Monday, April 27, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Telegram Piracy Channels Face Blocking After Italian Prosecutor Issues Emergency Order
Andy, 27 Apr 06:56 PM

Instant messenging platform Telegram has an estimated 400 million users who use the service to communicate on an limitless number of topics. It is also used for piracy purposes, which has resulted in criticism from copyright holders.

In Italy, significant pressure has been building following complaints from the Federation of Newspaper Publishers (FIEG). According to the association, a sample of 10 Telegram channels, that are specifically used for the illicit distribution of newspapers, have around 580,000 users obtaining copyrighted content without permission.

"The estimate of the losses suffered by publishing companies is alarming," FIEG President Andrea Riffeser Monti complained earlier this month.

"In a highly conservative hypothesis, we estimate €670 thousand per day, approximately €250 million per year: a figure which I trust that the sector authority wants to intervene against firmly and promptly."

In light of soaring illicit consumption during the coronavirus pandemic, FIEG said that it had asked local telecoms watchdog AGCOM, which has site-blocking powers, to take "exemplary and urgent measures" against Telegram, which stands accused of not doing enough to tackle piracy. It is a position supported by the European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA).

"We asked AGCOM for an exemplary measure because we think that the authority has this power but it also has a duty: one cannot witness a daily illegal act, the circulation of copies of newspapers fraudulently," ENPA President Carlo Perrone told local media this month.

"It is a lack of respect for the work of thousands of serious journalists as well as restricting citizens' rights to be informed."

The problem is complex, however. Telegram is based in Russia where even the Russian government, with all its determination, hasn't been able to block Telegram effectively. Nevertheless, the Italian publishers have been pushing ahead, demanding an intervention in proportion to the economic damages their members are said to be suffering.

Late last week, in response to building pressure from the publishers, AGCOM said it had examined an application from FIEG which demanded that either all pirated copies of its members' works should be removed from Telegram channels or the platform should be completely blocked. According to AGCOM, it entered into urgent discussion with Telegram which resulted in the platform deleting seven of the eight channels initially reported by FIEG.

The announcement came with words of caution, however. While reiterating that it is committed to protecting copyrights, AGCOM clarified that its interventions can only take place within the limits of relevant local regulations. When violations take place overseas, matters become more complex.

"When the violation occurs on the channels of a site located outside the national territory, as in the case of Telegram, the Authority can only turn to the Italian providers that provide internet access, ordering them to proceed to disable access to the entire site. It is not possible to order selective removal of only illegal content, as this would involve the use of filtering techniques that the Court of European justice has found incompatible with Union law," AGCOM wrote.

"In the current state of legislation, a possible indiscriminate blocking measure of access to all Telegram channels – such as the one requested by the FIEG – appears to lack the necessary requirement."

A key factor here is that AGCOM acts as a regulator and as such has limited powers. The Postal and Communications Police and the Guardia di Finanza law enforcement agency, on the other hand, can pursue cases more aggressively. So, while expressing "satisfaction" at the closure of the seven Telegram channels, FIEG said it would also be using those law enforcement avenues to protect its members' rights.

This morning it became evident that the screw was being tightened further. According to a report from La Repubblica, officers of the Economic and Financial Police Unit of the Guardia di Finanza of Bari arrived at AGCOM's headquarters in Rome to notify the agency of an unprecedented "emergency preventative seizure order" signed by Deputy Prosecutor Roberto Rossi. This, the publication said, "marked a point of no return in the war on piracy."

The prosecutor's case centers around complaints to Telegram over a series of copyright infringement offenses committed by yet-to-be-identified individuals.

"They distributed, transmitted and disseminated in PDF format, magazines, newspapers and books (copyright protected assets), after having illegally acquired them through abusive access to the computer system (or in any case with illegal subtraction from legitimate holders), tens of thousands of files," the report reads.

In tandem are allegations that alongside the copyright infringement offenses, money laundering is taking place, a crime that can result in a sentence of up to 12 years. the Bari prosecutor's office states that Telegram has never wanted to assist in identifying the offenders nor disable access to their channels.

As a result, the financial police have been given a mandate to close 19 Telegram channels said to be involved in mass infringement of various publications' copyrights. However, in the event that Telegram fails to cooperate, local Internet service providers could be required to block access to the channels or, if that is not possible, the entire Telegram service in Italy.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.

Covid-19 Measures Boosted Visits to Film Piracy Sites by Over 50%, New Data Show
Ernesto, 27 Apr 11:40 AM

The coronavirus pandemic has led to unprecedented changes in how people live their lives.

These changes are visible in all parts of society as well as all corners of the Internet. This includes pirate sites.

One of the earliest effects we reported was the increased interest in the movie Contagion, a decade-old classic which depicts a worldwide virus outbreak. Mid-March, the first signs revealed an increased interest in pirate sites and services in severely affected regions.

Earlier this month, we completed this picture with a detailed dataset of BitTorrent traffic. This showed that torrent traffic spiked in many countries when lockdown measures were put in place.

Today, UK piracy tracking company MUSO adds to these findings. The company continuously monitors the number of visits to pirate sites across various categories. According to their data, visits to film piracy sites increased significantly from the end of February to the and of March.

The table below shows an overview of the increase in visits to film piracy sites from the last seven days of February to the last seven days of March. This shows that the increase in traffic is clearly visible around the world.

Italy and Spain, two of the most widely affected countries, are both in the top three. However, an uptick in visits is also observed in other regions where lockdown measures were introduced.

MUSO shared some additional data with TorrentFreak which shows that traffic to software piracy sites also rose. The effect is less pronounced than with film piracy, but it's still a sizable 41% and 32% for Italy and Spain respectively.

The piracy tracking company doesn't separately report data on TV piracy, but it found that the increase is less pronounced there. This is in part due to the effect that this includes visits to live sports streaming sites. These numbers have tanked because there are virtually no live events.

"MUSO measured a drop of -49.10% in global visits to live sport piracy domains," MUSO CEO Andy Chatterley tells TorrentFreak.

"When looking at daily trends from February to March you can see a clear drop in visits over the weekend spikes as live sports has ceased across the world. When tracking individual piracy domains that distribute recorded content we see an upward trend in visits, we expect this to continue into April."

Overall, the data reported by MUSO are in line with earlier observations. The effects on various piracy channels very much mimic the increase in other consumption methods, such as legal streaming.

"Piracy or unlicensed consumption trends are closely linked to paid-for or licensed content. So, just as Netflix has seen large subscriber gains, we have seen a significant spike in visits to film piracy sites," Chatterley says.

MUSO will continue to look at how these trends develop over time. It will be particularly interesting to see if there are any lasting changes in piracy behavior, or if everything will eventually return to normal.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week on BitTorrent – 04/27/20
Ernesto, 27 Apr 09:06 AM

This week we have two newcomers in our chart.

Extraction is the most downloaded movie.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are Web-DL/Webrip/HDRip/BDrip/DVDrip unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the articles of the recent weekly movie download charts.

This week's most downloaded movies are:
Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer
Most downloaded movies via torrents
1 (…) Extraction 6.9 / trailer
2 (1) Fantasy Island 4.7 / trailer
3 (10) Bloodshot 5.7 / trailer
4 (2) Bad Boys for Life 7.1 / trailer
5 (…) Arkansas ?.? / trailer
6 (5) Gretel & Hansel 6.1 / trailer
7 (4) The Gentlemen 8.0 / trailer
8 (3) Trolls World Tour 6.1 / trailer
9 (8) Sonic The Hedgehog 6.6 / trailer
10 (9) IP Man 4 7.2 / trailer

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Sunday, April 26, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Anti-Piracy Lawyer Offers to Withdraw Twitter Complaint Against Popcorn Time in Exchange for a Settlement
Ernesto, 26 Apr 09:52 PM

Earlier this month we reported that a popular Popcorn Time fork had its Twitter account suspended over an alleged trademark violation.

As it turned out, this was the work of Hawaiian anti-piracy lawyer Kerry Culpepper, who used the "Popcorn Time" trademark as ammunition.

This trademark was recently registered by the attorney in name of the Hawaiian company '42 Ventures.' When we inquired about the reason for this peculiar move, the attorney's answer was clear.

"42 has partnered with various content providers to deliver a platform of LEGAL streaming media. One or more of these providers have been providing content since 2009 under same or related trademark," Culpepper said, adding that the company will continue to protect its rights in the future.

The content the company refers to can be found on Popcorntime4u.com, which links to content from the YouTube channel Popcorned Planet. The channel's operator, Andy Signore, later informed us that he has a distribution deal with 42 Ventures, but he seemed to be unaware of the trademark issues.

It is safe to say that using a trademark as a tool to combat online piracy – using the name of a piracy app against itself – is quite unusual. However, this was just the beginning. It turns out that an even more bizarre discussion was taking place behind the scenes.

TorrentFreak spoke to the Popcorn Time operators who handed over a long chain of email communication they had with Mr. Culpepper at the beginning of April. This shows that the attorney was willing to 'license' the trademark to the Popcorn Time team, and more.

It started when Popcorn Time complained about the trademark registration, threatening to file a complaint at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The attorney responded to this, by offering Popcorn Time a license to use the trademark, under certain conditions.

In an email, Culpepper explained that he doesn't only represent 42 Ventures but also other clients, including several movie companies, such as Millennium Films and Voltage Films. These copyright holders would like to have their films removed from Popcorn Time.

Popcorn Time replied that it was willing to remove the films. However, the license was a different issue.

The anti-piracy lawyer, however, framed the deal as a win-win and sweetened it by offering to drop the Twitter complaint. This meant that Popcorn Time could get their Twitter handle back, while the accounts of their competitors stayed down. In addition, Culpepper promised not to go after Popcorn Time's domain name.

"If you agree to a license 42 Ventures will withdraw the complaint against your twitter handle or other social media account. The other popcorn time twitter handles will be removed so only yours would remain," the attorney wrote.

"Also, 42 will not institute a domain dispute against your domain. Please let me know if you still refuse to pay for a license to 42," he added.

42 Ventures' licensing offer is intriguing, considering the earlier mentioned focus on "LEGAL streaming" and copyright enforcement. Popcorn Time also appeared to be interested.

When the developers asked what this license would cost, Culpepper replied that it depends on the app's monthly earnings. This would be $500 a month at most, according to the developers.

The lawyer responded that a typical license fee would usually be tens of thousands of dollars, and opted to settle the matter with a "covenant not to sue." That would cost Popcorn Time $4,900.

"I propose a payment of $4,900 for covenant of 42 not to sue and to let you have your twitter profile," he wrote, later adding that an agreement was being drafted and that money can be transferred to a Bitcoin address.

Not much later the agreement, seen in full by TorrentFreak, did indeed arrive. It doesn't include a licensing deal but spells out other terms, including a promise to keep the settlement amount confidential, and the covenant not to sue.

Under the terms, 42 Ventures agrees not to sue Popcorn Time as long as it doesn't violate US copyright law [which seems meaningless]. In addition, the company stresses that it doesn't give "any opinion on the legality of Infringers'website or related operations."

As promised, 42 Ventures will also withdraw its complaint at Twitter and agrees not to file any domain disputes over popcorntime.app and popcorntime.sh.

Interestingly, the agreement doesn't mention that Popcorn Time is required to remove any torrents, not even those that point to movies of the attorney's clients. That said, the agreement is only valid if Popcorn Time doesn't violate US copyright law, something that wasn't made explicitly clear in the email communication.

Today, several weeks have passed but the Bitcoin address remains empty. The Popcorn Time team decided not to sign the agreement.

"We were unable to get the money," Popcorn Time informs us. Another complication was that VPN.ht, one of the app's sponsors, wasn't happy with the proposed agreement and the demands of the lawyer.

As a result, Popcorn Time's Twitter account remains suspended. It is possible that Culpepper will eventually file a domain dispute over the Popcorn Time domains, or even a copyright infringement lawsuit.

TorrentFreak also spoke to Culpepper, who confirms that he offered to settle the trademark issue. According to the attorney, Popcorn Time indeed stopped responding after he requested more details regarding the link between the app and VPN.ht.

The attorney also said that he recently requested GitHub to remove the Popcorn Time repository. For now, however, that's still online.

Without taking any sides here, it will definitely be interesting to see this email chain and the proposed agreement being brought up in court. Given the circumstances and the unique situation, we have a feeling that the fingers of some attorneys are itching already.

Get the popcorn ready…

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.

Anti-Piracy Outfit Looking For 'Ethical Hacker' to Reverse Engineer Pirate Technologies
Andy, 26 Apr 01:28 PM

The existence of many thousands of pirate-focused sites and applications available on the Internet today shows that there's no shortage of skilled individuals interested in the piracy scene.

On the other hand, there's also no shortage of copyright holders and anti-piracy groups keen to disrupt their activities using any means at their disposal. At least on the 'battlefield', these opposing parties are not entirely dissimilar, with a shared interest in piracy but always at the expense of the other.

An example can be found at Danish anti-piracy group Rights Alliance. While their arch-rivals are beavering away developing the next Popcorn Time, Kodi add-on, TV app, or YouTube-ripper, Rights Alliance wants to keep up with all of these developments so that strategies can be put in place to deal with them.

"We are dealing with an area that is always evolving and where the people behind the services we try to stop are creative and often very technically proficient. This places great demands on us, as we must proactively follow the latest trends in the online marketplace for illegal content sharing and adapt our activities accordingly," a job listing posted this week explains.

"Here you will have a big role to play, as you need to keep an eye on the new technologies and help find solutions to obstruct their functionality and organize our enforcement strategy."

The successful candidate will also be required to dissect 'pirate' apps and the systems behind them. This is so the anti-piracy organization can present an analysis to law enforcement and in some cases, the courts.

"One of the other important tasks of the position will be to 'reverse engineer' technology / computer programs so that the functionality can be described and explained to judges and authorities. In addition, there will be ample opportunity for programming of crawlers, plugins and other automation tools," the listing reads.

This is only part of the responsibilities for the position of IT Investigator, however. Leveraging data collected from publicly available sources, the candidate will be expected to unmask the often anonymous entities behind piracy tools and services, as well as those who use them to obtain copyrighted material.

"Our work requires a great deal of investigative efforts on various internet forums and platforms, and your work will therefore largely be to use OSINT and other investigative tools to describe the methods and uncover the identities behind the operators of platforms and people who illegally share our members' content," Rights Alliance adds.

While the anti-piracy group says that an "ethical hacker" or computer scientist could have the necessary qualities for the job, there are numerous cases where former pirates have changed sides. So, for fun, we approached someone who previously built and ran a torrent site and tracker, to see if he could ever be tempted by a job offer from the 'other side'.

"I'm good thanks (lol) but you can see why someone like me might be a good fit. Some might balk at the idea but given the chance to do what we like and get paid for it in a new environment could be really interesting," he explained.

"My problem would come at the end watching someone in court because of my work so I'll pass if you don't mind. Anyway, I don't want them Googling me."

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company