Friday, September 16, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Pirate IPTV Subscription Seller Sentenced to Six Months in Prison
Andy Maxwell, 16 Sep 08:27 AM

IPTVEarly September, Swedish anti-piracy group Rattighetsalliansen (Rights Alliance) reported on a trial that took place at the specialist Patent and Market Court in Stockholm.

A man and woman, a couple from Eskilstuna in eastern Sweden, faced accusations of running an illegal IPTV business and laundering the proceeds. The man, reportedly in his 40s, was said to have run two different IPTV services from which he generated around SEK 2.3 million (around US$213.2k) in revenues over an unspecified period.

The woman denied any knowledge of her partner being an IPTV operator and said that as far as she was concerned, he only repaired set-top boxes. Rights Alliance said that revenues were funneled to the woman from IPTV-related sales and as a result, she faced charges of money laundering.

Rights Alliance and Police Investigation

Following an investigation launched by Rights Alliance and taken up by the police in 2020 following a criminal referral, evidence showed that the man sold illegal IPTV subscriptions and set-top boxes pre-configured for piracy.

Documents released by Swedish police linked the couple to IPTV brand Nordens Bästa IPTV (The Nordics' Best IPTV). Information released by Rights Alliance this week indicates the man sold subscriptions to NorthTV and PlayTV, which together offered access to live TV channels plus movie and TV show libraries.

Payments for PlayTV subscriptions were accepted via a PayPal account, which over a six month period in 2020 amounted to roughly SEK 1.2 million (around US$111,800). Other payments were received into the man's Swish account.

Man Sentenced to Prison

This week the Patent and Market Court found that the scale of the crime was worthy of time behind bars. The man received a six-month prison sentence, which is a notable step up from some of the conditional and community sentences handed down in similar cases during the past year.

"By accepting payments, he has controlled which people have received the supply on the illegal services and by sending boxes, he has made the films in question available. He is therefore convicted as a perpetrator," Rights Alliance says.

"The verdict shows once again that the people behind the illegal services cannot hide behind objections that they only did a minor part, such as posting boxes or answering questions from customers. The investigation also shows how the illegal services bring in large sums that end up directly in the pockets of the perpetrators."

While a custodial sentence is significant, Rights Alliance and the police didn't get everything they'd hoped for. The man and his partner were acquitted of money laundering charges after concluding that the evidence didn't convincingly link the income to PlayTV and NorthTV.

Pirate IPTV is a "Big Problem" in Sweden

"Illegal IPTV is a big problem," Rights Alliance says, commenting on the sentencing.

"It affects both the film and television industries as well as society at large. As many as 380,000 Swedish households (9%) pay for illegal IPTV services, according to Mediavision. This generates millions of kroner in revenue for criminals and organized crime."

To combat threats from IPTV and similar illegal services, Rights Alliance and partners, including the MPA, IFPI, local film producers, and the gaming industry, signed a deal earlier this year with internet service providers in Sweden to simplify the blocking of pirate sites.

The signatories will also work together to help form clear legislation that will pave the way for a streamlined administrative site-blocking regime.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Cloudflare Vows to Fight Global 1.1.1.1 DNS Blocking Orders
Ernesto Van der Sar, 15 Sep 10:23 PM

1111Website blocking has become an increasingly common anti-piracy tool around the globe.

In dozens of countries, ISPs have been ordered by courts to block pirate sites. In some cases, these blocking efforts are part of voluntary agreements.

Cloudflare 'Pirate' Blocking Orders

In the United States, these types of injunctions are rare. However, since the Internet has no clear borders, the effects sometimes spill over. The American Internet infrastructure company Cloudflare, for example, has been ordered to block pirate sites in Germany and Italy.

This week, Cloudflare published its latest transparency report covering the second half of 2021. The company explains that after weighing the potential impact on freedom of expression, it generally complies with blocking orders that target websites operated by its CDN customers.

These blocking efforts are not global. Instead, Cloudflare only blocks access to the location from where an order originates. These sites include DDL-Music in Germany and nearly two dozen sites in Italy.

"If we determine that the order is valid and requires Cloudflare action, we may limit blocking of access to the content to those areas where it violates local law, a practice known as 'geo-blocking'," Cloudflare explains in its transparency report.

Target: DNS

The aforementioned blocking orders apply to the websites of Cloudflare customers. However, Cloudflare also operates a DNS revolver that is the target of a newer anti-piracy campaign.

DNS resolvers are the address books of the web. They link domain names to the correct IP addresses to make these accessible through a web browser. They are a key component of a well-functioning Internet.

Interestingly, these DNS servers are often used by ISPs to comply with site-blocking orders. By removing a domain from the address book, users are unable to load the site in question.

This is a relatively simple blocking method that's easy to circumvent by using an external DNS resolver, such as the ones provided by Google, OpenDNS, Quad9, or Cloudflare. For this reason, DNS resolvers have become the target of blocking requests as well.

In Germany, Quad9 was previously ordered to block a pirate site through its DNS resolver following a complaint from Sony. Similarly, in Italy, a court ordered Cloudflare to block several pirate site domains on the DNS level.

Cloudflare Opposes 1.1.1.1 Blocking

In its transparency report, Cloudflare makes a clear distinction between blocking requests that target its customers' websites and those that apply to DNS functionality. DNS blocks can target any website on the web and are not easy to restrict geographically, the company writes.

"Because such a block would apply globally to all users of the resolver, regardless of where they are located, it would affect end users outside of the blocking government's jurisdiction.

"We therefore evaluate any government requests or court orders to block content through a globally available public recursive resolver as requests or orders to block content globally," Cloudflare adds.

Cloudflare doesn't want to meddle with its DNS resolver, which puts the company in a tough spot that requires a creative solution.

The company says that, thus far, it hasn't actually blocked content through the 1.1.1.1 Public DNS Resolver. Instead, it relies on an "alternative remedy" to comply with the Italian court order.

"Given the broad extraterritorial effect, as well as the different global approaches to DNS-based blocking, Cloudflare has pursued legal remedies before complying with requests to block access to domains or content through the 1.1.1.1 Public DNS Resolver or identified alternate mechanisms to comply with relevant court orders."

The above clearly shows that the company is determined to fight DNS blocking orders in court. And even if it loses, Cloudflare will seek alternative solutions. What these alternatives entail is not clear, but Cloudflare likely has the know-how to find a technical 'circumvention' mechanism.

A copy of Cloudflare's H2 2021 Transparency Report is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: