Wednesday, April 19, 2023

TorrentFreak's Latest News

 

Movie & TV Show Piracy Sites Disappear in Wake of ACE/MPA DMCA Subpoenas
Andy Maxwell, 19 Apr 09:08 AM

mystery-sWhile some anti-piracy groups focus on taking content down, others prefer to take entire sites down.

The benefits of the latter approach are obvious; when a site no longer exists, the need to send future takedown notices is eliminated. It's also much more easily said than done but certainly not impossible.

The Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment has taken down hundreds of sites, and it's often possible to predict which sites are about to feel the heat. DMCA subpoenas obtained at courts in the United States compel intermediaries to hand over details of pirate site operators, and since the applications are public, the names of sites are public too.

A series of recent applications revealed ACE attempting to gain information on The Pirate Bay's operators but other sites were mentioned too. Despite having millions of monthly visitors, two of them have just disappeared into thin air.

Bulgarian Exodus

Over the past several days, at least four pirate sites with a focus on Bulgaria disappeared without warning. According to SimilarWeb data, Filmisub.com was the largest with around 7.8 million visits per month.

filmisub-ss1

Filmisub specialized in streaming movies and TV shows. From its apparently large selection, ACE/MPA complained about just one (Shaft) but that was enough to get Cloudflare to hand over the operators' details. Of the four sites confirmed to have gone offline, Filmisub is the only one to have left any kind of message.

"The site is permanently closed. It will never work again in any form whatsoever," it announced before disappearing offline.

filmisub

"All sites, pages and groups on social networks that impersonate us offering applications and promises of return and continued activity have nothing to do with us and are created to mislead and abuse you in some way by using our name."

Filmi7 Down, Most Likely Permanently Out

Before it went offline, Filmi7.com was another popular site with a focus on Bulgaria. SimilarWeb data indicates the site received around 2.7 million visits per month, with video content the main attraction.

filmi7-ss

Filmi7 left no goodbye message, at least as far as we can determine. However, there are signs that it will likely follow the same terminal path as Filmisub.

As the image below shows, in court documents Filmi7 was also accused of making available the movie Shaft without permission. The URL pattern is identical to that deployed by Filmisub, so when combined with other telltale signs relating to site infrastructure, it's highly likely that the two platforms were connected.

filmi

The remaining pair of sites were not mentioned in the ACE/MPA subpoenas and neither left a shutdown message. Various rumors on Bulgarian forums are promoting theories on their demise but there may be a simple explanation based on available information.

Muvibg.com and Kinofen.net

When compared to Filmisub and Filmi7, Kinofen.net and Muvibg.com were much smaller sites, 880K and 230K visits per month respectively.

In common with Filmi7, Kinofen makes an appearance on the UK's Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit's Infringing Website List, a fate avoided by Filmisub despite it having considerably more traffic. Kinofen was first flagged by police in September 2021 and Filmi7 was added to the list in December 2020.

It's possible that Muvibg's lower traffic levels rendered it less interesting to the authorities, but the circumstances of its disappearance along with the other three sites suggests that it won't appear on the list in future; all four sites were apparently connected so they may all share the same fate.

Image credit: Pixabay/qimono

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

1Fichier Held Liable After Failing to Remove Pirated Nintendo Games
Andy Maxwell, 18 Apr 04:50 PM

nintendoEver since its launch in 2009, rightsholders have complained that file-hosting platform 1fichier.com fails to take intellectual property rights seriously.

1fichier operates a "freemium" business model which allows users to access the platform for free and then pay a fee to have various restrictions removed. 1fichier allows user content to be accessed via links posted elsewhere, meaning that when users upload infringing content, links render that content available to the public.

Rightsholders have publicly criticized the platform for more than a decade, claiming that 1fichier's response to takedown notices is minimal – in some cases amounting to a compliance rate of just 0.12%.

Nintendo Files Lawsuit

With the goal of forcing 1fichier to comply with its takedown notices and pay compensation for damages incurred due to its poor response, Nintendo sued 1fichier's owner, Dstorage SAS.

The Judicial Court of Paris sided with Nintendo in a decision handed down on May 25, 2021. The Court found that Dstorage could be held liable for failing to remove illegal copies of Nintendo games hosted on 1fichier, based on notifications sent by rightsholders.

The court also addressed 1fichier's assertion that content does not have to be removed without authorization from a court. The platform was informed that direct takedown notices from rightsholders do not require a court order to be valid. 1fichier was also instructed to publish the following notice:

By decision dated May 25, 2021, the Paris court ruled that the company DSTORAGE, which operates the website 1fichier.com, has engaged its liability as as a content host by not removing illegal content despite the notifications made by Nintendo Co., Ltd., The Pokémon Company, Creatures Inc. and DE Inc. and ordered it to pay NINTENDO Co Ltd, the sums of 885,500 euros and 50,000 euros in compensation for its damages.

Court of Appeal Sides With Nintendo

A press release published by Nintendo on April 17 reveals that on April 12, 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal confirmed that Dstorage SAS "engaged its civil liability for failing to withdraw or block access to illicit copies of Nintendo games hosted on its platform, despite the notifications Nintendo had sent to it for such purposes."

Nintendo says the Court of Appeal ruling confirms that rightsholders are not required to obtain a court order before filing requests with file-hosting services to remove or block access to infringing content. In respect of copyright infringement notices or trademark-based takedowns, rightsholders are not required to provide information that goes beyond the requirements of the law.

"Nintendo welcomes this judgment of the Court of Appeal whose message is clear: by refusing to remove or block access to unauthorized copies of video games notwithstanding prior notification, a provider of share hosting services such as that Dstorage (1fichier) is liable under French law, exposing it in particular to damages," Nintendo says.

"Dstorage's commitment to liability is important for Nintendo, but also for the entire video game industry, since shared content hosts such as 1Fichier cannot claim that a prior court decision is necessary for the removal of illegal content."

Damages Award Appears to Have Been Reduced

Nintendo reports that the Court of Appeal ordered Dstorage to pay 442,750 euros in damages and 25,000 euros in legal costs incurred by Nintendo. The videogame company did not share the Court of Appeal's decision and thus far we've been unable to obtain a copy. That leaves a key question unanswered.

According to the May 2021 decision, 1fichier was required to publish the fact that it had been ordered to pay 885,500 euros, an amount that's exactly half of the damages award made public this week. The reasons for that are currently unknown but the decision can still be appealed.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Nexon Sues 'Dark and Darker' Developer for Copyright Infringement
Ernesto Van der Sar, 18 Apr 01:06 PM

dark darkerThe official stable release of the first person shooter game Dark and Darker is eagerly awaited by hundreds of thousands of fans.

Whether the full game will actually be released is uncertain, however, as the game is at the center of a legal dispute.

Last month, police in South Korea raided the offices of Dark and Darker's developers, local game studio Ironmace. The legal action was triggered by a complaint from game publisher Nexon, which accused its rival of copyright infringement and stealing trade secrets.

Ironmace was founded by former Nexon developers who allegedly took thousands of files with them. The game publisher believes that these files were used to develop Dark and Darker, which is similar to the "P3" game project Nexon is working on.

Following the raid, the disgruntled publisher also complained to Steam, which banned Dark and Darker from its platform. And when Ironmace released its latest alpha test via BitTorrent last weekend, its adversary pulled out all the stops to slow down distribution.

Nexon Sues Ironmace in U.S. Court

The recent actions show that Nexon is serious about protecting its rights. This isn't limited to sending takedown notices and legal threats either; the company also filed a lawsuit at a federal court in Seattle, Washington, last Friday.

The complaint (pdf)

nexon complaint

The 55-page complaint accuses Ironmace of copyright infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets. In addition to the Korean game studio, two former Nexon employees – Ju-Hyun Choi and Terence Seungha Park – are personally listed as defendants too.

Choi is currently employed as Ironmace's Managing Director but he used to work as the director of Nexon's P3 game project. Park, who is a US citizen, is the CEO and co-founder of Ironmace and was previously employed as the head of a design team for Nexon's P3 project.

"In flagrant breach of their obligations to Nexon, the individual defendants stole P3 source code, audiovisual, and other materials that Nexon developed through a substantial expenditure of time and money," Nexon writes in its complaint.

The complaint alleges that Choi started requiring people from the P3 team, while working at Nexon, to recreate the game project outside of the company. He eventually took roughly half of the team with him to start Ironmace and develop the Dark and Darker game.

"Choi succeeded in recruiting nearly half of the P3 team, including, Defendant Park, the former director of game development at Nexon. Choi and Park formed Defendant Ironmace as the corporate vehicle to exploit the assets Choi stole," Nexon alleges.

Similar Look and Feel

The stolen content includes more than 10,900 visual data source files, Nexon claims, while protectable source code was confiscated as well. These assets were allegedly used to create Dark and Darker, which shows several similarities to Nexus' unpublished P3 project.

According to the complaint, visual elements weren't directly copied. Instead, the "look and feel" of both games are similar. The same also applies to characters, movements, settings, and other elements.

The complaint provides a visual comparison of several of these similarities. For example, Nexon mentions that both games contain identical monsters, including the "Mimic" chest, "Wraith," and a cave troll, shown below.

Similar Monsters?

monsters

Assets Purchased from Unreal

Ironmace previously contested the copyright infringement claims by pointing out that it did nothing wrong. Among other things, the developer said that most Dark and Darker assets were purchased from the Unreal Engine marketplace.

"Our code was built from scratch. Most of our assets are purchased from the Unreal marketplace. All other assets and all game designs docs were created inhouse. […]. As far as we know you cannot copyright a game genre," Ironmace said in a public statement.

Nexon disagrees with this conclusion. While the assets may have been bought from Unreal, the "look and feel" and the similarity in the "arrangement" of the assets could still be considered copyright infringement.

"No matter how creative a developer's selection of assets, the selection could be copied at will by any other developer. Works of enormous creativity would be left unprotected by copyright simply because the building blocks of the work came from the Unreal Engine Marketplace," Nexon writes in its complaint.

Based on these and a variety of other arguments, Nexon asks the court to put a stop to the alleged copyright infringements. In addition, it seeks damages for the unauthorized activities, including the allegedly stolen trade secrets and other ill-gotten gains.

A copy of the complaint, filed at the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, is available here (pdf). Hat tip to Eurogamer

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company

No comments: