Tuesday, June 8, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Why is Verizon Blocking Pirate Sites Such as NYAA and Mangadex?
Ernesto Van der Sar, 08 Jun 05:10 PM

verizon logoA week ago, complaints started pouring in that Verizon is actively blocking pirate sites. The issue was widely discussed on social media as well, where some suggested that pirate site blocking has officially arrived in the US.

At first sight, it indeed seems this way. Popular sites such as NYAA and Mangadex are unreachable. The same applies to Kemono.party and many others.

Users who try to access the sites get an error message in their browsers instead, noting that the domain names are unreachable. The big question is why these domains are being blocked.

Not a Simple Error

To find out more we reached out to Verizon through the official press channels last week, but without any response. That leaves us with no other option than to simply report what we know and what this could potentially mean.

At this point, it's clear that Verizon has known about the issue for over a week. Aside from reaching out ourselves, we heard from several Verizon subscribers who contacted the company. They were told that the issue was being investigated.

This suggests that it's more than a simple routing error or misconfiguration. That would have been fixed by now. There is more going on here, it seems.

The Russian Connection

The blocked sites we know of have things in common in that they're all pirate sites. Some operate in the anime/manga niches, but others such as vojvodinanet.com are inaccessible too. In addition, all sites use the same CDN and DDoS protection service, DDoS-Guard.

DDoS-Guard is a Russian CDN provider that's considered a safe haven for pirate sites. A few months ago the company was reported to the US Government by Hollywood's MPA, which said that DDoS-Guard is not responsive to takedown requests.

In addition to pirate sites, scammers, spammers, and other types of abuse also take place through DDoS-Guard. We don't know if this is more prevalent than on comparable services, but it's an important element to keep in mind.

Piracy Block or Collateral Damage?

NYAA and Mangadex have similar but different DDoS-Guard IP-addresses. NYAA uses 185.178.208.182 and Mangadex resolves to 185.178.208.185. Both IP addresses are blocked by Verizon and all traffic is sent into a black hole.

However, it is worth noting that other sites use these same addresses as well. This includes xn--bstchange-hib.com, which is a phishing site. Many other domains have their hosting accounts suspended, while ipts-money.site is linked to a dubious Ethereum and Bitcoin giveaway site.

deceptive

Looking through the list we see several abuse-related domain names linked to those IP-addresses. For example, znot-stresser.com sounds a lot like a DDoS tool. That domain is currently offline but the list of questionable names doesn't instill much confidence.

It is certainly possible that the NYAA and Mangadex IP-addresses are being blocked due to collateral damage because other sites of services are using those IPs for nefarious purposes. Large network providers regularly block malicious IP-addresses, so that wouldn't be unusual.

Not a Typical Pirate Site Block

Verizon's 'looking glass' reveals that, in North America, the blocked IP-addresses are null routed to AS65512. This essentially means that all traffic goes into a black hole, which is a typical way to handle abuse.

This is certainly not how other ISPs block pirate sites. That often happens through a relatively simply DNS blockade. And when that happens, users often see a message explaining why the site is blocked.

time out

In this case, users who try to access NYAA or Mangadex simply get an error message in their browser explaining that the domains are unreachable. Again, this applies to all sites that use these IP-addresses.

History of (Un)intentional Pirate Site Blocking

This isn't the first time that pirate sites have found themselves mysteriously blocked. A few years ago, Cogent suddenly blocked several Cloudflare IP-addressed that were linked to The Pirate Bay and other pirate sites.

Cogent's blockade was eventually linked to a court order, which required the Internet backbone provider to block several IP-addresses. Many of the pirate sites subsequently went down as collateral damage.

Comcast also has a history of unintentional blocking. Ten years ago the ISP's users were unable to access The Pirate Bay. However, the company swiftly reached out to The Pirate Bay and resolved the issue within a few hours after it became public.

Verizon Has the Answers

To us, it seems unlikely that Verizon has unilaterally started blocking pirate sites – that all happen to use DDoS-Guard – without a court order. But it's possible. Or perhaps there is a court order?

Verizon is the only one with the answers here but, for now, the company is silent.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Nintendo Awarded $1.13m After File-Hosting Site Failed To Remove Pirated Games
Andy Maxwell, 08 Jun 10:31 AM

nintendoThere are many options for those seeking to store and share files online. File-hosting platforms such as Mega.nz have become a huge success story for their owners but in order to avoid legal troubles, strict rules must be adhered to.

Not only must hosting platforms respond to law enforcement requests, there is the not insignificant issue of thousands if not millions of DMCA notices to process, in order to maintain safe harbor provisions under local law. According to historical reports from rightsholders, French file-hosting site 1fichier hasn't always played by the rules.

1fichier Has Been Irritating Rightsholders For Years

As far back as 2014, rightsholders including the RIAA have been complaining about a lack of cooperation from 1fichier. The site, which according to data from SimilarWeb has around 35 million visitors per month, fails to respond adequately to takedown demands, resulting in its reporting to the USTR more than five years ago.

In 2018, the powerful Entertainment Software Alliance (ESA) also weighed in, reporting 1fichier to the USTR for its takedown failings. ESA, whose members include gaming giants Nintendo, Activision and EA, claimed that 1fichier was reluctant to respond to takedown notices, noting that just 0.59% of content was removed following complaints. By 2020 that situation had apparently deteriorated, with takedown rates dropping to just 0.12%

Nintendo Takes Legal Action Against 1fichier

Disappointed with the lack of responses to takedown demands, Nintendo filed a lawsuit in France against DSTORAGE SAS, the operating company of 1fichier. The aim was to compel 1fichier to cooperate while obtaining damages for what the company claimed were infringements of its copyrights.

In a decision handed down on May 25, 2021, the Judicial Court of Paris sided with Nintendo, ruling that DSTORAGE SAS could be held liable after failing to remove illegal copies of Nintendo games hosted on its platform, despite receiving copyright notifications demanding that content should be removed or blocked.

According to a statement from Nintendo, the Court ordered DSTORAGE to pay 935,500 euros ($US1.13m) in damages but also clarified the responsibilities of file-hosting services such as 1fichier when it comes to the processing of copyright takedown notices.

The Court said it was not necessary for rights holders to obtain a decision from a court before asking for infringing content to be removed, so complaints should be actioned accordingly.

Decision Welcomed By Nintendo

Applauding the decision of the Court, Nintendo says that the ruling sends the clear signal that by refusing to block access to pirated content after receiving official takedown notices, services such as 1fichier and their owners can be held liable.

"Nintendo welcomes the decision of the Paris Judicial Court. The message it sends is clear: by refusing to block access to content such as unauthorized copies of video games notwithstanding prior notification, providers of shared hosting services such as Dstorage (1fichier) are liable under French law and are required to remove or make impossible access to such content," Nintendo says.

"Services that do not comply with the law may be ordered to pay damages to right holders whose intellectual property rights have been infringed."

Nintendo says the decision is not only important for its own business but for the entire videogame industry too, since file-hosting platforms like 1fichier cannot now insist that a court order is required before content can be removed.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: