Tuesday, August 10, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Rightscorp Site Triggers Security Warnings and Links to Cannabis Site
Ernesto Van der Sar, 10 Aug 05:06 PM

Backed by the RIAA, several major music industry companies have taken some of the largest U.S. Internet providers to court.

The music companies accuse these providers of failing to terminate the accounts of the most egregious pirates by ignoring millions of copyright infringement notices.

This has already resulted in a massive windfall in their case against Cox, where a jury awarded a billion dollars in damages. The same music companies now hope to get the same outcome against and RCN, Charter, Bright House, and Grande Communications.

Rightscorp Evidence

Many of these lawsuits are centered around evidence from the anti-piracy outfit Rightscorp. The company collected settlements from U.S. Internet subscribers for several years but struggled to make a profit.

Going after alleged pirates directly wasn't a great business model, so Rightscorp started to focus on ISPs. They encouraged the RIAA to take legal action against ISPs and offered its data as evidence, in return for a significant cash injection.

What followed was a series of copyright infringement lawsuits where Rightscorp's piracy notices were used as key evidence. The data helped the RIAA to argue that ISPs did not take reasonable steps to stop persistent pirates on their networks.

Security Warnings

The accuracy of Rightscorp's evidence is not without controversy. It was contested in court several times but, thus far, no judge has ruled that Rightscorp's evidence is so flawed that it can't be used. However, this doesn't mean that everything is running smoothly at Rightscorp's technical department.

It appears that Rightcorp's official website, which is also used to collect settlements, is seriously broken. While doing research today we tried to access the site but got a security warning instead.

rightscorp error

The error suggests that there's something wrong with the SSL certificate. Initially, we assumed that it had expired, but on closer inspection, it appears that the certificate is issued to Greenearth.com, not Rightscorp.com.

Greenearth?

This also explains why the non-secure link shows content from Greenearth, welcoming users with a friendly "Hi". The question is, why is this happening?

A likely explanation would be that the domain expired and someone else picked it up, but that's not the case here. Greenearth can actually be directly linked to Rightscorp after a long stroll through some online 'evidence' trails.

Today, Greenearth's homepage doesn't have much content but it previously hosted a 'thriving' cannabis community. The donation page for the site, which has a link to PayPal, is actually still online today.

When we click on the donation button, PayPal informs us that the money will go to "genjitsu dojo inc." This company has little to do with cannabis. It's actually a martial arts school in Ventura, California, which lists Greg Boswell as its CEO. That's a familiar name.

Chief Technology Officer

Gregory Boswell also happens to be the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of Rightscorp. In fact, Boswell is the person who wrote Rightscorp's software and system, starting on a PC in his garage.

On Linkedin, we also read that Boswell is running Greenearth which he relaunched as a "cannabis play," hoping to provide content and services to the now more legal and growing cannabis business. However, it appears that this wasn't a massive success.

The good news is that Rightscorp's domain hasn't been hijacked by a malicious third party. However, the company may want to fix the SSL errors as people are unable to settle any claims now, if that's still a thing.

And for a company whose technical systems are at the center of some of the most high-profile copyright lawsuits, these security errors are not a particularly good look either.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Court Dismisses Yout.com DMCA Circumvention Lawsuit Against RIAA, For Now
Andy Maxwell, 10 Aug 09:48 AM

RIAAFollow the RIAA's attempt to have youtube-dl removed from Github, ripping service Yout carried out a preemptive legal strike against the record label group.

Filed in a Connecticut court, Yout argued that previous actions by the RIAA to have its homepage delisted from Google, on the basis that it circumvented YouTube's 'rolling cipher' technology, were wrongful and damaged its business.

"Contrary to Defendants' allegations, Yout's software platform is not designed to descramble, decrypt, avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair the YouTube rolling cipher technology," Yout's complaint read.

RIAA's Motion to Dismiss, Yout's Response

A month after Yout filed its first amended complaint in December 2020, the RIAA filed a motion to dismiss, noting that according to copyright law the threshold definition for a Technological Protection Measure (the rolling cipher in this case) is low, meaning that just because a measure can be bypassed, it does not follow that the measure can't be considered "effective".

According to the RIAA, this is due to section 1201 of the DMCA considering whether an "ordinary" or "average" consumer can bypass protection measures, not someone with the necessary technical skills. The RIAA also argued that since the Yout service turns streams into MP3 downloads after obtaining a "signature value" from YouTube, that is the very definition of circumventing a TPM.

Yout responded to the RIAA's motion in February, arguing that since it does not decrypt, bypass or avoid any measures on YouTube, claims of circumvention are incorrect. Yout argued that terms used by the RIAA (including "avoid" and "bypass") suggest that the service abused YouTube's technical measures when in fact its methodology should be described simply as "use" of a TPM.

RIAA Asks Court to Dismiss Yout's Complaint

In March the RIAA fought back again, rejecting Yout's claims that its "use" of YouTube's rolling cipher protection is entirely legal. The RIAA also noted that the DMCA notices it sent to Google alleging circumvention offenses did not have to include references to specific copyright works, as Yout had claimed.

The RIAA asked the court to rule on its motion to dismiss Yout's first amended complaint as a matter of law, without allowing Yout to further amend its complaint. It asked the court to do so with prejudice, so that Yout would not be able to return with a "futile" amendment that would "only further support RIAA's legal arguments."

Late last week the court dismissed Yout's case as the RIAA requested but did so without prejudice, meaning that the matter isn't over just yet.

Court Gives Both Sides Room To Expand and Clarify

TorrentFreak has spoken with people familiar with the complaint and the consensus is that the lawsuit developed into something much more complex than Yout's complaint initially encompassed, something recognized by the judge.

Mitch Stoltz, Senior Staff Attorney at EFF, was present in court for the dismissal and he believes the hearing was good for Yout.

"The judge was highly engaged and appeared to be taking the time to understand the issue. A motion to dismiss is supposed to focus on the formal complaint (here, yout.com's) without bringing in additional facts," he informs TF.

"Ultimately, because both yout.com and RIAA brought up additional facts in their arguments about how YouTube works, the judge asked yout.com to revise its complaint to add more detail. After that, there will likely be more briefing from both sides and another hearing."

Yout's amended complaint must be filed within 28 days of the August 5 hearing.

RIAA's motion to dismiss/memo can be found here (1,2), order can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: