Saturday, June 11, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

tele
 

Nintendo Nemesis Max Louarn: Hacker, Rebel, and Wanted by the FBI
Ernesto Van der Sar, 11 Jun 09:25 AM

louarnIn the fall of 2020, the U.S. Government indicted three members of the infamous group Team Xecuter, the masterminds behind various Nintendo hacks.

The authorities arrested Canadian Gary Bowser in the Dominican Republic and Frenchman Max Louarn was detained in Tanzania.

Bowser was later deported to the U.S. where he was sentenced to 40 months in prison earlier this year. His sentence was lower than the five-year prison term the U.S. Government had requested.

At the sentencing, Judge Lasnik said that it was important 'to send a message' but a reduction was indeed warranted; Bowser played the smallest role of the three defendants and faced medical and other issues.

At the same time, Judge Lasnik also made clear that Max Louarn, who was portrayed as the boss of Team Xecuter, shouldn't expect the same treatment if he eventually appears before the court.

"If Mr. Louarn comes in front of me for sentencing, he may very well be doing double-digit years in prison for his role and his involvement," Judge Lasnik said.

Max Louarn: Professional Hacker

There is no sign that Louarn will be brought to justice in the US anytime soon. The 50-year-old Frenchman is currently living in an apartment in Avignon with his girlfriend, a former Russian model, and recently sat down for an in-depth interview with Le Monde.

Louarn doesn't hide the fact that he's a hacker. His career started in the 80s soon after his parents bought him a Commodore 64, a reward for his excellent school performance. This was the start of a lifelong hacking passion, which perfectly aligned with his math skills.

c64

At the age of 14, Louarn started to connect with like-minded people from all over the world, sharing messages on Bulletin Board Systems (BBS). Hacking in those days was mostly done for fun but as time went on, money started to play an increasingly important role.

"I wasn't going to end up as an engineer earning 5,000 euros a month when I realized, at 18, that hacking was not just fun, but that there was a way to make a lot of money," Louarn says.

While the Frenchman knew that companies were being damaged by his actions, that didn't hold him back. The companies he hacked had plenty of money, he reasons.

"Stealing from companies that make billions, what do I care?"

PARADOX, Jail, Megaupload

In the piracy scene, Louarn soon became a legend. At the start of the 1990s "MAXiMiLiEN" became the driving force behind the warez-demogroup PARADOX (PDX), which supplied a constant stream of pirated games, cracks, keygens, and other software.

This wasn't without risk. In 1993 he was arrested in a Nintendo piracy case, forcing him to flee to Spain where he enjoyed a lavish lifestyle in a Mallorcan villa.

The extravagant escapade didn't last very long. In 1994, a friend invited Louarn to the United States to party. It turned out to be a trap. Instead of partying, he was welcomed by 15 armed agents for reselling thousands of stolen phone cards.

Facing a potential 40-year prison term, Louarn decided to plead guilty. This eventually resulted in a sentence of five years and eight months for the then 23-year-old, who was sent to the Federal Correctional Institution in Petersburg, Virginia.

Louarn was released in 1999 and returned to France but he hadn't lost his passion for hacking nor his love for computers.

Along the way, he met a variety of people including Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, who shared his fascination with hacking. Louarn also invested in Kim Dotcom's file-storage platform Megaupload, which was later taken down by the feds.

A young Max Louarn with Megaupload's Kim Dotdom and Finn Batato (credit: Alonetrio)

In 2005, Louarn's name showed up again in federal court records, with Sony accusing him of operating Divineo, a company through which he sold modified Playstation devices and modchips. Sony went on to win the case, securing a judgment of more than $5 million in statutory damages.

Nintendo Nemesis

Meanwhile, Nintendo was also taking an interest in Louarn's 'hacking' activities. The Japanese gaming giant filed several lawsuits and pulled out all the stops to prevent people from jailbreaking consoles, with mixed results. That turned Louarn into Nintendo's archnemesis.

"They hate me. I bet that in Tokyo, they posted my picture in an office," he says. The Frenchman doesn't see himself as a criminal, though, but as a rebel instead. One who helps the public take control of the devices they bought.

"We've always been pro-liberty, that's our mindset: to do what we want with the machines and for everyone to have access to them," Louarn tells Le Monde.

Nintendo clearly sees things differently and with the US Department of Justice on its side, in 2020 the company went after Louarn again. This time, he stands accused of being the leader of Team Xecuter.

This claim was backed up by a plea agreement signed a few months ago by fellow defendant Gary Bowser. Louarn denies involvement with the group and believes that Bowser said these things to get a reduced sentence.

"He pleaded guilty to things he didn't do in order to escape a life sentence," Louarn says. "That's American justice! The press showed that Gary Browser was living poorly in a tin shack in the Dominican Republic, while Team Xecuter, they are all millionaires."

Tanzania, Reunion, France

The Frenchman doesn't plan on proving his innocence in a US court though. After being arrested at the Zuri Hotel Tanzania in late 2020, he was released from prison after a few weeks, with a Dar es Salaam court concluding that his arrest was "illegal".

View from the Zuri Hotel

zuri

With help from a friend, who sent a private plane from South Africa to pick him up, Louarn initially traveled to Reunion Island and then back to France, before the FBI could apprehend him again.

Although Louarn is now living relatively freely in France, his foreign bank and cryptocurrency accounts remain frozen. Leaving the country isn't really an option either, as he is still a wanted man in the United States.

There are legal issues in France as well. There's a case pending about his refusal to hand over the unlocking codes of his electronic devices to the American officers when he was arrested. His lawyer hopes to have this case closed.

Louarn, meanwhile, will seize any opportunity to brand the FBI and the US justice system as biased. They're "in the pay of large corporations, ready to destroy competitors by dressing up simple commercial disputes with criminal law," he notes.

There's no denying that "MAXiMiLiEN" has led a turbulent life, one that could be easily turned into a Hollywood script. He's made internet history books on several occasions and remains rebellious to this day.

But times have changed this hacker too, as a quote tucked away in the Le Monde piece shows. Reflecting on the five years he spent in prison in the 1990s, he now realizes that another long sentence would have an entirely different impact today.

"Now [serving time in prison] would be hard because I take care of my father. I have a 16-year-old daughter, and soon a second child," he says.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Bungie & Destiny 2 Cheat Creator Agree $13.5m Copyright Damages Judgment
Andy Maxwell, 10 Jun 11:06 PM

Destiny 2Late August 2022, game developer Bungie filed a lawsuit against the creators of software that enabled cheating in Destiny 2.

The complaint named Canadian business entities Elite Boss Tech and 11020781 Canada Inc., owner Robert James Duthie Nelson, plus a number of 'Doe' defendants said to be involved in the creation, sale, and distribution of the software.

Bungie's claims were underpinned by alleged breaches of copyright law, including the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions. Additional allegations included racketeering, fraud, money laundering, and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

In a February 2022 status report, Bungie stressed that Destiny 2's commercial viability depends on the integrity of its gameplay and the positive experiences of its players. The defendants threaten the gaming experience, Bungie added, noting that anti-cheating mitigation technology had cost it "exorbitant amounts of money."

The defendants argued that during the development of the cheating software, no copies of Destiny 2 were made or distributed, and no derivative works were created. They also claimed that certain terms in Bungie's Limited Software License Agreement (LSLA) are unenforceable and that any copyright infringement claims were baseless.

The parties were as far apart as ever and the lawsuit seemed to be heading towards trial. This week, however, news of consensus appeared in the form of a stipulated motion asking the court to enter a consent judgment to end Bungie's legal action.

Two Companies and Owner Accept Liability

The agreement sees Robert James Duthie Nelson, Elite Boss Tech, Inc., and 11020781 Canada, accept that the cheating software "displays a graphical overlay" that integrates into and annotates Bungie's copyrighted Destiny 2 work and injects code into Destiny 2's copyrighted code, in both cases creating an unlicensed derivative work.

The defendants agree that their infringement was willful and admit that their cheat software circumvents technological measures employed by Bungie to control access to its software, thereby violating the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions (17 U.S.C. § 1201(a) and (b)).

The cheating software was reportedly downloaded 6,765 times, with each download constituting an independent provision of a circumvention device, also in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a) and (b).

Statutory Damages Award for Copyright Infringment

Multiplying the number of downloads (6,765) by the statutory damages available under § 1201 (not less than $200 or more than $2,500), the defendants agree that judgment should be entered in the amount of $13,530,000, representing statutory damages of $2,000 per violation. All other alleged claims in the complaint are withdrawn.

The consent judgment also comes with a proposed permanent injunction that prohibits the defendants (and any person or company acting in concert with them) from creating, distributing or otherwise making available, any software that infringes Bungie's rights or those of its parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates. The defendants are also restrained from any reverse engineering activities or similar manipulation of any game connected to the plaintiff.

Any third parties connected to the defendants, including domain registrars and registries, are prohibited from supporting their activities if they include trafficking in circumvention devices or otherwise infringe Bungie's intellectual property rights. The defendants are also prohibited from using any online resource to provide any content relating to their own or anyone else's cheating software.

"This permanent injunction is binding against Defendants worldwide, without regard to the territorial scope of the specific intellectual property rights asserted in the Complaint and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction wherever Defendants or their assets may be found," the motion reads.

"Any violations of this order by Defendants will subject them to the full scope of this Court's contempt authority, including punitive, coercive, and monetary sanctions."

The consent judgment is yet to be signed off by the court but that is likely just a formality.

Supporting documents can be found here and here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Forwarding Piracy Warnings Violates Privacy Law, Dutch Court Rules
Ernesto Van der Sar, 10 Jun 01:27 PM

anonymous cardSupported by Hollywood and other content industries, Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN has shuttered hundreds of pirate sites and services in recent history.

BREIN has also targeted several prolific BitTorrent uploaders and other infringers with success. However, tracking down and going after individual file-sharers is quite resource-intensive and the anti-piracy group aims to cast its net wider.

Sending Warning Letters Pirates

To expand its reach, the group previously obtained permission from the Dutch Data Protection Authority to track and store the personal data of alleged BitTorrent pirates. This request was granted and at the end of 2020, BREIN announced the start of its mass warning campaign.

Unlike other copyright enforcement groups, BREIN is not interested in casual pirates. Instead, it focuses on the bigger fish and asks Internet providers to forward a warning to these subscribers.

This sounds like a balanced approach which would be relatively easy to pull off in many other countries where forwarding piracy notices is standard procedure. In the Netherlands, however, this isn't straightforward at all.

Ziggo Refuses to Forward, Court Agrees

When BREIN sent its warnings to the country's largest ISP Ziggo, the company refused to forward the warnings to its subscribers. According to Ziggo, linking IP addresses to specific subscribers raises serious privacy concerns, even if the personal information isn't shared with BREIN.

In February of this year, the Utrecht Court sided with the Internet provider. While BREIN has a license to process the personal information of alleged infringers, Ziggo doesn't. This means that linking an IP address to subscriber information would violate Dutch privacy law, which is based on the European GDPR.

This was a severe setback for the anti-piracy group. It effectively makes it impossible to alert subscribers that their connection is being used to share copyright infringing content, even if that personal information isn't handed over. BREIN didn't give up, however.

Court Doubles Down

The anti-piracy group submitted another case. This time, a Ziggo subscriber was accused of offering over 200 e-books to the public through an open directory. BREIN hoped that the ISP would forward a notice to the associated account holder or share their personal details.

This week, the Utrecht court ruled that the ISP is not required to cooperate with this request. Without a license from the Dutch Data Protection Authority, linking the IP-address to the subscriber information would violate privacy law. For the same reason, it can't share the subscriber details directly with BREIN either.

Even if Ziggo was allowed to process the data, BREIN wouldn't have won the case. The court concluded that there's insufficient evidence to show that the subscriber willingly made the books available for others to download. It's possible that they were simply put online for personal use, without proper protection.

"Contrary to what BREIN states, it is not certain that the IP address holder himself has infringed copyrights," the court writes in a press release.

Appeals

BREIN director Tim Kuik is disappointed with the outcome and says that BREIN will appeal both verdicts. The anti-piracy group maintains that simply forwarding notices to subscribers is a reasonable and proportional measure.

"It must be possible to combat infringements. Forwarding warnings is the least intrusive way of enforcement. By refusing to do so, the Utrecht court is really on the wrong track," Kuik notes.

"This decision is fundamentally incorrect, and the rejection to hand over of personal details is also incorrect and contrary to established case law. BREIN looks forward to the appeal with confidence."

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: