Wednesday, May 31, 2023

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Court Orders ISPs to Block "Spider-Man" Piracy… Before it Happens
Ernesto Van der Sar, 31 May 11:17 AM

spider man acrossIn recent years, website blocking has become one of the most widely-used anti-piracy enforcement mechanisms in the world.

ISPs in several dozen countries prevent subscribers from accessing a variety of 'pirate' sites, often in response to a court order.

These orders often started as basic injunctions, requiring providers to block one or more domain names. Today, many courts issue dynamic injunctions too, allowing rightsholders to add new domain names or IP-addresses, without returning to court.

Dynamic blocking orders are also common in India with courts noting that the flexible approach helps to combat pirate site 'hydras'. India is also known for another progressive site blocking strategy, one that targets piracy before it happens.

Preemptive Spider-Man Piracy Blockade

This week the High Court in New Delhi granted a site blocking order requested by Sony Pictures. This injunction aims to protect the upcoming release of "Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse," which is scheduled to premiere in theaters later this week.

As far as we know, no pirated versions of the film are currently available online. Sony doesn't mention any in its application either but expects rogue copies to appear on known pirate sites in the near future. To limit this potential piracy, these sites should be blocked, the studio argued.

The application lists 101 pirate sites including variants of The Pirate Bay, YTS, RARBG, LimeTorrents, Fmovies, Myflixer, 123movies and others. Many of these already share copies of the 2018 film "Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse" and are allegedly "in the process" of pirating the sequel too.

sites blocked

After reviewing the available evidence, Justice C Hari Shankar of the New Delhi High Court comments as follows:

"The facts of the case as recited hereinabove indicate that the plaintiff's copyright in the films 'Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse' and 'Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse' have/are in the process of being infringed and violated by the Defendants 1 to 101."

Mirrors and Copies are Covered

The owners of the pirate sites were alerted to the proceeding last week but it appears that none have objected formally. As a result, Justice Shankar issued an order that prohibits the operators from making pirated copies of the Spider-Man films available to the public.

In addition, Indian Internet providers are ordered to block access to the pirate sites' listed domain names, as well as any proxies and mirrors that may come online in the future.

"[The Internet providers] are directed to block access to the websites at S. Nos. 1 to 101, as well as any mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites which appear to be associated with any of the said websites," the order reads.

spider order

This leads to the intriguing situation that ISPs must block domain names, including those that have yet to be registered, to protect a film that is expected to be pirated in the future.

These types of preemptive blocking orders are not new in India. Similar ones have been issued previously and there's little doubt that rightsholders such as Sony will request more of them in the future.

A copy of Justice C Hari Shankar's order is available here (pdf). The full list of domain names mentioned in the order reads as follows:

1) flixhd.cc
2) www6.f2movies.to
3) www2.movieorca.com
4) moviekids.tv
5) moviesnation.vip
6) allmovieshub.party
7) 1xbetmovies.bio
8) hdtoday.tv
9) hdtoday.ru
10) 0123movie.net
II) www5.himovies.to
I2) bflix.gg
13) thepiratebayIO.org
I4) thepiratebay.party
15) thepiratebay.org
16) m.thepiratebayO.org
17) thepiratebay3 .to
18) fmovies.llc
19) fmovies.hn
20) fmovies.ps
21) uhdmovies.bio
22) psa.re
23) medeberiyas.com
24) proxyrarbg.org
25) rarbgdata.org
26) rarbgmirrored.org
27) rarbgp2p.org
28) rarbgproxied.org
29) rarbgto.org
30) rarbgunblocked.org
31) rarbggo.to
32) myflixer.vc
33) myflixer.center
34) filmkio.run
35) hurawatch.cc
36) wwwl.attacker.tv
37) cataz.net
38) soap2day.id
39) soap2day.mn
40) soap2day-online.com
41) ww6.soap2day.day
42) ww7.soap2dayhd.co
43) Putlokemew.sb
44) putlokemew.vc
45) putlockers9.live
46) aiofi lm.top
47) watchseries.id
48) watchseries.world
49) watchserieshd.live
50) watchserieshd.ru
51) 123-movies.pics
52) 123moviesite.one
53) arc018.com
54) bolly4u.cafe
55) desiremovies.lat
56) dopebox.se
57) emovtes.si
58) filmywap.com.pe
59) flixtor.id
60) goku.sx
61) grantorrent.bz
62) hdencode.org
63) hexdownload.co'~
64) hindmoviez.wiki
65) katmovieshd.ms
66) limetorrents.lol
67) losmovies.ru
68) membedl.com
69) mobomoviez.fun
70) movierulzhd.wiki
71) movies7.io
72) moviesj oy.plus
73) moviesmod.co.in
74) moviestowatch.tv
75) nkiri.com
76) Old3.rlsbb.cc
77) onionplay.rs
78) primewire.id
79) projectfreetv.space
80) sflix.se
81) solarmovies.win
82) solidtorrents.to
83) swatchseries.biz
84) tamilvip.city
85) terbit2l.art
86) tfpdl.seEmail:
87) Tgx.rs
88) theflixer.tv
89) themovieflix.eu.com
90) thenetnaija.net
91) vegamovies.chat
92) vhmovies.to
93) vumoo.to
94) watchsomuch.to
95) ww1.123moviesto.cc
96) wwl.streamm4u.ws
97) ww4.solarmovie.to
98) www3.yggtorrent.do
99) xmovies8.fun
100) yesmovies.lat
101) yts.rs

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Flawless IPTV: Men Behind UK's Largest Pirate Service Jailed For 30+ Years
Andy Maxwell, 30 May 08:12 PM

flawless-logo1Operating from 2016 until 2018, the Flawless IPTV service copied subscription TV broadcasts from official (and unofficial) sources and then restreamed that content to tens of thousands of customers, at a dramatically cut down price.

For many UK football fans, Flawless granted access to the sport they love, at a price they could afford. Others viewed the service quite differently.

From the Premier League's perspective, Flawless was a fraudulent, criminal enterprise that stole potential revenue from the country's leading football clubs. Through its illegal participation in the subscription TV market, Flawless had a direct impact on Sky and Virgin Media subscription package sales.

More broadly, Flawless undermined the Premier League's right to offer exclusive broadcasting licenses in the UK and that had the potential to affect how much broadcasters were prepared to pay for those licenses.

Today's Sentencing Hearing

Following an extraordinarily deep and costly investigation, and a five-year Premier League private prosecution, five men behind the UK's largest-ever piracy service were sentenced today at Chesterfield Justice Centre.

Mark Gould, Steven Gordon, Peter Jolley, Christopher Felvus and William Brown were sentenced to more than 30 years in prison combined. A sixth defendant, Zak Smith, did not appear in court.

In total, Flawless operated for just 22 months but still managed to generate an estimated £4.6 million in revenue. £3.7 million of that was profit, split very unequally between those sent to prison today.

Mark Gould, 36, was the driving force behind Flawless. His share of the profit was around £1.7 million. Today he received an unprecedented 11-year sentence on two counts of conspiracy to defraud and contempt of court.

Steven Gordon's cut was significant too, roughly £1 million according to the prosecution. Two counts of conspiracy to defraud and contempt of court led to a sentence of five years and two months.

Peter Jolley's share of the profit was reported as £773,000. He received a sentence of five years and two months, on two counts of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering.

Christopher Felvus' share was a relatively modest £164,500. Two counts of conspiracy to defraud earned him a sentence of three years and 11 months.

William Brown made just £15,000 but after pleading not guilty and then losing his case, today he was sentenced to four years and nine months, on two counts of conspiracy to defraud.

Zak Smith appears to have made less than £5,000 from Flawless. He did not appear in court today and a warrant was issued for his arrest.

What follows are just some of the events that led to the men being sentenced today, including why Flawless was so successful, and how it all fell apart.

Flawless Won Fans By Exploiting a Restricted Market, Fraudulently

Top-tier football matches in England take place in the Premier League, a league operated by a company of the same name, owned by the clubs that play in it.

Premier League broadcasting rights cost billions, so when broadcasters like Sky and Virgin hand over their share of the cash for exclusive local rights, recouping that cash from UK football fans is reflected in costly subscription package prices.

For cash-strapped football fans in the UK, pirate IPTV providers represent choice and affordability in a market where very little exists. Subscriptions available at a fraction of the official cost are a huge draw but the elephant in the room is unavoidable.

Pirate IPTV services cost less and offer more, but that's only because they pay nothing to rightsholders like the Premier League, while paying nothing to broadcasters whose transmissions they copy.

The end result of an aggressive Premier League private prosecution spanning five years, the sentences handed down today show that undermining corporations worth billions has the potential to end in complete catastrophe for IPTV operators. It also ends badly for football fans and the public in general.

While this was a private prosecution, the Premier League – and by extension Premier League clubs – will now recoup the costs of the investigation and prosecution from the Crown, meaning that tax paying football fans and taxpayers in general will pick up an incredibly large bill.

Flawless IPTV

Launched around August 2016, Flawless IPTV began as a three-way partnership consisting of Mark Gould, Steven Gordon, and Peter Jolley, all of whom had parted ways with another IPTV provider, known online as Overlords. Christopher Felvus, who was also active in the pirate IPTV scene, made up the quartet and for Flawless, it was game on.

In common with licensed services, pirate IPTV providers have broadly two options for reaching the market. Selling subscriptions directly to consumers makes the most money on paper but also causes the most headaches. Selling to customers via resellers makes considerably less, but in many cases a 40% cut may be considered worth it.

Flawless decided to cover both angles by selling direct from its own website and social medias, and also indirectly via a network of resellers.

With a heavy focus on Premier League content, particularly matches broadcast during the UK's '3pm blackout', Flawless and success went hand in hand. A big hit with football fans, the IPTV service went from strength to strength with a comprehensive, mostly reliable product, for just £10 per month. For a while, everything went broadly to plan.

Numerous behind-the-scenes dramas, some worthy of a TV series in their own right, kept the business on its toes in the months to come. Yet after signing up thousands of customers with no notable issues, a subscription purchased in 2017 sparked a massive criminal investigation and marked the beginning of the end for the entire service.

Charity Received Complaints

Crimestoppers, a UK charity famous for its anonymous tip lines, is said to have received complaints about Flawless in the summer of 2017. Instead of contacting the police, Crimestoppers alerted the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT) which led to a covert purchase of a Flawless subscription in October of the same year.

After concluding that Flawless offered streams broadcast by Sky and Virgin, among others, FACT leveraged its connections in government, law enforcement agencies, and civil authorities, calling for action to defend the Premier League's rights.

A report to GAIN, the Government Agency Intelligence Network, led to the allocation of significant public resources. With the support of a dedicated financial investigator, a senior Trading Standards officer took over the investigation and a little over six months later, Flawless was all but finished.

Mark Gould Arrested First, Others follow

In May 2018, search warrants were executed at two addresses in London. Gould was arrested at his home in Greenwich, an apartment on the river recently purchased for £600,000 – cash.

Around a month later the authorities arrested Steven Gordon and Peter Jolley, and three weeks after that Christopher Felvus was detained. William Brown and Zak Smith were arrested early August 2018 but it would be another five months before the case was submitted to the court, and another three years before today's sentencing.

Profitable Business, But Not For All

In total, Flawless operated for just 22 months but still managed to generate an estimated £4.6 million in revenue, £3.7 million of that in profit. As highlighted earlier, Gould is said to have made most from the operation, around £1.7 million.

William Brown made almost nothing from Flawless yet today received a sentence roughly on par with that handed to Steven Gordon, who made more than £1 million from the operation and was also held in contempt of court. In common with all of the defendants sentenced today, Brown had no previous convictions.

Warrant Issued For Arrest of Zak Smith

This curious anomaly leads us to Zak Smith, his apparent absence from court today, and a warrant for his arrest. Smith made roughly three times less than Brown, around £5,000, but was expected to receive a similar sentence today. The reasons for that are extraordinary.

The details of Smith's involvement aren't just interesting, they are arguably worthy of a Netflix drama series in their own right. Smith worked at anti-piracy company Friend MTS, known for working with the Premier League to ensure that pirate services are blocked by ISPs during match times.

This type of blocking is authorized by High Court injunction, the finer details of which are closely guarded secrets. Or at least that's the usual plan. In some cases blocking programs appear suddenly ineffective, with services like Flawless operating broadly as usual, with Flawless competitors not doing anywhere near as well.

We'll return to that story very soon and reveal how the dismantling of Flawless was interpreted as a prompt to launch more IPTV services that made even more money.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Tuesday, May 30, 2023

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

U.S. Govt Launches Consultation on Future Anti-Piracy Strategies
Ernesto Van der Sar, 30 May 11:55 AM

america flagFor many years, U.S. lawmakers have considered amending legislation so that today's online copyright issues can be addressed more effectively.

Many proposals have come and gone, without resulting in any significant updates. Calls to change current legislation persist, however.

Before any new laws or policies are introduced, the Government typically seeks input from stakeholders. That's also the case when planning future anti-piracy and anti-counterfeiting strategies.

Roundtable on Future Anti-Piracy Strategies

This coming October, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will hold a roundtable on the subject, with members of the public invited to join. There are no concrete proposals at this stage but the agency is interested to hear what strategies have proven to be effective.

The office is also open to new ideas for future anti-piracy strategies. The call is quite broad and could include hot topics such as no-fault injunctions, which would allow copyright holders to more easily pursue pirate site blocking orders in the United States.

"The USPTO seeks information from interested parties regarding their observations and insights into the future of anticounterfeiting and antipiracy strategies," the Office writes.

Quoting data from the United States Chamber of Commerce, a lobbying group operating independently of government, USPTO notes that video piracy alone causes losses of up to $115.3 billion in reduced GDP per year, as well as 560,000 lost jobs.

Broad Range of Questions

The consultation doesn't ask for input on any specific policies or plans. Instead, stakeholders and members of the general public are asked to share their thoughts on a wide range of piracy and counterfeiting issues, including harms and dangers to the public, voluntary collaborations, and common challenges.

"Are you considering new collaborative efforts to combat counterfeiting and piracy? What factors will affect your decision? How might those future collaborations be comprised?" one of the questions reads.

Some of the Questions

uspto question

The consultation and roundtable will also explore how existing laws factor into current anti-piracy measures. And perhaps more importantly, whether any improvements are needed in this area.

"Do online enforcement strategies use existing copyright laws to combat online piracy? If so, please describe in detail those activities, and provide any suggestions for maximizing these practices."

Needless to say, the roundtable and public comments will undoubtedly result in a wide range of opposing views.

It's no secret that rightsholders would like to have more anti-piracy tools, including site blocking and increased ISP liability in the US. However, these measures tend to trigger opposition from digital rights activists and the broader public.

A copy of the USPTO's notice of the public roundtable and its request for comments is available at the Federal Register

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Bungie's 'DoNotPay' Sleuth Doubtful That Destiny 2 Cheat Lives at Copyright Office
Andy Maxwell, 29 May 09:48 PM

watch-eyeBungie's pursuit of people behind Destiny 2 cheat operation Elite Boss Tech, is pushing forward and showing no sign of stopping.

The lawsuit began in August 2021 with the aim of shutting down the 'Wallhax' cheat. By June 2022, Bungie had a $13.5 million copyright infringement damages award in hand, and suddenly cooperative defendants helping to unveil others involved in the circumvention of Bungie's technological protection measures.

Bungie Asks Court For More Time

Earlier this month, Bungie was awarded over $16 million against a single defendant, with claims spanning copyright law, breach of contract, and civil RICO violations.

Just two days later, the court instructed Bungie to voluntarily dismiss all remaining unnamed defendants and any named defendants yet to be served. Bungie followed up with a request for the court to partially reconsider, arguing that progress is still being made in its quest to track the defendants down.

"Bungie continues its efforts to identify the unnamed Doe Defendants, and is actively seeking further information that may allow that identification, but does not have that information yet," Bungie informed the court.

"Bungie served Eddie Tran, who is the only Named Defendant believed to reside in the United States, on February 28th, 2023," the videogame company continued, noting that the remainder are believed to reside overseas.

eddie tran-served

On February 23, Bungie emailed each of the presumed foreign defendants with a request to waive service, with a deadline of April 13 to respond. Hoping that the defendants would eventually respond and in an effort to reduce costs, Bungie said that it didn't immediately press ahead with service proceedings under the Hague Convention. However, it does have someone working on the case with a track record of success.

Tracking Down Anonymous Cheaters

Kathryn Tewson, a paralegal and investigator at KUSK Law in New York, rose to fame in January after a ferocious teardown of DoNotPay, a company that claims to have developed "The World's First Robot Lawyer." DoNotPay says its AI product provides affordable legal representation but according to Tewson, the supposed AI amounts to a document wizard dressed up in Theranos-style marketing.

Being hounded by "the world's most tenacious paralegal" is also reality for defendants in Bungie cheat lawsuits.

In a declaration filed last week in support of Bungie's request for more time in the Elite Boss Tech lawsuit, Tewson revealed she was the person who identified Eddie Tran and six other defendants across Europe and China.

"All of the International Defendants operate incognito under assumed names and take other steps to hide their identities and avoid detection. Because of the International Defendants' intentional efforts to evade identification and detection, it is time-consuming and labor intensive to locate physical addresses for them sufficient to effectuate service," Tewson informed the court.

Just One Person Answered Bungie's Emails

One of Bungie's emailed requests to waive service was sent by Tewson to a defendant named as Marta Magalhaes, aka MindBender, aka Bluegirl. The email contained a copy of the complaint, a reminder about the duty to avoid unnecessary expenses, and a warning that if the waiver wasn't signed and returned, Bungie would arrange to have the summons and complaint physically served, with Magalhaes potentially picking up the bill.

A response from 'Bruno Silva' dated February 24 via a Gmail account said: "sorry i dont know what destiny 2 is, i dont play online games."

Tewson responded within minutes. "Our apologies. There may have been a mistake. Can you confirm your address?"

As seen in the image below, 'Bruno Silva' supplied an address in Bucharest, Romania.

bruno silva

Widely considered the most famous road in the entire country, Calea Victoriei is a major Romanian tourist attraction. The address provided by 'Bruno Silva' – Calea Victoriei 118 – is the home of the Romanian Copyright Office (ORDA)

Defendant May Be Trying to Mislead

Tewson believes that the address provided by 'Bruno Silva' is probably false.

"Based on information received in settlement and my own investigation, I believe the information provided by defendant Magalhaes / 'Bruno Silva' is likely false and that the individual who responded to the email is the proper defendant in this case, and probably resides in Portugal," Tewson informed the court.

"Bungie has issued a subpoena to Google in an effort to obtain information on Defendant Magalhaes (or Silva) sufficient to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. The return date for that subpoena is June 15th."

While it does seem highly unlikely that the defendant lives at the Romanian Copyright Office, email time stamps as they appear in correspondence suggest a time difference more closely aligned with Romania than Portugal, although other details tend to suggest the latter.

Gmail and Privacy

Exactly what information has been requested from Google isn't unclear but in broad terms, Gmail and Google accounts in general can be a privacy nightmare for the unaware, even in the event Google refuses to hand anything over.

Simply knowing someone's Gmail address can be the starting point for discovering their activities on other Google platforms that have nothing to do with email. In cases where users have previously contributed to certain Google platforms while unaware of the risks, those platforms can provide worrying amounts of location data.

In this case, none of that data relates to the Romanian Copyright Office.

Kathryn Tewson's declaration & related documents available here (1,2,3,4,5, pdf)

Image Credit: Pixabay/succo

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Yout Counters RIAA in Court, Quoting Lyrics & Highlighting YouTube's Absence
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 May 01:01 PM

yout logoAt the end of 2020, the operator of one of the largest YouTube rippers took the unprecedented step of taking the music industry to court.

Yout.com's Johnathan Nader was fed up with a bombardment of DMCA takedown requests and alleged defamatory claims. In response, he sued the RIAA, asking the federal court in Connecticut to declare his service non-infringing.

The RIAA and other music groups had been actively trying to remove so-called YouTube rippers from Google's search results. The industry group had also prevailed in legal action against some of the sites but in its battle with Yout.com, the RIAA filed a motion to dismiss.

Last fall, the district court decided to dismiss the matter, handing a win to the RIAA. Judge Stefan Underhill ultimately concluded that Yout had failed to show that it doesn't circumvent YouTube's technological protection measures. That rendered Yout's defamation and business disparagement claims moot.

Yout.com Appeal

Yout's operator did not give up on the case and opted to appeal in the belief that YouTube rippers do not violate the DMCA. The argument received backing from the EFF and GitHub in their supporting amicus briefs.

The RIAA filed a lengthy response concluding that Yout is an "illicit stream-ripping service" that effectively allows people to "bypass YouTube's technological restrictions" that prevent downloading of works streamed through YouTube. As such, the service violates the DMCA, a position supported by the Copyright Alliance.

One of the key issues in this dispute is whether YouTube actually implemented technological measures designed to control access to copyrighted works. In Yout's response to the RIAA filed this weekend, the focus returns to the same thorny topic.

Yout's reply brief stresses that this case was dismissed prematurely, even before both parties were allowed to conduct discovery. That's problematic, as the lawsuit deals with key questions relating to the DMCA, many of which remain unanswered.

The Elephant-Sized Hole

The stream-ripper points out that rightsholders haven't implemented any copy protection measures themselves. The RIAA argues that YouTube has but according to Yout's lawyer, it still isn't clear whether YouTube's technical hurdles were intended to act as copyright protection measures.

"[RIAA] attempts to argue not only that it is entitled to rely on technology that it claims to have been put in place by YouTube, but that it makes no difference at all whether YouTube intended for the technology to limit the access to or the ability to copy the videos that are freely available on YouTube to anyone with an internet connection and a browser."

This leaves an elephant-sized hole in the room. While the case centers around YouTube's alleged copyright protections, which are presumably vital to the music industry, YouTube itself is notably absent. It didn't file an amicus brief to back up the RIAA's position, for example.

" […] one might have assumed that YouTube itself would have appeared on Appellants behalf as an amicus. That it did not leaves an elephant sized hole in the room," Yout argues.

Yout says the RIAA is attempting to cover this "enormous hole with fig leaves." For example, the music group argues that the DMCA says nothing about the 'intent' of presumed protection measures, but Yout says that assertion is incorrect and defies common sense.

You're So Vain…

Yout also points out that the RIAA mischaracterizes its service. The music group repeatedly stresses that the site's only purpose is to infringe the copyrights of its members, which prompted an interesting response.

"To paraphrase one of the RIAA members' recording artists: You're so vain, I bet you think this software's about you," Yout's lawyers write, inspired by the lyrics of Carly Simon.

apologies

In a footnote, the attorneys apologize for this reference, but their message is serious. Music only represents a small fraction of the content on YouTube, they note, adding that Yout itself is merely a dumb 'recording' tool.

"The service provided by Yout is content-neutral, providing nothing more than a recording device that utilizes the very information that is freely and publicly available to anyone who cares to look for it, without the need to circumvent any technological measures.

"To the extent that the RIAA thinks otherwise, it should have the opportunity to prove that theory… at a trial following discovery," Yout's lawyers write.

Dismissal Should be Reversed

The brief further argues that many of the legal findings cited in the RIAA's answering brief come from cases that were properly litigated; not ones that were dismissed at an early stage.

The parties in these cases had the opportunity to build a proper record, with expert testimonies and witnesses. Considering the important issues at stake and the outstanding disputes, Yout believes it should be allowed to do the same.

Based on these and other arguments, Yout says the District Court's decision to dismiss the case was premature and should be reversed.

A copy of Yout's reply in response to RIAA's answering brief, filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the second circuit, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 05/29/2023
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 May 01:09 AM

john wick 4The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are only meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have three newcomers on the list. "John Wick: Chapter 4", which came out as a high-quality pirate release, is the most downloaded title.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on May 29 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (…) John Wick: Chapter 4 8.0 / trailer
2 (1) The Super Mario Bros. Movie 7.3 / trailer
3 (3) Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves 7.4 / trailer
4 (2) Sisu 7.0 / trailer
5 (7) Avatar: The Way of Water 7.8 / trailer
6 (5) Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania 6.4 / trailer
7 (4) The Covenant 7.6 / trailer
8 (6) Evil Dead Rise 6.9 / trailer
9 (…) Fast X 6.3 / trailer
10 (…) 65 5.4 / trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company