Thursday, February 11, 2021

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Search Engine Ordered To Pay Copyright Damages For Embedding Sports Clips
Andy Maxwell, 11 Feb 07:24 PM

SearchOnce seen as pure indexers of content, the role of search engines has expanded in recent years. In some circumstances, content is now presented in a manner that can reduce the need to visit external sites, much to the irritation of rightsholders.

As the leading Russian search engine, Yandex has been criticized for utilizing other people's content, something which led to the company being sued by sports rightsholder TeleSport Group.

TeleSport Argued That Yandex Infringed Its Rights

TeleSport owns the exclusive rights to distribute several types of sports content in Russia, including a deal that allows it to broadcast highlights from top-tier Italian football matches. These video clips are posted to platforms including vKontakte (Russia's answer to Facebook) and Odnoklassniki, a social network for classmates and old friends.

The problem for TeleSport is that when its videos appeared within Yandex's video search site (which has the appearance of YouTube), clicking on links didn't automatically send the visitor to the source platform. Instead, Yandex embedded the video and placed its own advertising around the content, something that TeleSport believes is an infringement of its rights.

TeleSport Wins Round One of Copyright Infringement Battle

In its fight against Yandex, TeleSport has filed several claims at the Moscow City Court and one of those has now come to fruition. The Court found that Yandex did indeed infringe TeleSports rights due to embedding and ordered the search engine to pay 3.68 million rubles (US$50,000) in damages.

Importantly, this represents just one of TeleSports' claims, with another for 2.95 billion rubles (US$40 million) still pending. This is a good start for TeleSports and sets the groundwork for things to come, the company says.

"This is a very important precedent for the industry and a significant amount of fines per violation. Our material requirements were fully met and this confirms the correctness of our position," commented TeleSport chief Petr Makarenko.

"It is important to understand that if we close our eyes to the implementation of such 'gray' schemes of content monetization by search engines, then in the future Russian viewers will be cut off from world sports – it will become economically unprofitable for copyright holders to acquire and sell rights to broadcast sports events."

Copyright Law Requires Search Engines to Act Responsibly

According to Igor Savochkin, head of legal affairs at TeleSport, Russia's copyright laws require search engines to send users directly to the site that carries the information requested, in this case sporting clips licensed for use on those platforms.

"In this case, the search engine acted as an advertising agent, placing ads for content to which Yandex did not have rights. The illegality of the actions was also confirmed by an independent expert proposed by the defendant himself. The decision of the court undoubtedly sets an important precedent for the industry," Savochkin said.

Yandex Allegedly Continues to Infringe, Will Appeal

According to TeleSport and despite the lawsuits already filed, Yandex continues to infringe the company's rights. TeleSport says that it intends to file claims in the future for each and every violation, in addition to coming out victorious in the large pending case which deals with 590 allegedly violations.

Yandex, of course, sees things rather differently. It believes it did nothing wrong and has already indicated that the company will file an appeal.

"We consider the claims of the plaintiff illegal and unreasonable," a statement from Yandex reads.

"TeleSport independently posted its videos on the Internet, including in its official groups on social networks. At the same time, TeleSport had the opportunity to close its content from indexing. TeleSport did this, but after filing a claim."

In comments to TASS, Yandex insisted that search engines should not be held liable for content posted on third-party websites, "..especially in cases where an unscrupulous copyright holder is trying to make money on content twice."

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Hollywood Warns Against Jailbreaking Exemption for Video Streaming Devices
Ernesto Van der Sar, 11 Feb 12:34 PM

jailbreakUS copyright law places restrictions on what people can do with their purchases, but there are some important exemptions too.

The U.S. Copyright Office regularly reviews these exemptions to Section 1201 of the DMCA, which prevents the public from 'tinkering' with DRM-protected content and devices.

These provisions are renewed every three years after the Office hears input from stakeholders and the general public. This review also allows interested parties to suggest new exemptions.

For example, during the last update in 2018 a new exemption was added to allow libraries to bypass copyright restrictions in order to preserve games that require an online component.

Exemption for Jailbreaking Video Streaming Devices

This year the Copyright Office has received several new suggestions, which are currently under consideration. This includes a proposal from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) which suggests an expansion of the current jailbreaking exemptions to include video streaming devices.

In previous years the Office already allowed the public to jailbreak smartphones, tablets, wearables, and smart TVs. According to the EFF, general video streaming devices should fit in the same category.

"Video streaming devices are functionally and architecturally identical to smart TVs, except that they are physically separate from the display itself, typically connecting to it through an input port," EFF writes in its proposal.

"Full Control"

By jailbreaking these devices, which include Roku boxes and Apple TV, the public will be able to "exercise full control" over them. That can enable valuable new features, such as adding a web browser and compatibility with other tools such as privacy-enhancing VPNs.

This proposal is supported by many digital rights activists, but the major copyright industry groups fiercely oppose the plan. This week a coalition including the RIAA, ESA, and Hollywood's MPA urged the Copyright Office not to grant the exemption.

Copyright Holders Fear Widespread Piracy

The groups fear that jailbreaking will result in widespread copyright infringement, as it allows the public to install piracy tools on these video devices as well.

"Access controls on these devices are designed to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works and subscription services, piracy of signals, and the copying of works," the copyright holders write.

"Once circumvented, even for the ostensible purpose of first installing a lawful application, nothing prevents a user from later installing infringing applications or applications that enable infringement on these devices."

The groups note that these concerns are not hypothetical. For example, MPA members have already addressed streaming box piracy in several lawsuits over the past years, mentioning the cases against TickBox TV and Dragon Box.

The United States Trade Representative has also focused on the pirate streaming box problem in recent 'notorious markets' reports, the rightsholders add. While that is true, it should be noted that this report is largely based on input from copyright holders.

Piracy Fears Outweigh Legitimate Uses

Nonetheless, Hollywood and other rightsholders urge the Copyright Office not to allow the circumvention of technical protection measures (TPMs) for video streaming devices. That would hurt copyright holders as well as artists and undermine the legitimate marketplace.

While the opposition letter doesn't deny that there can be non-infringing uses, such as adding a browser or a custom screensaver, it classifies these as minor compared to the piracy threat.

"The lack of such functionalities in devices protected by TPMs is a mere inconvenience," the copyright holder groups stress. "In the majority of instances, modification of software in devices is likely infringing."

The Copyright Office will consider the arguments from all stakeholders during the months to come. After a public hearing later this year it will decide if any changes will be made to the current exemptions.

A copy of the letter sent by the Joint Creators and Copyright Owners is available here (pdf). EFF's original proposal can be found here (pdf).

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: