Monday, October 24, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Pirate IPTV Pair Sentenced to 45 Months in Prison For Defrauding Sky & BT Sport
Andy Maxwell, 24 Oct 10:45 AM

IPTVSelling piracy-configured set-top boxes or subscriptions that enables access to pirated TV streams can lead to both civil and criminal prosecutions in the UK. In most cases over the past few years, the latter has been the preferred option.

Any rightsholder can file a civil lawsuit but companies including Sky, BT Sport and the Premier League, prefer private criminal prosecutions offering prison sentences in addition to damages. In several cases over the past few years, investigations by local Trading Standards teams have also led to custodial sentences and on Friday, another was added to the list.

Trading Standards Investigates BillsTV

Britain's pubs have long been associated with people quietly buying questionable items from men with names that suddenly can't be remembered. These days it's more likely for those sales to be organized on social media, which happily broadcast illegal sales to the whole world while logging everything for posterity.

After Kent County Council Trading Standards discovered piracy-configured set-top boxes and access to illegal streams being sold on Facebook, it launched an investigation. Sales took place via a dedicated page called 'BillsTV' with devices and subscription tiers offered at various prices, and then paid for via PayPal.

Combining illegal streaming subscriptions and Facebook advertising with PayPal payments isn't exactly ideal for avoiding detection and by May 2019, Trading Standards had seen enough. Two warrants were executed in Dover and Tonbridge, one of them against a man who used his own name to brand his piracy business.

Fraud, Copyright and Money Laundering

Following their arrest in May 2019, Billy Collin Arthur Martin from London and Darren Bough from Dover had a considerable wait for their guilty pleas to be heard in court. During a sentencing hearing in Court 5 of Canterbury Crown Court last Friday (case T20220079), it was revealed that the men sold devices and memberships that allowed customers to access TV shows, movies and live sporting events, in breach of copyright.

Kent County Council Trading Standards (KCCTS) says that Facebook customers paid the men via five different PayPal accounts, netting them over half a million pounds over a relatively short period.

"In the space of approximately 18 months the fraud made the criminals more than £540,000. Bough received £399,536 and Martin £140,568, all believed to be linked to this illegal activity."

Crimes "Too Serious" to Avoid Custodial Sentences

KCCTS reports that the men asked the Court for leniancy, citing their families' reliance upon them. There had also been a significant delay in bringing the case to a close following their arrests in 2019. Judge Rupert Lowe took their submissions into consideration butfound that the pair's offending had been "too serious" to avoid custodial sentences.

Describing the men as a "couple of Fagins" who had "struck at the heart" of online commerce, Judge Lowe sentenced Martin to 24 months imprisonment and Bough to 21 months for fraudulent trading, money laundering and copyright infringement offenses.

In a statement following the sentencing, Clive Phillips, Operations Manager at KCCTS, said that intellectual property crime has a negative effect on society.

"Intellectual property crime damages the economy. It impacts on creators, avoiding tax and hampering innovation. We will investigate and take appropriate action to ensure there is a fair and legal trading environment in Kent," Phillips said.

Trading Standards Strike in Scotland

Following a separate investigation, a report from Trading Standards Scotland (TSS) reveals that four people, aged 51, 50, 46 and 45, have been reported to the Procurator Fiscal Paisley for providing illegal access to broadcasts owned by Sky and other legal streaming services.

"After a joint operation with Police Scotland and Sky, the accused have been reported for various offenses against the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Trade Marks Act 1994, offences which are punishable by a fine and/ or imprisonment upon conviction: more charges are to follow," TSS says.

Matt Hibbert, Director of Anti-Piracy at Sky, described the four people as potentially important players.

"This operation targeted a group who were believed to be a major source of illegal streams. In taking this action Trading Standards Scotland has not only blocked access to stolen Sky content, it has helped protect consumers from some of the very real risks of accessing movies, TV shows and live sports in this way," Hibbert said.

TSS currently lists IPTV as a priority area for enforcement.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 10/24/2022
Ernesto Van der Sar, 24 Oct 12:30 AM

bullet trainThe data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.

These torrent download statistics are only meant to provide further insight into the piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.

This week we have four newcomers on the list. "Bullet Train" is the most downloaded title.

The most torrented movies for the week ending on October 24 are:

Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrent sites
1 (1) Bullet Train 7.4 / trailer
2 (4) Top Gun: Maverick 8.6 / trailer
3 (5) Thor: Love and Thunder 6.5 / trailer
4 (…) The Peripheral 8.5 / trailer
5 (…) Black Adam 7.1 / trailer
6 (8) Accident Man: Hitman's Holiday 5.8 / trailer
7 (2) Clerks III 6.8 / trailer
8 (…) Bros 6.4 / trailer
9 (…) Terrifier 2 6.8 / trailer
10 (9) Jurassic World Dominion 6.0 / trailer

Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

'I Know What You Download' Overwhelmed By Bogus DMCA Notices
Andy Maxwell, 23 Oct 09:14 PM

SpyMore than a decade ago, TorrentFreak reported on YouHaveDownloaded.com, a new service dedicated to BitTorrent tracking.

Knowing that most BitTorrent-based sharing is conducted in public, the site's operators harvested torrents and captured the IP addresses connected to them.

When we discovered the project, YouHaveDownloaded had 103,200 torrents in its database and IP address data on 51.2 million users. That platform eventually shut down but a similarly named site, IKnowWhatYouDownload, later emerged with similar functionality.

The tracking service has been entertaining and sometimes scaring BitTorrent users for years, matching IP addresses to infringing downloads and even providing lists of IP addresses relating to specific content. It can show the countries where a torrent proved most popular this month or reveal content becoming popular everywhere today.

Users with dynamic IP addresses researching themselves may be presented with false alarms, but as a broad research tool operating in an underserved niche, the service works as advertised.

samaritan data

Anyone who has spent any longer than five minutes on the site – pirates especially – will understand what the site is for. It's a service that harvests and then publishes data related to the BitTorrent ecosystem (specifically DHT) so if that's your thing, you won't be disappointed.

Those seeking pirate downloads will find absolutely nothing of interest. No torrents. No downloads. Not even a magnet link. Anti-piracy groups and leading entertainment companies arrived at a different conclusion five years ago and still haven't changed their minds.

Anti-Piracy Experts Unite in Disagreement

After we first reported on IKnowWhatYouDownload in December 2016, anti-piracy companies started reporting the site to Google, claiming it infringed their clients' rights.

DMCA notices spiked in February 2017 and a handful of months later began to level off. In late 2019, complaints to Google started to rise again and in January 2021, they suddenly took off once more.

iknowwhatyoudownload-google-dmca

At the time of writing, more than 9,472 individual complaints targeting in excess of 18,800 URLs have been submitted to Google, alleging copyright violations that simply did not happen.

Making matters worse, close to 50% of all complaints filed with Google contain URLs that weren't even present in Google's indexes when the takedown notices were sent. The search engine usually indexes all pages quickly but in this case the URLs couldn't be indexed because they never existed in the first place.

The anti-piracy companies may have attempted to predict where infringing links would appear in the future, fabricated the URLs, and sent them to Google in advance, hoping that Google would bin them before they appeared in search results. That can work against pirate sites, but this is not a pirate site – it's a database of piracy activity.

ikwydl-google dmca

Other things make the continuous targeting of IKnowWhatYouDownload even more baffling.

Demo Project to Showcase Data Availability

While the service is a fully functioning BitTorrent data portal in its own right, it's actually a live demo of what can be achieved using data collected by tech outfit PeerTrace. Due to the way data is collected, it is not suitable for prosecuting BitTorrent users but if copyright holders want to access the available data, they can.

PeerTrace data is also available to law enforcement agencies and, as we already know, is useful for people generally interested in how content is spread using BitTorrent, by whom, and where.

It's the type of data that could prove useful to anti-piracy and entertainment companies but beyond that, it also drives legitimate consumption. Every page on the site referencing data for a specific movie carries links to legal streaming portal Kinopoisk.

Checking For Actual Infringement?

As things stand, there's no sign that the copyright complaints will end anytime soon. French anti-piracy group ALPA, anime company Toei, Disney, Sky, Canal+, Columbia, Irdeto, Fox, Lionsgate, Sony, and Netflix have all filed infringement complaints – and that's just a tiny sample of the 42-page list of rightsholders published by Google.

IKnowWhatYouDownload owner Andrey Rogov believes that the companies scan for filenames matching their content and consider that's good enough to file a complaint.

"I think that a lot of companies (copyright holders) implement automatic systems that search pages with torrents with their content (movie, series and other)," Rogov says.

"Usually, they write to us with automatic email and we answer that we don't distribute content. But probably some just write reports to Google and that's it. We don't like it, of course, but I think we can do nothing with it."

iknowwhatyoudownload-data page

One thing we considered early on is that copyright holders might not be scanning for filenames on their own but also BitTorrent hash values. In itself, publishing hashes is not an infringement of copyright but if a filename referencing pirated content appears on the same page as an 'infringing' hash value, it's more likely to be a pirate site than not.

Unfortunately, that doesn't provide a credible explanation either. Rather than displaying the hash values of potentially infringing content, the hash values shown on Rogov's site (including in URLs) are internally generated and definitely not BitTorrent hashes.

Since Google is required to remove content following complaints, around 46% of the URLs submitted in DMCA notices so far have indeed been removed from Google. That raises the question of when IKnowWhatYouDownload's search ranking will suffer after being incorrectly labeled a pirate site.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: