Thursday, November 3, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Premier League Celebrates "Success" as IPTV Pirate Walks Out of Court
Andy Maxwell, 03 Nov 12:03 PM

marvelstreamsThis September, TorrentFreak was provided with information relating to Marvel Streams UK, a pirate IPTV service that suddenly disappeared in March 2022.

Like many similar services, Marvel Streams offered subscription packages that included live TV channels and a movie/TV show VOD service, all for a cheap monthly price.

The service's operator, Peter Dilworth of Merseyside, was unaware that the Premier League had discovered Sky and BT Sport streams being made available on his service and that anti-piracy group FACT had launched an investigation in January 2021.

Sources with knowledge of the service told TorrentFreak that the case was referred to NWROCU, the North West Regional Organised Crime Unit. This police unit had been involved in similar IPTV cases over the past couple of years and in March 2022, Dilworth was arrested.

Eight-Month Suspended Sentence

Documents shared with TorrentFreak indicated that Dilworth was initially expected to plead not guilty. When he appeared at Liverpool Crown Court this Tuesday, he'd already entered a guilty plea, something looked upon favorably by the courts. We understand that a custodial sentence was expected but in the event, Dilworth received an eight-month sentence, suspended for 18 months.

Given that the Premier League, FACT, BT Sport, Sky, and a police organized crime unit had all been involved at some point, it seems unlikely that a suspended sentence was their ideal outcome. However, in a joint statement issued yesterday, the suspended sentence was welcomed by the police, with Premier League and FACT also expressing satisfaction.

"We would like to thank Merseyside Police for all their work and support on this case. The successful prosecution would not have been possible without them acting on our intelligence and ultimately arresting the operator," said Kevin Plumb, General Counsel for the Premier League.

FACT Chief Executive Kieron Sharp thanked Merseyside Police for their work and described the outcome as "another step forward in the right direction in tackling the issue of illegal streaming."

Merseyside Police also provided an interesting comment – notable for what it included, and for what it left out.

Important Details Left Out?

"We welcome this sentence, which shows the value of working closely with our partners in law enforcement," said Merseyside Police Detective Constable Gareth Jones.

"Dilworth made a considerable amount of money from his dishonesty, and we are glad that this joint investigation has resulted in such a positive outcome."

When pirates are prosecuted in the UK, more often than not "considerable amounts of money" feature prominently in press releases announcing their convictions. In an earlier prosecution where three men made around £5 million, the amount was described as "significant" by the Premier League.

The complete absence of any specific figure beyond "considerable" in Dilworth's case is a departure from the norm, but documents seen by TorrentFreak in September do put a figure on the money he received – just under £19,500.

No Details of What Dilworth Was Actually Convicted Of

FACT's press release is available here but there is no mention whatsoever of the crimes Dilworth actually committed.

That is also a departure from tradition in these cases. Perhaps it's a simple oversight but the details are interesting since we understand the prosecution took a different track. The Premier League and FACT are known for their aggressive private prosecutions in criminal courts but Dilworth's case was a break from the norm.

Somewhat unusually, his prosecution was handled by the Crown Prosection Service and where Premier League and FACT present charges of fraud, the CPS opted for offenses under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (296ZB(2)(a) and Proceeds of Crime Act (section 329(1).

Whether this case is an outlier or the start of a new trend is unknown, but prosecutions under copyright law carry significantly lower sentences than those alleging fraud, something that Peter Dilworth is certainly aware of right now.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Bungie & Ubisoft Reach $300,000 Settlement With Ring-1 Cheat Sellers
Andy Maxwell, 02 Nov 09:00 PM

Destiny 2In a market saturated with tens of thousands of games spanning dozens of genres, videogamers don't have to look far to find the next big challenge to conquer.

For those with a desire to conquer but an aversion to putting in work, options are plentiful too.

Cheat vendors are rarely more than a few clicks away, and a few minutes after that, the joys of shooting fish in a barrel are replicated in the digital realm. In the physical realm, meanwhile, spotting lawyers through walls can be much more problematic.

Bungie and Ubisoft Sued Ring-1

As part of a widespread legal campaign, in July 2021 Bungie and Ubisoft teamed up in a lawsuit against Ring-1, a developer and distributor of cheat software targeting Destiny 2, Rainbox Six Seige, plus many other popular games.

Filed in a California district court, the complaint names Andrew Thorpe (aka 'Krypto'), Jonathan Aguedo (aka 'Overpowered'), Wesam Mohammed (aka 'Grizzly'), and Ahmad Mohammed, as the key people behind Ring-1, an operation run from Ring-1.io but active on hundreds of forums, websites and social media accounts.

Bungie and Ubisoft claim that the Ring-1 cheats are the product of fraudulent access to their games' software clients and violations of the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions. Ring-1 products have generated hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales, the companies say, together representing further violations of the DMCA for trafficking in circumvention devices.

Other claims in the complaint include the unlawful reproduction of copyrighted artwork and game files, plus inducing and contributing to the copyright-infringing acts of Ring-1 customers, who allegedly create unauthorized derivative works when they deploy Ring-1 cheats.

Defendants Picked Off, One By One

In a recent submission to the court, Bungie and Ubisoft describe Jonathan Aguedo (a/k/a 'Overpowered' and 'Berserker') and Andrew Thorpe (aka 'Krypto') as current or former "high-level participants" in the Ring-1 venture.

Both were directly involved in the development, marketing, sale, and distribution of cheats, the gaming companies claim. In addition to being administrators of the Ring-1 website, Aguedo and Thorpe allegedly recruited resellers of Ring-1 cheats, and handled communications with potential and existing customers.

Agueda answered the complaint in July, denying all of its allegations by stating that none of his actions constituted copyright infringement. If the gaming companies can't "resolve this matter informally" a motion for default judgment is certainly possible but as things stand, there is optimism that a settlement can be reached.

Thorpe's situation seems straightforward, but not in a good way. He failed to appear in response to the lawsuit, and since he is already in default, a motion for default judgment is in the pipeline for him as well. Two other defendants appear to have avoided that fate.

Wesam and Ahmad Mohammad Agree $300K Settlement

In a joint filing at the US District Court for the Northern District of California this week, plaintiffs Bungie and Ubisoft and defendants Wesam and Ahmad Mohammad ask the court to enter judgment against the defendants, containing the following text:

"Judgment shall be entered against Defendants in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000), due and payable solely pursuant to the terms set forth in the Parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release."

The joint request also calls for a permanent injunction to ensure that Wesam and Ahmad permanently cease and desist from being involved in Ring-1's operations in every conceivable way. The text of the proposed order is broad and includes a ban on the pair even possessing any cheat software that targets Bungie or Ubisoft games.

These two defendants haven't been found liable for any offenses by the court and since the details of the settlement are confidential, the question of whether anything will be paid is open to speculation.

Perhaps the most important matter for Bungie and Ubisoft right now is that the Ring-1 website remains online and appears unaffected by their lawsuit.

Destiny 2 cheats currently cost $42 per month, with the PRO version selling for double that. The Rainbox Six Seige cheat is 'just' $420 per year. All of these cheats will be 30% more expensive when the current Halloween discount times out.

Documents including the proposed judgment and injunction are available here (1,2,3)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Google Removes Hundreds of Domains to Aid French Sports Piracy Crackdown
Ernesto Van der Sar, 02 Nov 01:44 PM

franceAt the start of this year, a French bill went into effect that sanctioned the formation of a new regulatory body.

The old HADOPI anti-piracy outfit merged with the Higher Audiovisual Council, creating the Audiovisual and Digital Communication Regulatory Authority (Arcom).

Sports Piracy Crackdown

Along with this organizational change, Arcom received new anti-piracy powers. It can swiftly order online services to take down unlicensed streams of live sporting events, for example.

Thus far, more than 700 domain names have been reported to Arcom and subsequently blocked by local internet providers. According to the French authorities, live sports piracy was cut in half following these measures.

The speed and breadth at which these measures were implemented is impressive. Site blocking is common in other countries as well but legal procedures tend to be slower and more cumbersome elsewhere.

Google Offers a Helping Hand

Under Article L. 333-10 of the Sports Code, Internet providers can be ordered to take "proportionate measures" to prevent copyright infringement. Other services can be asked to take action as well, with Google a prime example.

Over the past months, Arcom has repeatedly sent notices to the search engine, asking it to remove infringing sports domains from its search results.

The "Government Requests" cite orders issued under the new blocking legislation. They target a wide range of sports streaming sites, including 4stream.gg, buffstream.io, pirlotv.fr, rojadirecta.me, and bingsport.com.

ARCOM Google

"It has been found that these services have as their main objective or among their main objectives the broadcasting of the FIM Moto GP World Championship Grand Prix 2022," one notice reads, asking Google to delist the domain names.

The new law can be used against Google but, as far as we know, there are no recent court orders that compel the company to take action (Cf.). That said, the search engine decided to voluntarily comply with local blocking orders that are directed at Internet providers, which also appears to be the case here.

Interestingly, Arcom isn't the only party asking Google to take action. The rightsholders themselves also send notices to the search engine, sometimes with similar domain names.

For example, last week broadcaster Canal+ asked Google to remove several domain names, citing an unnamed court order. This includes 4stream.gg, which is part of an earlier blocking order.

Bing?

In the past, we noticed that Google's blocking actions were not followed by other search engines. However, when we searched for several of the above-mentioned pirate site domains on Bing, we didn't get any results either.

Bing doesn't link to any specific requests. There is a notice at the bottom of some of the results pages, indicating that "some results have been removed" but whether that's related to Arcom requests is unknown.

With or without Bing, the French authorities and rightsholders will be pleased that Google is lending a helping hand, voluntary or not. While it's unrealistic to think that sports piracy can be fully defeated, marginalizing the practice is already a victory.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: