Thursday, May 9, 2024

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

New Piracy Blocking Order in Australia, Perhaps Congress Will Take a Look
Andy Maxwell, 09 May 11:17 AM

kangaroo-ozAfter almost a decade of fine-tuning, including amendments to copyright law, the administration of Australia's pirate site-blocking system looks organized and reliable.

Applications for injunctions filed at Federal Court are usually headed by local movie company Village Roadshow, with the main beneficiaries the major Hollywood studios, Netflix, and more recently, Apple.

This familiar format was evident again in a March application which requested ISP blocking measures against around three dozen pirate sites.

The Australian system is thorough but hasn't always displayed the type of responsiveness needed to tackle a constantly shifting pirate marketplace.

More recently, however, the time between application and blocking injunction has contracted. In this case the time between rightsholders filing a statement of claim/originating application and obtaining an injunction was less than two months.

Justice Halley's order dated May 8, 2024, was handed down Wednesday.

timelineThe order requires around 34 sites to be blocked by DNS tampering, IP address blocking or re-routing, URL blocking in respect of the target URLs and domain names, or any alternative means agreed between rightsholders and ISPs.

The full list of sites targeted, their domains and IP addresses, can be found at the end of this article. The summary reads as follows:

0gomovies.ws, watchseries1.video, 0gomovies.com.pk, 123series.art, abcproxy.org, cataz.to, emovies.si, ev01.sx, flixhd.cc, fmovies.style, gimy.ai, m4ufree.vip, moviehdkh.com, moviekhhd.biz, movies.do, musichq.pe, projectfreetv.cyou, projectfreetv.ru, rarbg.tw, serieshd.watch, soap2day-online.com, soap2day.tel, soap2dayto.io, thekickasstorrents.com, thekickasstorrents.to, thekisscartoon.com, uflix.cc, putlockersgo.net, watch4freemovies.com, watchseries1.stream, thesoap2day.com, animesuge.cc, putlocker.onl, m4ufree.site, m4ufree.to, watchseries.click, www15.4movierulz.to, ymovies.cc

The list of domains has plenty of recognizable brands but the fact they've appeared in a court order at all suggests they're imposter sites with no connections or no provable connections to their previously-blocked namesakes. Australia's blocking is carried out on a dynamic basis, meaning that a site can still be blocked regardless of domain or brand identity changes.

Blocking in Australia Marketed as a Success

After the MPA recently announced that it's working with Congress to introduce site-blocking legislation in the United States, attention will inevitably turn to other countries where blocking has shown good results. Likely candidates include Australia, United Kingdom, and Portugal.

Whether site-blocking has been effective in Australia (or indeed anywhere else in the world) mostly finds answers in studies carried out on behalf of the MPA. We've reported on almost all of them and while the research itself doesn't raise immediate concerns, some subsequently reported conclusions are difficult to square, not just with the position on the ground, but with the scale of subsequent blocking activity.

MPA report to Congress in 2023: The evidence shows that site blocking is effective both in reducing traffic to pirate websites and increasing the use of legitimate services. A site-blocking order applicable to the main access providers in a given country effectively reduces traffic to the targeted piracy domains in the period after blocking is implemented. For example, blocking 53 piracy websites in the United Kingdom caused an 88% drop in visits to the blocked sites and an 80% to 95% drop across user groups in other waves. Additionally, analysis in Australia, Portugal, and South Korea found average drops in visits to blocked sites of between 60 and 90% (pdf).

Of course, when the domains of pirate websites are suddenly blocked by a country's main ISPs, a significant drop in traffic to the domains that have been blocked is the inevitable outcome. The reality is that when domains are blocked, pirate sites know instantly, and since it takes minutes or even seconds to switch to a replacement domain or subdomain, the effectiveness of blocking finds itself immediately undermined.

That being said, there is credible evidence to show that users affected by a blocking wave in Australia "increased consumption of content on legal viewing sites in the post-period following the blocking by 5%." That 5% is not insignificant but the uplift refers to a traffic measurement, not an increase in subscription uptake.

More Blocking is Always Needed

Australia doesn't publish an official blocklist so again, figures produced by those requesting the blocking is the only information readily available. What we can say with some certainty is that in early 2023, 2,000 domains had been subjected to blocking orders by the Federal Court.

To that background, a study carried out by the MPA found that there were 1.8 billion visits to pirate sites from Australian IP addresses in 2022, up 10% on similar research a year earlier.

Another claim from last year by Creative Content Australia stated the following: 6.3 million Australians aged 13+ have experienced a cybersecurity issue while pirating with 82% of teens and 72% of adults falling victim to fraud, malware or identity theft

Taken at face value, that sounds like eight in every ten teenagers aren't finding blocking particularly effective.

In the UK, another country likely to be held up as an example of what blocking looks like when done properly, a conservative 10,000 domains have been blocked and piracy rates have remained static for years.

So for now, the sites listed below will soon be placed on Australia's blacklist. Tests today reveal that some may have disappeared. Others already have new domains.

Blocking may still have some benefits but, in general, it just doesn't really look like it.

The latest blocking order is available here (pdf)

No. Target Online Location Target Domain Names Target URLs Target IP Addresses
1 gimy gimy.ai https://gimy.ai 104.21.40.112
172.67.185.135
2 m4ufree.to m4ufree.to https://wwl.m4ufree.to 104.21.15.7
172.67.160.249
3 m4uFree.site m4ufree.site https://wwl.m4ufree.site 104.21.63.60
172.67.143.222
4 cataz cataz.to https://cataz.to 104.21.22.109
172.67.204.100
5 0gomovies.ws 0gomovies.com.pk https://0gomovies.com.pk 104.21.46.106
172.67.137.198
0gomovies.ws http://0gomovies.ws 104.31.16.8
104.31.16.121
6 soap2day-online.com soap2day-online.com https://soap2day-online.com 104.31.16.8
104.31.16.121
soap2dayto.io https://soap2dayto.io 104.21.28.74
172.67.144.186
7 thesoap2day thesoap2day.com https://web.thesoap2day.com 172.67.167.175
104.21.41.224
8 soap2day.tel soap2day.tel https://soap2day.tel 104.31.16.2
104.31.16.127
9 watch4freemovies watch4freemovies.com https://watch4freemovies.com 104.21.78.254
172.67.139.55
10 putlockersgo putlockersgo.net https://upto.putlockersgo.net 104.31.16.10
104.31.16.119
11 putlocker.onl putlocker.onl https://ww2.putlocker.onl 104.21.3.202
172.67.131.42
12 watchseriesclick watchseries.click https://www.watchseries.click 104.21.33.87
172.67.160.181
13 fmovies.style fmovies.style https://fmovies.style 104.31.16.127
104.31.16.2
14 projectfreetv projectfreetv.cyou https://projectfreetv.cyou 172.67.199.203
104.21.21.184
15 ev01 ev01.sx https://ev01.sx 104.21.28.9
172.67.170.34
16 serieshd serieshd.watch https://serieshd.watch 172.67.168.179
104.21.79.21
17 musichq musichq.pe https://musichq.pe 104.21.87.45
172.67.141.126
18 moviehdkh moviehdkh.com https://moviehdkh.com 104.21.25.228
172.67.134.218
19 123series 123series.art https://123series.art 104.31.16.124
104.31.16.5
20 flixhd flixhd.cc https://flixhd.cc 104.21.24.139
172.67.218.248
21 Movies Portal movies.do https://movies.do 104.26.10.107
104.26.11.107
172.67.70.103
22 project-free tv projectfreetv.ru https://projectfreetv.ru 104.21.47.237
172.67.174.125
23 emovies emovies.si https://emovies.si 104.21.90.34
172.67.193.201
24 moviekhhd moviekhhd.biz https://moviekhhd.biz 104.21.1.9
172.67.151.185
25 uflix uflix.cc https://uflix.cc 104.21.54.193
172.67.141.88
26 watchseries1 watchseries1.stream https://watchseries1.stream 172.67.158.50
104.21.90.165
watchseries1.video http://watchseries1.video 104.21.76.152
172.67.196.67
27 suge anime/animesuge animesuge.cc https://wl.animesuge.cc 104.21.62.159
172.67.137.19
28 thekisscartoon.com thekisscartoon.com https://thekisscartoon.com 104.21.9.147
172.67.160.47
29 m4ufree m4ufree.vip https://m4ufree.vip 104.21.66.7
172.67.154.119
30 ymovies ymovies.cc https://ymovies.cc 104.21.35.105
172.67.217.186
31 abc proxy abcproxy.org https://abcproxy.org 104.21.81.24
172.67.156.117
32 thekickasstorrentsproxy thekickasstorrents.to https://thekickasstorrents.to 104.21.72.91
172.67.179.117
thekickasstorrents.com https://thekickasstorrents.com 104.21.33.40
172.67.158.149
33 rarbg portal rarbg.tw https://rarbg.tw 104.21.35.93
172.67.217.12
34 4movierulz.to 4movierulz.to https://www15.4movierulz.to 104.21.12.35
172.67.193.162

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Nintendo's DMCA Operation Continues With Lockpick, Kezplez-nx Takedowns
Andy Maxwell, 09 May 12:57 AM

lockpick-sMore recent generations of video gamers will undoubtedly have their own ideas about which company in business today has made the greatest contribution to the art of videogames.

Those who nominate Sony, for marketing the original PlayStation at adults and forever transforming public perception of video games, have a very solid case. Yet when one balances software, hardware, innovation, consistency, branding and longevity, the only answer that stands up to the most intense scrutiny is Nintendo. Should its demise ever be announced, "you only miss things when they're gone" won't even scratch the surface.

Yet despite its status as video game royalty, Nintendo receives significant criticism for its approach to intellectual property infringement. While smaller companies would metaphorically hack off body parts for a fan base as passionate as Nintendo's, some believe the company has been taking that loyalty for granted. Its ruthless attitude towards fan-made labor-of-love games, struck down at the 11th hour because [insert your own reason here], certainly hasn't done the company many favors.

Many viewed Nintendo's smack down of the Switch emulator Yuzu earlier this year in much the same light. Yet those who took a few steps back probably could've predicted what lay on the horizon. The exciting and pioneering world of jailbreaking and homebrew had no chance of controlling the monster being created. It was only a matter of when it would arrive and who would end up paying the price.

When The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, leaked a week-and-a-half before its official release, and was reportedly played on up to a million hacked Switch consoles and emulators, that broke the metaphorical camel's back.

That pivotal piracy bonanza wasn't the direct work of the console hackers, homebrew developers, tinkerers, and others closely associated with the scene. However, as those who made the conditions for it to happen, while also making for the easiest targets, Nintendo's plan for the future likely envisions nothing good for those who continue to circumvent its technical measures.

Nintendo's Big Clean Continues

Following a series of takedowns in March that focused on various circumvention tools, a single DMCA notice filed at GitHub late April took down an unprecedented 8,535 Yuzu repos in the blink of an eye. While the scale of the removal may have given pause for thought, only one question needed to be answered; did the original Yuzu infringe copyright?

GitHub seems to believe it did so, on that basis, they all came down. While there was no pivotal lawsuit win for Nintendo against Yuzu, a point appears to have been reached where going over old ground concerning legality is mostly no longer needed. A pair of DMCA notices filed at GitHub in the wake of the Yuzu notice filed earlier, amount to a framework likely to be seen again and again moving forward.

"When a game is started on the Nintendo Switch console a Game [Technological Measure/TPM] is decrypted using cryptographic keys that are protected by Console TPMs. The games themselves can then be decrypted by the decrypted Game TPMs so the game can be played," one of the notices reads.

"Nintendo owns or exclusively controls numerous copyrights in software and games that are protected from unlawful access and copying by the operation of these Technological Measures."

nintendo-dmca-lockpick

The following is Nintendo's justification for the removal of the software. The focus is on Lockpick_RCM, a circumvention tool for extracting protected cryptographic keys (prod.keys) from the Nintendo Switch that, in turn, allows the decryption of games.

"The use of Lockpick with a modified Nintendo Switch console allows users to bypass Nintendo's Technological Measures for video games; specifically, Lockpick bypasses the Console TPMs to permit unauthorized access to, extraction of, and decryption of all the cryptographic keys, including product keys, contained in the Nintendo Switch," the takedown notice states.

"The decrypted keys facilitate copyright infringement by permitting users to play pirated versions of Nintendo's copyright-protected game software on systems without Nintendo's Console TPMs or systems on which Nintendo's Console TPMs have been disabled. Trafficking in circumvention software, such as Lockpick, violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of the United States (specifically, 17 U.S.C. §1201), and infringes copyrights owned by Nintendo."

Kezplez-nx: Same Purpose, Same Law, Same Story

The targeting of Kezplez-nx repos follows on from the deletion of the original repo and Nintendo's takedown of a popular fork in an earlier wave. The software received no mention in Nintendo's lawsuit against Yuzu but as a tool to allow users to dump keys from a Switch device, which in itself requires circumvention of Nintendo TPMs, there's scant basis for debate.

The fact that both tools were designed for infringing purposes, and have little to no other uses, effectively ends the discussion. The nature of the notices, anti-circumvention as opposed to regular DMCA notices, actually puts an end to the discussion; there is no counter notice process available.

The notices are available here and here. Elsewhere, through two main agents (Sonopress GmbH and Marketly llc) Nintendo takedowns average around 200 every day but in all likelihood the overall figure will be higher than that.

With the next Switch now confirmed but likely to be many months away from launch, Nintendo clearly sees benefit in clearing the decks, ready for whatever comes next.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

'IP House' Takes Global IP & Anti-Piracy Protection to a New Level
Ernesto Van der Sar, 08 May 06:02 PM

ip house logoSeven years ago, a new global anti-piracy coalition emerged under the umbrella of the Motion Picture Association (MPA).

The Alliance for Entertainment and Creativity (ACE) bundled the powers and pockets of dozens of entertainment companies; many more followed in the years after.

While skeptics may have doubted the launch of yet another anti-piracy group, ACE was and is a grand success. The group has industry members and law enforcement contacts all over the globe, allowing it to pool intelligence and take action more effectively than before.

The group didn't defeat piracy. However, it took down several key players including the original 123movies, Openload, Rapidvideo, Vader Streams, many Cuevanas, and pirate release group EVO, to name a few.

IP House Opens Doors

These actions were coordinated under the lead of MPA's chief global anti-piracy director Jan Van Voorn, whose name also appeared prominently in over a hundred subpoena requests that were filed on behalf of ACE.

Going forward, these legal requests will have to be signed by someone else. Van Voorn left ACE and the MPA in March, ending his tenure at Hollywood's anti-piracy arm, which began eleven years ago as an alumnus of the Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN.

The departure doesn't mean Van Voorn is moving away from copyright enforcement efforts. On the contrary, he will continue his work as the lead of the new private IP-enforcement company IP House, which was officially announced to the public this week.

Big Names, Big Numbers, Big Business

IP House is no ordinary anti-piracy startup. The company offers a broad range of every imaginable IP-enforcement service, while also covering brand protection and counterfeiting, all operating on a global scale.

While the company still has everything to prove, it launches with names and numbers that back up its ambitions. As a lauded anti-piracy expert, IP House CEO Van Voorn is flanked by IP House Executive Chairman Steve Francis, who boasts a 25-year career in U.S. federal law enforcement.

Francis previously worked as the Executive Associate Director for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and as Director of the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center). Both HSI and the IPR center were regularly involved in federal anti-piracy actions.

The two IP House founders are backed by funding from a private equity firm. These funds help to pay for more than 250 professional investigators, analysts, and IP law experts who work at the company. Together, these help to protect a growing list of nearly 300 brands.

Much of the workforce was added directly to IP House through acquisitions. The company plans to continue this strategy going forward, adding more 'brands' to their roster, in addition to outside clients.

All-In-One IP Enforcement and Protection

IP House doesn't disclose the names of its acquisitions or acquired clients, but its services are not aimed at small creators. Instead, IP House appears to target large international companies, offering a one-stop solution for all IP-enforcement efforts.

"The new company is designed to deliver proactive, end-to-end intellectual property protection at scale, addressing threats more completely than the industry's patchwork of point solution vendors can do," IP House announced this week.

"Through proprietary technology and partnerships with government and law enforcement organizations around the world, IP House's data-driven approach is able to escalate investigations through enforcement to achieve valuable commercial outcomes."

Building on ACE and MPA Lessons

This broad, global approach doesn't come as a surprise. In a way, Van Voorn and his colleagues are building on lessons learned in the past. To fight piracy and engage in other IP issues, collaboration is key. This was also highlighted by BREIN's former director Tim Kuik a few weeks ago.

Van Voorn previously worked at BREIN and eventually went to the MPA, to revitalize Hollywood's anti-piracy efforts. Speaking with TorrentFreak, he says that lessons learned along the way helped to design the blueprints for IP House.

"To be truly impactful in the IP space, you need to bring rightsholders across industries together so you can execute large-scale enforcement actions worldwide. It's also critical to have a solid and proactive escalation strategy and work very closely with law enforcement partners to create the right level of deterrence," Van Voorn says.

Tailored Anti-Piracy Solutions

IP House doesn't have a strong focus on single issues or threats. Instead, it tries to cover all bases, tailored to the needs of its clients. The effectiveness and efficiency of the actions should be leading.

ip house

Actions speak louder than words and IP House still has a lot to prove. However, Van Voorn truly believes that they offer something unique. IP House sets itself apart through its high-level 'in-house' expertise in many IP issues, with partners and connections, including law enforcement, all over the world.

"We are the first and only global entity to provide end-to-end intellectual property protection services; from prevention to investigation to enforcement with a focus on data-driven solutions. There are many point solutions out there and many say they are global/international, but they are not," Van Voorn says.

"Simply put, we provide a solution that is not currently on the market. This thesis is validated after speaking with many companies around the world. They are looking for a one-stop-shop solution to deal with any IP matter. This is exactly the house that we are building," he adds.

IP House aims to offer all required tools and services for rightsholders. This includes takedown notices, piracy monitoring, intelligence gathering, training, intermediary outreach, criminal referrals, expert witness statements, and much more.

The names of its clients, many of whom came in through acquisitions, are not yet revealed yet, but they are from a variety of industries.

"The acquired companies and those that will soon be part of IP House have been established for decades and serve a wide array of clientele. As such, IP House's current list of clients is broad, ranging from pharmaceutical companies to household electronics to luxury apparel, the automotive industry, and many more," Van Voorn tells us.

Looking Back at Key Shutdowns

It would be an understatement to say that these plans are ambitious. Time will tell how IP House fares but, one thing's for certain, Van Voorn stands on his successes at the MPA and ACE.

After more than a decade at the MPA, where he launched ACE in 2017, he leaves behind quite a legacy.

"I am most proud of restructuring the MPA approach to content protection, as well as launching and scaling ACE to what it was when I departed at the end of March. We built a very effective global enforcement program in the copyright space," Van Voorn says.

Looking back, there are many successes to reflect on. While Van Voorn doesn't have any clear favorites, he mentions the shutdown of Popcorn Time and the original YTS group as key victories. These required action outside of the U.S., in Canada and New Zealand, marking the importance of global presence.

The same applies to the more recent crackdown on piracy release group EVO, which was achieved with help from Portuguese authorities.

Other key actions mentioned by Van Voorn include the demise of the original 123Movies streaming site in 2018, which took place after consulting with the Vietnamese authorities, and enforcement actions in France which wiped the video hosting services Uptobox and Uptostream off the Internet.

"The most satisfying actions involve the global team collaborating closely to identify operators, with the outcome having a significant impact on the piracy space," Van Voorn tells us.

Whether IP House will be as visible on the anti-piracy front as ACE has yet to be seen. That said, the money and resources that are going into IP House show that copyright enforcement and protection is no longer an afterthought or a side hustle; it's a core business. It might even be big business.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

270x90-blue

Are you looking for a VPN service? TorrentFreak sponsor NordVPN has some excellent offers.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: