Wednesday, June 23, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Police Arrest Three For Posting 10 Minute Movie Summaries on YouTube
Andy Maxwell, 23 Jun 07:04 PM

Sad YouTubeMost movie companies require viewers to invest 90 minutes or longer to absorb their theatrical works in the way they were intended but this method of presenting a story is reportedly being undermined.

Earlier this week, the Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA), an anti-piracy group representing the rights of Motion Picture Association (MPA) members in Japan, informed TF that people are now devoting entire YouTube channels to so-called 'fast movies'.

These are heavily edited copies of mainstream movies that aim to tell the whole story (complete with spoilers) within a very short period, often inside just 10 minutes.

Fast Movies YouTube

As this image of one example channel shows, these edits are very popular and can generate millions of views. According to CODA, there are channels with hundreds of uploads being viewed tens of millions of times, often with a for-profit motive. This means that they may fall outside traditional 'fair use' style exceptions.

Police in Japan Arrest Three Individuals

During our discussions with CODA our impression was that 'fast movie' uploaders would be dealt with sometime in the future but a few hours ago the anti-piracy group informed us that police in Japan had already sprung into action.

During Wednesday, the Miyagi Prefectural Police Life Safety Division and the Shiogama Police Station arrested three suspects under suspicion of uploading 'fast movies' to YouTube without the rightsholders' consent. The arrests were reportedly carried out under the Copyright Act, which was boosted with new amendments on January 1, 2021.

"From June to July 2020, the suspects edited 'I Am a Hero' and two other motion pictures owned by Toho Co., Ltd. as well as 'Cold Fish' and one other motion picture owned by Nikkatsu Corporation down to about 10 minutes without the permission of the right holders. Further, the suspects added narration and uploaded the videos to YouTube to earn advertising revenue," CODA explains.

'Fast Movies' Threaten The Movie Industry

"Fast movies are clear copyright infringement and serious crime that goes beyond the scope of legally permitted citation, however minor each act may seem," CODA informs TorrentFreak.

"Fast movies including spoilers would discourage viewers from watching the original films and thus have a serious adverse effect on the right holders."

In addition to uploaders who do not seek to gain financially, CODA says that some are effectively commercial operations, working at scale to utilize existing copyrighted movies in order to generate profit.

"There are also malicious contributors who make a profit from advertising revenue, such as uploading 270 works and channels that are played about 80 million times in total. In addition, the content including spoilers leads to not watching the official main movie, and the influence on the right holder is enormous."

An earlier report from NHK indicates that the losses cited by rightsholders are huge – 95 billion yen (US$ 856.7m) in the past 12 months alone, roughly $10 per 'fast movie' view when working in the 80 million views cited by CODA.

Movie Companies Are Mulling Legal Action

Copyright laws in the United States (where YouTube is based) differ from those in Japan, so it is not yet clear what type of action will be taken overseas. According to CODA, however, the rightsholders it represents are "seriously concerned" with the rise of 'fast movies' and although specifics cannot be provided at the moment, CODA will play a prominent role in any action taken.

"CODA shall co-operate with international enforcement partners to identify malicious account operators and consult with the police for successful criminal prosecution to wipe out 'fast movies'," the anti-piracy group says.

In respect of civil action, CODA says it is yet to apply for DMCA subpoenas in US courts to identify people uploading 'fast movies' to YouTube but it will be assisting rightsholders when that takes place, or when lawsuits are filed.

Some Channel Operators Have Begun Removing Videos

CODA informs TF that some channels have already begun removing their 'fast movies'. Indeed, CODA sent us a number of links to channels that were accused of infringing the rights of MPA members studios (including Disney) but just a few hours later, these channels had disappeared from YouTube (1,2).

All of the channels shared by CODA appear to be operated from Japan but there is no shortage of YouTube channels operated from the US too.

CODA doesn't name any of these as specific problems but they are undoubtedly popular with movie fans. Well put together, with commentary describing the films in some detail, some appear to have been in operation for years while also managing to evade YouTube's Content ID system.

It will remain to be seen what legal remedies the studios have available to them outside Japan but in the meantime, CODA is encouraging movie fans not to visit 'fast movie' channels at all.

"CODA urges viewers to remember that viewing illicit videos would benefit the criminals indirectly and damage the interests of the right holders who create the original works," the anti-piracy group concludes.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Premier League Wins Enhanced Illegal Streaming Blocking Order For 2021/22
Andy Maxwell, 23 Jun 10:29 AM

For the past several years, The Football Association Premier League has been working to combat the availability of illegal streams of matches broadcast over the Internet.

These streams can be dealt with in a number of ways but the current preference is to seek cooperation from Internet service providers to have them blocked so that subscribers are prevented from accessing them. This usually involves targeting servers operated by illegal streaming operations by blocking their IP addresses.

Action in Ireland

ISPs won't typically block IP addresses on a voluntary basis but are happy to do so when the Premier League obtains authorization from a court. The High Court in the UK has been happy to grant such orders so in 2018 the Premier League sought to expand its program into Ireland.

In 2019, the Commerical Court gave the Premier League the green light to block pirate servers until June 30, 2020. Then last year, just before that permission ran out, the Premier League obtained an extension for the 2020/21 season.

Premier League Obtains New Blocking Injunction

With that order about to expire, the Premier League needed to obtain another extension to cover the 2021/22 season. According to Irish Examiner, that was granted by Justice David Barniville in the High Court yesterday.

The full ruling is yet to be published by the Court (it should appear here in due course) but at this early stage, there are clear indications that the Premier League has obtained permission to conduct an enhanced blocking program.

The order compels ISPs including Eircom/Eir, Sky Ireland, Sky Subscriber Services, Virgin Media Ireland and Vodafone Ireland to block the IP addresses of pirate servers. In common with previous applications, none of the providers objected to the proposed measures which is unsurprising given their broadcasting interests in delivering Sky Sports, BT Sport, and Amazon Prime, all of which offer Premier League matches.

Enhanced Dynamic Blocking

As noted the ruling is yet to be published but even when it is, little information regarding the specifics of the Premier League's blocking techniques will be made public. These details are shielded from general consumption to prevent pirate IPTV providers from circumventing the blockades but it seems clear that at least to an extent, some have already managed to do that.

In an effort to mitigate that threat next season, the Premier League has been given permission to use enhanced techniques. These are a closely guarded secret but Justice Barniville was reportedly satisfied that the changes were necessary and that enough safeguards against over-blocking (accidentally targeting legal content) were in place to warrant a green light.

In basic terms, the Premier League's anti-piracy partners identify servers associated with unlicensed streams and notify these to ISPs around and during match time. These are then blocked by the ISPs so that subscribers of their subscribers cannot view the streams using regular means.

The blocking measures, which are undoubtedly becoming more sophisticated, can be quickly thwarted with the use of a VPN. However, the Premier League hopes that by putting enough speedbumps in place, it will discourage the use of pirate IPTV services.

No measures will be able to stop the problem altogether but by making life as difficult as possible for both suppliers and consumers of illicit streams, there might be a tipping point in the future where official subscriptions become more attractive.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: