had already obtained a list of the 118 top pirating IP addresses from Grande. While initial attempts to contact those people didn't lead to useful information, the filmmakers didn't subpoena these potential witnesses.

Court Protects Redditor's Right to Anonymous Speech

After reviewing arguments presented by both sides, the motion to compel was denied by the court. This means that Reddit doesn't have to identify the anonymous Redditors.

"The court denies the motion because the plaintiffs have not demonstrated a compelling need for the discovery that outweighs the users' First Amendment right to anonymous speech," Judge Beeler concludes in her order.

The court doesn't disagree that the Redditors could offer usable testimony. However, since the filmmakers can also obtain this information from other sources, unmasking the anonymous users would go too far.

Subpoenaing (some of) the 118 top pirating Grande users directly would make more sense. That information will be more recent than the rather dated Reddit comments and wouldn't necessarily require more time.

"They are the top pirating IP addresses, and they are from a more recent time period: it is not obvious why subpoenaing even a subset of those addresses would not yield information at least equivalent to, if not better than, information from the six Reddit subscribers.

"The [Reddit] information may be relevant, but it is also attenuated: it is at best weak evidence about Grande's insufficient policy regarding repeat infringers or its appeal to pirating subscribers," Judge Beeler adds.

In addition to the five Reddit 'witnesses' who made general piracy-related comments about Grande, the filmmakers singled out a 12-year-old comment from the user "xBROKEx", who specifically mentioned having pirated the movie The Expendables.

This comment could, in theory, provide evidence for a direct copyright infringement lawsuit. However, Judge Beeler treated this person as a witness because the filmmakers failed to make a prima facie copyright infringement case against this person.

All in all, the denial means that the identities of the six Reddit users won't be shared with the filmmakers. While the users aren't accused of any wrongdoing, not being dragged into a copyright dispute through the side door is likely to be a relief.

The filmmakers, meanwhile, have to find other ways to obtain the required information. Whether they will try to get information from Reddit again in the future is unknown. If they do, they would likely have to seek a new approach.

A copy of U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler's order on the motion to compel is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

270x90-blue

Are you looking for a VPN service? TorrentFreak sponsor NordVPN has some excellent offers.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: