Tuesday, August 3, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

US Lawmakers Suggest That Piracy is Part of Twitter's Business Model
Ernesto Van der Sar, 03 Aug 07:49 PM

pirate twitterUnder US law, online service providers need to respond to takedown notices. In addition, they have to implement a meaningful policy to terminate accounts of repeat infringers.

Many of the large social media platforms stick to these rules. Twitter, for example, 'removes' over a million tweets each year that are flagged as problematic.

'Twitter's Refusal to Tackle Piracy'

While Twitter appears to operate within the boundaries of U.S. law, not all lawmakers are pleased with the service. Yesterday, a group of bipartisan House Representatives, led by Republican Congressmen Kelly Armstrong and Democrat Hakeem Jeffries, scolded the platform in a public letter.

"We write to you regarding the ongoing problem of copyright infringement on Twitter and the platform's apparent refusal to address it," the representatives inform Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.

To help identify pirated content, Twitter goes beyond legal requirements by offering copyright holders access to an API. That sounds positive, but the representatives find it offensive that creators have to pay for access to this tool.

"Twitter has taken the unprecedented step of charging creators for a fully functional search API that can identify instances infringement at scale," the letter reads, adding, "Twitter offers a more sophisticated API to academic researchers for free."

This complaint echoes comments made by the music industry group RIAA, which brought up the same issue during a Senate hearing a few months ago. According to RIAA CEO Mitch Glazier, Twitter could stop the piracy problem overnight if it had the will and the right incentive.

The lawmakers don't mention any incentives or repercussions in the letter but do stress that it would be best if Twitter enters into licensing agreements with copyright holders. This issue is high on the music industry's wishlist too.

A Piracy Business Model

While Twitter is not accused of doing anything illegal, the House Representatives write that the company's actions make it seem as if piracy is part of the social media platform's business model.

"Between refusing to pay creators for their works and obstructing their discovery of infringing works, it appears that unauthorized use of copyrighted works is an unacknowledged part of Twitter's business model," they write.

Instead of demanding concrete action, the lawmakers ask Twitter to answer several questions to explain what it will do to help copyright holders address the piracy problem going forward.

1. What will Twitter do to enable content owners to meaningfully search for and identify infringement of their works at a scale commensurate with the amount of infringing tweets occurring on the platform at no additional cost to them?

2. Tweets can be uploaded in a fraction of a second, and hundreds of millions are posted to Twitter every day. What is Twitter doing to ensure that takedown notices are addressed in a manner that corresponds with that speed and volume?

3. Will Twitter add robust content protection technology across all of its platforms and implement it effectively to decrease the posting and reposting of infringing content?

Music Lobby

The letter is music to the ears of the RIAA. The group has spent over five million dollars in lobbying efforts at the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives over the past 12 months, with platform accountability being one of the key topics.

This isn't the first time that Twitter has come under fire at The Hill. Late last year the social media platform infuriated U.S. Senator Thom Tillis by refusing to testify at a piracy-related hearing organized by the Senate's Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property.

"The only reasonable conclusion one can draw from your actions is that Twitter simply does not take copyright piracy seriously," Senator Tillis wrote in a letter to Jack Dorsey at the time.

A copy of the letter sent by the U.S. House Representatives yesterday, urging Twitter to respond before the end of the month, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Y2Mate: Massive YouTube-Ripping Service Blocks US & UK Visitors
Andy Maxwell, 03 Aug 11:23 AM

Y2Mate logoThe status of YouTube as the most popular resource to stream free (or at least ad supported) music is a well-established fact.

However, there are millions of users online today who would prefer to download music for keeps and that has resulted in a buoyant market for so-called YouTube-to-MP3 ripping services. Possibly the most popular platform in this sector is Y2Mate.com but developments this week have raised questions over the site's future.

Millions of Users See a Shut Down Message

According to SimilarWeb stats, more people visit Y2Mate from the United States than any other territory. Indeed, around 12 million of its 128 million users do so every month. But, at the time of writing, many (if not all) of those visitors are being informed that as of August 1, the Y2Mate service has been discontinued.

Y2Mate shutdown

With so many of Y2Mate's users seeing this message, one could be forgiven for thinking that the show really is over. Add into the mix that visitors from the UK are also seeing the same notice, then the writing really does seem to be on the wall. However, upon closer inspection, the announcement is much less global and final than it first appears.

Y2Mate Has Not Shut Down – It Appears to Be Geo-Blocking

Geo-blocking is something closely associated with legal streaming services that have obtained content but do not have the appropriate licensing to show it in a particular region. That isn't something that usually bothers stream-ripping platforms but in this case, Y2Mate does appear to be discriminating based on location.

In our extended tests, countries such as Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic and Denmark do not see the shutdown message. The same applies to Italy, Ireland, Germany, and the Netherlands. Visitors from Mexico – the second most popular region to access Y2Mate – are also free to use the site, as are users from Spain, India, and Japan.

Indeed, as far as our tests go, Y2Mate is only blocking visitors from the United States and United Kingdom. Visitors from Australia do receive a 'site blocked' message but only because of an earlier ISP blocking injunction obtained by Hollywood.

This raises the question of why the site's operators appear to have taken targeted action against visitors from the US and UK.

Geo-Blocking Can Point To Legal Issues

Traffic from the United States to Y2Mate has been on the increase lately so it makes no direct commercial sense to block those visitors. However, there are clear precedents in the ripping sector that show that geo-blocking can be directly linked to legal action.

In 2017, the world's leading YouTube ripping site, YouTube-MP3, shut down following legal action initiated by the RIAA. A year before that, the service took the decision to block visitors from the UK after reaching an agreement with the BPI.

Just weeks after YouTube-MP3's shutdown, more YouTube-ripping services took the same action by blocking UK traffic in an effort to avoid legal action. When such services choose to remain open for business in the UK, they can face enforced blocking, such as that recently experienced by Flvto and 2Conv.

Common Denominators are Usually the RIAA and BPI

With geo-blocking or enforced blocking often linked to action taken by the BPI, TorrentFreak has requested comment from the music industry group, which may be able to shine some light on why Y2Mate is blocking the UK. In the meantime, the RIAA's war against stream-ripping sites in general offers the most plausible reason for Y2Mate blocking visitors from the United States.

According to Google's Transparency Report, the RIAA has sent DMCA notices to have more than 9,300 Y2Mate URLs delisted from Google's search results. That effort appeared to come to a halt last summer but the RIAA certainly isn't finished with Y2Mate.

More than a year before that, the RIAA obtained DMCA subpoenas from a court in the United States aimed at uncovering the personal details of the people behind Y2Mate, which at the time was receiving around 64 million visits per month globally.

It's not clear whether that effort bore fruit but in October 2020 the RIAA obtained another set of DMCA subpoenas against Cloudflare and Namecheap, again seeking information on Y2Mate's operators.

RIAA Heavily Targeted Y2Mate With Anti-Circumvention Notices

Back in 2019, DMCA notices citing the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA were relatively rare but the RIAA has been using this method of attack against Y2Mate and similar sites ever since.

With the targeted platforms continuously updating their URLs, that descended into a game of whack-a-mole, which failed to have the desired result. Indeed, despite being one of the main targets, Y2Mate managed to increase its traffic massively.

Effects of Blocking US/UK Visitors

Presuming the current decision to block US and UK traffic doesn't expand to other regions, Y2Mate could in theory lose 15+ million visitors per month. However, the fact that the site hasn't actually shut down means that anyone with the means to circumvent a geo-block (via the use of VPNs or proxies, for example) can still access the site.

Whether this will be enough to fend off any legal action or satisfy the terms of a potential settlement agreement is currently unclear. The BPI and RIAA are yet to make any statement that might shine light on the situation but when we hear back, we'll update this article.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: