Thursday, May 7, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Google 'Showcases' YTS and YIFY Movie Releases in Search Results
Ernesto, 07 May 04:58 PM

To help hundreds of millions of people find what they search for, Google has implemented some nifty features over the years.

A search for a movie title, for example, doesn't only return the most relevant websites. It also comes with 'snippets' that show detailed information about the film, including review score and showtimes, when available.

Another Google feature is the movie reel. A search for "Disney Films" returns a carousel of Disney produced titles, and the same is true for other studios and platforms such as Netflix. This trick even works for release years and movie genres.

"Disney Movies"

These features are all powered by Google's advanced algorithms which tend to be very accurate and effective. The search results are appealing to most users and we assume that the movie studios are happy with them too. The more exposure, the better, after all.

That said, there may be some uses for the movie carousel that Hollywood will be less pleased with. As it turns out, it also works for several piracy-related searches.

For example, when we search for YIFY and YTS movies, we see a featured list of movies that were released by the popular torrent site. While these posters don't link to any torrents, the torrent site's domain name is at the top of the search results.

"Movies YTS"

This result makes sense, as YTS is a movie distributor. However, it certainly doesn't have the rights to share these films in public.

It appears that the movie titles and posters are somehow being scraped from the YTS website as the posters do indeed match up YTS torrent releases. The best illustration is the missing poster for Angel Has Fallen. YTS removed that film from its site as part of a copyright settlement.

The results may differ depending on one's setup and configuration but we confirmed that the feature works in various settings. Also, it's not limited to YTS and YIFY either. A search for "Fmovies films" returns a similar reel.

"Fmovies Films"

As mentioned, the posters don't link to any infringing content. Clicking on them simply brings up more movie details. That said, it's pretty unusual that pirate releases are highlighted at all.

That also applies to Google's list of "pirated movies," which shows up as a 'related search' for some terms that are linked to piracy.

"Pirated Movies"

Clicking on those posters actually links to a search for the movie title with the keyword "pirated." A few years ago that would point to pirate sites, but those have been scrubbed from the top search results now.

Finally, for those who were hoping that this would also work for The Pirate Bay, we have to disappoint. Instead of a reel of Pirate Bay releases, Google just features three films that mention The Pirate Bay.

This isn't the first time that Google's algorithms have delivered an unexpected piracy twist. A few years ago, movie ratings from pirate sites showed up in Google's search snippets, accidentally promoting pirate releases. These soon disappeared after the faux pas was made public.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also help you to find the best anonymous VPN.

MPA and Amazon Ask Github to Suspend Kodi Add-On Developer's Account
Andy, 07 May 11:58 AM

Following a massive surge in interest over the past several years, Kodi remains the platform of choice for millions of people looking to access movies and TV shows for free.

In its standard form, the Kodi software is entirely legal but when augmented with third-party add-ons, it turns into a piracy powerhouse.

As a result, the developers of Kodi are legally in the clear but the same cannot be said for the developers of the countless add-ons designed for the express purpose of finding, accessing, and delivering infringing content. The MPA and like-minded companies are in a constant battle to disrupt their activities, sometimes ending up in court to achieve those goals.

Some of these actions are heavily publicized but others maintain a lower profile. In February 2018, a developer known online as 'Blamo' (aka 'Mr. Blamo') revealed that he, in common with several of his counterparts, had been threatened by content companies. From there the trail went cold but according to a complaint filed against Github this week, legal action in Canada followed.

On September 7, 2018, a dozen companies including the studios of the MPA/MPA-Canada plus Amazon and Netflix launched a copyright infringement lawsuit at Canada's Federal Court against an individual "doing business" as Mr. Blamo.

"In the context of that action, our clients alleged that [Blamo] notably developed, hosted, promoted and distributed infringing add-ons for the Kodi media center, which provided unauthorized access to motion pictures and television content for which the copyright is owned by our clients," the MPA writes.

According to Federal Court records, Blamo did not mount any kind of defense so as a result, the matter was decided in his absence. On January 15, 2019, the Federal Court handed down a final judgment, including a declaration of infringement and a permanent injunction.

"The permanent injunction enjoins and restrains [Blamo] from, inter alia, hosting, distributing or promoting infringing Kodi add-ons and their repositories, including notably the 'Blamo' repository and the 'Chocolate Salty Balls' infringing add-ons," the MPA adds.

The problem here is that, according to the MPA and associated companies, Blamo has a Github account where it is claimed he continues to "host and distribute infringing Kodi add-ons and their repository, including notably the Chocolate Salty Balls infringing add-on and the Blamo repository." This, the MPA says, amounts to contempt of court.

What's particularly interesting here, however, is that the MPA isn't asking for the specified URLs to be deleted. Instead, it asks for Blamo's entire Github account to be deactivated instead. According to the studios they wrote to Blamo, most recently on December 19, 2019, to request that he "cease his infringing activities" but that correspondence apparently fell on deaf ears.

"We request that GitHub, Inc. ('GitHub') suspend the account github.com/MrBlamo6969 (the 'Account'). The Account is used by its operator to engage in ongoing acts of copyright infringement in contravention of an Order of the Federal Court (Canada) issued on January 15, 2019, which amounts to contempt of Court by the Account's operator," the MPA's complaint reads.

"We therefore request that GitHub immediately suspends the Account to preserve our clients' rights and ensure that the letter and spirit of the final Judgment of the Federal Court are respected."

As the image above shows, Github declined to delete the entire account as requested. However, it has deleted the first two URLs listed in the MPA's complaint, URLs that contained the content specifically covered by the injunction handed down by the Federal Court in Canada.

Whether that will be the end of the matter remains unclear but at least from a functional perspective, Github does appear to have acted in the 'spirit' of the court order.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also help you to find the best anonymous VPN.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: