Wednesday, August 11, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Netflix Intensifies 'VPN Ban' and Targets Residential IP-addresses Too (Updated)
Ernesto Van der Sar, 11 Aug 05:23 PM

Netflix logoSix years ago, Netflix started blocking customers who tried to access its service over a commercial VPN or proxy service.

These changes came after copyright holders repeatedly complained that 'pirates' were bypassing Netflix's geographical restrictions.

The VPN ban caused a lot of frustration for legitimate VPN users, many of whom had no intention of breaking any rules. At the same time, the VPN 'pirates' found workarounds by picking services that actively bypass Netflix's restrictions.

Bypassing Restrictions

There are various ways VPN services have managed to circumvent these blocking efforts. Most keep the technical details private, but it's commonly known that some are using residential IP-addresses as proxies, to make it look like VPN users are regular ISP subscribers.

This cat and mouse game has caused quite a bit of frustration at Netflix headquarters and, over the past few days, the company appears to have intensified its blocking measures.

There is a flurry of complaints on social media from users whose VPN services were suddenly 'blocked' by Netflix. Previously, these people couldn't play any content while using a VPN. That changed last year. Now, VPN users can still see Netflix originals while other content is hidden and blocked.

People who try to access blocked titles directly through a saved URL will see Netflix's dreaded proxy/VPN error message instead.

Netflix Bans Residential IP-Addresses

Netflix doesn't explain which IP addresses are blocked and why, but the most recent efforts are much broader than before. This issue was brought to our attention by WeVPN, which noticed that the updated geo-fencing system is blocking its residential IP addresses.

These IP addresses are assigned to common consumer ISPs such as AT&T, Comcast, Verizon. While it makes sense for Netflix to put an end to these workarounds, there appears to be some collateral damage.

"The collateral damage is that you have hundreds of thousands of legitimate residential Netflix subscribers blocked from accessing Netflix's local country full catalog from their home," a WeVPN spokesperson informs us.

While we are unable to verify how many people are facing issues, it is clear that the measures are spilling over to regular subscribers.

Complaints Start Pouring In

TorrentFreak reached out to Netflix for a comment but the company didn't immediately reply. However, a quick glance on social media shows a disturbing number of Netflix subscribers who are "missing" content, which is exactly what would happen when an IP-address is flagged.

"Hi! I noticed that my account is displaying nothing but Netflix originals and a handful of non-Netflix original content on my TV, but on my phone, it displays everything as usual/normal," Reddit user literarydone observed.

glitch

"Idk whats happened but Netflix suddenly stopped showing tv shows that I was watching when my laptop is connected to the internet over wifi. it shows the same tv shows when my laptop is connected to the internet over mobile data hotspot," another person wrote, with a commenter reporting the same problem.

netflix problem

Over the past 24 hours alone, there were multiple reports from people who are suffering "missing title" issues. None of these appear to use a VPN.

The common theme is that Netflix only shows Netflix originals on their IP address, which is expected when it's flagged as a VPN or proxy. One Redditor managed to get a new IP-address from his ISP, which immediately resolved the problem.

"Contact Your ISP…"

While Netflix hasn't released an official comment on the situation, the company is aware of the problems.

One user who complained on Twitter, got the advice to contact their ISP to see if their IP address is associated with proxy or VPN use. This is a peculiar suggestion, as the blocking is taking place on Netflix's end.

netflix twitter

We don't know how widespread the problem is but based on the number of complaints we have seen so far it's certainly not an isolated issue. That begs the question if the VPN banning measures are worth the collateral damage.

Netflix has all the rights to take action against people who bypass their restrictions, but when this harms paying customers who don't use a VPN, it might not be the best solution.

Meanwhile, VPNs are taking countermeasures to make sure that their customers can access Netflix without restrictions.

WeVPN told us that the company is experimenting with a solution, which appears to function for now. CyberGhost and Private Internet Access, which were also affected by Netflix's new blockades, say they managed to route around it within a day.

Update: A Netflix spokesperson informed us that the company is not banning all content for VPN and proxy services. Netflix originals are still available, as we mentioned. The streaming service is working with people who were inadvertently affected to restore access to the full library.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

YouTuber Receives Strikes For Reviewing Legal Video Apps Available on Google Play
Andy Maxwell, 11 Aug 11:41 AM

Sad YouTubeFor many years YouTube was a haven for people to upload and distribute videos explaining how to get otherwise premium content for free.

Tutorials for Kodi addons, infringing Android apps, and otherwise piracy-related videos were displayed in their thousands, providing assistance to established and would-be pirates alike.

Back in 2018 we predicted that the platform wouldn't put up with this forever and soon enough, YouTube began clamping down on this type of content using its 'harmful or dangerous' content policies. YouTube's restrictions are numerous and are especially clear when it comes to piracy-related tutorials.

"Bypassing payment for digital content or services: Showing viewers how to use apps, websites or other information technology to gain unauthorized free access to audio content, audiovisual content, full video games, software or streaming services that normally require payment," the relevant section reads.

This policy has teeth. YouTube says that a first breach will probably result in a warning but a 'strike' is also possible. Three strikes in 90 days mean a channel termination and there is no shortage of piracy-focused YouTubers that didn't heed the warnings and have been banned from the service. Interestingly, seemingly innocent parties can get sucked in too.

Popular YouTuber TechDoctorUK Can't Catch a Break

With 223K subscribers and 12.7 million channel views, TechDoctorUK is known for his video tutorials. A couple of years ago, these included presentations on piracy apps such as Mobdro and Showbox but to avoid falling foul of YouTube's content rules, these were all deleted and these days he says he only uploads tutorials for legal applications.

However, this shift doesn't appear to be helping the YouTuber much. In numerous complaints directed to YouTube on Twitter, he explains that on at least five occasions YouTube has flagged his tutorials as breaching content guidelines, something which resulted in strikes against his account.

"I have received strikes for doing a review on Xumo TV, Pluto TV and others. All of which are completely legal. Fortunately, after tweeting TeamYoutube, they did remove the strikes," he informs TF.

For example, the strike for the Pluto video was contested but YouTube stood by its stance that the video violated its guidelines. It took around four days to reverse the decision.

Another strike related to a video that showed how to use a Firestick backup manager. TechDoctorUK's first appeal was rejected in two minutes but following a review, was later restored and the corresponding strike was removed.

However, after posting another review, this time covering an app called Teleboy, YouTube flagged his content as policy-violating yet again.

TechDoctorUK Strike

What's of interest here is that the Teleboy app is distributed on Google Play and appears to be legitimate. Even if there were any red flags about the app itself, it's still being distributed from there.

After complaining about this strike the objection was again rejected in two minutes (the video is eight minutes long) and TechDoctorUK still can't get a response from YouTube or have his suspension removed. YouTube says that his content is still under review with the policy team.

So what is the problem exactly? TechDoctorUK believes that YouTube's automated scanning tools are to blame.

Automation Bots Can't Recognize Free From Infringing Apps

"The trouble is the automation bots don't know if something is free in the first place," TechDoctorUK informs TF.

"They just look/listen for keywords in your video and if they suspect it's something related to free access, they just take down your video and give you a strike. Three strikes in the same 90 days and your channel is deleted."

As the infringement warning from YouTube indicates a specific timestamp, it does appear that some scanning has taken place but why YouTube is flagging this type of content is unclear.

There's a possibility that earlier (but now deleted content) covering various piracy apps could have placed the channel on the radar but this latest set of strikes suggest that the recognition system may need a tweak or two.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: