Saturday, April 30, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

tele
 

Bing Removed 143 Million 'Pirate' Site URLs Last Year
Ernesto Van der Sar, 29 Apr 09:10 PM

bingBing has a relatively small market share but that doesn't mean that it's being ignored by copyright holders.

Microsoft's search engine processes millions of takedown requests per week on average and these numbers add up quickly.

142,855,667 URLs

Bing's latest transparency report was published last week, allowing us to take a closer look at the latest trends. The data show that, in 2021, Bing was asked to remove more than 144 million URLs.

More than 99% of these requests were valid and accepted, which ultimately resulted in the removal of 142,855,667 URLs. This is a small increase compared to the 125 million URLs that were taken down a year earlier.

Looking more closely at the data, we see that there was a sharp drop in removal requests in the second half of the year. The number of reported URLs dropped from 103 million in the first six months to 41 million in the months after.

Top Senders and Targets

The drop in takedown volume can largely be explained by a single takedown sender. More specifically, it's caused by the absence of requests from "Remove Your Media" toward the end of the year.

Remove Your Media works with various 'Manga' copyright holders and sent Bing over 50 million takedown requests in the first half of 2021. In the second half, this dropped to a measly 46k.

With over a third of all reported URLs, the company was still the top sender in 2021, followed by the UK music group BPI and Marketly with 31 million and 11 million reported URLs respectively.

When we look at the most reported domains, manga-related sites are on top as well. Mangapark.net was targeted more than 2.5 million times, followed by related domains such as Mangafox and Ninemanga.

Spillover

As we learned recently, these removals also appear to affect other search engines that rely on Bing's data. These include DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, Qwant, and Ecosia.

To give an example, one of our news articles about a Game of Thrones leak was removed from Bing's search results due to erroneous takedown requests. As a result, that article was nowhere to be found in the other search engines either.

After we covered this mistake, the article reappeared in Bing. Unsurprisingly, it reappeared in Yahoo, DuckDuckGo and other search engines as well. However, other removed news articles that we didn't mention, including this article about several movie screener leaks, are still unfindable at the time of writing.

This takedown spillover effect saves copyright holders a lot of time and effort. However, for those who are targeted by takedown mistakes, it just adds insult to injury.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Friday, April 29, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

tele
 

Man Who Lost $90m Pirate IPTV Suit Slams DISH in Response to New Lawsuit
Andy Maxwell, 29 Apr 12:02 PM

IPTVIn 2018, broadcaster DISH Network sued the people behind pirate IPTV service SetTV.

The defendants were eventually ordered to pay DISH $90 million in damages and comply with the terms of a permanent injunction that prevented them from operating a similar service in the future. This February, DISH alleged that the terms of the injunction had been breached.

A month later, DISH and NagraStar followed up with a new lawsuit claiming that former SetTV operators Jason LaBossiere, Sean Beaman, and Stefan Gollner had launched three new pirate IPTV services/brands.

According to the complaint, ExpediteTV, Mundo TV, and Must TV offered DISH copyrighted content. As a result, the men are liable for breaches of the DMCA and Federal Communications Act, and are in contempt of court.

LaBossiere Slams DISH in Answer to Complaint

LaBossiere has now responded to DISH's comprehensive allegations which are partly based on evidence obtained from telephone conversations recorded at the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office in Florida. LaBossiere comes out swinging, reminding the court that after eight years of Department of Justice litigation, a massive judgment against DISH put the company into financial turmoil.

"Pursuant to a six-week trial in 2016, Dish Network L.L.C. ('Dish') was fined $280,000,000, of which it agreed to pay $210,000,000 in 2020 after Dish was found in violation of federal and state law. Since 2017, Dish has been struggling to keep its stock price up from its 2015 and 2017 peaks," LaBossiere's answer begins.

"In order to find new profit centers, this $15.49 billion dollar company will stop at nothing to bully people into settlements to help its bottom line."

LaBossiere Admits Involvement With ExpediteTV

Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the level of detail in DISH's new complaint, LaBossiere does not deny being involved in ExpediteTV. However, he claims that DISH's allegations lack nuance. Any involvement, he says, was aimed at turning his "prior distribution channel" into a legitimate business offering lawful licensed content, for which DISH is now seeking to "punish" him.

"Dish gained the information in this case from subpoenas issued in a closed federal case issued with no notice to any party or court. The federal court enter [sic] an order exclaiming that it did not have jurisdiction. Clearly, Dish will do anything to add to its bottom line," his counsel informs the court.

ExpediteTV Was Supposed to Be Licensed and Legal

LaBossiere then recalls another blast-from-past – Ominverse One World Television – an IPTV company that agreed to pay the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment $50 million in damages after content licensing deals it believed it had in place were found to be invalid.

"While LaBossiere was initially working with ExpediteTV and Beaman to create a new platform with licensed content through Omniverse One World Television, Inc ('Omniverse'), LaBossiere's limited involvement was to find a middleware company for the licensed content and reviewed and made recommendations for the initial marketing blast in 2018," his answer reads.

Noting that Omniverse eventually shut down, LaBossiere suggests that his co-defendants in the current lawsuit may have taken a different approach and if that involved rebroadcasting DISH content, he wasn't a participant.

"Apparently, and according to the Plaintiff's Complaint, others that may have been involved with ExpediteTV changed the course of ExpediteTV's business model from content licensed from Omniverse, likely as the result of Omniverse no longer offering its service," his rebuttal adds.

Involved in Expedite TV, Never Heard of Mundo TV and Must TV

LaBossiere admits that ExpediteTV was advertised as a subscription-based streaming service "providing over 800+ channels" but says that his involvement stopped short of infringing DISH's rights. Any 'device codes' (IPTV subscriptions) processed through ExpediteTV related only to licensed content and if they went beyond that, he has no knowledge.

Additionally, LaBossiere admits that one or more people utilized an address related to him to register companies connected to ExpediteTV but he denies benefiting from them to the extent that involved any DISH content.

Regarding the other IPTV brands mentioned in the lawsuit (Mundo TV and Must TV), LaBossiere says that before reading the DISH lawsuit, he'd never heard of them and he had nothing to do with the processing of their credit card payments.

"LaBossiere prays this Court will deny the relief requested by Plaintiffs, issue sanctions against Plaintiff for wrongfully issuing subpoenas in a closed case and for a wrongful purpose, and award attorney's fees and costs against Plaintiffs," he concludes.

Separately, defendant Stefan Gollner has filed a motion with the court asking to be dismissed from the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. He wants the court to resolve this jurisdictional challenge prior to disposing of DISH's motion for a preliminary injunction.

The related court documents can be found here (1,2,3, pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

US Calls Out Countries For Failing to Tackle Pirate IPTV & Movie 'Camming'
Andy Maxwell, 28 Apr 06:02 PM

ustr notorious marketsThe Office of the United States Trade Representative has just released its 2022 Special 301 Report detailing the state of intellectual property protection and enforcement by trading partners around the world.

The annual report aims to spotlight laws, policies, and practices of foreign countries that fail to meet standards set by the United States. This public document seeks to inform the public and trading partners and hopes to be a "positive catalyst" for change.

The Special 301 Report places the most problematic countries on its 'Priority Watch List'. This year Argentina, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and Venezuela meet the criteria.

Almost two dozen others are featured in the standard 'Watch List' – Algeria, Barbados. Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, Mexico, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.

Ukraine was destined to appear on either the Priority or standard Watch List, but its Special 301 review has been suspended due to the ongoing Russian invasion.

The 88-page report covers a broad range of intellectual property rights issues. In our summary, we'll focus on matters related to online piracy and enforcement (or lack thereof).

USTR: Broadband Penetration is Good for Trade But Helps Pirates

There can be little doubt that increased availability of fast broadband connections is a boon for global trade. Legal content distribution platforms rely on excellent connectivity to grow their businesses, spreading everything from movies, television, and music, to electronic books and beyond. However, the US government warns that greater connectivity for legal content benefits pirates too.

"Online piracy is the most challenging copyright enforcement issue in many foreign markets. For example, during the review period, countries such as Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, India, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, Russia, Switzerland, Thailand, Ukraine, and Vietnam had high levels of online piracy and lacked effective enforcement," the report reads.

Pirate IPTV Services Are a Global Problem

First mentioned in the USTR's 2017 'Notorious Markets' report, piracy-configured set-top boxes ('Illicit Streaming Devices') are still considered a major threat to many US businesses including movie/TV show producers, sports leagues, and legitimate streaming, on-demand, and over-the-top media service providers. ISDs are often supplied with free infringing apps that aggregate content but can also be used alongside subscriptions to pirate IPTV services.

The USTR says that these for-profit entities are supported by complex technical infrastructures and along with ISDs, cause high levels of piracy globally. In particular, the report calls out "notable" levels of infringement in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Guatemala, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Mexico, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

The USTR says that the use of illicit streaming devices is excessively high in Brazil, and the number of criminal prosecutions has been insufficient to deal with the problem. Countries such as Algeria, Colombia and Guatemala are signaled as pirate IPTV problem areas but others receive more detailed criticism.

China is described as a "leading source and exporter of systems that facilitate copyright piracy". The USTR calls for "sustained action" against ISDs, websites and online platforms containing or facilitating access to unlicensed content, and piracy apps that facilitate access to such websites.

The US welcomes new amendments to Chinese law, including protections against the circumvention of technological protection measures, but notes that criminal liability for the manufacture, distribution, and exportation of circumvention devices needs clarification.

Movie 'Camming'

The disruption of COVID-19 saw some movies premiering in theaters and on streaming services simultaneously. Within hours, pirate copies were available too, mostly in very high quality, having been 'ripped' from these platforms. This week, John Fithian, head of the National Association of Theatre Owners, declared the simultaneous release strategy "dead as a serious business model" and said piracy was to blame.

This means that the unauthorized recording of movies in cinemas is set to bounce back. The USTR is aware of the threat and names several countries that need to step up their anti-camming games.

"Stakeholders continue to report serious concerns regarding unauthorized camcords. For example, in Russia, the number of sourced camcords prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was reportedly 48 in 2018 and 45 in 2019. While COVID-19-related cinema closures suppressed this activity during the pandemic, camcords have reportedly reappeared as theaters have started to re-open," the Special 301 Report reads.

In 2019, India proposed draft legislation to criminalize unauthorized camcording but has not passed into law. China is also cited as a source of cammed movies but several criminal convictions for unauthorized camcording in 2020, the country still lacks a specific criminal law to address the issue.

Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, India, Peru, and Russia "do not effectively criminalize unauthorized camcording," so should follow the examples set by Canada, Japan, the Philippines, and Ukraine, the USTR suggests.

"Countries also need to update legal frameworks to effectively deter unauthorized camcording and keep up with changing practices," the report adds. "For example, the requirement in some countries that a law enforcement officer must observe a person camcording and then prove that the person is circulating the unlawfully recorded movie before intervening often precludes effective enforcement."

Other Types of Piracy

The USTR says that virtually every country in its Special 301 Report has additional problems with online piracy and related infringement. The rebroadcasting of live sports and the unauthorized cloning of cloud-based entertainment software allow users to access pirated content online, while game copiers and mod chips allow users to play pirated games on physical consoles.

The report also highlights the problem of "stream-ripping software" which can be used to create infringing copies of copyrighted works by accessing licensed streaming sites.

"Stream-ripping is now a dominant method of music piracy, causing substantial economic harm to music creators and undermining legitimate online services. During the review period, stream-ripping was reportedly popular in countries such as Canada, India, Mexico, Russia, Switzerland, and Ukraine."

In reality, stream-ripping is popular everywhere and at least in volume terms, the United States could easily qualify for inclusion in its own list, despite having access to some of the tightest laws and enforcement tools anywhere on the planet.

The 2022 Special 301 Report can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

Thursday, April 28, 2022

TorrentFreak's Latest News

tele
 

Court Dismisses Bungie's Copyright Claims Against Cheat Seller AimJunkies, For Now
Ernesto Van der Sar, 28 Apr 11:55 AM

aimjunkiesOver the past several years a wave of copyright infringement lawsuits has targeted alleged cheaters and cheat makers.

Several game companies including Take-Two Interactive and Epic Games, have taken cheaters to court. More recently, American video game developer Bungie joined in on the action.

Bungie is known for the Halo and Destiny series, which have millions of fans around the world. The popularity of these games also attracts cheaters, including those who used the 'Destiny 2 Hacks' suite that was offered for sale at AimJunkies.com.

Bungie Sued AimJunkies

In a complaint filed at a Seattle federal court last June, Bungie accused AimJunkies.com of copyright and trademark infringement, among other things. The same accusations were also made against Phoenix Digital Group, the alleged creators of the software.

Initially, the parties entered settlement discussions. AimJunkies has already removed the Destiny 2 cheats from its site and was willing to negotiate. However, when Bungie moved for a default judgment, reportedly without prior warning, tensions rose.

Earlier this year, AimJunkies hit back with a motion to dismiss. According to the cheat seller, no law prohibits cheating. In addition, the company denied Bungie's copyright infringement allegations.

Among other things, AimJunkies countered that Bungie's allegations are vague and not specific enough to allege a plausible claim. The cheat software itself certainly isn't a copy of Bungie's work, they argued.

Bungie also accused AimJunkies of a variety of other wrongdoings, including breach of contract, tortious interference, and unjust enrichment.

These claims don't belong in federal court either, according to the cheat maker, since Bungie's own License Agreement (LSLA) prescribes that, aside from copyright and trademark issues, all disputes should be resolved by mandatory arbitration.

Court Dismisses Copyright Claims

After reviewing the positions from both sides, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Zilly has now ruled on the matter. Judge Zilly dismisses the copyright claims as Bungie failed to show that AimJunkies copied its work.

"Notably, Bungie has not pleaded any facts explaining how the cheat software constitutes an unauthorized copy of any of the copyrighted works identified in the complaint. Bungie's complaint must contain more than a 'formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action'," Judge Zilly writes.

The court does leave room for Bungie to fix this issue in an amended complaint, but for now, it's dismissed.

bungie dismiss

Judge Zilly also agrees to refer the non-copyright and trademark-related claims to arbitration, as AimJunkies requested. This is in line with Bungie's own license agreement and both parties are encouraged to resolve these issues outside of court.

Not Over Yet

Not all of Bungie's claims were dismissed or referred. Judge Zilly concludes that Bungie's trademark infringement accusations are sufficiently pled, which means that the case can go ahead based on that allegation. The same is true for the "false origin" claim which is closely related to trademark infringement.

AimJunkies booked an initial victory with the dismissal of the copyright infringement claims but they're not celebrating yet. Bungie can still refile these claims with additional evidence and the trademark accusations remain.

Responding to the order, the cheat seller informed us that it's not commenting on the matter just yet. However, it did stress that they are in the final stages of selling the AimJunkies websites to a Ukrainian group of investors.

A copy of U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Zilly's order on the motion to dismiss/refer is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Anti-Piracy Coalition ACE Gets Bigger, Stronger and More Effective
Ernesto Van der Sar, 27 Apr 09:15 PM

ACE logoDuring the summer of 2017, several of the world's largest entertainment industry companies teamed up to create a new anti-piracy coalition.

The Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE) brought together well-known Hollywood companies including Disney, Warner Bros, NBCUniversal, media giants such as Sky and BBC, as well as streaming-based newcomers Amazon, Netflix, and Hulu.

Heading towards its fifth anniversary, the coalition is stronger than ever. ACE continues to expand and now has 35 members, with beIN becoming the latest addition just this week. The addition of the sports rightsholder also represents an expansion into the live streaming arena.

The coalition's growth is not limited to its member count, the number of people involved in ACE's anti-piracy operations also continues to grow. The team currently consists of more than 100 full-time professionals speaking 30 languages across 24 countries.

Expansion appears to be paying off. While many pirate site operators manage to avoid ACE's grasp, those who fail to take extreme precautions have become easy prey.

ACE's global content protection chief Jan van Voorn informs us that more investigators and attorneys continue to be added to the alliance in various parts of the world. These "boots on the ground" allow access to local governments and law enforcement, to target local piracy players.

ACE Books Progress

Over the years ACE has built a dedicated library of open-source intelligence. This has resulted in a wealth of information that is now paying off at a rapid pace.

"Over the past three years, we have built up a significant pipeline of investigations. These are coming to fruition week by week and month by month. If someone is running a pirate business of any significance, they can be 100% sure that their case is somewhere in our pipeline," van Voorn says.

These strong words are expected, as ACE wants site operators to feel vulnerable, but they're not hollow threats. Over the past few months alone the coalition has shut down several prominent piracy players, including Pelisplushd.net, Afdah.video, and Altered Carbon.

And those names are just the tip of the iceberg. Between 2019 and 2021, the number of illegal websites and streaming subscription services operated from North America reportedly dropped from 1,400 to just 200. ACE believes this is in large part the result of its anti-piracy efforts.

Cease and Desist

There are a variety of enforcement actions available to ACE. The coalition takes a holistic approach, searching for vulnerabilities wherever it can. While court cases are also part of the repertoire, a cease-and-desist letter is usually the first step taken.

"Whenever the case at hand allows for it, ACE's preferred course of action is to serve cease and desist notices on pirate operators and then open discussions to shut down their illegal enterprise voluntarily. The increasing number of pirate services' domains taken over by ACE is a testament to the effectiveness of such direct action," van Voorn tells us.

While this sounds easy, finding out who's behind a pirate site isn't always straightforward. The operators of these sites and services often go to extremes to hide their identities, using proxies, VPNs, and fake names and addresses.

ACE regularly tries to uncover information through DMCA subpoenas in the U.S. or Right of Information (ROI) claims in the EU. These target intermediaries such as hosting providers and Cloudflare, who are compelled to hand over customer information.

"Disclosure requests have been a very effective way for ACE to expand its investigations. Through these processes we target all relevant intermediaries that have customer information that can help us identify the operator of a pirate site or service, including hosting providers, payment processors, advertising networks, etcetera."

"Having targeted more than 200 online intermediaries this way, it also allows us to identify patterns of piracy friendly intermediaries across the globe," van Voorn notes.

Even when intermediaries cooperate, information obtained isn't always useful. Many operators of pirate sites and services use fabricated or inaccurate details to sign up.

"The information we receive from intermediaries is mixed. While the information obtained does not always instantly identify the individual running a pirate operation, there are almost always leads we can follow that either give us investigative insights or that help confirm prior suspicions."

KYBC Frustrations

In recent years many ACE members have lobbied for stricter "Know Your Business Customer" (KYBC) requirements for online intermediaries. The lack of identity verification is one of the greatest frustrations for ACE at the moment. Making these checks mandatory would be a game-changer.

Van Voorn says that it's not hard for people to stay anonymous and run a commercial pirate enterprise. Online service providers hardly ever check who their customers really are. And while ACE doesn't want to limit the privacy of regular Internet users, it believes that pirates are in a different league.

"Private individuals are entitled to their personal privacy, of course. But when you start running a business that is taking people's money and selling services, you incur certain obligations to tell the world who you are and to obey the law," van Voorn says.

"What's illegal offline should be illegal online. Online service providers should be able to respond to legitimate civil judicial and law enforcement requests to identify their customers. If they can't do that, they are enabling illegal activity, and there should be consequences."

Identifying people behind pirate sites and services is a priority but when intermediaries can't or won't hand over any useful information, ACE will look for other ways to go after the culprits.

"There are many more ways to make the lives of pirate operators unpleasant, make their websites less user-friendly, and significantly impact their bottom line. We can, and we always will, disrupt and ultimately identify pirate operators by pouring more resources into our investigations."

Civil and Criminal Lawsuits

As ACE is expanding, the cease-and-desist approach has become a more international endeavor. And with employees around the globe, it becomes more difficult for pirate sites and services to stay under the radar.

Cease-and-desist letters can be effective but they are no silver bullet. In some cases, operators of pirate sites and services will continue undeterred. When that happens, ACE will consider taking action in court, or referring the operators to local prosecutors.

"We think of litigation or criminal referrals as the logical next step when discussions with pirate operators are unsuccessful, or when operators try to go back into business despite agreeing not to do so. There are certainly more civil and criminal cases to come in the near future," van Voorn notes.

At the end of 2020, the United States adopted the 'Protecting Lawful Streaming Act' which was seen as a game-changer since it made running an illegal streaming service a felony. Thus far, this hasn't resulted in a wave of prosecutions.

This isn't due to a lack of referrals, according to ACE's global anti-piracy chief.

"Illegal streaming is now a felony in the US, and we are doing our best to help ensure that those criminal offenders will face justice. We know that DOJ is aware of some significant pirate operators in the US, and we trust that they will take appropriate action."

In recent months ACE has published a steady stream of enforcement successes on its website. While not all achievements can be shared publicly, the alliance sees the shutdown of PrimeWire, Altered Carbon, 123movies.la, Afdah.video, and Pelisplushd.net as some of the biggest successes of the past year.

Future Plans

Looking ahead, van Voorn mentions a few areas where ACE plans to spend more time and effort. This includes enforcement targeted at live streaming, which in part motivated beIN to join the coalition.

ACE already has some experience in going after IPTV services and they have learned that a lot of IPTV sellers rely on a relatively small group of wholesalers. Targeting these big players is a priority.

In addition, the alliance also takes a special interest in release groups at the top of the 'piracy pyramid'. Last year, ACE shut down the movie and TV show release group NTG and it plans to use the same strategy to go after other key players.

"Another important issue we are dedicating even more time to are release groups, in particular those that focus on ripping content from ACE Members' streaming services," van Voorn says.

"Following our success in shutting down the NTG release group last year, we are currently focusing on major release groups following the same strategy and we are working closely with law enforcement on these cases," he adds.

All in all, ACE is confident that it can severely disrupt the piracy ecosystem. While it's undeniable that the alliance has booked several major successes, history has shown that the most stubborn pirates are hard to catch. In any case, it will be an interesting battle to watch.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company