Thursday, December 14, 2023

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Two Arrested in Pirate IPTV Raids, Police Obtain Details of UK Subscribers
Andy Maxwell, 14 Dec 10:01 AM

iptv2-sAfter years of relative calm, punctuated by intermittent action against larger operations, law enforcement actions against pirate IPTV services in Europe are on the rise.

The UK's Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU), a regional force with responsibility for disrupting organized crime and counter terrorism policing, has revealed details of raids executed on Tuesday targeting a pirate IPTV operation.

Warrants Executed in England and Scotland

ERSOU reports that simultaneous warrants were executed at residential addresses in Harlow and Chigwell in Essex, Waltham Cross in Hertfordshire, and Lanarkshire in Scotland. Two men, aged 33 and 35, were arrested on suspicion of fraud, money laundering, and intellectual property offenses.

The investigation, led by ERSOU but most likely supported by Sky investigators, relates to a channel on Telegram where pirate subscription packages, granting illegal access to Sky TV channels, were sold to the public. Police say the packages were sold to thousands of end users, earning those behind the scheme over £800,000 (US$1.01m).

Police Seize Cash, 'Custom' Streaming Devices, Firearms

Police report that specialist financial investigators were able to seize around £17,000 (US$21,800) in cash, unnamed digital devices, and an unspecified number of 'custom' streaming devices. Supplied images featuring some of the seized cash, and clear evidence bags containing immediately recognizable orange boxes, suggests modified Amazon Firesticks were probably part of the haul.

Images from the raids (credit: ERSOU)ERSOU-IPTV-Seized1

ERSOU reports that the men were taken into police custody where they were questioned and subsequently bailed. After two shotguns were seized by police, a man at the address in Harlow was also arrested for firearms license breaches, ERSOU reports.

Large-Scale Criminal Operation

ERSOU Detective Inspector Steve Payne says the arrests were part of an investigation into a "sophisticated large-scale criminal operation" that has generated significant revenue from the sale of illicit IPTV subscription packages. The money generated comes from buyers of the packages, most likely ordinary people looking for a cheaper way to access subscription TV.

DI Payne says that after police obtained subscriber lists, further action shouldn't be ruled out.

"We have also gained access to the details of those purchasing the streams, and I would remind anyone doing so that they will be breaking the law and could ultimately be subject to criminal proceedings," DI Payne notes.

The arrests were also welcomed by Matt Hibbert, Sky's Director of Anti-Piracy.

"We're grateful to ERSOU and to the forces involved for taking this action, which will have a significant impact on the illicit sale of Sky TV. We'll continue to support efforts to shut down the organised networks involved in the large-scale theft of our content, and to protect consumers from the risks involved in accessing content in this way," Hibbert says.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Take Aim at AI Freeloading
Ernesto Van der Sar, 13 Dec 10:17 PM

yodaOver the past year, artificial intelligence enjoyed its mainstream breakthrough.

The instant success of ChatGPT and follow-up releases of other large language model-based tools kickstarted what many believe is a new revolution.

By now it is clear that AI offers endless possibilities. At the same time, however, it has ignited many new worries. Copyright holders, in particular, are concerned that their work is being used as training models but without permission.

'Piracy-Trained' AI Models

Over the past few months, we have seen a variety of copyright lawsuits, many of which were filed by writers. These cases target ChatGPT's OpenAI but other platforms are targeted as well. A key allegation in these complaints is that the AI was trained using pirated books.

For example, several authors have just filed an amended complaint against Meta, alleging that the company continued to train its AI on pirated books despite concerns from its own legal team.

This clash between AI and copyright piqued the interest of the U.S. Copyright Office which launched an inquiry asking the public for input. With more than 10,000 responses, it is clear that the topic is close to the hearts of many people.

The tone of the responses isn't hard to guess either. Copyright holders defend their rights and interests, often suggesting keeping a tight leash on AI training, while AI developers and tech companies prefer as few barriers to innovation as possible.

Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers

It's impossible to summarize all opinions without AI assistance, but one submission stood out to us in particular; it encourages the free sharing of books while recommending that AI tools shouldn't be allowed to exploit this generosity for free.

The submission was filed by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA), which represents over 2,500 published writers. The association is particularly concerned with the suggestion that its members' works can be used for AI training under a fair use exception.

sfwa

SFWA sides with many other rightsholders, concluding that pirated books shouldn't be used for AI training, adding that the same applies to books that are freely shared by many Science Fiction and Fantasy writers.

"SFWA acknowledges the problem of generative AI scraping pirated material published as copy-protected ebooks by professional publishers, but SFWA additionally has the unique position of representing many authors who have fought to make their work available for free for human readers.

"[M]any science fiction and fantasy authors of short fiction have embraced the open Internet, believing that it is good for society and for a flourishing culture that art be available to their fellow human beings regardless of ability to pay," SFWA adds.

Many of the authors strongly believe that freely sharing stories is a good thing that enriches mankind, but that doesn't automatically mean that AI has the same privilege if the output is destined for commercial activities.

The SFWA stresses that it doesn't take offense when AI tools use the works of its members for non-commercial purposes, such as research and scholarship. However, turning the data into a commercial tool goes too far.

"The current content-scraping regime preys on that good-faith sharing of art as a connection between human minds and the hard work of building a common culture. The decision to publish creative work online to read and share for free […] is a trade-off of many factors including piracy, audience, and the simple (albeit elusive) ability to make a living.

"Bluntly, many authors do not want their work taken for this purpose, and that cannot be ignored," SFWA insists.

Frodo and Gandalf faced the Balrog in Moria

AI freeloading will lead to unfair competition and cause harm to licensing markets, the writers warn. The developers of the AI tools have attempted to tone down these concerns but the SFWA is not convinced.

On one hand, AI-generated Science Fiction and Fantasy publications may vastly increase the availability of content. It could lead to a "flood of trash" publications that make it harder for human writers to get noticed and reach an audience.

AI-powered works could also compete within the licensed market, by using popular concepts, that are clearly inspired by existing works.

Meta previously said that AI models learn by taking basic concepts from a variety of sources. However, the writers counter that an AI's knowledge about Frodo and Gandalf is much more specific.

Meta's discussion in their lengthy section entitled, 'How Large Language Models "Learn"' uses the sentence, "Susan's aunt planted the flower in the garden" to illustrate how these tools would draw from a wide variety of sources to learn individual words. This enables their tools to fluently use words like 'flower' and 'Susan'; however, their explanation holds less true in how these tools would learn the words in a sentence like, "Frodo and Gandalf faced the Balrog in Moria." Learning the words in that sentence both requires a much more targeted input data set, and—with due respect to Susan's aunt—seems likely to be more commercially interesting.

Finding a Balance

The writers want to protect their rights but they don't believe in the extremely restrictive position of some other copyright holders. They don't subscribe to the idea that people will no longer buy books because they can get the same information from an AI tool, for example. However, authors deserve some form of compensation.

SFWA argues that all stakeholders should ultimately get together to come up with a plan that works for everyone. This means fair compensation and protection for authors, without making it financially unviable for AI to flourish.

"Questions of 'how' and 'when' and 'how much money' all come later; first and foremost the author must have the right to say how their work is used," their submission reads.

"So long as authors retain the right to say 'no' we believe that equitable solutions to the thorny problems of licensing, scale, and market harm can be found. But that right remains the cornerstone, and we insist upon it," SFWA concludes.

A copy of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association's submission to the U.S. Copyright Office's inquiry is available here (pdf).

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

France: Streaming & DDL Piracy Fall But Cloud & Usenet Boosts Wipe Out Gains
Andy Maxwell, 13 Dec 03:03 PM

ArcomFor more than a decade, the French government has produced a report detailing the digital content consumption habits of French internet users.

Currently produced by telecoms regulator Arcom, the content consumption barometer report quantifies consumption of major content categories including movies, TV shows, live sports broadcasts, music, video games, software, and audiobooks, among others. It aims to profile consumers of content, map changes in consumption habits and sources, and gauge public perception of legal content availability. Arcom published the report's 2023 edition yesterday.

Overall Exposure to Cultural Content

In terms of overall exposure to digital cultural and sporting content, the report estimates that 87% of internet users aged 15 and over, around 45 million people, were consumers in 2023. That's up from 86% in 2022.

Of the dozen content categories covered in the report, movies were consumed by 55%, music by 50%, and TV series by 49%, meaning no change in the most popular content categories consumed in 2023 versus last year.

arcom-consumption digital content 2023

Paying (And Not Paying) For Content

For 2023, Arcom reports that 61% of consumers or 27.5 million people, paid to consume digital content online. This year the average monthly spend was €38.00 ($41.00) per month, a significant increase from the €32.00 ($34.50) reported in 2022. The report notes that this is the biggest increase in average spending in recent years, with Arcom describing the uplift as "remarkable" in the context of price inflation.

One of Arcom's key responsibilities is to reduce piracy rates. In 2021, around 27% of internet users consumed at least one piece of pirated content, a figure that reduced to 24% in 2022.

Arcom introduces 2023's overall piracy rate as follows: "The fall observed in 2022 in the proportion of illegal consumption of digital cultural and sporting content has continued this year," while later adding, "..this continues the decline seen in 2022."

While this year's figures are provided, the "fall observed in 2022" was actually the difference between an overall rate of 27% in 2021 and 24% in 2022, in other words a three percentage point reduction in the overall piracy rate, aka success. Perhaps a less ambiguous statement would've been more helpful to describe the state of play this year.

In 2023 there was zero reduction in the overall piracy rate, i.e. the rate is static year-on-year. In common with 2022, in 2023 around 24% of internet users still consumed at least one piece of pirated content. The report describes this as illegal content consumption "leveling off."

arcom-illegal content 2023

Appetite For Piracy Wanes With Age

In common with most other studies conducted in Europe, piracy rates are higher among younger people in France and lower among the older generations.

"The 15-24 and 25-39 age groups are the biggest consumers of illegal digital cultural and sporting content (46% and 36% respectively). Conversely, only 16% of 40–59-year-olds and 7% of 60+ year-olds are involved," the report notes.

When drilling down into content categories, the report says that a drop in illegal consumption was observed in a quarter.

"This is particularly the case for films and music, two of the three content categories with the highest levels of illegal consumption by internet users in 2022 (-1 point each, to 12% and 6% of internet users respectively)," Arcom reports.

"While illegal consumption of TV series, the second most pirated content in 2022, remains stable in 2023 within the internet user population (9% illegal consumption), there has been a slight fall among those who consume it (18%, -1 point)."

Consumption of Illegal Streams & Downloads Fall

The two most popular methods of obtaining infringing content in France are streaming and direct downloading, often referred to as DDL. However, this year's report from Arcom finds that both methods experienced declining popularity in 2023.

While remaining the most frequently used method among consumers overall (49% and 38% respectively), streaming fell two percentage points and downloading four percentage points versus rates in 2022.

arcom-illegal-consumption 2023

Arcom says that these declines in two key categories demonstrate "the positive effects of the anti-piracy measures implemented in 2022 and 2023." While that may well be the case, if overall piracy rates remained static this year, something else must've taken up the slack.

As the Arcom graph shows, remarkable gains are on display in two categories. In 2022, services in the 'Usenet and newsgroups' category were used by 11% of French internet users but in 2023, that figure has increased to 16%. The other category climbing quickly, Cloud services, reached a peak of 21% in 2020 and then fell to 19% and 16% in 2021 and 2022 respectively.

In 2023, improved privacy versus other illicit content access methods may have contributed to Cloud services' 2020-equalling usage rate of 21%.

Illegal Access Rates Overall

Arcom reports a "stabilization" in illicit consumption of live sports broadcasts for 2023. This year's rate of 4% is identical to that reported in 2022, but still an improvement over 2021 where 6% of internet users consumed liver sports from illegal sources.

In summary, illegal streaming was used by 49% of internet users in 2023, direct downloading (DDL) by 38%, social networks by 32%, with peer-to-peer networks such as BitTorrent hanging on to around 26% of users.

The surprise package of Usenet (16%) and Cloud services (21%) returning to rates not seen since 2020 might be the trend to watch since Arcom has much less control over these methods. Deterring the use of streaming and downloading services may be considered a success, but that could be tempered if more complex issues are encountered further down the road.

Arcom's 2023 Barometer report is available here (pdf, French)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

270x90-blue

Are you looking for a VPN service? TorrentFreak sponsor NordVPN has some excellent offers.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: