Saturday, October 3, 2020

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Megaupload Lawsuits Remain on Hold Until 2021, Or (Much) Later
Ernesto Van der Sar, 03 Oct 11:39 PM

love megaupload kardashianThere are a few recurring themes TorrentFreak has covered over the past decade, with the Megaupload case being a prime example.

For those who haven't been around long enough, Megaupload was once one of the largest file-sharing empires on the Internet. It was founded in 2005 and grew exponentially in the years that followed.

The site first made mainstream headlines late 2011, when it released the Megaupload song, a PR stunt of epic proportions that took the Internet by surprise.

Mega PR

While copyright holders had just framed the site as the largest piracy threat on the Internet, top artists and celebrities including Alicia Keys, Kanye West, Snoop Dogg, Kim Kardashian, Will.i.am and even boxer Floyd Mayweather endorsed the site.

The video was viewed millions of times in a matter of hours and became a smash hit. Universal Music swiftly pulled the video offline with a dubious copyright claim, which only increased its popularity, adding to the embarrassment.

What the Megaupload team didn't know, however, is that American and New Zealand law enforcement officials were already planning to take the site down for good.

Megaupload Takedown

Barely a month after the Megaupload song came out, helicopters and armed police forces were storming the New Zealand mansion of the site's founder Kim Dotcom. They acted on behalf of the US, which announced a criminal prosecution into the Megaupload conspiracy.

Today, nearly nine years have passed but Kim Dotcom and his former colleagues are still fighting a legal battle in New Zealand to prevent their extradition to the US, for which the final decision has yet to be issued.

While all parties await the outcome, the criminal case in the United States remains pending. The same goes for the civil cases launched by the MPA and RIAA in 2014, more than six years ago.

Lawsuits Remain on Hold

Since the civil cases can potentially influence the criminal proceedings, Megaupload's legal team previously asked to put these cases on hold, and last week they requested another extension, which was swiftly granted by the federal court in Virginia.

megaupload stay order

With no objections from the MPA and RIAA, it is no surprise that the stay until April 2021 was granted. If anything, these motions serve as a bi-annual reminder of the lack of progress in the Megaupload case.

How Much Longer?

The extradition process in New Zealand may very well continue for several more years. And in the event that the defendants are extradited, it can take much longer before the criminal case concludes. This means that 2021 may eventually become, 2022, 2025, 2030, etc.

A few years ago there were concerns that the long delays could result in the destruction of evidence, as some of Megaupload's hard drives were starting to fail. However, after the parties agreed on a solution to back-up and restore the files, this is no longer a problem.

There have also been attempts to make it possible for millions of former Megaupload users to retrieve their personal files. However, in recent years there hasn't been any update on this front, and it's unlikely that this will change anytime soon.

By now it's pretty clear that the original Megaupload site will never return. However, the Megaupload song lives on.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

New Law Requires Google & Apple to Remove Pirate Apps or Face ISP Blocking
Andy Maxwell, 03 Oct 01:44 PM

Pirate AppleFor well over a decade copyright holders have been developing their capabilities to block sites at the ISP level. Specially crafted "no fault" injunctions obtained around the world mean that thousands of sites are now inaccessible (at least directly) by local audiences.

Of course, piracy hasn't stood still since the first blockade was put in place in Denmark around 2006. Site operators have come up with various techniques to nullify ISP blocking but over the past several years a new threat has emerged. Piracy-enabling apps that provide access to movies, TV shows, music and live sports are now favored by millions of users and they are not so easy to block.

These apps typically aggregate content from a range of underlying pirate mechanisms, which can move, shift and mutate at the will of their developers. Blocking this content is a grand game of whack-a-mole so, over in Russia, copyright holders and the government have come up with new legislation to restrict access to the apps themselves.

New Law Will Target Distributors of Piracy-Enabling Apps

After two years in the making, this summer the final text of new amendments to copyright law were adopted by the State Duma. After being signed by President Putin the law came into effect this week, October 1, 2020, with a goal to put pressure on app developers and the pirate app ecosystem itself, rather than tackle illegal content directly.

While apps of all kinds need developers, those developers need a platform from where to reach the public. Given today's mobile markets, that's likely to mean Google Play or Apple's App Store which together dominate the market.

Being listed on either is a great start to building a large audience for a pirate app so the new law wants to stop that in its tracks, before it becomes too much of a problem. All app distributors, therefore, will have to remove pirate apps quickly from their platforms or face the consequences.

One Way or Another, Pirate Apps Must Be Removed Quickly, Or Else

The system will be implemented as follows. Copyright holders will file complaints about pirate apps with telecoms regulator Roscomnadzor, which will determine, within 72 hours, who is hosting the software. This could be Apple or Google, another index of apps, or indeed any other web resource.

Once the location has been identified, Roscomnadzor will send a copyright infringement notice (in English and Russian) directly to the platform detailing the infringing content in the complaint and whose rights it breaches. Along with that will come a demand to restrict access to that content which in most cases is likely to mean a complete removal of the app itself.

The platform will then be required to identify the person who uploaded the software, typically its developer, that a notice of infringement has been filed. The developer or other responsible party will then have 24 hours to address the infringement within their software, such as the provision of copyright-infringing movies or TV shows. This could mean implementing restrictions so that the app doesn't continue to infringe or even the wholesale removal of the app from the distribution platform itself.

Responsibility Ultimately Falls On The App Distributor

If the developer takes no action to remedy the situation, the responsibility for preventing ongoing infringement will fall back to the app distribution platform, such as Apple, Google or any other site/system with similar functionality. They will then have to remove or block access to the software to avoid becoming a target themselves.

"In case of refusal or inaction of the owner of the software application, the owner of the information resource on which the software application is located, or another person who provides the placement in the information and telecommunication network, including the Internet, of the software application, are obliged to restrict access to the corresponding software application no later than the expiration of three working days from the date of receipt of the notification," the law reads.

Failure to Comply Will Mean ISP Blocking

In the event that neither the software developer nor the distributor takes remedial action to prevent the infringement listed in the complaint, Roscomnadzor will now be able to issue an instruction to have the distributor itself blocked by all Internet service providers in Russia.

Whether ISPs will be able to precisely prevent access to specific apps will remain to be seen but in the past there have been instances of over-blocking due to technical issues or limitations, leaving other aspects of platforms or indeed their entire operations blocked in Russia. The new law doesn't seem to require surgical blocking either.

"In case of refusal or inaction of the owner of the information resource, the hosting provider or another person specified [..] shall be obliged to restrict access to the relevant information resource immediately after the expiration of a day after receiving the [original] notification," it reads.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: